
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R055AY038ND
Clayey
Last updated: 5/08/2025
Accessed: 05/20/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 055A–Northern Black Glaciated Plains
The Northern Black Glaciated Plains MLRA is an expansive and agriculturally important region consisting of 8,200,000 acres and including all or a portion of 16 counties in north-central and northeast North Dakota.
Nearly all MLRA 55A is covered by till: material that was moved and redeposited by the glaciers. Pre- glaciated bedrock (shale) is exposed in some of the deeper valleys and at the edges of some hills; but what covers the bedrock is glacial sediment, known as drift. These areas have the Late Wisconsin age till plain integrated drainage system in contrast to the closed drainage of much of the till plain and moraines. The Drift Prairie Region consists of nearly level to gently rolling glacial till plains dissected by glacial outwash channels. Five rivers flow through parts of the MLRA. The Souris (also known as Mouse) River meanders across the Canadian border through Renville and Ward counties; it then loops east through McHenry County and north through Bottineau County returning to Canada. The Des Lacs River flows southward from Canada through Burke, southwest Renville, and Ward counties where it joins the Souris River. Along the eastern edge of the MLRA the Pembina River, Park River, and Forest River flow eastward to join the Red River. Some soils along these rivers have weathered shale beds in the substratum.
This region is utilized mostly by farms and ranches; about 80 percent is cropland that is dry-farmed. Cash-grain, bean and oil production crops are the principal enterprise on many farms, but other feed grains and hay are also grown. The vegetation on the steeper slopes and thinner (or sandy) soils is still native rangeland. About 3 percent of this area is forested. The most extensive areas of forest are in the Turtle Mountains, Pembina Gorge, White Horse Hill, and on the moraines in proximity to Devils Lake.
Classification relationships
Level IV Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: 46a – Pembina Escarpment; 46c – Glacial Lake Basins; 46d – Glacial Lake Deltas; 46f – End Moraine Complex; 46g – Northern Black Prairie; and 46i – Drift Plains.
Ecological site concept
The Clayey ecological site typically is located on linear back slopes, concave foot slopes, and flats on ground moraines and lake plains. The soils generally are very deep; however, some soils have soft sedimentary shale bedrock as shallow as 5 feet. The dark-colored surface soil is more than 7 inches thick. Surface textures are loam, silt loam, silty clay loam or clay loam. Subsoil textures typically are clay or silty clay, although clay loam and silty clay loam textures with >35% clay also occur. The subsoil forms a ribbon >2 inches long. Soil on this site is moderately well drained or well drained.
Generally, calcium carbonate does not occur in the surface and upper subsoil layers; however, very slight to slight effervescence is allowable. At depths exceeding 16 inches, a layer of carbonate accumulation is common. Soil salinity is none to very slight in the upper 20 inches, but below that depth may increase to moderate in some soils. Slopes range from 0 to 9 percent. On the landscape, this site is above the Claypan, Thin Claypan, Limy Subirrigated, and Wet Meadow ecological sites and commonly is slightly below the Loamy site. In the northeastern corner of the MLRA (Pembina Gorge area), the Clayey site is higher on the landscape (interfluves) than the Upland Hardwood Forest ecological site.
To see a full copy of the ecological site description with all tables and the full version 5 rangeland health worksheet. Please use the following hyperlink:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/55A_Clayey_ESD_Narrative_FINAL_Ref_FSG.pdf
Associated sites
R055AY039ND |
Claypan This site typically occurs slightly lower on the landscape. It has a root-restrictive claypan layer. Commonly, visible salts occur below a depth of 16 inches. |
---|---|
R055AY050ND |
Thin Claypan This site typically occurs slightly lower on the landscape. It has a root-restrictive claypan within a depth of 6 inches and visible salts within a depth of 16 inches. |
R055AY040ND |
Limy Subirrigated This site occurs lower on the landscape. It is highly calcareous in the upper part of the subsoil and has redoximorphic features at a depth of 18 to 30 inches. All textures are included in this site. |
R055AY047ND |
Loamy This site typically occurs somewhat higher on the landscape. The subsoil forms a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long. The surface and upper subsoil are typically non-calcareous, but slight effervescence is allowed where the depth to strong or violent effervescence is >16 inches. |
F055AY058ND |
Upland Hardwood Forest This site is on forested side slopes in the Pembina Gorge area. The soils commonly have 'alfic' properties in the subsurface and upper subsoil layers; these properties can be identified by a thin albic horizon or by uncoated sand grains or grayish silt coats on ped surfaces in the subsoil. Subsoil textures typically are clay loam, silty clay, or clay. The subsoil forms a ribbon >2 inches thick. |
R055AY055ND |
Wet Meadow Poorly drained soils in depressions and flats on uplands; the site also occurs on floodplains. In depressions, it is frequently ponded (typically <1.5 feet) in April and May. It typically has redoximorphic features within a depth of 18 inches. Some soils are highly calcareous. E.C. is <8 dS/m in the surface and subsoil layers. |
Similar sites
R055AY039ND |
Claypan This site typically occurs slightly lower on the landscape. It has a root-restrictive claypan layer. Commonly, visible salts occur below a depth of 16 inches. |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pascopyrum smithii |
Physiographic features
This site typically occurs on glaciated uplands – ground moraines and lake plains. This site is typically on linear back slopes, concave foot slopes, or on flats. Slopes are less than 9 percent. On ground moraines the parent material is either fine-loamy or clayey. On lake plains the parent material is either fine-silty or clayey.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Ground moraine
(2) Lake plain |
---|---|
Runoff class | Low to high |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 950 – 2,525 ft |
Slope | 9% |
Water table depth | 36 in |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
MLRA 55A is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are common and characteristic of MLRA 55A. The continental climate is the result of the location of this MLRA in the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the northern Great Plains, so air masses move unobstructed across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature.
The average annual precipitation is 17 to 19 inches (432 to 483 millimeters). The normal average annual temperature is 36⁰ to 41⁰ F (2⁰ to 5⁰ C). January is the coldest month with an average low temperature of about ⁻ 3⁰ F (⁻19⁰ C). July is the warmest month with an average high temperature of about 80⁰ F (27⁰ C).
About 75 percent of the rainfall occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during the growing season. Winter precipitation is typically snow. The annual snowfall is 25 to 50 inches (635 to 1,270 millimeters). The frost-free period averages 101 days and ranges from 108 days to 92 days. The freeze-free period averages 124 days and ranges from 128 to 119 days.
Growth of native cool-season plants begins in mid-April and continues to mid-July. Native warm-season plants begin growth in late May and continue to the end of August. Green-up of cool-season plants can occur in September and October when adequate soil moisture is present.
Long-term climate data is lacking for Turtle Mountain; however, annual precipitation for the International Peace Garden averaged 27.7 inches (704 millimeters) from 1967-1970 while that for Boissevain, Manitoba averaged 17.1 inches (434 millimeters). Turtle Mountain likely has greater precipitation, cooler temperatures and less evapotranspiration than the adjacent plains.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 92-109 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 119-128 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 17-19 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 88-112 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 116-132 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 17-20 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 101 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 124 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 18 in |
Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) DRAKE 9 NE [USC00322304], Drake, ND
-
(2) UPHAM 3 N [USC00328913], Upham, ND
-
(3) WESTHOPE [USC00329333], Westhope, ND
-
(4) EDMORE 1NW [USC00322525], Edmore, ND
-
(5) GRANVILLE [USC00323686], Granville, ND
-
(6) HANSBORO 4 NNE [USC00323963], Hansboro, ND
-
(7) LANGDON EXP FARM [USC00324958], Langdon, ND
-
(8) MINOT EXP STN [USC00325993], Minot, ND
-
(9) MOHALL [USC00326025], Mohall, ND
-
(10) TOWNER 2 NE [USC00328792], Towner, ND
-
(11) VELVA 3NE [USC00328990], Velva, ND
-
(12) DEVILS LAKE KDLR [USW00014912], Devils Lake, ND
-
(13) WILLOW CITY [USC00329445], Willow City, ND
-
(14) ROLLA 1NE [USC00327664], Rolla, ND
-
(15) MINOT INTL AP [USW00024013], Minot, ND
-
(16) BOTTINEAU [USC00320941], Bottineau, ND
-
(17) LEEDS [USC00325078], Leeds, ND
-
(18) RUGBY [USC00327704], Rugby, ND
-
(19) CROSBY [USC00321871], Crosby, ND
-
(20) BOWBELLS [USC00320961], Bowbells, ND
Influencing water features
This site does not receive significant additional water during the growing season, either as runoff from adjacent slopes or from a seasonal high water table. Depth to the water table is deeper than 3 feet during April through June. From July through October it is deeper than 4 feet (typically deeper than 5 feet). The soils have a moderately slow to very slow infiltration rate and saturated hydraulic conductivity in the clayey subsoil is moderately low. Water loss on this site occurs through transpiration and/or percolation below the root zone.
Wetland description
Not Applicable.
Soil features
Soils associated with the Clayey ES are in the Mollisol & Vertisol orders. The Mollisols are classified further as Glossic Natrudolls and Pachic Vertic Argiudolls. The Vertisols are classified further as Aquic Hapluderts, Chromic Hapluderts, and Typic Hapluderts. These soils were developed under prairie vegetation. They formed in glaciolacustrine sediments or in fine-loamy or clayey till. The soils on this site are deep or very deep. They are moderately well drained or well drained; redoximorphic features do not occur within a depth of 3 feet. The common feature of soils in this site is a fine- textured subsoil (>35% clay) that is not dense enough to be root restrictive. Typically, the subsoil is silty clay or clay, but clay loam or silty clay loam also occur. The surface layer is 7 to 18 inches thick. Most commonly, the surface texture is loam, silt loam, or silty clay loam; but it is silty clay or clay in some soils.
Soil salinity is none to very slight (E.C. <4 dS/m) in the upper 20 inches and none to slight (E.C. <8 dS/m) between 20 and 40 inches; below this it may increase to moderate (E.C. 8 - <16 dS/m).
Sodicity is low above the clayey subsoil; however, in many soils it increases to moderate in the upper part of the subsoil and SAR values may exceed 13 in the lower subsoil and substratum.
Soil reaction typically is slightly acid to slightly alkaline (pH 6.1 to 7.8) above the subsoil and slightly or moderately alkaline (pH 7.4 to 8.4) in the subsoil and substratum; in layers with high SAR values, reaction may be strongly alkaline (pH 8.5 to 9.0). Calcium carbonate content is none to moderately low to a depth of 16 inches or more; below it may increase to as much as 25 percent.
When dry, these soils crack. When the soils are wet, surface compaction can occur with heavy traffic. This site typically should show slight to no evidence of rills, wind-scoured areas, or pedestalled plants. Water flow paths should not be present, and the soil surface is stable and intact. Sub-surface soil layers are non-restrictive to water movement and root penetration. These soils are susceptible to water and wind erosion. The hazard of water erosion increases on slopes greater than about 5 percent.
Major soil series correlated to the Clayey site are Aberdeen, Cresbard, Gwinner, Hattie, Nutley, and Sinai.
Access Web Soil Survey (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx ) for specific local soils information.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Glaciolacustrine deposits
(2) Till (3) Residuum – shale |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Silty clay loam (2) Loam (3) Silt loam (4) Clay loam (5) Silty clay |
Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
Permeability class | Very slow to moderately slow |
Depth to restrictive layer | 60 – 80 in |
Soil depth | 80 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 1% |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
6 – 12 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
25% |
Electrical conductivity (0-20in) |
4 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-20in) |
8 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6.1 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
9% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
3% |
Ecological dynamics
This ecological site description is based on nonequilibrium ecology and resilience theory and utilizes a State-and-Transition Model (STM) diagram to organize and communicate information about ecosystem change as a basis for management. The ecological dynamics characterized by the STM diagram reflect how changes in ecological drivers, feedback mechanisms, and controlling variables can maintain or induce changes in plant community composition (phases and/or states). The application of various management actions, combined with weather variables, impact the ecological processes which influence the competitive interactions, thereby maintaining or altering plant community structure.
Prior to European influence, the historical disturbance regime for MLRA 55A included frequent fires, both anthropogenic and natural in origin. Most fires, however, were anthropogenic fires set by Native Americans. Native Americans set fires in all months except perhaps January. These fires occurred in two peak periods, one from March-May with the peak in April and another from July-November with the peak occurring in October. Most of these fires were scattered and of small extent and duration.
The grazing history would have involved grazing and browsing by large herbivores (such as American bison, elk, and whitetail deer). Herbivory by small mammals, insects, nematodes, and other invertebrates are also important factors influencing the production and composition of the communities. Grazing and fire interaction, particularly when coupled with drought events, influenced the dynamics discussed and displayed in the following state and transition diagram and descriptions.
Following European influence, this ecological site generally has had a history of grazing by domestic livestock, particularly cattle, which along with other related activities (e.g., fencing, water development, fire suppression) has changed the disturbance regime of the site. Changes will occur in the plant communities due to these and other factors.
Weather fluctuations coupled with managerial factors may lead to changes in the plant communities and may, under adverse impacts, result in a slow decline in vegetative vigor and composition. However, under favorable conditions the botanical composition may resemble that prior to European influence.
Four vegetative states have been identified for the site (Reference, Native/Invaded, Invaded, and Go- Back). Within each state, one or more community phases have been identified. These community phases are named based on the more dominant and visually conspicuous species; they have been determined by study of historical documents, relict areas, scientific studies, and ecological aspects of plant species and plant communities. Transitional pathways and thresholds have been determined through similar methods.
State 1: Reference State represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site prior to European influence. Dynamics of the state were largely determined by variations in climate and weather (e.g., drought), as well as that of fire (e.g., timing, frequency) and grazing by native herbivores (e.g., frequency, intensity, selectivity). Due to those variations, the Reference State is thought to have shifted temporally and spatially between three plant community phases.
Currently the primary disturbances include widespread introduction of exotic species, concentrated livestock grazing, lack of fire, and perhaps long-term non-use and no fire. Because of these changes, particularly the widespread occurrence of exotic plants, as well as other environmental changes, the Reference State is considered to no longer exist. Thus, the presence of exotic plants on the site precludes it from being placed in the Reference State. It must then be placed in one of the other states, commonly State 2: Native/Invaded State (T1A).
State 2: Native/Invaded State. Colonization of the site by exotic plants results in a transition from State 1: Reference State to State 2: Native/Invaded State (T1A). This transition was inevitable; it often resulted from colonization by exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, quackgrass) which have been particularly and consistently invasive under long-term non-use and no fire. Other exotic plants (e.g., Canada thistle, leafy spurge) are also known to invade the site.
Three community phases have been identified for this state; they are similar to the community phases in the Reference State but have now been invaded by exotic cool-season grasses. The exotic cool- season grasses can be expected to increase. As that increase occurs, plants more desirable to wildlife and livestock decline. A decline in forb diversity can also be expected. Under non-use or minimal use management, mulch increases and may become a physical barrier to plant growth. This also changes the micro-climate near the soil surface and may alter infiltration, nutrient cycling, and biological activity near the soil surface. As a result, these factors coupled with shading cause desirable native plants to have increasing difficulty remaining viable and recruitment declines.
To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses or other exotic plants, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. If management does not include measures to control or reduce these exotic plants, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected (T2A).
State 3: Invaded State. The threshold for this state is reached when both the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, quackgrass) exceed 30% of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40% of the community. One community phase has been identified for this state.
The exotic cool-season grasses can be quite invasive and often form monotypic stands. As they increase, both forage quantity and quality of the annual production becomes increasingly restricted to late spring and early summer, even though annual production may increase. Forb diversity often declines. Under non-use or minimal use management, mulch can increase and become a physical barrier to plant growth which alters nutrient cycling, infiltration, and soil biological activity. As such, desirable native plants become increasingly displaced.
Once the state is well established, prescribed burning and prescribed grazing techniques have been largely ineffective in suppressing or eliminating the exotic cool-season grasses, even though some short-term reductions may appear successful. However, assuming there is an adequate component of native grasses to respond to treatments, a restoration pathway to State 2: Native/Invaded State may be accomplished with the implementation of long-term prescribed grazing in conjunction with prescribed burning (R3A).
State 4: Go-Back State often results following cropland abandonment and consists of one plant community phase. This weedy assemblage may include noxious weeds that need control. Over time, the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, quackgrass) will likely predominate.
Initially, due to extensive bare ground and a preponderance of shallow rooted annual plants, the potential for soil erosion is high. Plant species richness may be high, but overall diversity (i.e., equitability) is typically low, with the site dominated by a relatively small assemblage of species. Due to the lack of native perennials and other factors, restoring the site with the associated ecological processes is difficult. However, a successful range planting may result in something approaching State 2: Native/Invaded State (R4A). Following seeding, prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, haying, and the use of herbicides will generally be necessary to achieve the desired result and control weeds, some of which may be noxious weeds. A failed range planting and/or secondary succession will lead to State 4: Invaded State (R4B).
The following state and transition model diagram illustrates the common states, community phases, community pathways, and transition and restoration pathways that can occur on the site. These are the most common plant community phases and states based on current knowledge and experience; changes may be made as more data are collected. Pathway narratives describing the site’s ecological dynamics reference various management practices (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed fire, brush management, herbaceous weed treatment) which, if properly designed and implemented, will positively influence plant community competitive interactions. The design of these management practices will be site specific and should be developed by knowledgeable individuals; based upon management goals and a resource inventory; and supported by an ongoing monitoring protocol.
When the management goal is to maintain an existing plant community phase or restore to another phase within the same state, modification of existing management to ensure native species have the competitive advantage may be required. To restore a previous state, the application of two or more management practices in an ongoing manner will be required. Whether using prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, or a combination of both with or without additional practices (e.g., brush management), the timing and method of application needs to favor the native species over the exotic species. Adjustments to account for variations in annual growing conditions and implementing an ongoing monitoring protocol to track changes and adjust management inputs to ensure desired outcome will be necessary.
The plant community phase composition table(s) has been developed from the best available knowledge including research, historical records, clipping studies, and inventory records. As more data are collected, plant community species composition and production information may be revised.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
T1A | - | Introduction of exotic cool-season grasses |
---|---|---|
T2A | - | Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, no fire |
R3A | - | Long term prescribed grazing with prescribed burning |
R4A | - | Successful range seeding with prescribed grazing and prescribed fire |
R4B | - | Failed range seeding |
T5A | - | Cessation of annual cropping |
State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A | - | Heavy grazing with or without drought |
---|---|---|
1.1B | - | Above average precipitation, extended fire interval, with or with out light grazing |
1.2A | - | Return to average precipitation and reduced grazing |
1.3A | - | Return to average precipitation and historic fire interval. |
State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A | - | Heavy season-long grazing with or without drought |
---|---|---|
2.1B | - | Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, no fire |
2.2A | - | Long term prescribed grazing with prescribed burning |
2.2B | - | Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, no fire |
2.3A | - | Long term prescribed grazing with prescribed burning |
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This state represents the natural range of variability that dominates the dynamics of this ecological site. This state is composed predominately of cool-season grasses. Prior to European influence the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included occasional fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing, coupled with weather events, dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. Today the primary disturbances are from a lack of fire and concentrated livestock grazing. Grasses that are desirable for livestock and wildlife can decline and a corresponding increase in less desirable grasses will occur. Exotic species did not occur in this state.
Characteristics and indicators. Because of changes in disturbances and other environmental factors (particularly the widespread occurrence of exotic species), the Reference State is considered to no longer exist.
Resilience management. If intact, the reference state should probably be managed with current disturbance regimes which has permitted the site to remain in reference condition, as well as maintaining the quality and integrity of associated ecological sites. Maintenance of the reference condition is contingent upon a monitoring protocol to guide management.
Community 1.1
Green Needlegrass-Western Wheatgrass (Nasella viridula-Pascopyrum smithii)
This community evolved with frequent fires and grazing/browsing by native ungulates and may be described as a cool-season dominated grassland. The main grasses include green needlegrass, western wheatgrass, porcupinegrass, needle and thread, slender wheatgrass, and bearded wheatgrass. Other associated graminoids include the warm-season grasses such as big bluestem, little bluestem, and blue grama. A diverse forb component is also present and may include dotted blazing star, upright prairie coneflower, purple prairie clover, scarlet beeblossom, silverleaf Indian breadroot, western wallflower, and others. Prairie sagewort, leadplant, prairie rose, and western snowberry are among the more common shrubs found in the community. Annual production will range roughly between 1900 to 3500 pounds per acre with graminoids, forbs, and shrubs contributing about 85%, 10%, and 5% of the production respectively. Community Phase 1.1 is considered the Reference Plant Community upon which most interpretations are based and is described in the “Plant Community Composition and Group Annual Production” portion of this ecological site description.
Figure 7. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 1615 | 2295 | 2890 |
Forb | 190 | 270 | 340 |
Shrub/Vine | 95 | 135 | 170 |
Total | 1900 | 2700 | 3400 |
Figure 8. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ND5503, Central Black Glaciated Plains, cool-season/warm-season co-dominant.. Cool-season, warm-season co-dominant..
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 21 | 40 | 20 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Blue Grama-Western Wheatgrass/Sedges/Prairie Sagewort (Bouteloua gracilis-Pascopyrum smithii/Carex spp./Artemisia frigida)
This community phase resulted from heavy grazing with or without drought. Blue grama, sedges (e.g., sun sedge, needleleaf sedge), and prairie sagewort were markedly more abundant than in Community Phase 1.1. The forb and shrub components were also expected to contain increases in common yarrow, and silverleaf Indian breadroot.
Community 1.3
Western Wheatgrass/Western Snowberry (Pascopyrum smithii/Symphoricarpos occidentalis)
Due to above average precipitation with extended fire intervals, with or without light grazing, this community phase contained a higher contribution of western snowberry and western wheatgrass and reduced green needlegrass compared to Community Phase 1.1.
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Community Phase Pathway 1.1 to 1.2 occurred with heavy grazing with or without drought. This led to increases in blue grama and prairie sagewort with a corresponding decrease in green needlegrass.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3
Community Phase Pathway 1.1 to 1.3 occurred during periods of above average precipitation with extended fire intervals with or without light grazing. This led to a marked decrease in green needlegrass and increases in western wheatgrass and western snowberry compared to Community Phase 1.1. A noticeable increase in white sagebrush was also common.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1
This Community Phase Pathway 1.2 to 1.1 occurred upon return to average precipitation and reduced grazing, leading to an increase in green needlegrass and corresponding decreases in blue grama, sedges, and prairie sagewort.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1
This Community Phase Pathway 1.3 to 1.1 occurred with the return to average precipitation and historic fire intervals resulting in a noticeable decline in western snowberry and increase in green needlegrass.
State 2
Native/Invaded State
This state is similar to the State 1: Reference State but has now been colonized by exotic cool-season grasses (often Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass). Although the state is still dominated by native grasses, an increase in the exotic cool-season grasses can be expected. These exotic cool-season grasses have been particularly and consistently invasive under long-term non-use and no fire. To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. If management does not include measures to control or reduce these exotic cool-season grasses, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected.
Characteristics and indicators. The presence of trace amounts of exotic cool-season grasses indicates a transition from State 1 to State 2. The presence of exotic biennial or perennial leguminous forbs (i.e., sweet clover, black medic) may not, on their own, indicate a transition from State 1 to State 2 but may facilitate that transition.
Resilience management. To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully chosen, constructed, and evaluated with respect to that objective. Grazing management should be applied that enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species. This may include: (1) early spring grazing when exotic cool-season grasses are actively growing and native cool-season grasses are dormant; (2) applying proper deferment periods allowing native grasses to recover and maintain or improve vigor; (3) adjusting overall grazing intensity to reduce excessive plant litter (above that needed for rangeland health indicator #14 – see Rangeland Health Reference Worksheet); (4) incorporating early heavy spring utilization which focuses grazing pressure on exotic cool-season grasses and reduces plant litter, provided that livestock are moved when grazing selection shifts from exotic cool-season grasses to native grasses. Prescribed burning should be applied in a manner that maintains or enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species. Prescribed burns should be applied as needed to adequately reduce/remove excessive plant litter and maintain the competitive advantage for native species. Timing of prescribed burns (spring vs. summer vs. fall) should be adjusted to account for differences in annual growing conditions and applied during windows of opportunity to best shift the competitive advantage to the native species.
Community 2.1
Green Needlegrass - Western Wheatgrass (Nasella viridula - Pascopyrum smithii)
This community phase is similar to that of Community Phase 1.1 but exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, quackgrass) have colonized the community and are now present in small amounts.
Community 2.2
Blue Grama-Western Wheatgrass/Sedges/ Prairie Sagewort (Bouteloua gracilis-Pascopyrum smithii/Carex spp./ Artemisia frigida)
This Community Phase is similar to that of Community Phase 1.2 but has now been colonized by exotic cool-season grass, typically Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass, which are now present in small amounts. This community phase is often dispersed throughout a pasture in an overgrazed/ undergrazed pattern, typically referred to as patch grazing. Some overgrazed areas will exhibit the impacts of heavy use, while the ungrazed areas will have a build-up of litter and increased plant decadence. This is a typical pattern found in properly stocked pastures grazed season-long. As a result, Kentucky bluegrass tends to increase more in the undergrazed areas while the more grazing tolerant short statured species, such as blue grama and sedges, increase in the heavily grazed areas. If present, Kentucky bluegrass may increase under heavy grazing.
Community 2.3
Western Wheatgrass/ Western Snowberry (Pascopyrum smithii/ Symphoricarpos occidentalis)
This Community Phase is similar to that of Community Phase 1.3 but has now been colonized by exotic cool-season grass, typically Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass, which are now present in small amounts.
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2
This Community Phase Pathway 2.1 to 2.2 results from heavy season-long grazing with or without drought, leading to an increase in blue grama, sedges, and prairie sagewort with a corresponding decrease in green needlegrass.
Pathway 2.1B
Community 2.1 to 2.3
This Community Phase Pathway 2.1 to 2.3 results from extended periods of non-use or very light grazing and no fire which results in a decline in green needlegrass and a marked increase in western snowberry. A noticeable increase in white sagebrush is also commonly observed.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1
This Community Phase Pathway 2.2 to 2.1 occurs with long term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning resulting in a decrease in blue grama, sedges, and prairie sagewort and corresponding increase in green needlegrass.
Pathway 2.2B
Community 2.2 to 2.3
This Community Phase Pathway 2.2 to 2.3 occurs during extended periods of non-use or very light grazing and no fire resulting in a noticeable increase in western snowberry and decline in blue grama. A noticeable increase in white sagebrush is also commonly observed.
Pathway 2.3A
Community 2.3 to 2.1
This Community Phase Pathway 2.3 to 2.1 occurs with long term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning to reduce western snowberry and other shrubs and increase in green needlegrass.
State 3
Invaded State
This state is the result of invasion and dominance of the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, quackgrass). These exotic cool-season grasses often form monotypic stands; as a result, plant diversity is often markedly reduced and peak production is restricted to late spring/early summer. These exotics are also particularly well adapted to heavy grazing. Once the state is well established, even drastic events such as high intensity fires driven by high fuel loads will not result in more than a very short-term reduction of these species. Native forbs generally decrease in production, abundance, diversity, and richness compared to that of State 1: Reference State and may include white heath aster, goldenrod, common yarrow, and white sagebrush. Shrubs, such as western snowberry and rose, may show marked increases. Annual production of this state may vary widely, in part due to variations in the extent of invasion by exotic cool-season grasses. However, annual production may be in the range of 2700-4200 pounds.
Characteristics and indicators. This site is characterized by exotic cool-season grasses constituting greater than 30 percent of the annual production and native grasses constituting less than 40 percent of the annual production.
Resilience management. Light or moderately stocked continuous, season-long grazing or a prescribed grazing system which incorporates adequate deferment periods between grazing events and proper stocking rate levels will maintain this State. Application of herbaceous weed treatment, occasional prescribed burning and/or brush management may be needed to manage noxious weeds and increasing shrub (e.g., western snowberry) populations.
Community 3.1
Exotic Cool-Season Grasses/Forbs
This community phase is dominated by exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, quackgrass), often with a much-reduced forb and shrub component. Excessive accumulation of mulch may also be present, particularly when dominated by Kentucky bluegrass. Common species of forbs and shrubs include common yarrow, silverleaf Indian breadroot, white sagebrush, prairie sagewort, and prairie rose. Other exotic plants (e.g., leafy spurge) may also invade the site. The longer this community phase exists, the more resilient it becomes. Natural or management disturbances that reduce the cover of Kentucky bluegrass or smooth brome are typically short-lived.
State 4
Go-Back State
This state often results from the abandonment of cropland, hayland, or residences/farmsteads. Vegetation is typically dominated by Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass with a variety of annual and weedy perennial forbs. In this MLRA, the most probable origin of this phase is plant succession following cropland abandonment. This plant community will initially include a variety of annual forbs and grasses, some of which may be noxious weeds needing control. However, exotic cool-season grasses (such as Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass) come to dominate the site.
Characteristics and indicators. Tillage has destroyed the native plant community, altered soil structure and biology, reduced soil organic matter, and resulted in the formation of a tillage induced compacted layer which is restrictive to root growth. Removal of perennial grasses and forbs results in decreased infiltration and increased runoff.
Resilience management. Continued tillage will maintain the state. Control of noxious weeds will be required.
Community 4.1
Annual/Pioneer-Perennial/Exotic Species
This community phase is highly variable depending on the level and duration of disturbance related to the T5A transitional pathway. In this MLRA, the most probable origin of this phase is secondary succession following cropland abandonment. This plant community will initially include a variety of annual forbs and grasses. Over time, the site will naturally transition to State 3: Invaded State which is generally dominated by exotic cool-season grasses (e.g. Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass).
State 5
Any Plant Community
This state is the result of annual cropping.
Community 5.1
Any Plant Community
This plant community is the result of annual cropping.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
This Transition from State 1: Reference State to State 2: Native/Invaded State results from the introduction of exotic cool-season grasses, often Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass. This transition is probably inevitable, and as such may occur under a wide range of managerial conditions (e.g. heavy season-long grazing, complete rest and no fire).
Constraints to recovery. Current knowledge and technology will not facilitate a successful restoration to Reference State.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
This Transition from State 2: Native/Invaded State to State 3: Invaded State often occurs during extended periods of non-use or very light grazing and no fire (and may occur in other situations as well). Exotic cool-season grasses, generally Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass, become the dominant graminoids. Studies indicate that a threshold may exist in this transition when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30% of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40% of the plant community composition. Similar thresholds may exist for smooth brome and quackgrass. This transition may occur under a wide range of managerial conditions ranging from non-use and no fire to heavy season-long grazing (primarily Kentucky bluegrass).
Constraints to recovery. Variations in growing conditions (e.g., cool, wet spring) will influence effects of various management activities on exotic cool-season grass populations.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2
This Restoration Pathway from the Invaded State to the Native/Invaded State can be accomplished with the implementation of long-term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning to reduce the exotic species and simultaneously increase the native species.
Context dependence. Grazing management should be applied in a manner that enhances/maximizes the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species over the exotic species. This may include the use of prescribed grazing to reduce excessive plant litter accumulations above that needed for rangeland health indicator #14 (see Rangeland Health Reference Worksheet). Increasing livestock densities may facilitate the reduction in plant litter provided length and timing of grazing periods are adjusted to favor native species. Grazing prescriptions designed to address exotic grass invasion and favor native species may involve earlier, short, intense grazing periods with proper deferment to improve native species health and vigor. Fall (e.g., September, October) prescribed burning followed by an intensive, early spring graze period with adequate deferment for native grass recovery may shift the competitive advantage to the native species, facilitating the restoration to State 2: Native/Invaded. Prescribed burning should be applied in a manner that enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species over the exotic species. Prescribed burns should be applied at a frequency which mimics the natural disturbance regime, or more frequently as is ecologically (e.g., available fuel load) and economically feasible. Burn prescriptions may need adjustment to: (1) account for change in fine fuel orientation (e.g., “flopped” Kentucky bluegrass); (2) fire intensity and duration by adjusting ignition pattern (e.g., backing fires vs head fires); (3) account for plant phenological stages to maximize stress on exotic species while favoring native species (both cool- and warm-season grasses).
Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 2
This Restoration Pathway from the Invaded State to the Native/Invaded State can be accomplished with a successful native seeding. Following seeding, prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, haying, or use of herbicides will generally be necessary to achieve the desired result and control any noxious weeds.
Context dependence. A successful range planting will include proper seedbed preparation, weed control (both prior to and after the planting), selection of adapted native species representing functional/structural groups inherent to the State 1, and proper seeding technique. Management (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) during and after establishment must be applied in a manner that maintains the competitive advantage for the seeded native species. Adding non-native species can impact the above and below ground biota. Elevated soil nitrogen levels have been shown to benefit smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass more than some native grasses. As a result, fertilization, exotic legumes in the seeding mix, and other techniques that increase soil nitrogen may promote smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass invasion. The method or methods of herbaceous weed treatment will be site specific to each situation; but generally, the goal would be to apply the pesticide, mechanical control, or biological control (either singularly or in combination) in a manner that shifts the competitive advantage from the targeted species to the native grasses and forbs. The control method(s) should be as specific to the targeted species as possible to minimize impacts to non-target species.
Restoration pathway R4B
State 4 to 3
This restoration pathway from State 4: Go-Back State to State 3: Invaded State results from a failed range planting and/or secondary succession.
Context dependence. Failed range plantings can result from many causes (both singularly and in combination) including drought, poor seedbed preparation, improper seeding methods, seeded species not adapted to the site, insufficient weed control, herbicide carryover, poor seed quality (purity & germination), and/or improper management.
Transition T5A
State 5 to 4
This transition from any plant community to State 4: Go-Back State. It is most commonly associated with the cessation of cropping without the benefit of range planting, resulting in a “go-back” situation. Soil conditions can be quite variable on the site, in part due to variations in the management/cropping history (e.g., development of a tillage induced compacted layer (plow pan), erosion, fertility, and/or herbicide/pesticide carryover). Thus, soil conditions should be assessed when considering restoration techniques.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Needlegrasses | 405–1080 | ||||
green needlegrass | NAVI4 | Nassella viridula | 540–810 | – | ||
porcupinegrass | HESP11 | Hesperostipa spartea | 135–405 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 135–270 | – | ||
2 | Wheatgrass | 270–945 | ||||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 135–405 | – | ||
slender wheatgrass | ELTR7 | Elymus trachycaulus | 54–270 | – | ||
bearded wheatgrass | ELCA11 | Elymus caninus | 54–270 | – | ||
3 | Tall/Mid Warm Season Grasses | 27–270 | ||||
big bluestem | ANGE | Andropogon gerardii | 27–135 | – | ||
sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 0–135 | – | ||
prairie dropseed | SPHE | Sporobolus heterolepis | 0–135 | – | ||
little bluestem | SCSC | Schizachyrium scoparium | 0–135 | – | ||
4 | Short Warm Season Grasses | 0–135 | ||||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 0–135 | – | ||
buffalograss | BODA2 | Bouteloua dactyloides | 0–135 | – | ||
5 | Other Native Grasses | 54–135 | ||||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 54–135 | – | ||
plains reedgrass | CAMO | Calamagrostis montanensis | 54–135 | – | ||
Graminoid (grass or grass-like) | 2GRAM | Graminoid (grass or grass-like) | 54–135 | – | ||
6 | Grasslikes | 27–135 | ||||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 27–135 | – | ||
Grass-like (not a true grass) | 2GL | Grass-like (not a true grass) | 0–135 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
7 | Forbs | 135–270 | ||||
Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) | 2FORB | Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) | 27–135 | – | ||
common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 27–81 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLU | Artemisia ludoviciana | 27–81 | – | ||
false boneset | BREU | Brickellia eupatorioides | 27–81 | – | ||
upright prairie coneflower | RACO3 | Ratibida columnifera | 27–81 | – | ||
scarlet globemallow | SPCO | Sphaeralcea coccinea | 27–81 | – | ||
silverleaf Indian breadroot | PEAR6 | Pediomelum argophyllum | 27–54 | – | ||
wavyleaf thistle | CIUN | Cirsium undulatum | 27–54 | – | ||
Cuman ragweed | AMPS | Ambrosia psilostachya | 27–54 | – | ||
western wallflower | ERAS2 | Erysimum asperum | 27–54 | – | ||
purple prairie clover | DAPU5 | Dalea purpurea | 27–54 | – | ||
scarlet beeblossom | OESU3 | Oenothera suffrutescens | 27–54 | – | ||
goldenrod | SOLID | Solidago | 27–54 | – | ||
white heath aster | SYER | Symphyotrichum ericoides | 27–54 | – | ||
dotted blazing star | LIPU | Liatris punctata | 27–54 | – | ||
American vetch | VIAM | Vicia americana | 27–54 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
8 | Shrubs | 27–135 | ||||
western snowberry | SYOC | Symphoricarpos occidentalis | 27–135 | – | ||
Shrub (>.5m) | 2SHRUB | Shrub (>.5m) | 0–135 | – | ||
prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 0–81 | – | ||
prairie rose | ROAR3 | Rosa arkansana | 27–54 | – | ||
leadplant | AMCA6 | Amorpha canescens | 0–27 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Animal Community – Wildlife Interpretations
Landscape:
The MLRA 55A landscape is characterized by mostly nearly level to gently rolling till plains with some steep slopes adjacent to streams. The MLRA includes areas of kettle holes, kames, and ground moraines. MLRA 55A is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are common and characteristic of the MLRA. This area supports mid- to tall-grass prairie vegetation with quaking aspen, bur oak, green ash, and willow species growing on the higher elevations in Turtle Mountain, on moraines in proximity of Devils Lake, Pembina River Escarpment and Gorge, and various drainageways throughout the MLRA. Numerous depressional wetlands are ringed with quaking aspen. Complex intermingled ecological sites create diverse grass/shrub land habitats interspersed with varying densities of linear, slope, depressional, and in-stream wetlands associated with headwater streams and tributaries of the Souris and Pembina Rivers. MLRA 55A is located entirely within North Dakota and within the boundaries of the Prairie Pothole Region. The primary land use is cropland. Glacial Lake Souris and the Devils Lake Basin are known for exceptional fertility with major crops including corn, canola, soybeans, and small grains. Together, these two areas make up 73% of the MLRA (Glacial Lake Souris 5500 mi2, 43%; and the Devils Lake Basin 3810 mi2, 30%).
Turtle Mountain (1000 mi2 of which 405 mi2 are found in North Dakota), in the north-central part of the MLRA on the Canadian border, is approximately 1,950 to 2,541 feet (595 to 775 meters) in elevation, rising approximately 600 to 800 feet (150 meters) above the adjacent till plain. Home to an extensive forest of quaking aspen, bur oak, green ash, and willows, it has an understory of beaked hazel with associates of chokecherry, Saskatchewan serviceberry, downy arrowwood, and rose. Turtle Mountain comprises the largest area of quaking aspen forest in North Dakota.
The Pembina Escarpment extends from the Canadian border southeast to Walhalla where the Pembina River enters the floor of the Red River Valley in MLRA 56A. Mainly found on steep slopes along the Pembina River, the Pembina Gorge is in a rugged and sheltered setting with bur oak, green ash, cottonwood, and American elm. Encompassing approximately 12,500 acres, the Pembina Gorge is one of the largest uninterrupted blocks of woodlands in North Dakota. This segment of the Pembina River is the longest segment of unaltered river valley in the North Dakota.
Two major Hydrologic Unit Areas make up this MLRA. 56% of the MLRA drains into the Souris River while 44% drains into the Red River (via the Pembina River) or into Devils Lake (out-letting to Sheyenne River via a pump, pipeline, canal system). The North Dakota portion of the Souris River watershed is in this MLRA. The Souris River basin drains nearly 23,600 square miles and has a long history of flooding.
By the mid-19th century, over 75% of the MLRA had been converted from mid- to tall-grass prairie or woodland to annual crop production. To alleviate crop production loss from wetlands and overland flow, a system of shallow surface ditches, judicial ditches, and road ditches removes surface water in spring and during high rainfall events. Tile drainage systems have been or are being installed extensively throughout MLRA 55A for sub-surface field drainage to enhance annual crop production.
Historic Communities/Conditions within MLRA 55A:
The northern tall- and mixed-grass prairie along with the quaking aspen forest were disturbance- driven ecosystems with fire, herbivory, and climate functions as the primary ecological drivers (either singly or often in combination). American bison roamed MLRA 55A wintering along the Souris River and migrating through MLRA 55A into MLRAs 56A and 55B. Many species of grassland birds, small mammals, insects, reptiles, amphibians, elk, moose, pronghorn, and large herds of American bison were historically among the inhabitants adapted to this region. Roaming herbivores, as well as several small mammal and insect species, were the primary consumers linking the grassland resources to large predators (such as the wolf, American black bear, grizzly bear) and smaller carnivores (such as the coyote, bobcat, red fox, and raptors). Extirpated species include free-ranging American bison and gray wolf (breeding). Extinct is the Rocky Mountain locust.
Present Communities/Conditions within MLRA 55A:
This area supports natural prairie vegetation characterized by western wheatgrass, green needlegrass, needle and thread, and blue grama. Little bluestem is an important species on the more sloping and shallower soils. Prairie cordgrass, northern reedgrass, big bluestem, and wheat sedge are important species on soils with higher water tables. Western snowberry, leadplant, and prairie rose are commonly interspersed throughout the area. Native forests occur in Turtle Mountain, Pembina Gorge, moraines near Devils Lake, woody draws, scattered tracts along the Souris River, and in the sand dunes in west central region of the MLRA.
Over 75% of MLRA 55A has been converted to annual crop production. European influence has impacted remaining grassland, forestland, and shrubland by domestic livestock grazing, elimination of fire, tree harvest, removal of surface and subsurface hydrology via artificial drainage, and other anthropogenic factors influencing plant community composition and abundance.
Hydrological manipulation is extensive throughout the MLRA. Extensive wetland and subsurface tile drainage have taken place. Ephemeral and intermittent streams and the Souris River have been straightened - removing sinuosity, creating isolated oxbows, and converting riparian zones to annual crop production. These anthropogenic impacts have reduced flood water detention and retention on the landscape. The results have been increasing storm water runoff sediment and nutrient loading impacting the Souris and Des Lacs Rivers and their tributaries along with Devils Lake and other lakes within the MLRA. The installation of instream structures has reduced aquatic species movement within the MLRA. Two large dams in Saskatchewan, Canada (Rafferty on the Souris River and Alameda on Moose Mountain Creek, a major tributary to the Souris River) were built, in part, to reduce flood peaks on the Souris River. In addition, three USFWS National Wildlife Refuges were created by building two low-head dams on the Souris River and one on the Des Lacs River in North Dakota. Numerous low-head dams are located on the Souris and Des Lacs Rivers in North Dakota. The Eaton Irrigation Project low-head dam, located in the vicinity of Towner, North Dakota, provides flood irrigation to approximately 6,700 acres of hayland and pastureland.
The loss of the American bison and fire, as primary ecological drivers, greatly influenced the character of the remaining native plant communities and the associated wildlife moving towards a less diverse and more homogeneous landscape. Annual cropping is the main factor contributing to habitat fragmentation, reducing habitat quality for area-sensitive species. These influences fragmented the landscape, reduced or eliminated ecological drivers (fire), and introduced exotic species including smooth brome, Kentucky bluegrass, and leafy spurge which further impacted plant and animal communities.
Included in this MLRA are over 121,000 acres of National Wildlife Refuges and over 77,000 acres of waterfowl production areas owned and managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. White Horse Hill National Game Preserve is a 1,674-acre national wildlife refuge sitting on the south shores of Devils Lake, about 10 miles south of the city of Devils Lake. Numerous state-owned parks, state wildlife management areas, North Dakota Forest Service and Department of Trust Lands are found in the MLRA. Wakopa Wildlife Management Area is the largest WMA covering approximately 6,739 acres.
Some characteristic wildlife species in this area are:
Birds: Common loon, common goldeye, bufflehead, ruffed grouse, broad-winged hawk, alder flycatcher, mourning warbler, mallard, blue-winged teal, red-tailed hawk, American kestrel, killdeer, eastern and western kingbird, American crow, common yellowthroat, clay-colored sparrow, vesper sparrow, red-necked grebe, Savannah sparrow, downy and hairy woodpeckers, black-capped chickadee, white-breasted nuthatch, and brown-headed cowbird.
Mammals: Northern short-tailed shrew, water shrew, beaver, muskrat, mink, long-tailed weasel, American martin, fisher, white-tailed jackrabbit, snowshoe hare, Franklin’s ground squirrel, thirteen- lined ground squirrel, northern pocket gopher, plains pocket gopher, western harvest mouse deer mouse, meadow vole, meadow jumping mouse, western jumping mouse, coyote, red fox, racoon, American badger, striped skunk, white-tailed deer, elk, moose, and woodchuck, red squirrel, porcupine, and northern flying squirrel.
Reptiles/Amphibians: American toad, Great Plains toad, northern leopard frog, chorus frog, tiger salamander, plains garter snake, smooth green snake, wood frog, and common garter snake.
Presence of wildlife species is often determined by ecological site characteristics including grass and forb species, tree and shrub species, hydrology, aspect, and other associated ecological sites. The home ranges of a majority species are usually larger than one ecological site or are dependent on more than one ecological site for annual life requisites. Ecological sites offer different habitat elements as the annual life requisites change. Habitat improvement and creation must be conducted within the mobility limits of a known population for the species.
Insects play an important role providing ecological services for plant community development. Insects that are scavengers or aid in decomposition provide the food chain baseline sustaining the carnivorous insects feeding upon them. Many insects provide the ecological services necessary for pollination, keeping plant communities healthy and productive. Insects provide a protein food source for numerous species including grassland-nesting birds, woodpeckers, and woodland edge and interior species, and their young. Extensive use of insecticides for specialty crops (such as soybeans, corn, and other crops) has greatly reduced insects within this MLRA.
Species of Concern within MLRA 55A:
The following is a list of species considered “species of conservation priority” in the North Dakota State Wildlife Action Plan (2015) and “species listed as threatened, endangered, or petitioned” under the Endangered Species Act within MLRA 55A at the time this section was developed:
Invertebrates: Dakota skipper, monarch butterfly, and regal fritillary. Within the MLRA, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists 5 areas (in Rolette and McHenry Counties) as critical habitat for the Dakota skipper.
Birds: American avocet, American bittern, American kestrel, American white pelican, Baird’s sparrow, bald eagle, black tern, black-billed cuckoo, bobolink, canvasback, chestnut-collared longspur, ferruginous hawk, Franklin’s gull, grasshopper sparrow, horned grebe, LeConte’s sparrow, lesser scaup, loggerhead shrike, marbled godwit, Nelson’s sparrow, northern harrier, northern pintail, piping plover, sharp-tailed grouse, short-eared owl, Sprague’s pipit, Swainson’s hawk, upland sandpiper, western meadowlark, whooping crane, willet, Wilson’s phalarope, and yellow rail.
Mammals: American martin, Arctic shrew, big brown bat, gray fox, little brown bat, northern long- eared bat, plains pocket mouse, pygmy shrew, Richardson’s ground squirrel, river otter, and Townsend’s big-eared bat.
Amphibians/Reptiles: Canadian toad, common snapping turtle, plains hog-nosed snake, and smooth green snake.
Fish: Finescale dace, hornyhead chub, largescale stoneroller, logperch, northern pearl dace, and trout-perch.
Mussels: Black sandshell, creek heelsplitter, creeper, mapleleaf, and pink heelsplitter.
Grassland and Woodland Management for Wildlife in MLRA 55A
Management activities within the community phase pathways impact wildlife but are essential for maintenance of healthy grassland ecosystems. Community phase, transitional, and restoration pathways are keys to long-term management within each State and between States. Timing, intensity, and frequency of these inputs can have dramatic positive or negative effects on local wildlife species. Ranchers and other land managers must always consider the long-term beneficial management effects of grassland and woodland resources in comparison to typically short-term negative effects to the habitats of individual species.
Ecological sites occur as intermingled complexes on the landscape with gradual or sometimes abrupt transitions. Rarely do ecological sites exist in large enough acreage to manage independently for wildlife. Conversion to annual cropping and fragmentation due to transportation and electrical transmission corridors and to rural housing are main causes of fragmentation. This MLRA supports ecological sites that are dominated by woody vegetation and can be located adjacent to ecological sites that support tall- to mid-statured grasses (Thin Loamy/Shallow Loamy) or are adjacent to ecological sites that support wetland vegetation (Shallow Marsh and Wet Meadow).
Management of these ecological site complexes challenges managers to properly manage the entire landscape. A management strategy for one ecological site may negatively impact an adjacent site. For example, grazing Upland Hardwood Forest or Loamy Savannah ecological sites along with herbaceous dominated Loamy Overflow ecological sites may degrade one site by under-use, favoring woody vegetation or increasing exotic cool-season grasses.
Life requisites and habitat deficiencies are determined for targeted species. Deficiencies need to be addressed along community phase, transitional, and restoration pathways as presented in specific state-and-transition models. Ecological sites should be managed and restored within the site’s capabilities to provide sustainable habitat for targeted species or species guilds. Managers also need to consider vegetative associations provided by adjacent/intermingled ecological sites for species with home ranges or life requisites that may not be provided by one ecological site. Understanding specific grassland species’ sensitivity to woody encroachment and preferred vegetative structure enables managers to determine which grassland-nesting bird species will avoid grassland habitats adjacent to Upland Hardwood Forest or Loamy Savannah ecological sites or woody dominated, Plant Community Phase 5, Loamy ecological site.
Many passerine species utilize MLRA 55A as a major migratory travel corridor. Grassland species sensitive to woody associations during nesting and brooding may utilize the woodier fragmented sites, such as the Wooded State 5.0 in the Loamy ecological site, during migration.
Grassland-nesting birds use various grass heights for breeding, nesting, foraging, or winter habitat. While most species use varying heights, many have a preferred vegetative stature height or sensitivity to woody vegetation. Understanding the sensitivity of grassland species to woody vegetation and preferred vegetative structure enables managers to determine which grassland-nesting bird species avoid grassland habitats adjacent to Upland Hardwood Forest or Loamy Savannah ecological sites.
The following chart provides sensitivity to woody vegetation and preferred vegetative stature heights. To see a full copy of the ecological site description with all tables please use the following hyperlink:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/55A_Clayey_ESD_Narrative_FINAL_Ref_FSG.pdf
Clayey Wildlife Habitat Interpretation:
Clayey ecological sites have no restrictions in the soil profile. This complex of ecological sites provides habitat for many edge-sensitive grassland bird species. Clayey habitat features support nesting and foraging grassland birds but may be too dense and tall for sharp-tailed grouse leks. Associated ecological sites include Claypan, Limy Subirrigated, Loamy, Thin Claypan, Wet Meadow, and Upland Hardwood Forest.
Clayey ecological sites may be found in four plant community states (1.0 Reference State, 2.0 Native/Invaded State, 3.0 Invaded State, and 4.0 Go-Back State); multiple plant community phases exist within states 1.0 and 2.0. These states occur primarily in response to grazing, drought, and non-use. Secondary influences include fire and anthropogenic disturbances.
Because there is no known restoration pathway from State 2.0 to State 1.0, it is important to intensively manage using tools in State 1.0 and State 2.0 community phase pathways to prevent further plant community degradation along T2 transitional pathway to Invaded State 3.0. Native grassland associated wildlife generally benefit from a heterogeneous grassland found in community phases States 1.0 and 2.0 that include diverse grass and forb species with varying structure and density.
As plant communities degrade within State 2.0 and transition to State 3.0, cool-season exotic grasses and low shrubs increase while native forbs are reduced. This transition results in reduced structure, increased plant community homogeneity, and reduced insect populations resulting in a reduction of breeding, nesting, foraging, or winter habitat for grassland birds. When adjacent/intermingled, ecological sites undergo the same transition, the result can be an expansive, homogenous landscape. A homogenous grassland landscape does not provide quality escape or winter cover. As a result, many species are not able to meet life requisites within State 3.0.
Success along restoration pathway R3A from State 3.0 to State 2.0 is very difficult and is dependent upon presence of a remnant native grass population or successful native range seeding.
Management along community phase, transition or restoration pathways should focus upon attainable changes. Short- and long-term monetary costs must be evaluated against short- and long-term ecological services in creating and maintaining habitat of enough quality to support a sustainable population.
1.0 Reference State
Community Phase 1.1 Green Needlegrass-Western Wheatgrass: This plant community phase offers quality wildlife habitat; every effort should be made to maintain this ecological site within this community phase. This phase retains high functionality through continued maintenance including prescribed grazing with adequate recovery period, as well as prescribed fire. Predominance of grass species in this community favors grazers and mixed- feeders (animals selecting grasses as well as forbs and shrubs). The structural diversity provides habitat for a wide array of migratory and resident birds.
Invertebrates: Insects play a role in maintaining the forb community and provide a forage base for grassland birds, reptiles, and rodents. Ecological services, historically provided by bison, are simulated by domestic livestock. These services include putting plant material and dung in contact with mineral soil to be used by low trophic level consumers (such as invertebrate decomposers, scavengers, shredders, predators, herbivores, dung beetles and fungal-feeders).
Dakota skippers do not prefer this site due to limited host plants, such as little bluestem and prairie dropseed. Regal fritillary habitat is limited due to Nuttall's violet and prairie violets being uncommon. Monarch butterfly may use flowering forbs on this site; however, few milkweed species are found on this site to support breeding and larvae development. Bumblebees and other native bees utilize forbs for pollen and nectar sources and bare ground for nesting amongst bunchgrasses. Prescribed grazing with adequate recovery periods (as well as prescribed fire) to maintain the 1.1 phase will have long-term positive effects on ground dwelling insects.
Birds: This plant community provides quality nesting, foraging, and escape habitats favored by short- to mid-grass nesting birds. Plant structure may be too dense or tall for species using short-grass habitats; however, it may be used during periods of drought (or under management such as rotational grazing or fire which results in defoliation) along Community
Phase Pathway 1.1A. The low scattered shrubs present in the plant community phase should not impact woody vegetation sensitive bird species. Grassland birds preferring short- to mid-grass structure will use this site. In years with reduced precipitation or drought, nesting recruitment may be compromised. This plant community provides suitable areas for sharp-tailed grouse lek sites and nesting and brood- rearing habitat. Limited structure and diverse prey populations provide good hunting opportunity for grassland raptors. Many passerine species utilize MLRA 55A as a major migratory travel corridor.
Mammals: The diversity of grasses and forbs provide high nutrition levels for small and large herbivores. Short- to moderate-statured vegetation provides suitable food and thermal, protective, and escape cover for small herbivores.
Amphibians/Reptiles: This ecological site and associated plant communities provides habitat for smooth green snakes. This ecological site, typically, is not adjacent to wetlands, streams, or lakes; it provides limited habitat for the northern leopard frog and Great Plains toad.
Fish and Mussels: This ecological site is not directly associated with streams, rivers, or water bodies. Associated ecological sites, such as Limy Subirrigated or Claypan, can receive run-on hydrology from Clayey sites. Management on these interconnected sites can have indirect effect on aquatic species.
Community Phase 1.2 Blue Grama-Western Wheatgrass/Sedges/Prairie Sagewort: This plant community phase occurs along Plant Community Pathway 1.1A due to heaving grazing with or without drought. This leads to increases in blue grama and prairie sagewort with a corresponding decline in green needlegrass, creating a plant community dominated by short-saturated grasses and sedges.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1. However, increases in turf-forming grasses and sedges may negatively impact ground nesting pollinator species. Wind-pollinated prairie sagewort provides nesting sites for native bees and larval food butterfly species.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1. However, the increase of short, warm-season grasses favors grassland-nesting birds species preferring short to mid- statured vegetation. Short, warm-season grasses may be more attractive for sharp-tailed grouse lek sites.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, foliage and stems of prairie sagewort provide browse for jackrabbits, cottontails, ground squirrels, and various mice species.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 1.3 Western Wheatgrass/Western Snowberry: Coupled with above normal precipitation and a reduction in fire frequency (with or without light grazing), native shrubs (such as western snowberry) become prominent and begin to dominate. Western wheatgrass increases as native cool-season bunch grasses, such as green needlegrass, decrease. Leadplant and wild rose may also increase across the entire site. Increased burn intervals and normal precipitation, via Community Phase Pathway 1.3A, can return this plant community phase back to Community Phase 1.1.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1. However, increased shrub component will provide early- and mid- season nectar and pollen sources for pollinating insects. Dependent on the number of forbs still present, late season pollen and nectar may not be available. These woody species are not considered nectar sources for regal fritillary or monarch butterfly.
Birds: Western snowberry-dominated sites provide nesting, brood, and winter cover for sharp-tailed grouse and ring-necked pheasant. Dependent upon the density of western snowberry, grassland nesting birds which are intolerant of woody vegetation may not use this site. Western snowberry provides winter cover and food (berries) for grassland-nesting bird species that use woody vegetation (or can tolerate a small amount) within areas dominated by grassland habitat. Without taller shrubs and trees, woody vegetation will not reach needed density to provide habitat for woodland edge species but may reach density for grassland nesting birds sensitive to woody vegetation to avoid this site. Brown-headed cowbird use will increase with an increase in the woody cover component of this ecological site.
Mammals: Increase in woody habitat provides winter and escape cover, birthing sites, browse, etc. for white-tailed deer. The increase in woody cover will not benefit bat species found in MLRA 55A, since necessary maternity trees are limited to non-existent.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, the increase in woody vegetation will decrease habitat quality for the smooth green snake.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1
2.0 Native/Invaded State
Community Phase 2.1 Green Needlegrass-Western Wheatgrass: This plant community develops through Transition Pathway T1 due to changes in management and the presence of exotic, cool-season grasses. Complete rest from grazing and no fire events can also lead to this transition. The threshold between States 1.0 and 2.0 is crossed when Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, or other exotic species become established. This plant community phase has a very similar appearance and function to the Reference State of Community 1.1, except it has a minor amount of cool-season exotic grasses and forbs. This phase still functions at a high level for native wildlife; therefore, managers should consider the 2.0 community phase pathways to avoid transitioning to the Invaded State 3.0. There is no known Community Phase Pathway back to State 1.0 from State 2.0.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 2.2 Blue Grama-Western Wheatgrass/Sedges/Prairie Sagewort: This community developed from heavy grazing with or without drought. Community Phase Pathway 2.1A leads to shorter-statured warm-season grasses. Forb diversity remains with an increase in prairie sagewort. Dominated by shorter-statured grasses and sedges the diversity of this plant community is reduced. Prescribed grazing with adequate recovery periods along Community Phase Pathway 2.2A is an efficient, effective method to regain the cool-season grass and forb diversity components found in Community Phase 2.1.
Invertebrates: The reduction of native forbs and increases in sod-forming grasses and sedges begin to limit foraging and nesting sites for all pollinators. Heavy, season-long grazing may reduce ground-nesting site availability. Wind-pollinated prairie sagewort provides nesting sites for native bees and larval food butterfly species.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.2.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.2.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 2.3 Western Wheatgrass/Western Snowberry: Extended periods of non- use or very light grazing, and no fire, (via Community Pathway 2.1B) allows western snowberry to dominate this site. Exotic cool-season grass (typically Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass) are present and may begin to dominate this site without adequate management along Community Phase Pathway 2.2B.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3. Extended periods of non- use or very light grazing, and no fire, will increase Kentucky bluegrass, brome and quackgrass invasion making this site less attractive to grassland nesting birds that are dependent on mid-statured vegetation.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
3.0 Invaded State
Community Phase 3.1 Exotic Cool-Season Grasses/Forbs: Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, and no fire (via Transitional Pathway T2A) is characterized by a dominance (>30%) of exotic cool-season grasses, such as Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome; native grasses represent less than 40%. Warm-season, native grasses may still be present but with reduced vigor and numbers. Return to State 2.0, via Restoration Pathway R3A through prescribed burning and high levels of grazing management, requires remnant amounts of native warm- and cool-season and forbs to be successful. The remnant native community needs frequent prescribed burns and high levels of grazing management targeting the exotic cool-season grasses to improve competitiveness and increase vigor and density. This plant community is resistant to change; time and extensive resources will be needed to accomplish significant change. Managers need to evaluate impacts to wildlife while implementing these management practices. Intensified management along the R3A Pathway will have significant short-term negative impacts on wildlife habitat; however, this is necessary to restore long-term native habitat functions.
Invertebrates: The invasion and dominance of cool-season exotic grasses and the loss of cool-season native grasses (combined with the reduction of forb production, abundance, diversity and richness) reduces or may eliminate habitat for invertebrate species of concern within MLRA 55A. Western snowberry and prairie rose provides early- to mid-season bloom period nectar and pollen. Common forbs (white sagebrush, white heath aster, and goldenrod) provide late season pollen and nectar opportunities. Litter and thatch levels are high, limiting bare ground for ground-nesting bee species.
Birds: The homogeneous community phase, dominated by exotic short statured grass species, provides limited habitat and life requisites for most obligate grassland-nesting birds. Bird species that favor short-statured vegetation may use this site; however, a lack of plant diversity and stature limits use by many grassland-nesting birds. Dependent on density of western snowberry, grassland nesting birds which are sensitive to woody vegetation encroachment may be reduced.
Mammals: The dominance of short-statured, sod forming, cool-season grasses (with non- use or no fire) creates a thick duff and litter layer. Limited habitat is available for mammals except for ground dwelling rodent species. Dependent on the density of western snowberry, increased year-round cover and browse for white-tailed deer may increase.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
State 4: Go-Back State
Community Phase 4.1 Annual/Pioneer Perennial/Exotics: These plant communities are the result of severe soil disturbance (such as cropping, recreational activity, or concentrated livestock activity for a prolonged period). Following cessation of disturbances, the resulting plant community is dominated by early pioneer annual and perennial plant species. Plant species composition and production are highly variable. Weedy plants can provide pollinator habitat along with spring and summer cover for many mammals and birds, and their young. Dense weed cover can keep soils moist, increasing the presence of insects. Milkweed can be an early pioneering pollinator species and host plant for monarch butterflies. Tall stature provided by some annual weeds offers thermal cover and seeds throughout winter for deer, small mammals, and over-wintering birds. The response by wildlife species will be dependent upon plant community composition, vegetative stature, patch size, and management activities (such as prescribed grazing, burning, inter-seeding, haying, or noxious weed control).
Successful restoration of native species along Transition Pathway R4A can result in a native grass and forb community in Native/Invaded State 2.0. Over time (with no management), the exotic cool-season perennial grasses (Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or quackgrass) generally become established and dominate the community. Failed native grass seeding, via Transition Pathway R4B, can result in an invaded plant community
Animal Community – Grazing Interpretations:
This site is well adapted to managed grazing by domestic livestock. The predominance of herbaceous plants across all plant community phases best lends these sites to grazing by cattle, but other domestic grazers with differing diet preferences may also be a consideration depending upon management objectives. Often, the current plant community does not match any particular plant community (as described in the ecological site description). Because of this, a resource inventory is necessary to document plant composition and production. Proper interpretation of this inventory data will permit the establishment of a safe, initial stocking rate for the type and class of animals and level of grazing management. More accurate stocking rate estimates should eventually be calculated using actual stocking rate information and monitoring data.
NRCS defines prescribed grazing as “managing the harvest of vegetation with grazing and/or browsing animals with the intent to achieve specific ecological, economic, and management objectives”. As used in this site description, the term ‘prescribed grazing’ is intended to include multiple grazing management systems (e.g., rotational grazing, twice-over grazing, conservation grazing, targeted grazing, etc.) provided that, whatever management system is implemented, it meets the intent of prescribed grazing definition.
The basic grazing prescription addresses balancing forage demand (quality and quantity) with available forage, varying grazing and deferment periods from year-to-year, matching recovery/deferment periods to growing conditions when pastures are grazed more than once in a growing season, implementation of a contingency (e.g., drought) plan, and a monitoring plan. When the management goal is to facilitate change from one plant community phase or state to another, then the prescription needs to be designed to shift the competitive advantage to favor the native grass and forb species.
Grazing levels are noted within the plant community narratives and pathways in reference to grazing/prescribed grazing management. “Degree of utilization” is defined as the proportion of the current years forage production that is consumed and/or destroyed by grazing animals (may refer to a single plant species or a portion or all the vegetation). “Grazing utilization” is classified as slight, moderate, full, close, and severe (see the following table for description of each grazing use category). The following utilization levels are also described in the Ranchers Guide to Grassland Management IV. Utilization levels are determined by using the landscape appearance method as outlined in the Interagency Technical Reference “Utilization Studies and Residual Measurements” 1734-3.
Utilization Level % Use Description
Slight (Light) 0-20 Appears practically undisturbed when viewed obliquely. Only choice areas and forage utilized.
Moderate 20-40 Almost all of accessible range shows grazing. Little or no use of poor forage. Little evidence of trailing to grazing.
Full 40-60 All fully accessible areas are grazed. The major sites have key forage species properly utilized (about half taken, half left). Points of concentration with overuse limited to 5 to 10 percent of accessible area.
Close (Heavy) 60-80 All accessible range plainly shows use and major sections closely cropped. Livestock forced to use less desirable forage, considering seasonal preference.
Severe > 80 Key forage species completely used. Low-value forages are dominant.
Hydrological functions
Available water is the principal factor limiting forage production on this site. This site is dominated by soils in hydrologic groups C and D. Infiltration varies from slow to moderately slow; runoff potential varies from low to high depending upon soil hydrologic group, slope percent, slope shape, and ground cover. In many cases, areas with greater than 75% ground cover have the greatest potential for high infiltration and lower runoff. An exception would be where short grasses form a strong sod and dominate the site. Areas where ground cover is less than 50% have the greatest potential to have reduced infiltration and higher runoff (refer to Section 4, NRCS National Engineering Handbook for runoff quantities and hydrologic curves).
Recreational uses
Hunting and Bird Watching: Over 113,000 acres of National Wildlife Refuges and over 77,000 acres of Waterfowl Production Areas owned and managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service are available for public hunting and bird watching. In addition, over 22,000 acres of North Dakota Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs), approximately 8,000 acres of North Dakota Forest Service, and thousands of acres of Department of Trust Lands are scattered throughout the central and western portions of the MLRA; these areas are available for hunting and bird watching. MLRA 55A provides a unique ruffed grouse hunting opportunity in North Dakota on wildlife management areas managed by the North Dakota Game and Fish Department and forest service lands managed by North Dakota Forest Service within the Turtle Mountain.
Camping: Three state parks are located within the MLRA including Lake Metigoshe State Park (Turtle Mt.), Grahams Island State Park (Devils Lake), and the newly designated Pembina Gorge State Park (formerly Pembina Gorge Recreation Area). These Parks provide hiking, biking, birding, canoeing, and wildlife viewing opportunities. Many local parks and private parks provide modern and primitive camping opportunities. The approximately 8,000 acres of North Dakota Forest Service provides primitive camping (no electric or water hookups) as well as fishing and canoeing access at various lakes. These forests and lakes provide access to swimming beaches, picnicking, and an extensive trail system open to hiking, mountain biking, horseback riding, snowmobiling, and cross-country skiing (not groomed). Limited primitive camping is also available on North Dakota Game and Fish Department Wildlife Management Areas.
Hiking/Biking/Horseback Riding: Hiking is permitted on most state and federally owned lands. Developed hiking and biking trails can be found on North Dakota Forest Service lands (18.6 miles), Upper Souris NWR (4.25 miles), Des Lacs NWR (8.5 miles), J. Clark NWR (3.3 miles), White Horse Hill National Game Preserve (3.6 miles), Lake Metigoshe State Park (16 miles), and Grahams Island State Park (2.1 miles; 3 miles cross country skiing). In addition, extensive biking and walking trails are found in local county and city parks. The Turtle Mountain State Recreation Area (ND Forest Service) is located six miles northwest of Bottineau. This recreation area has over 12 miles of trails open to hiking, biking, snowshoeing, horseback riding, and OHV’s.
The Pembina Gorge State Park encompasses over 2,800 acres of public land in the Pembina River Gorge. Steep valley cliffs towering over small, isolated prairies and pocketed wetlands surrounded by the largest continuous, undisturbed forest in North Dakota provide opportunities for canoeing, kayaking, hiking, biking, horseback riding, hunting, wildlife observing, birding, and downhill and cross- country skiing. Thirty miles of trails provide snowmobiling, mountain biking, and off-highway vehicles (OHV) opportunities.
Canoeing/Kayaking: Designated canoe and kayaking trails are available within the MLRA. J. Clark Sayler NWR has 12.75 miles of designated trails on the Souris River and Pembina Gorge State Park has 14.25 miles on the Pembina River. The Pembina Gorge State Park offers kayak rentals along with kayak transportation. Lake Metigoshe State Park offers canoe and kayak rentals along with standup paddleboards, pontoons, cross country skis, snowshoes, etc.
Downhill Skiing: Downhill skiing is available at Bottineau Winter Park within Turtle Mountain and Frost Fire Park at the Pembina Gorge. Full-service rental shops are available along with alpine trails ranging from beginner to expert. Conveyor lifts on the beginner hills to chairlifts are available for skiers.
International Peace Garden: The only peace garden located on the United States/Canada border, the International Peace Garden is a 2,339-acre botanical garden commemorating peace between the United States and Canada along the world’s longest unfortified border. It blooms with more than 155,000 flowers and showcases the Peace Chapel, Peace Towers, and Floral Clock. The North American Game Wardens Museum if also located within the boundaries of the International Peace Garden.
Wood products
No appreciable wood products are found on this site.
Other products
Seed harvest of native plant species can provide additional income on this site.
Other information
• Further investigation is needed on site hydrology and soil chemistry where this site is in complex with Limy Subirrigated, Thin Claypan, or Wet Meadow sites. These sites all have higher water tables than the Clayey site. In addition, the soils assigned to the Clayey site in these complexes are Natrudolls which have a risk of increasing soil salinity and SAR values in the subsoil. Site to site interactions need further study in the following MLRA map units:
Hamerly-Cresbard loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes (map unit 2q4gm)
Colvin-Aberdeen silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes (map unit 2q55p)
Aberdeen-Bearden complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes (map unit 2q55r)
Aberdeen-Exline silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes (map unit 2q565v)
• Further evaluation and refinement of the State-and-Transition model is needed to identify disturbance driven dynamics. Additional states and/or phases may be required to address grazing response.
• Further documentation may be needed for plant communities in all states. Plant data has been collected in previous range-site investigations, including clipping data; however, this data needs review. If geo-referenced sites meeting Tier 3 standards for either vegetative or soil data are not available, representative sites will be selected for further investigation.
• Site concepts will be refined as above noted investigations are completed.
• The long-term goal is to complete an approved, correlated Ecological Site Description as defined by the National Ecological Site Handbook.
• NASIS revisions needed:
o One component of Alkabo and 13 components of Niobell are currently linked to 53A Clayey (Legacy); these need to be relinked to 55A Clayey ecological site.
o One major component of Cashel, somewhat poorly drained is linked to Clayey; this needs to be relinked to Subirrigated. One frequently flooded minor component of Cashel is currently linked to Subirrigated; since this is in a channeled map unit, Riparian Complex ES should be considered.
This ESD is the best available knowledge. The site concept and species composition table have been used in the field and tested for more than five years. It is expected that as additional information becomes available revisions may be required.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented here has been derived from NRCS and other federal/state agency clipping and inventory data. Also, field knowledge of range-trained personnel was used. All descriptions were peer reviewed and/or field-tested by various private, state and federal agency specialists.
Other references
Bakker, K.K. 2003. The effect of woody vegetation on grassland nesting birds: an annotated bibliography. The Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 82:119-141.
Barker, W.T. and W. C. Whitman. 1988. Vegetation of the Northern Great Plains. Rangelands 10(6): 266-272.
Bluemle, J.P. 1985. Geology of Bottineau County, North Dakota. North Dakota Geological Survey Bulletin 78-Part I. 57 pages.
Bluemle. J.P. 2016. North Dakota’s geologic legacy. North Dakota State University Press. 382 pages.
Briske, D.D. (editor). 2017. Rangeland systems – processes, management, and challenges. Springer Series on Environmental Management. 661 pages.
DeKeyser, E.S., G. Clambey, K. Krabbenhoft, and J. Ostendorf. 2009. Are changes in species composition on central North Dakota rangelands due to non-use management? Rangelands 31:16-19
Dix, R.L. and F.E. Smeins. 1967. The prairie, meadow, and marsh vegetation of Nelson County, North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Botany 45:21-57.
Dornbusch, M.J., R.F. Limb, and C.K. Gasch. 2018. Facilitation of an exotic grass through nitrogen enrichment by an exotic legume. Rangeland Ecology & Management 71:691-694.
Dyke, S.R., S.K. Johnson, and P.T. Isakson. 2015. North Dakota state wildlife action plan. North Dakota Game and Fish Department, Bismarck, ND. 468 pages.
Ehrenfeld, Joan G. 2002. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503-523.
Ereth, C., J. Hendrickson, D. Kirby, E. DeKeyser, K. Sedevic, and M. West. Controlling Kentucky bluegrass with herbicide and burning is influenced by invasion level. Invasive Plant Science and Management 10: 80-89.
Gilgert, W. and S. Zack. 2010. Integrating multiple ecosystem services into ecological site descriptions. Rangelands: 32:49-54.
Grant, T.A. and R.K. Murphy. 2005. Changes on woodland cover on prairie refuges in North Dakota, USA. Natural Areas Journal 25:359-368.
Guinan, D.M, and C.S. Rewcastle. 1982. Trends of plant succession in Turtle Mountain Provincial Park. Manitoba Department Natural Resources MS Report No. 82-6. 40 pages.
Heitschmidt, R. K., K. D. Klement, and M. R. Haferkamp. 2005. Interactive effects of drought and grazing on Northern Great Plains rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:11-19.
Hendrickson, J.R., P. S. Johnson, M. A. Liebig, K. K. Sedivec, and G. A. Halvorson. 2016. Use of ecological sites in managing wildlife and livestock: an example with prairie dogs. Rangelands
Hendrickson, J.R., S.L. Kronberg, and E.J. Scholljegerdes. 2020. Can targeted grazing reduce abundance of invasive perennial grass (Kentucky Bluegrass) on native mixed-grass prairie? Rangeland Ecology and Management, 73:547-551.
Higgins, K.F. 1984. Lightning fires in grasslands in North Dakota and in pine-savanna lands in nearby South Dakota and Montana. J. Range Manage. 37:100-103.
Higgins, K.F. 1986. Interpretation and compendium of historical fire accounts in the Northern Great Plains. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Resource Publication 161. 39 pages.
Higgins, K.F., A.D. Kruse, and J.L. Piehl. 1989. Effects of fire in the Northern Great Plains. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Cooperative Extension Service South, Dakota State University. Extension Circular 761. 48 pages.
High Plains Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska, 830728 Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583- 0728. (http://hprcc.unl.edu)
Hoffman, G.R. and R.R. Alexander. 1987. Forest vegetation of the Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota and Wyoming: a habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM- 276, 48 pages
.
Johnson, Sandra. 2015. Reptiles and amphibians of North Dakota. North Dakota Game and Fish Department. 64 pages.
Jordan, N. R., D.L. Larson, and S.C. Huerd. 2008. Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biological Invasions 10:177-190.
Knudson, W. and R. L. Post. 1963. Butterflies of Bottineau County. North Dakota State University Department of Agricultural Entomology. 29 pp.
Kurmis, V., and E. Sucoff. 1999. Population density and height distribution of Corylus cornuta in undisturbed forests of Minnesota: 1965-1984. Can. J. Bot. 67:2409-2413.
Lemke, Richard W., Geology of the Souris River area North Dakota Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 325 pp. Prepared as a part of a program of the Department of the Interior for development of the Missouri River Basin United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC:1960.
Mader, E., M. Shepherd, M. Vaughan, and S.H. Black. 2011. Attracting native pollinators: protecting North America's bees and butterflies. Accessed at https://xerces.org, May 1, 2017.
McCartney. D.H. 1993. History of grazing research in the aspen parkland. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:749-763.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Managing your woodland for ruffed grouse, Accessed on February 25, 2019; Available at https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/recreation/hunting/grouse/managing_woodland_ruffed_grouse_flat.pdf
North Dakota Division of Tourism, Accessed on February 25, 2019. Available at https://www.ndtourism.com/sports-recreation
North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, Accessed on February 25, 2019. Available at http://www.parkrec.nd.gov/recreationareas/recreationareas.html
Palit, R., G. and E.S. DeKeyser. 2022.
Impacts and drivers of smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyes.) invasion in native ecosystems. Plants: 10,3390. http://https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/10/1340
Palit, R., G. Gramig, and E.S. DeKeyser. 2021. Kentucky bluegrass invasion in the Northern Great Plains and prospective management approaches to mitigate its spread. Plants: 10,817. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040817
Potter, L.D. and D. R. Moir. 1961. Phytosociological study of burned deciduous woods, Turtle Mountains North Dakota. Ecology Vol 2, No. 3: 468-480.
Printz, J.L. and J.R. Hendrickson. 2015. Impacts of Kentucky bluegrass invasion (Poa pratensis) on Ecological Processes in the Northern Great Plains. Rangelands 37(6):226-232.
Redmann, Robert E. 1975. Production ecology of grassland plant communities in western North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 45:83-106.
Reeves, J.L., J.D. Derner, M.A. Sanderson, J.R. Hendrickson, S.L. Kronberg, M.K. Petersen, and L.T. Vermeire. 2014. Seasonal weather influences on yearling beef steer production in C3-dominated Northern Great Plains rangeland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 183:110-117.
Renton, J. C. 2010. The impact of cattle grazing on aspen regeneration on crown lands in western Manitoba. M.S. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. 130 pages.
Riffle, J.W. and G.W. Peterson. 1986. Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains. U.S.D.A. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-129. 149 pages.
Royer, R. A., 2003. Butterflies of North Dakota: An Atlas and Guide. Minot State University, Minot, ND.
Schulz, J.W. 1984. Manipulation of habitat for ruffed grouse on the Wakopa Wildlife Management Area, North Dakota. Pages 109-121 In Robinson, W.L. editor. Ruffed Grouse Management, state of the art in the early 1980’s. Proceedings of a Symposium, 45th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, St. Louis, MO. 181 pages. Available at https://wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Robinson1984_RuffedGrouseManagement_300dpi.pdf
Seabloom, R. 2020. Mammals of North Dakota. North Dakota Institute for Regional Studies, Fargo, ND. 470 pages.
Sedivec, K.D., J.L. Printz. 2014. Ranchers guide to grassland management IV. NDSU Extension Service publication R1707.
Severson, K. E. and C. Hull Sieg. 2006. The nature of eastern North Dakota: Pre-1880 historical ecology. North Dakota Institute for Regional Studies.
South Dakota Dept. of Game, Fish and Parks. 2014. South Dakota wildlife action plan. Wildlife Division Report 2014-03.
Spaeth, K.E., Hayek, M.A., Toledo, D., and Hendrickson, J. 2019. Cool season grass impacts on native mixedgrass prairie species in the Northern Great Plains. America’s Grassland Conference: Working Across Boundaries. The Fifth Biennial Conference on the Conservation of America’s Grasslands. Bismarck, ND. 20-22 August.
Thorpe, J.P. 1978. Effects of cattle grazing on understory shrubs in Saskatchewan aspen forests. M.S. thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. 135 pages.
Tidwell, D., D.T. Fogarty, and J.R. Weir. 2021. Woody encroachment in grasslands, a guide for understanding risk and vulnerability. Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service publication E-1054. 32 pages.
Toledo, D., M. Sanderson, K. Spaeth, J. Hendrickson, and J. Printz. 2014. Extent of Kentucky bluegrass and its effect on native plant species diversity and ecosystem services in the Northern Great Plains of the United State. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7(4): 543-552.
USDA, NRCS. 2021. National range and pasture handbook, (https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb104 3084)
USDA, NRCS. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
USDA, NRCS. National soil information system, 100 Centennial Mall North, Room 152, Lincoln, NE 68508-3866. (https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/tools/?cid=nrcs142p2_053552)
USDA, NRCS. National Water & Climate Center, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd, Suite 802, Portland, OR 97232-1274. (https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/)
USDA, NRCS. 2001. The PLANTS database, Version 3.1 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.
USDA, NRCS, Various Published Soil Surveys.
USDI BLM.1999. Utilization studies and residual measurements. Interagency Technical Reference 1734-3.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; designation of critical habitat for the Dakota skipper and Poweshiek skipperling; Vol. 79 No. Final Rule October 1, 2015, 50 CFR Part 17.
Vinton, M.A. and E.M. Goergen. 2006. Plant-soil feedbacks contribute to the persistence of Bromus inermis in tallgrass prairie. Ecosystems 9: 967-976.
Waddington, J., D.H. McCartney, and L.P. Lefkovitch. 1999. Effects of management on species dynamics of Canadian aspen parkland pastures. Journal of Range Management 52:60-67.
Weatherill, R.G., and L.B. Keith. 1969. The effect of livestock grazing on an aspen forest community. Utah State University. Department of Lands and Forests Fish and Wildlife Division Technical Bulletin No. 1. 31 pages.
Whitman, W.H., H. Hanson, and R. Peterson. 1943. Relation of drought and grazing to North Dakota range lands. North Dakota Agricultural Experimentation Bulletin 340.
Contributors
ND NRCS: David Dewald, Jonathan Fettig, Alan Gulsvig, Mark Hayek, Chuck Lura, Jeff Printz, Steve Sieler, and Hal Weiser
Approval
Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 5/08/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | USDA-NRCS North Dakota |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist |
Date | 12/01/2021 |
Approved by | Suzanne Mayne-Kinney |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not expected on this site. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are not visible on this site. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Neither pedestals nor terracettes are expected. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is less than 5%. Bare ground patches should be small (less than 2 inches in diameter) and not connected. Animal activity (burrows and ant mounds) may occasionally result in isolated bare patches of up to 24 inches in diameter. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Active gullies are not expected on this site. If present, gully channel(s) are fully vegetated with no active erosion visible. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
No wind-scoured or depositional areas expected on this site. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Plant litter movement is not expected on this site. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Stability class averages 6. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Use soil series description for depth, color, and structure of A-horizon. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Mid- and short-statured bunch grasses are dominant and are well distributed across the site. Mid- and short-rhizomatous grasses are subdominant. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
No compaction layers occur naturally on this site. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Phase 1.1:
Mid & short C3 bunch grasses (6)Sub-dominant:
Phase 1.1:
Mid & short C3 rhizomatous grasses (2)Other:
Minor - Phase 1.1:
Mid & short C4 bunch grasses; Mid & short C4 rhizomatous grasses; Forbs; Grass-likes; Shrub; Tall C4 rhizomatous grassesAdditional:
Due to differences in phenology, root morphology, soil biology relationships, and nutrient cycling Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and crested wheatgrass are included in a new Functional/structural group, mid- and short-statured early cool-season grasses (MSeC3), not expected for this site.
To see a full version 5 rangeland health worksheet with functional/structural group tables. Please use the following hyperlink:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/55A_Clayey_ESD_Narrative_FINAL_Ref_FSG.pdf -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Dead or dying plants/plant parts are not expected on this site. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Plant litter cover is 70 to 80% with a depth of 0.25 to 0.5 inches. Litter is in contact with soil surface. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual air-dry production is 2700 lbs./ac (reference value) with normal precipitation and temperatures. Low and high production years should yield 1900 lbs./ac to 3500 lbs./ac, respectively. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
State and local noxious species, Kentucky bluegrass, smooth bromegrass, crested wheatgrass, quackgrass, and Eastern red cedar/juniper. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Noninvasive species in all functional/structural groups are vigorous and capable of reproducing annually under normal weather conditions.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.
Ecosystem states
T1A | - | Introduction of exotic cool-season grasses |
---|---|---|
T2A | - | Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, no fire |
R3A | - | Long term prescribed grazing with prescribed burning |
R4A | - | Successful range seeding with prescribed grazing and prescribed fire |
R4B | - | Failed range seeding |
T5A | - | Cessation of annual cropping |
State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A | - | Heavy grazing with or without drought |
---|---|---|
1.1B | - | Above average precipitation, extended fire interval, with or with out light grazing |
1.2A | - | Return to average precipitation and reduced grazing |
1.3A | - | Return to average precipitation and historic fire interval. |
State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A | - | Heavy season-long grazing with or without drought |
---|---|---|
2.1B | - | Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, no fire |
2.2A | - | Long term prescribed grazing with prescribed burning |
2.2B | - | Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, no fire |
2.3A | - | Long term prescribed grazing with prescribed burning |