

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02C072
Steep Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/19/2025
Accessed: 05/20/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 012X, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in Idaho. MLRA 012X is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources, and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mt. Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869 meters). Annual precipitation has a significant range from 6 to 47", the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly east of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from Salmon, Idaho to the north, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the south, the Beaverhead Mountain Range to the east, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the west. This LRU borders MLRA 043B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 010X - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet). The boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M170 Great Basin-Intermountain Dry Shrubland & Grassland Macrogroup
G304 Intermountain Mountain Big Sagebrush Steppe and Shrubland Group
A3208 Mountain Big Sagebrush - Mixed Steppe and Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001032 Mountain Big Sagebrush - Antelope Bitterbrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Shrubland Association
Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 Northwestern Forested Mountains
Level II: 10.1 Western Cordillera
Level III: 10.1.4 Middle Rockies
Ecological site concept
The Steep Skeletal 15 to19 inch precipitation zone. (StSk 15 to 19 inch ) is an upland ecological site with a high volume (greater than 35 percent average) of coarse fragments in the top 20 inches (50 centimeters) of the soil profile. The size of coarse fragments in the soil profile are gravel or larger, and often consists of a combination of different fragment sizes. This site is also found on slopes greater than 30 percent. The site is moderately deep to very deep to lithic restrictions and does not receive additional moisture outside of annual precipitation.
These soils:
o Are not saline, saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are moderately deep, deep, or very deep
o Have a high volume of coarse fragments (greater than 35 percent) in the top 20 inches (50 centimeters)
o Occur on slopes greater than 30 percent
The primary limiting factors shaping plant communities for this ecological site involve water holding capacity in the rooting zone. The high volume of coarse fragments allows water to rapidly drain deeper into the soil profile where it is less accessible to plants. As a result, plants that dominate these communities tend to have adaptations that allow them to be successful with less available moisture. Production values often tend to be lower than similar sites with soil profiles that are less skeletal. Moderate relative effective annual precipitation at this site may lessen the resource restrictions created by lower water holding capacity.
Associated sites
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is driven by limestone parent material and can be found adjacent to Steep Skeletal sites on the landscape. |
---|---|
BX012X02C065 |
Shallow Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found adjacent to steep skeletal where coarse fragment concentration remains high, however bedrock is closer to the surface (less than 20 |
BX012X02C070 |
Steep Loamy 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also occurs on slopes greater than 30 percent, has a loamy textures and below 35 percent coarse fragments in the top 20 |
BX012X02C068 |
Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can occur adjacent where the slope steepness drops below 30 percent, but high volumes of coarse fragments remain in the top 20 inches of the soil profile. |
BX012X02C063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is driven by limestone parent material and can be found adjacent to Steep Skeletal sites on the landscape. |
BX012X02C034 |
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can occur on steep slopes with skeletal soils, but also tends to be shallow to moderately deep to lithic contact and have higher concentrations of calcium carbonates in the top 20 |
Similar sites
BX012X02B034 |
Rocky Hills 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can occur on steep slopes with skeletal soils, but also tends to be shallow to moderately deep to lithic contact and have higher concentrations of calcium carbonates in the top 20 inches. |
---|---|
BX012X02C070 |
Steep Loamy 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also limited by steep slopes (>30 percent), but lacks high volumes of coarse fragments in the top 20 inches. |
BX012X02C068 |
Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also has an average coarse fragment concentration greater than 35 percent in the top 20 inches. |
BX012X02C065 |
Shallow Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains Like Steep Skeletal, this site has a high volume (>35 percent) of coarse fragments in the top 20 inches. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XC072ID
Physiographic features
This site can occur on mountain slope, ridge, or swale all within the mountain landscape. The site is not aspect dependent, though aspect may influence the elevation at which it occurs. Within the 15 to 19 inch relative effective annual precipitation range, transition to a forested system is increasingly likely as aspects become more Northerly. This site is influenced by slope steepness, only existing on slopes greater than 30 percent. Runoff is low to moderate and flooding and ponding do not occur.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Ridge -- A long, narrow elevation of the land surface, usually sharp crested with steep sides
and forming an extended upland between valleys.
Swale -- A shallow, open depression in unconsolidated materials that lacks a defined channel but can funnel overland or subsurface flow into a drainageway.

Figure 1. Plot showing aspect (degrees) and elevation (meters) of each Steep Skeletal 15-19" range site surveyed in the Lost River Mountain LRU
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Ridge (3) Mountains > Swale |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 2,210 – 2,500 m |
Slope | 35 – 55% |
Aspect | W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Flooding frequency | Not specified |
---|---|
Ponding frequency | Not specified |
Elevation | 1,850 – 2,860 m |
Slope | 30 – 80% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity's and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this Steep Skeletal ecological site, the effective precipitation is 15 to19 inches. Because effective precipitation is a modeled value that factors in elevation, aspect, and topography in association with mean annual precipitation, it is often a lower value than actual precipitation. Actual precipitation and temperature data were taken from Snotel stations located on the Lost River and Lemhi Range. Data was taken from Snotel sites that record actual precipitation and sit at a fixed location. Therefore, actual climatic conditions at a given ecological site can vary from data provided based on localized conditions.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 30-60 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 40-65 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 457-686 mm |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 25-75 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 40-85 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 356-787 mm |
Frost-free period (average) | 45 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 60 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 533 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this site are moderately deep to very deep, ranging from 20 to greater than 60 inches (50 to 150 centimeters) and consist of textures ranging from fine sandy loams to clay loams, often with gravelly or cobbly modifiers. Soils are skeletal, averaging 35 percent or greater coarse fragments in the top 20 inches (50 centimeters) . Soils are well to somewhat excessively well drained.
Representative Taxonomy:
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Xeric Argicryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Pachic Haplocryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Typic Argixerolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Pachic Argicryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Xeric Haplocryepts
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Xeric Haplocryolls
Sandy-skeletal, mixed, frigid Typic Haploxerepts
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Haploxerolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Argixerolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Mollic Haploxeralfs
Sandy-skeletal, mixed Xeric Haplocryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Pachic Haploxerolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Pachic Argixerolls

Figure 8. Coarse fragment percentage in each horizon of StSk 15-19" sites

Figure 9. Soil texture by horizon in StSk 15-19" sites

Figure 10.

Figure 11.
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
quartzite
(2) Colluvium – limestone (3) Colluvium – metasedimentary rock (4) Colluvium – andesite (5) Colluvium – rhyolite |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly sandy loam (2) Gravelly coarse sandy loam (3) Cobbly loam (4) Gravelly loam (5) Gravelly silt loam (6) Very cobbly loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy-skeletal (2) Sandy-skeletal |
Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
Permeability class | Moderate to rapid |
Soil depth | 152 – 203 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 39% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 11% |
Available water capacity (0-50.8cm) |
0.15 – 0.33 cm |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-50.8cm) |
6.5 – 7.2 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-50.8cm) |
25 – 46% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-50.8cm) |
0 – 10% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
---|---|
Permeability class | Moderately slow to rapid |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 50% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 39% |
Available water capacity (0-50.8cm) |
0.03 – 0.38 cm |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-50.8cm) |
6.2 – 7.3 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-50.8cm) |
16 – 61% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-50.8cm) |
0 – 22% |
Ecological dynamics
The state and transition model for the Steep Skeletal 15 to 19 inch precipitation zone ecological site consists of three states: Reference, Disturbed, and Degraded. Under these three states, there is a total of six different communities. The primary driver of transitions between states is disturbance related. The most common disturbances impacting these communities is frequent or severe fire, intensive grazing that results in chronic defoliation, and prolonged periods of drought. Transitions between state and communities is represented by shifts in plant composition, canopy cover, and production values.
The Steep Skeletal ecological site is a range ecological site existing within the greater sagebrush steppe ecosystem. This ecosite is comprised of three states: Reference, Disturbed, and Degraded. Within these states there is a total of six different communities.
The primary overstory shrub species in the Reference state is mountain big sagebrush and although many different rhizomatous and bunch grasses can exist in the understory, bluebunch wheatgrass is the primary species.
Transitions from the Reference state are driven by disturbances, both natural and anthropogenic. The two primary disturbances that impact this ecological site are fire and herbivory. To a lesser extent, climate-driven disturbances such as drought or flood can also instigate transitions within the site's range of variability. The steep slopes of this site can create frequent colluvial disturbances and promote the establishment of invasive species.
A state-and-transition model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the state-and-transition model (STM). This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference State. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the STM, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between reference states and degraded states in this ecological site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Current Reference

Figure 12. Steep Skeletal 15-19" Site in the Lost River Range

Figure 13. Steep Skeletal 15-19" Site in the White Knob Mountains
The Reference state consists of three plant communities: The mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata var. vaseyana) dominated community, the mixed shrub community, and the mixed early sagebrush community. The mixed shrub community includes mountain big sagebrush, mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), currant species (Ribes spp.) and saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia). The mixed early sagebrush community consists of little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula var. longiloba) and black sagebrush (Artemisa nova). The dominant understory in all three communities is bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegnaria spicata). The mountain big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass community is the most common community in the Reference State, and canopy cover is generally balanced between the sagebrush overstory and the bunch grass understory. The mixed shrub community often occurs as a result of very localized site condition variation. Small changes in surface fragment composition, slope shape, and site specific effective precipitation can allow for establishment of several additional overstory shrub species in outside of mountain big sagebrush. Composition and occurrence of shrub species in the mixed shrub community is variable and site specific. The mixed early sagebrush community in this ecological site is an indicator of increased coarse fragment volume within the 20 inch rooting zone of the soil profile (50cm). Although coarse fragments at this ecological site are already high, averaging above 35 percent in the top 20 inches, as the volume increases it can act as a root restriction. This creates favorable conditions for little and black sagebrush to establish. The presence of these species may also indicate a localized increase in calcium carbonate concentration in the soil profile resulting from limestone parent material. Processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that can result in state and community changes include fire, grazing, land use change, and occurrence of invasive species (Davies et al., 2011).
Characteristics and indicators. The transition between states at this ecological site is generally driven by relative annual effective precipitation and sagebrush killing disturbances or lack thereof. Historically, low to mixed severity fires occurred at relatively frequent fire return intervals of 10-25 years, limiting sagebrush canopy density and creating a mosaic of sagebrush stands and more open grasslands (Knick, Holmes, & Miller, 2005). Exclusion of fire (in conjunction with climate change) increases sagebrush canopy cover and can lead to more severe stand replacing fires, often times at more frequent intervals. These severe fires can drive shifts to grassland communities as well as create opportunities for invasive species establishment (Roadhouse, Irvine, & Bowerstock, 2020; Knick et al., 2005). Improper grazing practices can also lead to an increase in sagebrush canopy cover and increased risk of severe, stand replacing fire occurrence. Removal of understory grasses can lessen the opportunities for low severity fire occurrence which leads to increased canopy densities and increases potential for severe fire disturbance events (Knick et al., 2005).
Resilience management. This site has moderate to high resilience as a result of the cryic soil temperature regime and xeric soil moisture regime. Resistance and resilience of a specific site has been attributed with abiotic conditions favorable to plant growth and reproduction (Maestas et al. 2016). Soils that fall within the cryic (cold) temperature regime and xeric (wet) moisture regime tend to have higher diversity and production, and are therefore more resilient. This is specifically true in terms of resisting or recovering from invasion post disturbance (Maestas et al., 2016).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Mountain Big Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 14. Mountain Big Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Community in the Steep Skeletal 15-19" Reference State
This community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU, specifically when soils are well drained, skeletal and steep. Mountain big sagebrush can occur on Mollisols, Aridisols, and Inceptisols, however, is most abundant on Mollisols (Innes, 2017). As seen in this community, mountain big sagebrush has the ability to form dense monocultures with little competition from other shrub species. The understory is dominated by bunchgrasses, primarily bluebunch wheatgrass, and to a lesser extent at the higher end of the effective precipitation range, Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis). Plant diversity in mountain big sagebrush dominated communities is higher than with any other big sagebrush species primarily due to high diversity in forb species (Innes, 2017), the most common being Indian paintbrush species (Castilleja), arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), and fleabane species (Erigeron). Mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant of the big sagebrush species. On the landscape, transition from Wyoming big sagebrush and low sagebrush dominated communities to communities dominated by Mountain big sagebrush usually occurs along a gradient of increasing available soil moisture. Seedling establishment of mountain big sagebrush is highly dependent on available moisture and seedling mortality increases during periods of drought (Innes, 2017). Total annual production on this ecological in this community ranges from 600 to 1200 pounds per acre, averaging 850 pounds per acre. Canopy cover of mountain big sagebrush averages 20 percent and accounts for an average of 250 pounds per acre of annual production. Canopy cover of bluebunch wheatgrass averages 22 percent and accounts for 410 pound per acre of annual production. Although gaps in the canopy can exceed 6 feet, they are generally limited to less than 2 feet and occupy less than 6 percent of a 100 foot transect.
Resilience management. This community has moderately low resilience. Mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant of the big sagebrush species. Mountain big sagebrush is highly flammable and fire typically kills plants within the disturbance area. Because this species reproduces via seed that is dispersed through wind, water, and zoochory, distance from a viable source population plays a major role in post disturbance regeneration. When disturbance events cover a large area spatially, regeneration timespan increases and likelihood of transitioning to another state or community increases (Innes, 2017). Slow regeneration can open windows for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Post disturbance seeding and planting can increase restoration success. Bluebunch wheatgrass is a much more resilient species to the local disturbance regimes. The species is drought tolerant and usually is not killed except during the most severe wildfire events. During severe disturbances that remove the sagebrush overstory, bluebunch wheatgrass can persist as the dominant vegetation on this ecological site (Zlatnik, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
-
buckwheat (Eriogonum), other herbaceous
-
fleabane (Erigeron), other herbaceous
Figure 15. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 353 | 476 | 673 |
Shrub/Vine | 336 | 420 | 585 |
Forb | 36 | 92 | 112 |
Total | 725 | 988 | 1370 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 8-39% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 9-41% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-19% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 25-70% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-50% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-14% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-47% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 8-39% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 9-41% |
Forb basal cover | 0-19% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 25-75% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 20-60% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-4% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0% |
Figure 16. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0705, ARTRV–PSSPS-FEID. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Mixed Shrub and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 17. Steep Skeletal 15-19" Site: Community 1.2
Community 1.2 is much less common than Community 1.1 and moderately less common than Community 1.3. The Mixed Shrub Community is primarily influenced by very localized abiotic conditions. Although mountain big sagebrush usually remains the dominant overstory shrub, a diversity of other shrubs often including antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), and currant species (Ribes) may be present at varying population sizes. Antelope bitterbrush is also well suited to well drained permeable soils that are coarse textured or have a high concentration of cobbles and stones in the soil profile. It is usually found to be secondarily dominant to mountain big sagebrush. This species is often drawn to lava outcroppings and able to establish dry, rocky sites due to the presence of long taproot(s) (Zlatnik, 1999). When chokecherry is present on this ecological site, it is usually an indicator of a very localized increase in moisture with the soils remaining well drained (Johnson, 2000). This generally occurs on steep slopes and ravines near riverine systems in this LRU. Mountain snowberry, saskatoon serviceberry, and some currant species are highly adaptable to many of the conditions found on this ecological site (Aleksoff, 1999; Marshall, 1995; & Fryer, 1997). Bluebunch wheatgrass remains the primary understory species, with and increase of elk sedge (Carex geyeri) appearing towards the higher end of the relative annual effective precipitation range (19 inches).
Resilience management. This community has moderate resilience primarily attributed to the diversity in the shrub overstory. Having multiple species in the overstory reduces the chance of severe impact from insect and disease that often target a single species. Other natural disturbances such as frequent or severe fire and prolonged periods of drought will also differentially impact overstory species. Limited population loss reduces potential for increased erosion and establishment of invasive species following a disturbance. Bluebunch wheatgrass, which is the primary understory species in this ecological site is also very resilient to local disturbance regimes. The species is drought tolerant and usually is not killed except during the most severe wildfire events. During severe disturbances that remove the sagebrush overstory, bluebunch wheatgrass can persist as the dominant vegetation on this ecological site (Zlatnik, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), shrub
-
chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
cushion buckwheat (Eriogonum ovalifolium), other herbaceous
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
Figure 18. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 10. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 349 | 438 | 527 |
Grass/Grasslike | 354 | 401 | 447 |
Forb | 73 | 90 | 106 |
Total | 776 | 929 | 1080 |
Table 11. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 13-40% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 13-17% |
Forb foliar cover | 3-4% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-25% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 7-10% |
Table 12. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-2% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 0-4% |
Forb basal cover | 0-1% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-25% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 7-10% |
Figure 19. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0705, ARTRV–PSSPS-FEID. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.3
Low Sage and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

The Low Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass community within the Steep Skeletal 15 to 19 inch ecological site is rare, but generally indicates a very localized change in soil depth conditions or an increase in calcium carbonate concentration within the soil profile. Both black sagebrush (Artemesia nova) and little sagebrush (Artemesia arbuscula) are well adapted to soils that are shallow to a restrictive layer such as bedrock, clay, or tightly packed course fragments. The two species also establish well when the calcium carbonate equivalency approaches or is greater than 15 percent (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012). The two species are able to tolerate conditions of prolonged drought and limited moisture often occurring as co-dominant in the canopy. However, the more pronounced the localized restrictions become, the more likely it becomes that black sagebrush will dominate the shrub overstory (McArthur & Stevens, 2009). If depth to bedrock becomes less than 20 inches (50cm) or calcium carbonate equivalency becomes greater than 15 percent, transition occurs from the Steep Skeletal ecological site into a shallow site or a site that is strongly influenced by soil chemistry. Of the sites surveyed in this community, black sagebrush has tended to occupy a greater percentage of the canopy and account for a greater volume of the annual production when compared with little sagebrush. Gaps in shrub canopy average 37.5 percent, with 19 percent of those gaps greater than 3.1 feet in length. Total annual production in this community is slightly lower than that of Community 1.1 and 1.2, averaging just under 600 pounds per acre. Bluebunch wheatgrass is the primary understory species, accounting for up to 175 pounds per acre of production and 15 percent of the total canopy cover.
Resilience management. Resilience in this community is slightly higher than that of Community 1.1, as both black sagebrush and little sagebrush are more drought tolerant species than mountain big sagebrush. Resilience to insect and disease in this community is greater when the shrub canopy is more evenly populated by black and little sagebrush, decreasing the likelihood of complete die off in the event of a related disturbance.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Figure 20. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 13. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 308 | 375 | 443 |
Grass/Grasslike | 207 | 230 | 267 |
Forb | – | 28 | 56 |
Total | 515 | 633 | 766 |
Table 14. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 17-25% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 13-20% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-5% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 5-30% |
Table 15. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-4% |
Forb basal cover | 0-1% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-55% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0% |
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2


Transition from Community 1.1 to Community 1.2 is generally a result of localized abiotic conditions relating to relative annual effective precipitation (REAP), slope steepness, position on slope, and surface fragment. Slight increases in REAP, slope steepness greater than 50 percent, increase in surface fragment volume, or a combination of these factors can create conditions suitable to a wider range of shrub species outside of big and low sagebrush.
Context dependence. Transition to this community often occurs on the boundaries or transitional zones of the ecological site. As the slight changes in abiotic characteristics that allow for a more diverse shrub overstory become more pronounced, transition to a different ecological site will occur.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3


Transition from Community 1.1 to 1.3 is a result of slight localized changes to soil depth or chemistry within the rooting depth. Both low sage species, black and little sagebrush are well adapted to shallow and calcareous soils. Within Steep Skeletal 15 to 19 inch ecological sites, variations in depth to bedrock or localized increase in calcium carbonate concentration can result in shifts from a mountain big sagebrush dominated site to a site dominated by black sagebrush, little sagebrush, or a mixed population of the two. Mountain big sagebrush can still exist within the canopy of this community, however canopy cover is greatly decreased compared with that of Community 1.1.
Context dependence. The changes in abiotic conditions that drive the transition from Community 1.1 to 1.3 usually occur at or near the transition zones of other ecological sites. As these conditions become more prominent and reach certain levels, the ecological site changes.
State 2
Disturbed

Figure 21. Steep Skeletal 15-19" Ecological Site in the Disturbed State
The disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance events that result in widespread sagebrush mortality at a given site. The primary natural disturbance resulting in sagebrush mortality at this ecological site is frequent or severe wildfire; however, flooding, intense freeze events, and insect and disease can also occur. Of the big sagebrush species, mountain big sagebrush is particularly susceptible to stand replacing fires and often experiences complete canopy loss during moderate and severe wildfire events (Innes, 2017). Because this LRU exists primarily on publicly managed lands (US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and State), widespread anthropogenic disturbance events are infrequent. Examples of anthropogenic disturbance events include brush management through sagebrush mowing or removal treatments, chemical treatments, or improper grazing techniques that result in high intensity hoof disturbance or chronic defoliation. A combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbance is possible and can result in increased severity of disturbance, decreased resilience, and greater difficulty returning to the reference state. For example, improper grazing practices post fire disturbance can increase bare ground cover, increase erosion potential, and slow the reestablishment of grass species that preclude the return of overstory sagebrush canopy (Zlatnik, 1999).
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the disturbed state is a near complete loss of overstory sagebrush species, often replaced by shrub species that are able to take advantage of the local disturbance regime such as Artemisia tripartita (threetip sagebrush) and Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus (yellow rabbitbrush). A shift towards an increase in native and disturbance tolerant grasses and forbs is likely with the removal of resource competition associated with the sagebrush overstory presence. Severe disturbance events also increase the opportunity for invasion of annual grasses and weeds such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and thistle species. The canopy cover percentage of these species is usually dependent on distance of a seed source post disturbance, but mostly stays under five percent (Zlatnik, 1999).
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is moderate. Many of the post disturbance grasses and shrubs that are common in this state establish quickly and reach a representative canopy within 10 years post disturbance, continuing to increase until overstory canopy of sagebrush begins to return. However, local resilience of these sites in this state is highly dependent on current soil moisture availability, seed sources, timing and severity of the disturbance. In the instance of severe or frequent fire disturbance, bluebunch wheatgrass mortality can be significantly lower if the fire occurs in the spring as opposed to fall, and recovery can be impacted by quantity of immediate post fire precipitation (Zlatnik, 1999). More severe disturbances increase possibility of post disturbance invasion. The greater the establishment of invasives, the lower the site resilience becomes.
Dominant plant species
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Community 2.1
Three Tip Sagebrush, Yellow Rabbitbrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 22. Community 2.1: Threetip Sagebrush Overstory with a Bluebunch Wheatgrass Understory
Community 2.1 is driven by the disturbance related removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in complete or nearly complete removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment and canopy cover of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance tolerant shrubs. Threetip sagebrush has the ability to re-sprout from the roots or crown. In Eastern Idaho, threetip sagebrush has shown to have significant post fire sprouting potential. Repeated instances of fire disturbance promote continued increase and dominance of threetip sagebrush in the overstory canopy (Tirmenstein, 1999). Yellow rabbitbrush can quickly and aggressively establish on sites post disturbance and is considered as a seral species to sagebrush dominated overstory canopies. Although rabbitbrush populations are usually greatest within 15 years post disturbance, the species rarely becomes dominant except in the instance of repeated disturbance over short periods of time. After 15 years if no additional disturbance occurs, yellow rabbitbrush populations begin to diminish as they are replaced with sagebrush species (Tirmenstein, 1999). Bluebunch wheatgrass is rarely harmed by fire except during the most severe events. The species is able to reduce the amount of heat transfer to the root systems, promoting successful regrowth (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997). Studies have shown that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass dominated systems are able to return to pre fire production levels eight years post disturbance (Zlatnick, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Figure 23. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 16. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 324 | 340 | 354 |
Shrub/Vine | 244 | 263 | 284 |
Forb | 7 | 15 | 21 |
Total | 575 | 618 | 659 |
Table 17. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 22-30% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 25-30% |
Forb foliar cover | 2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-35% |
Table 18. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-2% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-3% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-35% |
Figure 24. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0705, ARTRV–PSSPS-FEID. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 2.2
Mixed Grass and Forb

Figure 25. Mixed bunchgrass community with visible disturbance maintained sagebrush edge (Site 2021ID7032023)

Figure 26. Site: 2021ID7032023
The mixed grass and forb community is driven by the disturbance related removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in complete or nearly complete removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment and canopy cover of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance tolerant shrubs. The primary sagebrush removing disturbance at this ecological site is fire. The frequency and severity of these fire disturbances is highly influenced by the overstory composition of the specific site in the reference state. The composition and extent of the sagebrush species in the overstory impacts that respective fire regime. At sites dominated either solely by black sage, alkali sage, or varying combinations of the two, fire return intervals are less frequent. Additionally, fires are usually low to moderate in severity and don't cover a large spatial extent (Steinberg, 2002 & Fryer, 2009). Black and alkali sagebrush dominated communities often lack fuels sufficient for frequent fire return intervals, severe fire events, or large fire events (Fryer, 2009). Steep Skeletal sites with an overstory canopy at least partially comprised with mountain big sagebrush are more susceptible to frequent fire return intervals, more severe fires, and often at a greater extent. Sites dominated by mountain big sagebrush communities have historically burned more frequently than sites dominated by other sagebrush species because the soil moisture and temperature regimes required by mountain big sagebrush are also more apt to produce an increased amount of fine fuels from other plant species (Innes, 2017).
Resilience management. This plant community is moderately resilient because the grasses and forbs that dominate the composition are resistant to a variety of disturbances and able to re-establish quickly in the event of more severe disturbances. Both bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegenaria spicata) and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) are rarely harmed by fire events except for in the most severe instances. Both plants are able to reduce the amount of heat transfer to the root systems, leaving them able to recover successfully (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997). Studies have shown that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass dominated systems are able to return to pre fire production levels eight years post disturbance (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg's bluegrass has been shown to fully re-establish post plowing disturbance events in as little as seven years after the plowing (Howard, 1997). Idaho fescue (Festuca Idahoensis) is less resilient to both fires and grazing. Idaho fescue can often survive low severity fires, however, moderate to severe fires are more destructive, resulting in a 30 year return to pre-disturbance levels. In terms of grazing disturbance, Idaho fescue is considered a decreaser and doesn't tolerate heavy grazing pressure well (Zouhar, 2000). Although many of the species in this state are at least somewhat resilient towards many of the disturbances encountered, available soil moisture, post disturbance weather, and rest from grazing all play an important role in how quickly a site can recover following a disturbance event. Both of the common shrub species found in this community at varying compositions are not only disturbance tolerant, but tend to increase with disturbance. Both yellow rabbitbrush and rubber rabbitbrush are often the first shrub species to re-establish on this ecological site following a disturbance, and can increase in relation to the severity or frequency of the disturbance. Although yellow rabbitbrush can exist in relatively small numbers within the reference state, it can only become the dominant shrub species in highly disturbed systems (Terminstein, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
Figure 27. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 19. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 504 | 829 | 1009 |
Shrub/Vine | – | 95 | 224 |
Forb | 17 | 29 | 84 |
Total | 521 | 953 | 1317 |
Table 20. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0-8% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-5% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 5-20% |
Table 21. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-2% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-6% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 5-20% |
Figure 28. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1205, FEID-PSSPS. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2


Transition from Community 2.1 to 2.2 is a result of a severe sagebrush removing disturbance that eliminates the overstory shrub cover and discourages future shrub recovery. This transition is usually temporary as threetip sagebrush tends to sprout well following disturbances events (or repeated disturbance events) of low to moderate severity (Termenstein, 1999). If the disturbance were severe enough and existing threetip are unable to sprout, the transition to a mixed grass/fob community could be more permanent.
Context dependence. For this transition to occur, the causal disturbance must be severe enough to remove the overstory sagebrush canopy.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1


Transition from Community 2.2 to 2.1 is a result of time without a sagebrush canopy removing disturbance. Threetip sagebrush in particular has shown to vigorously sprout following disturbances of varying severities. In these instances, return to pre-disturbance canopy levels generally occurs within 25 to 40 years (Termenstein et al., 1999).
Context dependence. For threetip sagebrush canopy to return to dominance, a viable sprouting population or nearby seed source must exist on site.
State 3
Degraded

Figure 29. Site: 2021ID7033139 - Post fire disturbance invaded state
When a Steep Skeletal 15 to 19 inch site enters the degraded state, it is generally a result of post disturbance invasion by invasive species. This state can be driven by a particularly severe disturbance either in the form of frequent or severe fire, intensive grazing that results in chronic defoliation of vegetation, land use, or repeated disturbances of low to moderate severity over short periods of time. Proximity to seed source as well as seed transport vectors play a role in likelihood of post disturbance invasion.
Characteristics and indicators. In this state, total canopy cover and production values for mid to large sized bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass will decrease. Traditional overstory cover and production of mountain big sagebrush and other shrubs will also decrease. These openings in the canopy will be filled with invasive annuals such as cheatgrass (Bromus techtorum) and more disturbance tolerant forbs such as phlox species, vetch species, an Indian paintbrush (Castilleja sp.). Continued disturbance will increase cover and production of these species. Productivity and canopy cover are lower than the reference state and shifted towards the understory grass species and forbs, particularly the invasive annuals.
Resilience management. This site has low resilience primarily due to the invasive species establishment. Cheatgrass is well adapted to post disturbance establishment, particularly after wildfire disturbances. Cheatgrass takes advantage of prolific seedbanks resilient to fire and its ability to rapidly establish when competition from native vegetation has been removed. Additionally, cheatgrass is able to alter fire regimes, shortening fire return intervals which provides a further advantage for cheatgrass and hinders re-establishment of native vegetation (Zouhar, 2003). Once fully established, restoration of sites invaded by cheatgrass either through natural or mechanical means has low success rates.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
-
tapertip hawksbeard (Crepis acuminata), other herbaceous
Community 3.1
Yellow Rabbitbrush and Cheatgrass

Figure 30. Site: 2021ID7033139
The Yellow Rabbitbrush and Cheatgrass (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus/Bromus techtorum) community becomes dominant on a site in the Degraded State where native vegetation has been removed or severely altered by either natural or anthropogenic disturbances. Once cheatgrass has established, the species can outcompete the native vegetation that it replaced and promote feedback loops (such as shortened fire return intervals) that help perpetuate dominance (Zouhar, 2003). Yellow rabbitbrush is able to take advantage of its ability to aggressively sprout and rapidly grow following a disturbance. Once established in the overstory, yellow rabbitbrush needs continued frequent disturbances to stay dominant in the shrub overstory. In the absence of disturbance, yellow rabbitbrush will remain dominant for about 15 years before beginning to be replaced by shrub species from the reference community.
Resilience management. This community has high resilience as it is primarily disturbance driven. The dominant overstory and understory species are highly disturbance tolerant. Frequent disturbance regimes tend to perpetuate the dominance of this community.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
tapertip hawksbeard (Crepis acuminata), other herbaceous
-
granite prickly phlox (Linanthus pungens), other herbaceous
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
Figure 31. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 22. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 319 | 460 | 600 |
Grass/Grasslike | 266 | 289 | 313 |
Forb | 31 | 36 | 40 |
Total | 616 | 785 | 953 |
Table 23. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 16-22% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 21-37% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-4% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-12% |
Table 24. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-5% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-12% |
Figure 32. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0702, POSE/ BRTE- ANNUALS. State 2.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2


Transition from the reference to the disturbed state is primarily a mechanism of moderate to severe disturbance, both natural and anthropogenic. At this ecological site, the most likely disturbance to cause this transition is frequent or severe wildfire. Other disturbances include but are not limited to flooding events, freeze kill events, insect and disease, overgrazing that results in chronic defoliation, and mechanical brush removal.
Constraints to recovery. Primary constraint to recovery is distance to seed source and time. When the disturbance is severe enough and the extent is great, seed source populations for sagebrush species may be removed from the vicinity. In this case, immigration and re-establishment of overstory sagebrush species can be slow. Re-establishment to pre disturbance canopy cover and extent of mountain big sagebrush cover generally exceeds 25 years even under ideal conditions (Innes, 2017). This time period can be greatly reduced through seeding and planting interventions.
Context dependence. The primary factors driving likelihood of restoration success are post disturbance weather patterns and distance from viable seed source. Disturbances that cover larger extent increase distance to seed sources and prolonged periods of drought can slow restoration processes. Alternately, average to above average precipitation post disturbance can greatly increase speed and success in re-establishment of sagebrush species (Robin, 2017; Steinberg, 2002; and Fryer, 2009).
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3


The transition from the reference state to the Degraded state is primarily a mechanism of severe disturbance and post disturbance establishment of invasive species. The most likely disturbance events in this LRU associated with transition to this state are severe or frequent wildfire events and repeated overgrazing that results in chronic defoliation. Following a severe disturbance, invasive and disturbance tolerant species will rapidly establish, preventing native vegetation from recovering. Other possible disturbances include but are not limited to flooding events, freeze kill events, insect and disease, and mechanical brush removal.
Constraints to recovery. The most significant constraint to recovery in this state is establishment of non-native vegetation and disturbance tolerant plants. Once established, these species are able to outcompete native vegetation preventing those species from recovering to pre-disturbance levels. Effective treatment options are limited once significant populations of cheatgrass have established. Using prescribed or natural fire in conjunction with post fire seeding of native vegetation has shown success, however, reverting to cheatgrass canopy covers under five percent and returning to the reference state is highly unlikely (Zouhar, 2003).
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1


The most important mechanism driving restoration from the disturbed state to the reference is time without sagebrush removing disturbances and distance from overstory species (sagebrush) seed source. Seeding or planting of desired overstory species in the reference state can speed restoration efforts.
Context dependence. Restoration is highly dependent on time without disturbance. New sagebrush seedlings that are able to establish on a site are moderately sensitive to disturbances such as flood, freeze, and insect and disease. They are highly sensitive to herbivory and even low severity fire occurrence (Fryer, 2009 & Steinberg 2002). Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process, however, regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during the restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above normal precipitation aid in sagebrush regeneration and establishment (Innes, 2017; Steinberg 2002 & Fryer, 2009).
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3


Transition from the disturbed state to the degraded state results from repeated low to moderate severity disturbances at frequent intervals or single high severity disturbance events. Invasive species and disturbance tolerant vegetation establish prior to native vegetation, preventing recovery to even disturbed state levels.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery primarily involve energy and resource expenditure to remove invasive species and return native plant cover. Once the degraded state is reached, invasive species such as cheatgrass have become well established on site. Eliminating these species and returning native plant cover is costly and resource intensive with low success rates.
Additional community tables
Table 25. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 78–933 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 78–740 | 7–35 | ||
Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | 0–280 | 0–7 | ||
mallow ninebark | PHMA5 | Physocarpus malvaceus | 0–127 | 0–8 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–118 | 0–4 | ||
winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 0–108 | 0–2 | ||
currant | RIBES | Ribes | 0–45 | 0–2 | ||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 0–43 | 0–2 | ||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 0–26 | 0–1 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 0–10 | 0 | ||
juniper | JUNIP | Juniperus | 0–10 | 0 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–10 | 0 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–9 | 0–1 | ||
pricklypear | OPUNT | Opuntia | – | 0–1 | ||
Woods' rose | ROWO | Rosa woodsii | – | 0 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 118–947 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 112–874 | 5–40 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–717 | 0–7 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 0–168 | 0–6 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–108 | 0–2 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–21 | 0–1 | ||
muttongrass | POFE | Poa fendleriana | 0–11 | 0–1 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–386 | |||||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
fernleaf licorice-root | LIFI | Ligusticum filicinum | 0–43 | 0–2 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–36 | 0–1 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 0–30 | 0–2 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–20 | 0–1 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–20 | 0–1 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–18 | 0–3 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–17 | 0–1 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–17 | 0–1 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 0–17 | 0 | ||
onion | ALLIU | Allium | 0–17 | 0 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–17 | 0 | ||
cushion buckwheat | EROV | Eriogonum ovalifolium | 0–16 | 2 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
sulphur-flower buckwheat | ERUM | Eriogonum umbellatum | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 0–10 | 0 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0–10 | 0 | ||
pincushion cactus | PEDIO | Pediocactus | 0–8 | 0 | ||
rockcress | ARABI2 | Arabis | – | 0 | ||
larkspur | DELPH | Delphinium | – | 0 | ||
Blue Mountain buckwheat | ERST4 | Eriogonum strictum | – | 0 | ||
western stoneseed | LIRU4 | Lithospermum ruderale | – | 0 | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | – | 0 | ||
plains pricklypear | OPPO | Opuntia polyacantha | – | 0 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | – | 0 | ||
yellow salsify | TRDU | Tragopogon dubius | – | 0 |
Table 26. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 241–510 | |||||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 224–510 | 20–25 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 6–177 | 0–15 | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 20 | 2 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 6 | 0 | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 6 | 0 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 157–275 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 138–196 | 10–15 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 20–84 | 3–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–56 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–28 | 3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–22 | 0–1 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–17 | 1 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–6 | 0–1 | ||
pincushion cactus | PEDIO | Pediocactus | 0–6 | 0–1 | ||
common dandelion | TAOF | Taraxacum officinale | 0–6 | 0–1 | ||
plains pricklypear | OPPO | Opuntia polyacantha | – | 1 |
Table 27. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 224–303 | |||||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 196–269 | 7–30 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–84 | 0 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–34 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 308–370 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 224–303 | 15–20 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 67–84 | 2–10 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | – | 0 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–28 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–11 | 0–2 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0–6 | 0–2 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–6 | 0–2 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–6 | 0–2 |
Table 28. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 0–280 | |||||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–168 | 0–4 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–84 | 0–3 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–56 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 504–1009 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 336–729 | 8–30 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 0–196 | 0–5 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–168 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 17–84 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–28 | 0–3 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 0–28 | 0–3 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–22 | 0–2 | ||
yellow salsify | TRDU | Tragopogon dubius | 0–22 | 0–1 |
Table 29. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 179–740 | |||||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–224 | 0–10 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 34–179 | 1–20 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–112 | 0–5 | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 0–56 | 0–3 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–34 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 242–336 | |||||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 90–202 | 5–35 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 17–112 | 1–6 | ||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 0–56 | 0–3 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–56 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 27–45 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Steep Skeletal ecological site within the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset. These numbers can be used to estimate stocking rates; however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at a specific location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre):
Reference State:
1.1 - 680-850-1200
1.2 - 705-840-960
1.3 - 460-565-690
Disturbed:
2.1 - 500-575-625
2.2 - 465-840-1175
Degraded:
3.1 - 470-565-680
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush steppe in the Lost River Mountain LRU provide critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountains. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG) in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, northern end of the Pahsimeroi mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana) - Communities 1.1/1.2:
Mountain big sagebrush is considered to be highly palatable by most wildlife browsers (Rosenstrater, 2005). Sage grouse, ungulates, and rodents browse mountain big sagebrush primarily during the winter when it becomes one of the more palatable available forages. However, seasonal snow levels can exclude many browsing species. Several studies have shown that Mountain big sagebrush is a preferred forage by elk, mule deer, and sage grouse when compared to the other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017).
Black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) - Community 1.3:
Mule deer and pronghorn use black sagebrush habitats extensively. Use is especially heavy by mule deer in early decades post fire disturbance (Communities 1.3 and 3.1). This is most prevalent within the first three decades after the fire event (Fryer, 2009). Black sagebrush dominated sites have been shown as great winter ranges for pronghorn (Kindschy et al., 1982) and pronghorn winter distribution has been strongly associated with black sagebrush communities (Clary & Beale, 1983).
Sage grouse are obligate species of black and other sagebrush varieties. Generally, big sagebrush communities are preferred by sage grouse, however some black sagebrush sites on the Snake River Plains and in Nevada have shown to be preferred winter grounds for feeding and cover (Dalke et al., 1963).
Other species of note that have shown to rely on black sagebrush communities include great basin pocket mice, Ord's kangaroo rats, sage thrashers, and a large variety of insect pollinator species (Fryer, 2009).
Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula longiloba) - Community 1.3:
In early spring and winter, little sagebrush is often a preferred forage species for mule deer (Blaisdell et al., 1982). In the Great Basin, little sagebrush dominated sites have shown to be heavily utilized by pronghorn during the summer (Kindschy et al., 1982). Little sagebrush, among other varieties is an important forage source for sage grouse throughout the year (Steinberg, 2002).
Threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. tripartita) - Community 2.1:
Generally, three tip sagebrush is not a preferred browse species for most wild ungulates. It can be used to a minor extent by mule deer in both the winter and summer and as emergency forage for other large ungulates (Tirmenstein, 1999.)
Antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) - Community 1.2:
Antelope bitterbrush is a very important browse species for pronghorn, mule deer, elk, bighorn sheep and moose. This is especially true towards the end of the summer season when the forage becomes more valuable. Mule deer diets in September can be comprised of up to 91 percent antelope bitterbrush when available. The species becomes a critical food source for many wild ungulates during the winter season (Zlatnik, 1999). Antelope bitterbrush is also important to many insect species including pogonomyrmex ants which utilize the seed for food and tent caterpillars which utilize the canopy (Furniss, 1983).
Mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus) - Community 1.2:
Mountain snowberry can be a valuable early season forage for wild ungulates as it is one of the first palatable species to leaf out in the spring. In high elevation summer ranges it is an important forage species for deer and elk. The fruits are utilized by a few upland birds such as grouse, pheasants, and magpies (Aleksoff, 1999).
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata) - All states/communities:
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on Western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, utilization of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) - Community 1.1 and 1.2
When available, Idaho fescue can be a dominant component to many wild ungulate diets, including pronghorn, deer, elk, and bighorn sheep. In some instances depending on other available forage, the species can be considered as valuable but not preferred forage for ungulates. The species is a valuable component to the diet of the northern pocket gopher and grizzly bear when it is found within their range.
Hydrological functions
Water in the form of annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid and soil permeability is moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals including antelope, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies.
The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site ID's and data collection intensity for each site used in development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include Line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involved a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
(Order = Site ID, state/community phase, location, and survey intensity)
2019ID7031029 1.1 White Knob Mtns High
2021ID7031228 1.1 Lemhi Range High
2020ID7032172 1.1 Lost River Range High
2020ID7034232 1.1 Lost River Range High
2021ID7035006 1.1 Lost River Range High
2019ID7031023 1.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2019ID7031027 1.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2019ID7031100 1.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2021ID7031221 1.1 Lost River Range Low
2021ID7035003 1.1 Lost River Range Low
2021ID7035002 1.1 Lemhi Range Low
2019ID7031092 1.2 White Knob Mtns Low
2021ID7031225 1.2 Lost River Range Low
2019ID7033026 1.3 White Knob Mtns Low
2021ID7031217 1.3 Lemhi Range High
2020ID7031192 1.3 Lemhi Range Low
2021ID7033196 1.3 Lemhi Range Low
2019ID7031096 2.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2019ID7031097 2.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2021ID7032023 2.2 Lemhi Range Low
2019ID7032033 3.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2021ID7033139 3.1 Lemhi Range Low
Other references
Aleksoff, Keith C. 1999. Symphoricarpos oreophilus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, K.M. Havstad, B. Alexander, G. Chavez, and J.E. Herrick. 2003. Development and Use of State and Transition Models for Rangelands. Jornal of Range Management 56:114–126.
Bestelmeyer, B. and J.R. Brown. 2005. State-and-Transition Models 101: a Fresh Look at Vegetation Change.
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, J.E. Herrick, D.A. Trujillo, and K.M. Havstad. 2004. Land Management in the American Southwest: a state-and-transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environmental Management 34:38–51.
Bestelmeyer, B.T., K. Moseley, P.L. Shaver, H. Sanchez, D.D. Briske, and M.E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2010. Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models. Rangelands 32:23–30.
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Chambers, J.C., J.L. Beck, T.J. Christiansen, K.J. Clause, J.B. Dinkins, K.E. Doherty, K.A. Griffin, D.W. Havlina, K.F. Henke, L.L. Kurth, J.D. Maestas, M. Manning, K.E. Mayer, B.A. Mealor, C. McCarthy, M.A. Perea, and D.A. Pyke. 2016. Using resilience and resistance concepts to manage threats to sagebrush ecosystems, Gunnison sage-grouse, and Greater sage-grouse in their eastern range: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-356.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 1–143.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Esipinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A. Wuenschel. 2014. Using resistance and resilience concepts to reduce impacts of invasive annual grasses and altered fire regimes on the sagebrush ecosystem and greater sage-grouse: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-326.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station., Fort Collins, CO. 73.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Daubenmire, R. F. (1940). Plant Succession Due to Overgrazing in the Agropyron Bunchgrass Prairie of Southeastern Washington. Ecology, 21(1), 55–64.
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html
Forest Service Remote Automoted Weather Station (Bonanza & Copper Basin). Retrieved from: Western Regional Climate Center. October, 2022. https://wrcc.dri.edu/
Francis, John K. ed. 2004. Wildland shrubs of the United States and its Territories: thamnic descriptions: volume 1. Gen. Tech. Rep. IITF-GTR-26. San Juan, PR: USDA, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, and Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 830 p.
Fryer, Janet L. 1997. Amelanchier alnifolia. In: Fire Effects
Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Furniss, Malcolm M. 1983. Entomology of antelope bitterbrush. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Johnson, Kendall L., compilers. Proceedings--research and management of bitterbrush and cliffrose in western North America; 1982 April 13-15; Salt Lake City, UT. General Technical Report INT-152. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 164-172.
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Johnson, Kathleen A. 2000. Prunus virginiana. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
Kirk W. Davies, Jon D. Bates, Rory O'Connor. 2021. Long-term evaluation of restoring understories in Wyoming big sagebrush communities with mowing and seeding native bunchgrasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 75, Pages 81-90.
Knick, S.T.; Holmes, A.L.; Miller, Richard F. 2005. The role of fire in structuring sagebrush habitats and bird communities. Pages 63-75 In: Saab, Victoria A.; Powell, Hugh D. W. (eds.). Fire and Avian Ecology in North America. Studies in Avian Biology No. 30. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.
Marshall, K. Anna. 1995. Ribes montigenum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
McArthur and Stevens. 2009. Composite Shrubs. In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw [compilers]. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-136-vol-2. p. 493-537.
Miller, M., Belnap, J., Beatty, S., Reynolds, R. (2006). Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in Relation to Soil Properties, Water Additions, and Chemical Amendments in Calcareous Soils of Southeastern Utah, USA. Canyonlands Research. 288. 10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Rodhouse TJ, Irvine KM and Bowersock L (2020) Post-Fire Vegetation Response in a Repeatedly Burned Low-Elevation Sagebrush Steppe Protected Area Provides Insights About Resilience and Invasion Resistance. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:584726.
Rosentreter, Roger. 2005. Sagebrush identification, ecology, and palatability relative to sage-grouse. In: Shaw, Nancy L.; Pellant, Mike; Monsen, Stephen B., eds. Sage-grouse habitat restoration symposium proceedings; 2001 June 4-7; Boise, ID. Proc. RMRS-P-38. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 3-16
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [1]. 2012. Plant Guide for black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [2]. 2012. Plant Guide for low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tripartita. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttrp/all.html [2023, January 18].
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Pascopyrum smithii. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2022, October 25].
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Purshia tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zouhar, Kristin L. 2000. Festuca idahoensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zouhar, Kris. 2003. Bromus tectorum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Contributors
Zachary Van Abbema
Carla Rebernak
Grant Petersen
Kirt Walstad
Marji Patz
Karen Clause
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/19/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Nicholas Kozlowski
Katelyn Palmer
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Zachary Van Abbema |
---|---|
Contact for lead author |
Zachary Van Abbema zachary.vanabbema@usda.gov |
Date | 10/11/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not present in the reference condition. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon in the reference condition. When present, they usually occur on steeper slopes (>15 percent) and are inconspicuous, disconnected, and very short in length. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes: Pedestals are not evident in the reference condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is between 3-17 percent, however, averaging 12 %. This refers to exposed mineral soil not covered by litter, rock, basal cover, plant cover, standing dead, lichen and/or moss. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gullies are not present in the reference condition. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind scoured, or depositional areas are not evident in the reference condition. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Movement of fine herbaceous litter may occur within less than a foot from where it originated. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil Surface Stable with Stability Ratings of 4-6 (both under canopy and bare). Abiotic crusts and or root mats may be present. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface structure is granular with the A horizon ranging from 0 -35cm thick, averaging 19 cm thick. Predominant A horizon colors are 10YR 3/3, 10YR 3/2, or 10YR 2/2. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plants are evenly distributed across the ecological site and the shrubs and bunchgrasses present improved infiltration as well as protect against runoff. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Not present. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Mountain big sagebrush = Bluebunch wheatgrassSub-dominant:
Remaining grass species > Remaining shrub speciesOther:
Arrowleaf balsamroot = Buckwheat > Hoods phloxAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Mortality in herbaceous species is not evident. Species with bunch growth forms may have some natural mortality in centers. Sagebrush species will become decadent in the absence of historical fire return intervals. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Total ground litter cover varies but can range from 25-70 percent averaging 35 percent. Depth is usually shallow at less than 1/8 inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production ranges from 600 - 1200 lbs/acre, averaging 850 lbs/per acre. Production varies based on effective precipitation and natural variability of soil properties for this ecological site. Total production is slightly higher for perennial grass species, but tends to be split mostly equal between grasses and shrubs. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invasive species include cheatgrass, spotted knapweed, toadflax, and crested wheatgrass. Native species such a yellow rabbitbrush or significant populations of Sandberg bluegrass or rhizomatous wheatgrasses can indicate a departure from the reference state. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in most years. Bluebunch wheatgrass may not reproduce during extended periods of drought.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.