

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02C070
Steep Loamy 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/19/2025
Accessed: 05/19/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 012X, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in Idaho. MLRA 012X is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources, and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mt. Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869 meters). Annual precipitation has a significant range from six to 47 inches, with the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly east of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from Salmon, Idaho to the north, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the south, the Beaverhead Mountain Range to the east, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the west. This LRU borders MLRA 043B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 010X - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet). The boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M170 Great Basin-Intermountain Dry Shrubland & Grassland Macrogroup
G304 Intermountain Mountain Big Sagebrush Steppe and Shrubland Group
A3208 Mountain Big Sagebrush - Mixed Steppe and Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001032 Mountain Big Sagebrush - Mountain Snowberry/Idaho Fescue Shrubland Association
Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 Northwestern Forested Mountains
Level II: 10.1 Western Cordillera
Level III: 10.1.4 Middle Rockies
Ecological site concept
This site does not receive additional water and occurs on slopes of 30 percent or greater.
These soils:
o Are not saline, saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are not highly calcareous within the top 50 centimeters.
o Are moderately deep, deep, or very deep
o Consist of fine sandy loam to clay loam textures (includes silt loams, loams, and sandy clay loams)
o Are highly productive
The primary resource limitation for this ecological site is relative effective annual precipitation. This site is not impacted by soil depth, soil chemistry, slope steepness, or high volumes of course fragments within the soil profile.
Associated sites
BX012X02C068 |
Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains Transition to this site can occur as coarse fragment volume in the top 50cm averages greater than 35 percent and slopes drop below 30 percent. |
---|---|
BX012X02C034 |
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can occur adjacent or interspersed where localized areas of bedrock are closer to the surface. |
BX012X02C072 |
Steep Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also occurs on steep slopes, however, the volume of coarse fragments in the top 50cm averages greater than 35 percent. |
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be adjacent and contain similar plant communities, however, soils are highly calcareous in the 25-50cm range. |
Similar sites
BX012X02C022 |
Loamy 15 to 19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has many of the same soil characteristics, however, occurs on slopes less than 30 percent. |
---|---|
BX012X02C072 |
Steep Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also has slopes greater than 30 percent, however, coarse fragment volume is greater than 35 percent in the top 50cm. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XC070ID
Physiographic features
This site can occur on mountain slopes, stream terraces, swales, and ravines, within the mountain landscape of the Lost River Mountains LRU. This site is not aspect-dependent, however, aspect can influence the elevation at which it occurs. This site has steep slopes, occurring from 30 to 75 percent.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Swale -- A shallow, open depression in unconsolidated materials that lacks a defined channel but can funnel overland or subsurface flow into a drainageway.
Ravine -- A small stream channel; narrow, steep-sided, commonly V-shaped in cross section and larger than a gully, cut in unconsolidated materials.
Stream Terrace -- One, or a stepped series of flat-topped landforms of alluvium in a stream valley, that flank and are parallel to the stream channel.
Drainageway -- A general term for a course or channel along which water moves in draining an area.

Figure 1. Lot of Steep Loamy 15-19" sites based on elevation and aspect.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Swale (3) Mountains > Stream terrace (4) Mountains > Ravine |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 6,744 – 7,216 ft |
Slope | 35 – 53% |
Aspect | W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Flooding frequency | Not specified |
---|---|
Ponding frequency | Not specified |
Elevation | 6,729 – 7,670 ft |
Slope | 32 – 62% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this Loamy ecological site, the effective precipitation is 15 to 19 inches. Effective precipitation is a modeled value that considers annual precipitation, aspect, elevation, slope, and slope shape. Often this value will be greater than or less than annual precipitation values in relation to these other characteristics. Below 15 inches and above 19 inches, a notable shift will occur in dominant plant community composition, canopy cover, and production value. Because of the loamy textures present at this ecological site, higher amounts of available moisture may be present when compared to adjacent ecological sites in the same climatic subset.
Precipitation and temperature data were taken from representative Snotel stations in the area. Snotel and other weather monitoring stations in the mountains of MLRA 12 are limited, so climatic values may not specifically represent the range of conditions present at a given ecological site. Frost-free days are calculated for temperature and moisture regimes in MLRA 12.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 30-60 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 40-65 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 18-27 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 25-75 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 40-85 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 14-31 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 45 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 60 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 21 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this site are moderately deep to very deep, ranging from 20 to greater than 60 inches (50 to 150 centimeters) and consist of textures including loams, sandy loams, sandy clay loams, and silty loams. These soils will occasionally present with gravelly or cobbly modifiers. Soils are not skeletal and generally well drained. The loamy textures lend to increased plant diversity and production as a result of increased moisture availability.
Major soil components correlated to this site include:
Primeaux, Amelar, Shakespeare, Etchen, Cloudless, and Howcan.
Additional minor soil components correlated to this site include:
Redbird and Justesen.
Representative Taxonomy:
Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive Pachic Argicryolls
Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Haploxeralfs
Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Mollic Haploxeralfs
Coarse-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Pachic Haploxerolls
Fine, loamy mixed, superactive, frigid Pachic Argixerolls

Figure 8. Profile of 10 Steep Loamy 15-19" Sites in the Lost River Mountain LRU.
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
rhyolite
(2) Colluvium – volcanic rock (3) Colluvium – metasedimentary rock |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Loam (2) Silt loam (3) Sandy loam (4) Clay loam (5) Sandy clay loam (6) Gravelly loam (7) Gravelly sandy loam (8) Gravelly silt loam (9) Gravelly clay loam (10) Gravelly sandy clay loam (11) Cobbly sandy clay loam |
Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
Permeability class | Moderately slow to moderately rapid |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 20% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 7% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
2.5 – 3.1 in |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6.5 – 7.3 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
9 – 21% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
0 – 8% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Moderately well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
---|---|
Permeability class | Moderately slow to rapid |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 40% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 10% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
2.3 – 3.5 in |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6 – 8.2 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
0 – 30% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
0 – 30% |
Ecological dynamics
The Steep Loamy ecological site is dominated by mountain big sagebrush and Idaho fescue. It is found in three different states: Reference, Disturbed, and Degraded. Within these states, there are five different communities. Transitions between states are primarily disturbance driven with the most common disturbances being frequent or severe fire and intensive grazing that results in chronic defoliation.
A state-and-transition model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the state-and-transition model. This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference State. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating the similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the state-and-transition model, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between reference states and degraded states in this ecological site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference


The Reference state of the Steep Loamy 15 to 19 inch ecological site consists of three dominant plant communities. Community 1.1 and 1.2 are dominated by a mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana) overstory; however, Community 1.1 has a dominant understory of Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) and the understory of Community 1.2 is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata). Community 1.1 is more predominant at sites closer to the higher end of the relative effective annual precipitation range (15 to 19 inches) as Idaho fescue is better adapted to slightly wetter conditions (Zouhar, 2000). In Community 1.3, a shift from a mountain big sagebrush-dominated overstory to a more diverse shrub overstory occurs. Bunchgrasses (Idaho fescue and bluebunch wheatgrass) remain the dominant understory. The characteristics of the Steep Loamy 15 to 19 inch ecological site allow for relatively high productivity and diversity in both the overstory and understory relative to many other ecological sites within the Lost River Mountain LRU. Processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that can result in state and community changes include frequent or severe fire, grazing that results in chronic defoliation, and land use changes (Davies et al., 2011).
Characteristics and indicators. The shift between communities at this ecological site is primarily driven by slight variations in local abiotic conditions. Shift in the understory composition from Idaho fescue to bluebunch wheatgrass is usually attributed to available moisture. Although Idaho fescue can be present closer to the 15 inch end of the relative effective annual precipitation range, bluebunch wheatgrass is better adapted to these conditions and tends to occupy a greater percentage of the canopy (Zouhar, 2000). Shift from an overstory canopy dominated by mountain big sagebrush to a mixed shrub overstory can result from slightly localized abiotic factors such as depth to bedrock and coarse fragment volume on the surface and throughout the soil profile. Biotic conditions including distance from seed source and resource competition can also play a role.
Resilience management. This site has moderate to high resilience as a result of the cryic soil temperature regime and xeric soil moisture regime. Resistance and resilience of a specific site have been attributed to abiotic conditions favorable to plant growth and reproduction (Maestas et al. 2016). Soils that fall within the cryic (cold) temperature regime and xeric (wet) moisture regime tend to have higher diversity, high production, and are therefore more resilient. This is specifically true in terms of resisting or recovering from invasion post-disturbance (Maestas et al., 2016). On the LRU scale, this site may also have increased resistance to post-disturbance invasion due to the biodiversity generally present at the site. Sites with high biodiversity have been shown to exhibit increased resistance and resilience as a result of the differential impact of disturbances such as insects, disease, and fire on the variety of species present (Oliver et al., 2015).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Mountain Big Sagebrush and Idaho Fescue

The Mountain Big Sagebrush and Idaho Fescue community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions found at the Steep Loamy 15 to 19 inch ecological site in the Lost River Mountain LRU. Both of the primary species thrive in loamy-based soil textures that lack carbonates and high volumes of coarse fragments, with the primary limiting factors being relative effective annual precipitation and slope steepness. Idaho fescue prefers slightly higher amounts of effective precipitation than the other grass species found at this ecological site and understories dominated by this species become more predominant on the upper end of the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset (Zouhar, 2000). Mountain big sagebrush has the greatest preference for sites with higher soil moisture availability. The species is commonly found on moderately deep to deep, well-drained Mollisols, and at higher elevations than other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017). In this community, mountain big sagebrush tends to exist as a monoculture in the overstory; however, other species of shrubs may be present at less than five percent canopy cover. Production in this community is moderately high, ranging from 400 to 900 pounds per acre, with an average of just over 650 pounds per acre. Mountain big sagebrush foliar cover averages 30 percent, while Idaho fescue averages eight percent. Species of lupine (Lupinus spp.) and arrow leaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata) each average between two to seven percent canopy cover.
Resilience management. Mountain big sagebrush is the primary overstory species in the Reference state. It exhibits low to moderate resistance but moderate to high resilience. Mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant of the big sagebrush species. Mountain big sagebrush foliage is highly flammable and is among the most productive of sagebrush species so fuel loading and continuity are high (Innes, 2017). This increases susceptibility to severe wildfire events at more frequent intervals which can slow recovery. Fires in mountain big sagebrush stands tend to be stand-replacing. When Idaho fescue is the dominant understory, fire return intervals can be as frequent as 10 to 15 years. Although Idaho fescue fares better than mountain big sagebrush during fire events, mortality averages between 20 and 50 percent and can exceed 75 percent after severe events (Zouhar, 2000). Severe fire events can prompt a shift into the Disturbed state. Resilience at this site is deemed moderate to high due to the ability of mountain big sagebrush to quickly re-establish canopy cover post-disturbance. Under moderate to ideal conditions, mountain big sagebrush can return to pre-disturbance levels relatively quickly compared to other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017). The additional effective precipitation received at this site (15 to 19 inches) adds resilience. Available moisture is key component of successful recovery (Chamber et al., 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Figure 9. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 248 | 315 | 383 |
Shrub/Vine | 238 | 264 | 289 |
Forb | 40 | 72 | 103 |
Total | 526 | 651 | 775 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-30% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 50-65% |
Forb foliar cover | 2-8% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 45-65% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-40% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-2% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-8% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-6% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-40% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 45-75% |
Figure 10. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0705, ARTRV–PSSPS-FEID. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Mountain Big Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

The Mountain Big Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass community is more prevalent on the lower end of the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset of the Loamy ecological site. Bluebunch wheatgrass can thrive under a broad range of moisture conditions and is one of the most drought-resistant native bunchgrasses (Zlatnik, 1999). These adaptations often allow bluebunch wheatgrass to become the dominant understory at the drier sites in the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset. Although both Idaho fescue and bluebunch wheatgrass populations can be present in this community, canopy cover and percentage of total production will be higher for bluebunch wheatgrass. Mountain big sagebrush remains the dominant overstory species. Other shrub species that may be present at a limited canopy cover include mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), and antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata). Production in this community is moderately high, ranging from 650 to 1,000 pounds per acre, with an average of 850 pounds per acre. Mountain big sagebrush foliar cover averages 25 percent, while bluebunch wheatgrass averages 20 percent. Idaho fescue is sub-dominant in the understory averaging eight percent canopy cover. Species of lupine (Lupinus spp.), arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata) and phlox (Phlox spp.) contribute zero to three percent of canopy cover respectively.
Resilience management. With mountain big sagebrush being the primary overstory species, this community in the Reference state exhibits low to moderate resilience. Of all the big sagebrush species, mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant. Sagebrush foliage is highly flammable and because they are among the most productive of sagebrush species, fuel loading and continuity are higher (Innes, 2017). This increases susceptibility to severe wildfire events at more frequent intervals which can slow recovery. Fires in mountain big sagebrush stands tend to be stand replacing and under poor conditions, recovery to pre-fire levels can exceed 75 years (Innes, 2017). Bluebunch wheatgrass usually survives fires because its buds are protected. Fire return intervals are generally less than 30 years depending on overstory and related vegetation. Recovery of bluebunch wheatgrass from fire is rapid, generally returning to pre-disturbance populations in less than five years (Zlatnik, 1999). Although bluebunch populations may survive severe fire events, if the mountain big sagebrush overstory is removed, this can prompt a shift into the Disturbed state. The additional relative effective annual precipitation received at this site (15 to 19 inches) adds resilience. Available moisture is key component of successful post-disturbance recovery (Chamber et al., 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
Figure 11. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 10. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 350 | 450 |
Grass/Grasslike | 250 | 350 | 450 |
Forb | 20 | 80 | 120 |
Total | 420 | 780 | 1020 |
Table 11. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 15-35% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 3-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 25-55% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 3-10% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-8% |
Table 12. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-4% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-6% |
Forb basal cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 7-20% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 17-55% |
Figure 12. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0705, ARTRV–PSSPS-FEID. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.3
Mixed Mountain Shrub and Bunchgrass

Community 1.3 shifts from the mountain big sagebrush-dominated overstory to a more diverse overstory that includes a variety of mountain shrub species. The mixed shrub community is primarily influenced by very localized abiotic conditions. Although mountain big sagebrush usually remains the dominant overstory shrub, other shrubs often including antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), Saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) and currant species (Ribes spp.) may be present at varying population sizes. Mountain snowberry, usually secondary in dominance to mountain big sagebrush in this community is well suited to sandy and clay loam soils at varying elevations, both under acidic and basic soil conditions (Aleksoff, 1999). When chokecherry is present on this ecological site, it is usually an indicator of a very localized increase in moisture with the soils remaining well drained (Johnson, 2000). This generally occurs on steep slopes and ravines near riverine systems in this LRU. Mountain snowberry, saskatoon serviceberry, and some currant species are highly adaptable to many of the conditions found on this ecological site (Aleksoff, 1999; Marshall, 1995; Fryer, 1997). Bluebunch wheatgrass remains the primary understory species, with and increase of Geyer's sedge (Carex geyeri) appearing towards the higher end of the effective precipitation range (19 inches). Production in this community can be moderately high, with a wide range from 450 to 1,300 pounds per acre, with an average of 900 pounds per acre. Mountain big sagebrush foliar cover averages between 10 to 15 percent, mountain snowberry ranges from five to 20 percent, and Idaho fescue/bluebunch wheatgrass averages 10 to 15 percent canopy cover. Species of lupine (Lupinus spp.) and arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata) contribute zero to five percent to total canopy cover.
Resilience management. This community has moderate resilience primarily attributed to the diversity in the shrub overstory. Having multiple species in the overstory reduces the chance of severe impact from insects and diseases that often target a single species. Other natural disturbances such as fire and prolonged periods of drought will also impact overstory species differentially. Limited population loss reduces the potential for increased erosion and the establishment of invasive species following a disturbance. Bluebunch wheatgrass, which is one of the primary understory species in this ecological site is also very resilient to local disturbance regimes. The species is drought tolerant and usually is not killed except during the most severe wildfire events. During severe disturbances that remove the sagebrush overstory, bluebunch wheatgrass can persist as the dominant vegetation on this ecological site (Zlatnik, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
Figure 13. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 13. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 200 | 500 | 780 |
Grass/Grasslike | 132 | 280 | 350 |
Forb | 50 | 150 | 250 |
Total | 382 | 930 | 1380 |
Table 14. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 15-35% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-30% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-14% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 45-73% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 1-8% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 1-5% |
Table 15. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 2-6% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 3-8% |
Forb basal cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 4-18% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 50-84% |
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2


Differences in understory dominance between Idaho fescue (1.1) and bluebunch wheatgrass (1.2) are generally attributed to slight localized variations in effective precipitation at this ecological site. Idaho fescue is better suited for conditions found at the higher end of the 15 to 19 inch relative effective annual precipitation range, while bluebunch wheatgrass is more drought tolerant and better able to cope with conditions at lower effective precipitation (Zouhar 2000; Zlatnik 1999). When the ecological site occurs at the higher end of the effective precipitation range, Idaho fescue is more likely to dominate the understory both in canopy cover percentage and production value.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3


The transition from the mountain big sagebrush-dominated shrub overstory to the mixed shrub overstory is primarily a mechanism in slight variations in localized abiotic conditions. Mountain big sagebrush prefers soil conditions that are moderately deep to deep and well drained (Innes, 2017). Slight variations in site soil characteristics and other abiotic conditions can increase favorability for other shrub species to establish and share site dominance. These species include antelope bitterbrush, mountain snowberry, chokecherry, and occasionally Saskatoon serviceberry.
State 2
Disturbed

The Disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance events that result in widespread sagebrush mortality at a given site. The primary natural disturbance resulting in sagebrush mortality at this ecological site is frequent or severe wildfires; however, intense freeze events, insect damage, and disease can also occur. Both mountain big sagebrush and basin big sagebrush are particularly susceptible to stand-replacing fires and often experience complete canopy loss during moderate and severe wildfire events (Innes, 2017; Tirmenstein, 1999). Because this LRU exists primarily on publicly managed lands (US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and State of Idaho), widespread anthropogenic disturbance events are infrequent. Examples of anthropogenic disturbance events include brush management through sagebrush mowing or removal treatments, chemical treatments, or improper grazing techniques that result in high-intensity hoof disturbance or chronic defoliation of vegetation. A combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbance is possible and can result in increased severity of disturbance, decreased resilience, and greater difficulty returning to the Reference state. For example, improper grazing practices post-fire disturbance can increase bare ground cover, increase erosion potential, and slow the reestablishment of grass species that preclude the return of overstory sagebrush canopy (Zlatnik, 1999).
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the Disturbed state is a near complete loss of overstory sagebrush species, often replaced by shrub species that can take advantage of the local disturbance regime such as threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita) and yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus). A shift towards an increase in native and disturbance-tolerant grasses and forbs is likely with the removal of resource competition associated with the sagebrush overstory presence. Severe disturbance events also increase the opportunity for invasion of annual grasses and weeds such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and thistle species. The canopy cover percentage of these species is usually dependent on the distance of a seed source but mostly stays under five percent (Zlatnik, 1999).
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is moderate. Many of the post-disturbance grasses and shrubs that are common in this state are established quickly and reach a representative canopy within 10 years post-disturbance. These species continue to increase until the overstory canopy of sagebrush begins to return. However, local resilience of these sites in this state is highly dependent on current soil moisture availability, seed sources, timing and severity of the disturbance. In the instance of fire disturbance, bluebunch wheatgrass mortality can be significantly lower if the fire occurs in the spring as opposed to fall, and recovery can be impacted by the quantity of immediate post-fire precipitation (Zlatnik, 1999). More severe disturbances increase the possibility of invasion. The greater the establishment of invasives, the lower the site resilience becomes.
Community 2.1
Bunchgrass and Forb

The mixed grass and forb community is driven by the removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in the removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment and canopy cover of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance-tolerant shrubs. The primary sagebrush removal disturbance at this ecological site is fire. The frequency and severity of these fire disturbances are highly influenced by the overstory composition of the specific site in the reference state. The composition and extent of the sagebrush species in the overstory impacts that respective fire regime. Steep Loamy sites with an overstory canopy at least partially comprised of mountain big sagebrush are more susceptible to frequent fire return intervals, more severe fires, and often to a greater extent. Sites dominated by mountain big sagebrush communities have historically burned more frequently than sites dominated by other sagebrush species because the soil moisture and temperature regimes required by mountain big sagebrush are also more apt to produce an increased amount of fine fuels from other plant species (Innes, 2017). Production in this community is moderately high, ranging from 370 to 1075 pounds per acre, with an average of 865 pounds per acre. Mountain big sagebrush foliar cover averages nearly five percent, while bluebunch wheatgrass averages over 20 percent.
Resilience management. This plant community is moderately resilient because the grasses and forbs that dominate the composition are resistant to a variety of disturbances and able to re-establish quickly in the event of more severe disturbances. Both bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) are rarely harmed by fire events except for in the most severe instances. Both plants can reduce the amount of heat transfer to the root systems, enabling successful regrowth (Zlatnik, 1999; Howard, 1997). Studies have shown that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass-dominated systems can return to pre-fire production levels in eight years (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg bluegrass has been shown to fully re-establish post-plowing disturbance events in as little as seven years after the plowing (Howard, 1997). Idaho fescue is less resilient to both fires and grazing. Idaho fescue can often survive low-severity fires, however, moderate to severe fires are more destructive, resulting in a 30-year return to pre-disturbance levels. In terms of grazing disturbance, Idaho fescue is considered a decreaser and doesn't tolerate heavy grazing pressure well (Zouhar, 2000). Although many of the species in this state are at least somewhat resilient towards many of the disturbances encountered, available soil moisture, and rest from grazing all play an important role in how quickly a site can return following the disturbance. The resilience of mountain big sagebrush populations is highly dependent on the severity of disturbance and distance from a seed source. Mountain big sagebrush communities are significantly impacted in all but the lowest severity fire events. This often leaves little remaining sagebrush canopy on sight or nearby as a viable seed source. Additionally, mountain big sagebrush is reliant on favorable weather patterns and moisture availability to increase seed establishment and success (Innes, 2017).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
silverleaf phacelia (Phacelia hastata), other herbaceous
Figure 14. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 16. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 300 | 675 | 800 |
Shrub/Vine | 50 | 150 | 200 |
Forb | 20 | 40 | 75 |
Total | 370 | 865 | 1075 |
Table 17. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 5-26% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 20-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 1-6% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 15-40% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 3-10% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-10% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-7% |
Table 18. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-4% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 3-8% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-25% |
Surface fragments >3" | 1-20% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 35-70% |
Figure 15. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1205, FEID-PSSPS. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 3
Degraded

When a Steep Loamy 15 to 19 inch site enters the Degraded state, it is generally a result of post-disturbance invasion by invasive species. This state can be driven by a particularly severe disturbance either in the form of fire, intensive grazing, or land use, or repeated disturbances of low to moderate severity over short periods. Proximity to a seed source as well as seed transport vectors play a role in the likelihood of post-disturbance invasion.
Characteristics and indicators. In this state, total canopy cover and production values for mid to large-sized bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass will decrease. Traditional overstory cover and production of mountain big sagebrush and other shrubs will also decrease. These openings in the canopy will generally be filled with invasive annuals such as cheatgrass (Bromus techtorum) and more disturbance-tolerant forbs such as phlox species, vetch species, and Indian paintbrush (Castilleja spp.). Continued disturbance will increase the cover and production of these species. Productivity and canopy cover are lower than the Reference state and shifted towards the understory grass species and forbs, particularly the invasive annuals.
Resilience management. This site has low resilience primarily due to the invasive species establishment. Cheatgrass is well adapted to post-disturbance establishment, particularly after wildfire disturbances. Cheatgrass takes advantage of prolific seedbanks resilient to fire and the ability to rapidly establish when competition from native vegetation has been removed through disturbance. Additionally, cheatgrass can alter fire regimes, shortening fire return intervals which provides a further advantage for cheatgrass and hinders re-establishment of native vegetation (Zouhar, 2003). Once fully established, restoration of sites invaded by cheatgrass either through natural or mechanical means has low success rates.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
bluebells (Mertensia), other herbaceous
Community 3.1
Invasive Annual Grass

The invasive annual grass community becomes dominant on a site in the Degraded state where native vegetation has been removed or severely altered by either natural or anthropogenic disturbances. Once cheatgrass (Bromus techtorum) has established, the species can outcompete the native vegetation that it replaced and promote feedback loops (such as shortened fire return intervals) that help perpetuate dominance (Zouhar, 2003). In this LRU, yellow rabbitbrush is another species that is often able to take advantage of its ability to aggressively sprout and rapidly grow following a disturbance. Once established in the overstory, yellow rabbitbrush needs continued frequent disturbances to stay dominant in the shrub overstory. In the absence of disturbance, yellow rabbitbrush will remain dominant for about 15 years before beginning to be replaced by shrub species from the Reference state. Production in this community is moderately high, ranging from 475 to 1,025 pounds per acre, with an average of just over 800 pounds per acre. Mountain big sagebrush and yellow rabbitbrush both average five percent foliar cover. Cheatgrass canopy cover can be as high as 70 percent. Species of lupine (Lupinus sp.) and arrow leaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata) each average between 0 to 5 percent canopy cover respectively.
Resilience management. This community in the Degraded state is primarily disturbance-driven. The dominant overstory and understory species are highly disturbance tolerant. Frequent disturbance events tend to perpetuate the dominance of this community. Once cheatgrass has fully established, returning to the disturbed or Degraded state is very difficult and resource-intensive.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), shrub
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
oblongleaf bluebells (Mertensia oblongifolia), other herbaceous
Figure 16. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 19. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 350 | 560 | 700 |
Shrub/Vine | 75 | 168 | 225 |
Forb | 50 | 72 | 100 |
Total | 475 | 800 | 1025 |
Table 20. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 5-18% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 20-77% |
Forb foliar cover | 3-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 10-28% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 2-11% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-10% |
Table 21. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 3-6% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 8-23% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-7% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 35-70% |
Figure 17. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1602, B8 BRTE-Annuals. State 2.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 40 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2


The transition from the Reference state to the Disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance regimes. The primary disturbance regime likely to impact this ecological site is moderate to severe fire occurrence. Fire return intervals in the reference communities are often driven by the dominant understory species. This can be less than 30 years in bluebunch wheatgrass communities and 15 years for Idaho fescue (Innes 2017; Zouhar, 2000).
Constraints to recovery. The primary constraint to recovery is the distance to a seed source. Most fire events are fatal to mountain big sagebrush and when the disturbance is severe enough and the extent is large, seed source populations for sagebrush species may be removed from the vicinity. In this case, immigration and re-establishment of overstory sagebrush species can be slow. This period can be greatly reduced through seeding and planting interventions. Bluebunch wheatgrass is resistant to fire and generally unharmed in all but the most severe events. Idaho fescue is less resistant, increasing the time needed to return to pre-disturbance levels.
Context dependence. The primary factors driving the likelihood of restoration success are post-disturbance weather patterns and distance from natural seed sources. Prolonged periods of drought can slow restoration processes, whereas average to above-average precipitation following the disturbance can greatly increase speed and success in the re-establishment of sagebrush species (Robin 2017; Steinberg 2002; Fryer 2009).
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3


The transition from the Reference state to the Degraded state is a result of a disturbance event (or multiple disturbance events) followed by the establishment of invasive species, primarily cheatgrass. The likelihood of this transition increases when multiple disturbance events occur with little time for recovery, or following especially severe disturbance events.
Constraints to recovery. Once cheatgrass begins to establish on a site, it can grow and reproduce rapidly often forming a monoculture (Zouhar, 2003). Once established, complete removal of the species from a site is difficult, costly, and resource intensive, limiting restoration options. Success is increased by identifying sites early in the transition and beginning treatment before cheatgrass populations become significant.
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1


The most important mechanism driving restoration from the Disturbed state to the Reference state is time without a sagebrush removing disturbances and distance from overstory species (sagebrush) seed source. Seeding or planting of desired overstory species in the Reference state can speed restoration efforts.
Context dependence. Restoration is highly dependent on time without disturbance. New sagebrush seedlings that can establish on a site are moderately sensitive to disturbances such as freeze-kill, insect damage, and disease. They are highly sensitive to herbivory and even low-severity fire occurrence (Fryer 2009; Steinberg 2002). Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process, however, regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during the restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above-normal precipitation aid in sagebrush regeneration and establishment (Innes 2017; Steinberg 2002; Fryer 2009).
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3


The transition from the Disturbed state to the Degraded state is more likely than a direct transition from the Reference to the Degraded state. The transition occurs when a disturbance removes most or all of the native shrub overstory and grass understory, creating available space for invasive species establishment. Once established, many invasive species such as cheatgrass can promote feedback loops that increase their dominance over time.
Constraints to recovery. The primary constraint to recovery is the successful removal of invasive species. Once established, the successful removal of cheatgrass and other invasive species is a resource-intensive process. Time without disturbance and seeding/planting interventions of native vegetation can aid in recovery.
Context dependence. Factors that contribute to restoration success include the level of invasive species establishment, intervention methods, and post-treatment weather patterns. A prolonged period of drought can slow restoration processes, whereas average to above-average precipitation post-disturbance can greatly increase speed and success in the re-establishment of sagebrush species (Robin, 2017; Steinberg, 2002; Fryer, 2009).
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2


The most important factor in restoration from the Degraded state to the Disturbed state is the removal of invasive annual grasses and the re-establishment of native grasses. Depending on the level of invasive species presence, this may only be achieved using mechanical interventions and seeding.
Context dependence. Restoration is dependent on time without disturbance and favorable planting conditions. Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process, however, regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during the restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above-normal precipitation aid in sagebrush and bunchgrass regeneration and establishment (Innes 2017; Steinberg 2002; Fryer, 2009).
Additional community tables
Table 22. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 212–315 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 200–315 | 4–25 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 12 | 1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 180–450 | |||||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 225 | 10 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 180 | 5–8 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 45 | 2 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 8–135 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 4–54 | 1–3 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 36 | 2 | ||
old man's whiskers | GETR | Geum triflorum | 18 | 1 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 18 | 1 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 9 | 1 | ||
aster | ASTER | Aster | 4 | 1 |
Table 23. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–450 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 150–325 | 15–40 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 25–150 | 1–7 | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 250–450 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 175–428 | 8–30 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 25–150 | 2–10 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 20–120 | |||||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 10–40 | 1–7 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 5–25 | 1–3 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 5–25 | 1–3 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–10 | 0–2 |
Table 24. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 200–780 | |||||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 25–300 | 5–20 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 150–300 | 10–15 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 10–180 | 1–5 | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 10–75 | 5–15 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 132–350 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 100–200 | 5–20 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 50–150 | 3–15 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
slender wheatgrass | ELTR7 | Elymus trachycaulus | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 50–250 | |||||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 15–96 | 2–5 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 15–96 | 2–5 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 5–60 | 1–2 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–12 | 0–3 | ||
larkspur | DELPH | Delphinium | 0–12 | 0–3 |
Table 25. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 50–200 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 25–175 | 1–9 | ||
American red raspberry | RUID | Rubus idaeus | 0–48 | 0–4 | ||
Lewis' mock orange | PHLE4 | Philadelphus lewisii | 0–19 | 0–2 | ||
Canadian gooseberry | RIOX | Ribes oxyacanthoides | 0–19 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 300–800 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSPS | Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata | 200–550 | 10–30 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 20–150 | 1–8 | ||
spike fescue | LEKI2 | Leucopoa kingii | 0–125 | 0–4 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
needlegrass | ACHNA | Achnatherum | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 20–75 | |||||
silverleaf phacelia | PHHA | Phacelia hastata | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
tansymustard | DESCU | Descurainia | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
rockcress | ARABI2 | Arabis | 0–15 | 0–2 |
Table 26. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 75–225 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 25–120 | 3–10 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 20–100 | 3–10 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 350–700 | |||||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 100–450 | 15–70 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 75–250 | 3–15 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 50–100 | |||||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 10–40 | 2–5 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 5–24 | 1–4 | ||
bluebells | MERTE | Mertensia | 5–10 | 1–3 | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 0–10 | 0–2 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous ecological site within the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset. Production ranges can be used to estimate stocking rates; however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match the current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at any specific location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre):
Reference State:
1.1 - 400 - 650 - 900
1.2 - 650 - 850 - 1,000
1.3 - 450 - 900 - 1,300
Disturbed:
2.1 - 370-865-1,075
Degraded:
3.1 - 475-800-1,025
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush steppe in the Lost River Mountain LRU provides critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountains. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG) in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, northern end of the Pahsimeroi mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana) - All states/communities:
Mountain big sagebrush is considered to be highly palatable by most wildlife browsers (Rosenstrater, 2005). Sage grouse, ungulates, and rodents browse Mountain big sagebrush primarily during the winter when it becomes one of the more palatable available forages. However, seasonal snow levels can exclude many browsing species. Several studies have shown that mountain big sagebrush is a preferred forage by elk, mule deer, and sage grouse when compared to the other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017). Sage grouse are considered obligate species of mountain big sagebrush and other big sagebrush varieties and these species are generally preferred over the low sagebrush species; Artemisia nova and Artemisia arbuscula (Dalke et al., 1963).
Antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) - Community 1.3:
Antelope bitterbrush is a very important browse species for pronghorn, mule deer, elk, bighorn sheep and moose. This is especially true towards the end of the summer season when the forage becomes more valuable. Mule deer diets in September are comprised of up to 91 percent antelope bitterbrush when available. The species becomes a critical food source for many wild ungulates during the winter season (Zlatnik, 1999). Antelope bitterbrush is also important to many insect species including pogonomyrmex ants which utilize the seed for food and tent caterpillars which utilize the canopy (Furniss, 1983).
Mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus) - Community 1.3:
Mountain snowberry can be a valuable early-season forage for wild ungulates as it is one of the first palatable species to leaf out in the spring. In high elevation summer ranges it is an important forage species for deer and elk. The fruits are utilized by a few upland birds such as grouse, pheasants, and magpies (Aleksoff, 1999).
Yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) - All states/communities:
Yellow rabbitbrush can be a browse species for mule deer in the fall, winter and spring. Winter use by elk has been reported, as well as spring and summer use by pronghorn. It is believed to be a primary food source for black-tailed jackrabbits in the winter and early spring (Tirmenstein, 1999).
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata) - Possible in all states/communities:
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on Western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, utilization of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) - Possible in all states/communities:
When available, Idaho fescue can be a dominant component to many wild ungulate diets, including pronghorn, deer, elk, and bighorn sheep. In some instances depending on other available forage, the species can be considered as valuable but not a preferred forage for ungulates. The species is a valuable component to the diet of the Northern pocket gopher and grizzly bear when it is found within their range.
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) - Possible in all states/communities:
Sandberg bluegrass is one of the earliest grasses to green up during the spring and become available forage for wildlife, however becomes less utilized during the later summer months. The degree of use for Elk and pronghorn is good to poor, and good to fair for mule deer, small mammals, small nongame birds, and upland game birds. Usage is fair to poor by waterfowl (Howard, 1997).
Hydrological functions
Annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid and soil permeability is slow to moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals including antelope, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies.
The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site ID's and data collection intensity for each site used in the development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include Line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involved a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
(Order = Site ID, state/community phase, location, and survey intensity)
NASIS ID State/Comm Location Intensity
2021ID7031229 1.1 Lemhi Range High
2019ID7033091 1.1 White Knob Mtns Low
2020ID7032167 1.1 Lost River Range Low
2021ID7031196 1.2 Lemhi Range High
2019ID7031021 1.2 White Knob Mtns Low
2019ID7031033 1.3 White Knob Mtns Low
2020ID7032259 1.3 Lemhi Range High
2021ID7032015 2.1 Lemhi Range Low
2019ID7033002 3.1 White Knob Mtns Low
Other references
Aleksoff, Keith C. 1999. Symphoricarpos oreophilus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, K.M. Havstad, B. Alexander, G. Chavez, and J.E. Herrick. 2003. Development and Use of State and Transition Models for Rangelands. Jornal of Range Management 56:114–126.
Bestelmeyer, B. and J.R. Brown. 2005. State-and-Transition Models 101: a Fresh Look at Vegetation Change.
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, J.E. Herrick, D.A. Trujillo, and K.M. Havstad. 2004. Land Management in the American Southwest: a state-and-transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environmental Management 34:38–51.
Bestelmeyer, B.T., K. Moseley, P.L. Shaver, H. Sanchez, D.D. Briske, and M.E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2010. Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models. Rangelands 32:23–30.
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Chambers, J.C., J.L. Beck, T.J. Christiansen, K.J. Clause, J.B. Dinkins, K.E. Doherty, K.A. Griffin, D.W. Havlina, K.F. Henke, L.L. Kurth, J.D. Maestas, M. Manning, K.E. Mayer, B.A. Mealor, C. McCarthy, M.A. Perea, and D.A. Pyke. 2016. Using resilience and resistance concepts to manage threats to sagebrush ecosystems, Gunnison sage-grouse, and Greater sage-grouse in their eastern range: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-356.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 1–143.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Esipinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A. Wuenschel. 2014. Using resistance and resilience concepts to reduce impacts of invasive annual grasses and altered fire regimes on the sagebrush ecosystem and greater sage-grouse: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-326.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station., Fort Collins, CO. 73.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Daubenmire, R. F. (1940). Plant Succession Due to Overgrazing in the Agropyron Bunchgrass Prairie of Southeastern Washington. Ecology, 21(1), 55–64.
Davies, K. Boyd, C. Bates, J. Eighty Years of Grazing by Cattle Modifies Sagebrush and Bunchgrass Structure. 2018. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(3):27
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html
Forest Service Remote Automoted Weather Station (Bonanza & Copper Basin). Retrieved from: Western Regional Climate Center. October, 2022. https://wrcc.dri.edu/
Francis, John K. ed. 2004. Wildland shrubs of the United States and its Territories: thamnic descriptions: volume 1. Gen. Tech. Rep. IITF-GTR-26. San Juan, PR: USDA, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, and Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 830 p.
Fryer, Janet L. 1997. Amelanchier alnifolia. In: Fire Effects
Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Furniss, Malcolm M. 1983. Entomology of antelope bitterbrush. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Johnson, Kendall L., compilers. Proceedings--research and management of bitterbrush and cliffrose in western North America; 1982 April 13-15; Salt Lake City, UT. General Technical Report INT-152. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 164-172.
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Johnson, Kathleen A. 2000. Prunus virginiana. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
Kirk W. Davies, Jon D. Bates, Rory O'Connor. 2021. Long-term evaluation of restoring understories in Wyoming big sagebrush communities with mowing and seeding native bunchgrasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 75, Pages 81-90.
Knick, S.T.; Holmes, A.L.; Miller, Richard F. 2005. The role of fire in structuring sagebrush habitats and bird communities. Pages 63-75 In: Saab, Victoria A.; Powell, Hugh D. W. (eds.). Fire and Avian Ecology in North America. Studies in Avian Biology No. 30. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.
Marshall, K. Anna. 1995. Ribes montigenum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
McArthur and Stevens. 2009. Composite Shrubs. In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw [compilers]. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-136-vol-2. p. 493-537.
Miller, M., Belnap, J., Beatty, S., Reynolds, R. (2006). Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in Relation to Soil Properties, Water Additions, and Chemical Amendments in Calcareous Soils of Southeastern Utah, USA. Canyonlands Research. 288. 10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Tom H. Oliver, Matthew S. Heard, Nick J.B. Isaac, David B. Roy, Deborah Procter, Felix Eigenbrod, Rob Freckleton, Andy Hector, C. David L. Orme, Owen L. Petchey, Vânia Proença, David Raffaelli, K. Blake Suttle, Georgina M. Mace, Berta Martín-López, Ben A. Woodcock, James M. Bullock. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 30, Issue 11, 2015.
Rodhouse TJ, Irvine KM and Bowersock L (2020) Post-Fire Vegetation Response in a Repeatedly Burned Low-Elevation Sagebrush Steppe Protected Area Provides Insights About Resilience and Invasion Resistance. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:584726.
Rosentreter, Roger. 2005. Sagebrush identification, ecology, and palatability relative to sage-grouse. In: Shaw, Nancy L.; Pellant, Mike; Monsen, Stephen B., eds. Sage-grouse habitat restoration symposium proceedings; 2001 June 4-7; Boise, ID. Proc. RMRS-P-38. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 3-16
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [1]. 2012. Plant Guide for black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [2]. 2012. Plant Guide for low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tripartita. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tridentata subsp. tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2022, October 25].
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Purshia tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zouhar, Kristin L. 2000. Festuca idahoensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zouhar, Kris. 2003. Bromus tectorum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Contributors
Grant Petersen
Carla Rebernak
Kirt Walstad
Marji Patz
Karen Clause
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/19/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Nicholas Kozlowski
Katelyn Palmer
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Zachary Van Abbema |
---|---|
Contact for lead author |
Zachary Van Abbema zachary.vanabbema@usda.gov |
Date | 10/11/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not present in the reference condition. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon in the reference condition. When present, they usually occur on steeper slopes (greater than 15 percent) and are inconspicuous, disconnected, and very short in length. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes: Pedestals are not evident in the reference condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is between two to 35 percent, averaging 10 percent. This refers to exposed mineral soil not covered by litter, rock, basal cover, plant cover, standing dead, lichen and/or moss. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gullies are not present in the reference condition. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind scoured, or depositional areas are not evident in the reference condition. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Movement of fine herbaceous litter may occur within three feet from where it originated. This is primarily in relation to the steep slopes present at this ecological site. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil Surface Stable with Stability Ratings of four to six (both under canopy and bare). Abiotic crusts and or root mats may be present. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface structure is granular with the A horizon ranging from 0 to 25cm thick, averaging 20 cm thick. A horizon colors are 10YR 3/2, 10YR 2/2, and 10YR 2/1. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plants are evenly distributed across the ecological site and the shrubs and bunchgrasses present improved infiltration as well as protect against runoff. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Not present. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Idaho fescue > mountain big sagebrushSub-dominant:
Bluebunch wheatgrass and prairie Junegrass > mountain snowberryOther:
spiny phlox > pink pussytoes > lupine = old man's whiskersAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Mortality in herbaceous species is not evident. Species with bunch growth forms may have some natural mortality in centers. Sagebrush species will become decadent in the absence of historical fire return intervals. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Total ground litter cover varies but can range from 50 to 65 percent averaging 55 percent. Depth is usually shallow at less than 1/8 inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production ranges from 400 to 9000 lbs/acre, averaging 650 lbs/per acre. Production varies based on effective precipitation and the natural variability of soil properties for this ecological site. Total production is slightly higher for perennial grass species but tends to be split equally between grasses and shrubs. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invasive species include cheatgrass, spotted knapweed, toadflax, and crested wheatgrass. Native species such as yellow rabbitbrush or significant populations of Sandberg bluegrass or rhizomatous wheatgrasses can indicate a departure from the reference state. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in most years. Bluebunch wheatgrass may not reproduce during extended periods of drought.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.