

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02C034
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/19/2025
Accessed: 05/21/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 12, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in the state of Idaho. MLRA 12 is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources, and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mount Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869 meters). Annual precipitation has a significant range from six to 47 inches, the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management: Idaho Falls District. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly East of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from the town of Salmon, Idaho to the North, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the South, the Beaverhead Mountain Range to the East, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the West. This LRU borders MLRA 43B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 10 - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet) because the boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) ranges between 10 to over 36 inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M118 Intermountain Basins Cliff, Scree & Badland Sparse Vegetation Macrogroup
G570 Intermountain Basins Cliff, Scree & Badland Sparse Vegetation Group
A4051 Intermountain Bedrock Cliff & Canyon Wooded Scrub Alliance
CEGL002977 Littleleaf Mountain-mahogany Slickrock Sparse Vegetation Association
Ecological site concept
The Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone is an upland ecological site that primarily occurs on or near rock outcropping where soil is intermittently shallow or very shallow to bedrock. Although not limited by soil chemistry, this site often occurs on highly calcareous soils. This site does not receive additional water.
These soils:
o Are not saline, saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are shallow or intermittently shallow to bedrock
o Are often highly calcareous, having greater than 15 percent calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) within the top 50 centimeters (20 inches) of the soil profile.
The primary abiotic factors shaping this ecological site are landform, depth to bedrock, and effective precipitation in relation to the LRU. The dominant overstory species, curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), is able to establish on ridges and rock outcroppings that are often shallow to bedrock. Under these conditions, the species can take advantage of its shallow and wide-spreading root system.
Associated sites
BX012X02C065 |
Shallow Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains Shallow site that can occur adjacent to the Rocky Hills 15-19 inch Precipitation Zone ecological site. |
---|---|
BX012X02B020 |
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site occurs on limestone parent material. |
BX012X02C063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site occurs on limestone parent material. |
BX012X02C072 |
Steep Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site exists on steep slopes with a high volume of coarse fragments in the top 20 inches (50cm). |
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site occurs on limestone parent material. |
Similar sites
BX012X02C065 |
Shallow Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is shallow to bedrock which is often the case with the Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site. |
---|---|
BX012X02B020 |
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is derived from limestone parent material and has calcareous soils in the top 4 inches (10cm) as can be the case with the Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site. |
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is derived from limestone parent material and has calcareous soils in the 4 to 10 inch (10-25cm) portion of the soil profile, as can be the case with the Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site. |
BX012X02C063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is derived from limestone parent material and has calcareous soils in the 10 to 20 inch (25-50cm) portion of the soil profile, as can be the case with the Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Cercocarpus ledifolius |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XC034ID
Physiographic features
This site can occur on mountain slopes, canyon walls, and ridges within the mountain landscape. The site is not aspect-dependent, though heavily favors southern aspects regardless of elevation. Additionally, this site is not influenced by slope percentage, however, tends to occur on slopes ranging from 25 to 70 percent. Runoff is generally medium to high and flooding and ponding do not occur.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Canyon Wall -- The steep to near vertical slope between a canyon bottom and higher, adjacent hillslopes, mountain slopes, or summits. Canyon walls are generally dominated by rock outcrop and/or bedrock within the soil profile.
Ridge -- A long, narrow elevation of the land surface, usually sharp crested with steep sides and forming an extended upland between valleys.

Figure 1. Aspect and elevation of sampled Rocky Hills sites.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Canyon wall (3) Mountains > Ridge |
---|---|
Runoff class | Medium to high |
Elevation | 6,748 – 7,661 ft |
Slope | 47 – 65% |
Aspect | SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class | Medium to very high |
---|---|
Elevation | 6,403 – 8,104 ft |
Slope | 28 – 70% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this ecological site, the effective precipitation is 15 to 19 inches. Because effective precipitation is a modeled value that factors in elevation, aspect, and topography in association with mean annual precipitation, it is often a lower value than actual precipitation. Actual precipitation and temperature data were taken from Snotel stations located on the Lost River and Lemhi Range. Data was taken from Snotel sites that record actual precipitation and sit at a fixed location. Therefore, actual climatic conditions at a given ecological site can vary from data provided based on localized conditions.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 30-60 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 40-65 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 18-27 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 25-75 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 40-85 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 14-31 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 45 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 60 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 21 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this ecological site are intermittently shallow or very shallow in relation to the presence or absence of shallow bedrock. Soil textures are gravelly to extremely gravelly loams, silt loams, and sandy loams. Soils are often skeletal and highly calcareous (measured with a pH of 7.8 and an effervescence of strong or greater) in the top 50 cm (20 inches) of the soil profile.
Representative soil taxonomy includes:
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Calcixerolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Lithic Calcircryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Xeric Calcicryepts
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Calcic Haploxerolls

Figure 8. Texture by horizon of 10 Rocky Hills 15-19 inch sites

Figure 9. pH by horizon of 10 Rocky Hills 15-19 inch sites

Figure 10. Soil profile picture: Rocky Hills site ID: 2023ID7031244

Figure 11. Soil profile picture: Rocky Hills site ID: 2021ID7031219
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
limestone
(2) Residuum – limestone (3) Colluvium – quartzite |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly loam (2) Gravelly sandy loam (3) Extremely gravelly loam (4) Sandy loam (5) Silt loam (6) Cobbly silt loam (7) Extremely cobbly silt loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy-skeletal |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate to rapid |
Soil depth | 16 – 59 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 35% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 5 – 40% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
1.65 – 2.4 in |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6.6 – 8 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
16 – 52% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
10% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Well drained |
---|---|
Permeability class | Moderate to rapid |
Soil depth | 13 – 60 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 55% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 66% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
1.5 – 2.5 in |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6.4 – 8.2 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
10 – 58% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
40% |
Ecological dynamics
The Rocky Hills 15-19-Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site is a range ecological site existing within the greater sagebrush steppe ecosystem and often the transition to a forested ecosystem. The primary overstory species is curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), and although many different rhizomatous and bunch grasses can exist in the understory, bluebunch wheatgrass is the primary species.
Transitions from the Reference state are driven by disturbances, both natural and anthropogenic. The two primary disturbances that impact this ecological site are fire and herbivory. To a lesser extent, climate-driven disturbances such as drought or flood can also instigate transitions within the site's range of variability. The steep slopes of this site can create frequent colluvial disturbances and promote the establishment of invasive species.
A state-and-transition model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the state-and-transition model (STM). This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference state. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating the similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the STM, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between reference states and degraded states in this ecological site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference

The Reference state consists of three dominant plant communities: The curl-leaf mountain mahogany-dominated community, the mixed shrub overstory community (1.2) which can include curl-leaf mountain mahogany, mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula) and black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), and the wooded mountain mahogany community which can include Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum), and limber pine (Pinus flexilis). The understory in both communities is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass but can include a variety of other bunch and rhizomatous grasses at a lesser canopy cover. The primary difference between the two communities is the composition and foliar cover of shrub species. Foliar cover of other shrub species increases in relation to openings not already occupied by curl-leaf mountain mahogany. Processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that result in state and community changes include fire, grazing, land use change, and the occurrence of invasive species.
Characteristics and indicators. The shift between communities in the Reference state is driven by curl-leaf mountain mahogany canopy cover. Well-established stands of mountain mahogany can be dense and prevent any future establishment of other shrub species, primarily sagebrush. Likewise, less dense canopies of mountain mahogany present less competition and create opportunities for other species to establish in their absence. Low-severity disturbances are the primary driver for decreasing the canopy cover of mountain mahogany and creating opportunities for other species to establish. Severe disturbances such as fires that are stand-replacing and destroy the seed bank could lead to a shrub community not dominated by curl-leaf mountain mahogany.
Resilience management. The Reference state is overall moderately resilient. In well-established communities, resilience towards climatic disturbances such as drought is high. Curl-leaf mountain mahogany is adapted to dry conditions and is able to take advantage of moisture funneled to cracks in the bedrock. Resilience to low-severity fire is high; however, severe stand-replacing fire, which removes any nearby seed source, can take several decades to recover from (Gucker, 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Mountain Mahogany and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

The Mountain Mahogany and Bluebunch Wheatgrass community is well adapted to the specific conditions found at this ecological site. This community is dominated by an overstory of curl-leaf mountain mahogany and an understory dominated by bunchgrasses, primarily bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata). The canopy density of curl-leaf mountain mahogany of this community can vary by site but can be as dense as 40 percent. On sites where curl-leaf mountain mahogany is less dense, a mixture of other shrubs fill in the canopy gaps. These species can include mountain big sagebrush, black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus), yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), and gooseberry (Ribes sp.). The forb population can be quite diverse and includes longleaf phlox (Phlox longifolia), spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), granite prickly phlox (Linanthus pungens), buckwheat species (Eriogonum sp.), hawksbeard (Crepis sp.), arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), and stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis). Production in this community is high and heavily weighted towards the shrub overstory, specifically, curl-leaf mountain mahogany. Production is 800 to 1,300 pounds per acre, with an average of 1,000 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This community has low to moderate resilience. Although very resistant to drought and frequent or high-severity fires, this community has difficulty recovering when much of the overstory is eliminated. Regeneration of curl-leaf mountain mahogany occurs through seed. If stand-destroying disturbances occur, distance to the seed source can play a significant role in how long reestablishment takes. Resistance at a particular site can be partially attributed to composition and canopy cover. Sites with more bare ground and lower vegetative cover are less prone to high-severity fires. Sites with these characteristics have the oldest stands of curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Gucker, 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
slender buckwheat (Eriogonum microthecum), other herbaceous
-
granite prickly phlox (Linanthus pungens), other herbaceous
Figure 12. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 650 | 725 | 850 |
Grass/Grasslike | 175 | 250 | 375 |
Forb | 0 | 50 | 100 |
Total | 825 | 1025 | 1325 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-43% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-21% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-20% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-8% |
Litter | 17-50% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-15% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-3% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-25% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 30-65% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-6% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 15-65% |
Table 10. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
---|---|
Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Figure 13. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1512, CELE3/PSSPS. REFERENCE PLANT COMMUNITY.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Mountain Mahogany, Black Sagebrush, and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

The Mountain Mahogany, Black Sagebrush, and Bluebunch Wheatgrass community is similar to Community 1.1, however has an increase in composition and canopy cover of plants tolerant of highly calcareous soils. This is most notable in the presence of black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) and little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). Black and little sagebrush are particularly well adapted to the calcareous soil conditions that often occur at this ecological site (Fryer, 2009). Black sagebrush production in this community can reach as high as 550 pounds per acre (150 pounds per acre for Community 1.1). With the increase in black and low sagebrush canopy cover, curl-leaf mountain mahogany canopy cover decreases, staying below 25 percent. Other shrubs often present at this ecological site include mountain big sagebrush, mountain snowberry, gooseberry, and yellow rabbitbrush. The understory canopy is dominated by bunchgrasses, most notably bluebunch wheatgrass. Bluebunch wheatgrass tolerates the calcareous soil conditions usually present in this community and can often thrive in the understory (Zlatnik, 1999). Other grass species often present include Indian ricegrass, Sandberg bluegrass, and Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis). Forb species in this community are relatively diverse but don't occupy much of the total canopy cover. The most common forbs are pink pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), tapertip hawksbeard (Crepis acuminata), Spiny phlox, and longleaf phlox. Production in this community is variable with a large range, being highly dependent on localized conditions. Production is 450 to 1,150 pounds per acre, averaging 950 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This community has low to moderate resilience. Although very resistant to drought and frequent or high-severity fire, this community has difficulty recovering when much of the overstory is eliminated. Regeneration of curl-leaf mountain mahogany occurs through seed. If stand-destroying disturbances occur, distance to seed source can play a significant role in how long reestablishment takes. Resistance at a particular sites can be partially attributed to composition and canopy cover. Sites with more bare ground and lower vegetative cover are less prone to high-severity fires. Sites with these characteristics have the oldest stands of curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Gucker, 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
-
tapertip hawksbeard (Crepis acuminata), other herbaceous
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Figure 14. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 11. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 225 | 600 | 675 |
Grass/Grasslike | 175 | 325 | 450 |
Forb | 25 | 35 | 45 |
Total | 425 | 960 | 1170 |
Table 12. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 8-32% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 12-38% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-8% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-10% |
Litter | 17-50% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-4% |
Bedrock | 0-10% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-6% |
Table 13. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-3% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-25% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 30-65% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-6% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 15-65% |
Table 14. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
---|---|
Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Figure 15. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1512, CELE3/PSSPS. REFERENCE PLANT COMMUNITY.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.3
Wooded Mountain Mahogany and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Community 1.3 is dominated by curl-leaf mountain mahogany in the shrub overstory and bluebunch wheatgrass in the shrub understory. Unlike Communities 1.1 and 1.2, Community 1.3 is found at or near the transition to a timber-dominated canopy. This community will have Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum), limber pine (Pinus flexilis) or a combination of the three at relatively low densities in the overstory canopy. Limber pine and Rocky Mountain juniper are more prominent on sites when soils have a higher volume of calcium carbonates or are highly calcareous. Bluebunch wheatgrass remains the primary understory. Other species with lesser canopy cover include Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides) , Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), and needleleaf sedge (Carex duriuscula). Other shrub species, in addition to curl-leaf mountain mahogany, include mountain big sagebrush, yellow rabbitbrush, and little sagebrush. Production in this community is lower than in the other two communities in the Reference state. Production values are 700 to 950 pounds per acre, with an average 800 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This community has low to moderate resilience. The introduction of Douglas-fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, and limber pine into the overstory increase the frequency and potential severity of fire. Additionally, because this community exists near transitions to timber dominated overstory, this increases the likelihood of encroachment and possible transition to a forested ecological site. Curl-leaf mountain mahogany are susceptible to stand destroying fires at relatively infrequent fire return intervals. Douglas-fir has a much more frequent fire return interval at seven to 20 years (Steinberg, 2002). As encroachment occurs, curl-leaf mountain mahogany are exposed to different fire regimes than those that occur within the natural range of variability.
Dominant plant species
-
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), tree
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
Figure 16. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 15. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 450 | 525 | 600 |
Grass/Grasslike | 225 | 275 | 300 |
Forb | 25 | 30 | 35 |
Total | 700 | 830 | 935 |
Table 16. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 2-10% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-48% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 11-35% |
Forb foliar cover | 1-7% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 17-50% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 3-18% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-12% |
Table 17. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 1-3% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-3% |
Forb basal cover | 1-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-10% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 30-65% |
Surface fragments >3" | 1-10% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-60% |
Table 18. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | 0-4% |
---|---|
Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | 0-4% |
Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2


The primary driver for community 1.2 is localized abiotic conditions involving highly calcareous soils. These abiotic conditions are found on Rocky Hills 15 to 19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological sites with a higher volume of calcium carbonates within the rooting depth of the soil profile. Black and little sagebrush are well adapted to conditions where soils are highly calcareous (Tilley & St. John, 2012). Black and little sagebrush replace other shrubs and grasses in the canopy that would be present in Community 1.1.
Context dependence. The abiotic conditions that result in community transitions from Community 1.1 to 1.2 are site specific and not directly influenced by anthropogenic or biotic interactions.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3


Shifts to community 1.3 are a combination of localized abiotic conditions and altered disturbance regimes. These communities occur at or near transition zones with timber-dominated areas. Without the close proximity to a source, seed dispersion is less likely and Douglas-fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, and limber pine are less likely to establish. Historic-low severity fire at frequent fire return intervals limits the expansion of tree species into the Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site. However, suppression of fire or lack of fuels to carry fire can aid in the expansion of these forest species.
Context dependence. In addition to local abiotic conditions, fire at frequent and low severity (or lack thereof) can influence how Douglas-fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, or limber pine can establish and expand their respective range.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3


Shifts to community 1.3 are a combination of localized abiotic conditions and altered disturbance regimes. These communities occur at or near transition zones with timber-dominated areas. Without the close proximity, seed dispersion is less likely and Douglas-fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, and limber pine are less likely to establish. Historic low-severity fire at frequent fire return intervals limits the expansion of tree species into this ecological site. However, suppression of fire or lack of fuels to carry fire can aid in the expansion of these forest species.
Context dependence. In addition to local abiotic conditions, fire at frequent and low severity (or lack thereof) can influence how Douglas fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, or limber pine can establish and expand their respective range.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1


Transition from Community 1.3 to Community 1.1 can occur through low-severity fire at a site that is in the early stages of tree establishment. Fires that result in mortality for tree species while leaving other species found in the community unharmed can facilitate transition back to community 1.1. Fuels treatments that mimic historic fire regimes, removing overstory tree species can also facilitate transition to Community 1.1.
Context dependence. Fire events that facilitate transition from Community 1.3 to Community 1.1 must be severe enough that mortality occurs within the tree species (Douglas-fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, limber pine), but leaves the other dominant species unharmed (curl-leaf mountain mahogany and sagebrush species).
Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.2


Transition from Community 1.3 to Community 1.2 can occur through low severity fire at a site that is in the early stages of tree establishment. Fires that result in mortality for tree species while leaving other species found in the community unharmed can facilitate transition back to community 1.2.
Context dependence. Fire events that facilitate transition from Community 1.3 to Community 1.2 must be severe enough that mortality is induced with the tree species (Douglas-fir, Rocky Mountain juniper, limber pine) but leaves the other dominant species unharmed (curl leaf mountain mahogany, big and dwarf sagebrush species).
State 2
Grazing Resistant

When a Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site enters the Grazing Resistant state, the primary shift occurs in the understory vegetation. Grazing pressure from livestock, native ungulates, or a combination of the two drives a shift from the cool-season bunchgrasses that are present in the Reference state towards rhizomatous wheatgrasses, short-stature bunchgrasses, and ground-covering forbs. This state is generally a result of current or historic improper grazing practices that potentially included higher stocking rates and repeated heavy grazing during the growing season.
Characteristics and indicators. In this state, total canopy cover and production values for mid to large sized bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass will decrease. These understory grasses will be relegated to the protected areas under the sagebrush canopies where they are sheltered from grazing. As they are removed from the canopy gaps, they will be replaced with grazing-resistant short-stature bunch grasses like Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) and rhizomatous wheatgrasses. Openings in the canopy gaps vacated by bunchgrasses also present opportunities for an increase in disturbance-tolerant forbs such as spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), vetch species (Vicia ssp.), and Indian paintbrush species (Castilleja ssp.). Opportunities for invasive annual grasses also increase as competition from native grasses is removed from the canopy gaps. Depending on how well grazing-resistant rhizomatous and bunchgrasses occupy the gaps within the canopy, an increase in bare ground cover usually occurs. This can lead to increased erosion and decreased infiltration, decreasing available moisture. Because of this, productivity and canopy cover will be lower than at the Reference state.
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is lower than in the Reference state, primarily due to the decrease in available moisture and the opportunity for invasive species recruitment. The ability to recover from disturbance in rangeland systems is in part related to local climatic conditions. As available moisture increases and temperature decreases, resilience to disturbance increases (Chambers et al., 2014). Intensive grazing that results in chronic defoliation also promotes recruitment of invasive species, which lowers site resilience.
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Community 2.1
Mountain Mahogany and Mixed Bunchgrass Community

Figure 17. Exclosure at Rocky Hills site - Exterior grazed

Figure 18. Grazed Rocky Hills Site
In Community 2.1, the primary overstory shrub species is curl-leaf mountain mahogany with a possible mix of other secondary shrubs such as mountain big sagebrush, black sagebrush, and little sagebrush. As a result of grazing pressure and chronic defoliation, the understory grass species shift from that of the reference communities, which are dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass, to a more even mix of bunchgrasses and Sandberg bluegrass becoming dominant. Sandberg bluegrass is a more grazing-tolerant grass species and will increase in canopy cover under more intense grazing conditions (Howard, 1997). Grazing tolerant forb species such as spiny phlox and stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis) also increase in canopy cover when compared to the communities in the Reference state. As a result of grazing pressure, annual production in this community is significantly reduced when compared with that of the Reference communities. Production at this is 350 to 750 pounds per acre, averaging 500 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. Resilience in Community 2.1 is moderately low as a result chronic defoliation of vegetation from grazing pressure. Conversion of the understory from a bluebunch wheatgrass dominated canopy to a mixed bunchgrass canopy dominated by Sandberg bluegrass creates more opportunity for invasive species recruitment. Sandberg bluegrass is slightly less resilient to low to moderate severity fire than bluebunch wheatgrass (Howard, 1997 & Zlatnik, 1999). Resilience to erosion and invasive species establishment would be dependent on how well other bunchgrasses, rhizomatous grasses, and forbs occupy the bare ground spaces left by the removal of bluebunch wheatgrass. Rhizomatous grasses are mat forming and, if able to establish relatively quickly, can aid in reducing erosion. Additionally, if native rhizomatous grasses and forbs are able to quickly establish, this decreases the ability of invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass to occupy bare soil openings within the site.
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis), other herbaceous
Figure 19. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 19. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 175 | 250 | 375 |
Grass/Grasslike | 150 | 200 | 225 |
Forb | 25 | 50 | 150 |
Total | 350 | 500 | 750 |
Table 20. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-45% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-20% |
Forb foliar cover | 2-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 5-15% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 13-30% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0-20% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-15% |
Table 21. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 2-5% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-4% |
Forb basal cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-40% |
Surface fragments >3" | 1-10% |
Bedrock | 0-20% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 25-70% |
Table 22. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
---|---|
Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Figure 20. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1512, CELE3/PSSPS. REFERENCE PLANT COMMUNITY.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 3
Disturbed
The Disturbed state in the Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone ecological site results from any disturbance that removes the overstory vegetation. The primary disturbance for this ecological site that results in the removal of overstory shrubs is frequent or severe fire. The dominant overstory species found in the Reference state such as curl-leaf mountain mahogany, black sagebrush, low sagebrush, and mountain big sagebrush experience high rates of mortality during severe fire events. In the immediate years following the event, canopy cover increases for early seral and disturbance-tolerant species such as yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), and the common bunchgrass species found in most communities of the Reference state. Historic fire return intervals for curl-leaf mountain mahogany stands in the Salmon River area ranged between 13 to 22 years. Because of grazing and fire exclusion, time between fire events has increased significantly. This has resulted in fewer, but more severe stand destroying fire events (Gucker, 2006).
Characteristics and indicators. This state is distinguished by the lack of curl-leaf mountain mahogany and sagebrush overstory. This is accompanied by an increase in bunchgrass and other early seral grass species as well as disturbance-tolerant shrub species such as yellow rabbitbrush and threetip sagebrush. Canopy cover for mahogany and sagebrush can still be present, however, it is sparse, ranging between zero to eight percent canopy cover on a site.
Resilience management. Once in the Disturbed state, resilience is moderately high. The species present are disturbance tolerant or even perpetuated by frequent or continued disturbance events. Resilience is lost however, by the opportunity for invasive species establishment. Openings in the canopy caused by a disturbance can allow for recruitment of invasive species if native species don't readily occupy those spaces.
Dominant plant species
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides), grass
Community 3.1
Bunchgrass
This community shifts from the shrub-dominated communities of the Reference state to a community dominated by native bunchgrass and disturbance-tolerant species. The grass species tend to be similar to that of the reference communities and include bluebunch wheatgrass, Sandberg bluegrass, and Indian ricegrass. The overstory shrub community, if present, is yellow rabbitbrush and to a lesser extent, threetip sagebrush. Production for this community is no longer weighted toward the shrub functional group, but shifts towards grasses and forbs. Production values remain relatively high, ranging from 500 to 900 pounds per acre, averaging 650 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This community is moderately resilient. Many of the bunchgrasses present are tolerant of continued low to moderate severity disturbances. Bluebunch wheatgrass is able to survive all but the most severe fire disturbances because of its protected root system (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg bluegrass is also tolerant of disturbance and able to quickly recover to pre-disturbance canopy cover. Both of the primary shrubs that can be present in this community (yellow rabbitbrush and threetip sagebrush) are disturbance tolerant and can be perpetuated by a frequent disturbance regime.
Dominant plant species
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
Figure 21. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 23. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 200 | 375 | 500 |
Shrub/Vine | 75 | 175 | 225 |
Forb | 50 | 100 | 150 |
Total | 325 | 650 | 875 |
Table 24. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 2-15% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 2-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-30% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-10% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-6% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 5-15% |
Table 25. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-4% |
Forb basal cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-15% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 30-60% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-6% |
Bedrock | 0-7% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 15-60% |
Table 26. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
---|---|
Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Figure 22. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1205, FEID-PSSPS. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 4
Invaded

The Invaded state is represented by a shift from native grasses and forbs in the understory to an understory dominated by invasive species. Transition to this state occurs after a severe disturbance that creates openings in the canopy for invasive species to establish. The primary invasive species that becomes dominant in the Invaded state is cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum). This state is especially prevalent on steep, rocky slopes where colluvial movement is active. As the soil is disturbed through movement of material downhill, ideal conditions are presented for cheatgrass recruitment. Once established and a seed source is readily available, cheatgrass is well adapted to increasing its coverage area.
Characteristics and indicators. This state is indicated by any single invasive species occupying five percent or more of the canopy, or a group of invasive species occupying 10 percent of the canopy collectively.
Resilience management. This state exhibits low resilience due to the establishment of invasive and non-native species. Once established, non-native vegetation tends to increase in canopy cover and can often be promoted by further disturbances.
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe), other herbaceous
-
rush skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea), other herbaceous
Community 4.1
Invasive Species

This community may resemble other communities within other states of the ecological site; however, will have a canopy cover of five percent or greater for a single invasive species, or 10 percent or greater for all invasive species on site.
Resilience management. This community is perpetuated by continued, frequent disturbances. The invasive species that occupy the site thrive when disturbance regimes shift outside the historic range of variability. Production can be high, however may not occur in desirable species. The production range for this community is 400 to 1,000 pounds per acre, averaging 750 pounds per acre.
Dominant plant species
-
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe), other herbaceous
-
rush skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea), other herbaceous
Figure 23. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 27. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 200 | 450 | 700 |
Grass/Grasslike | 150 | 300 | 400 |
Forb | 50 | 100 | 150 |
Total | 400 | 850 | 1250 |
Table 28. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 8-35% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 12-38% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-8% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 15-47% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 3-18% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-6% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-6% |
Table 29. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-4% |
Forb basal cover | 1-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-9% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 30-60% |
Surface fragments >3" | 1-9% |
Bedrock | 0-15% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 15-65% |
Table 30. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
---|---|
Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | 0-3% |
Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-2% |
Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Figure 24. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0511, BRTE-ANNUALS. State 2.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2


The transition from the Reference state to the Grazing Resistant state is a mechanism of intensive grazing practices that result in chronic defoliation of the understory vegetation. Over time, species like bluebunch wheatgrass are not able to recover from defoliation, and total canopy cover of that species will decrease on a site. In the absence of these species, grazing-tolerant plants such as Sandberg bluegrass will increase in canopy cover and production.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: Continued improper grazing techniques that result in chronic defoliation of vegetation; Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species; Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion; Establishment of invasive species.
Context dependence. Restoration efforts can be greatly influenced by precipitation patterns. Successful regeneration of Reference state understory species is highly dependent on moisture received post-restoration efforts. Rates of successful establishment of bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass increase when available moisture is high during critical regeneration periods (Zlatnik, 1999; Howard, 1997).
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3
The transition from the Reference state to the Disturbed state is a mechanism of frequent or severe disturbances that remove the overstory shrubs on a given site. The most common disturbance that results in the loss of the shrub overstory is high-intensity fire. Historic fire return intervals for curl leaf mountain mahogany stands were relatively frequent (13 to 22 years) and events tended to be lower severity. Since 1900, fire exclusion has decreased fire return intervals and increased the likelihood of less frequent, more severe fire events that are often stand destroying (Gucker, 2006).
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: Frequent disturbances before recovery has completed; Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species; Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion; Establishment of invasive species; Distance from seed source.
Context dependence. The primary factor driving likelihood of restoration success is post-disturbance weather patterns. Prolonged periods of drought can slow restoration processes, whereas average to above average precipitation post disturbance can greatly increase speed and success in the re-establishment of Reference state species (Steinberg, 2002; Fryer, 2009).
Transition T1C
State 1 to 4


Transition from the Reference state to the Invaded state is usually a result of colluvial disturbances on steep slopes. Soil movement downslope that disturbs the surface creates ideal conditions for establishment of invasive species, one of the most prominent species being cheatgrass. Once locally established, cheatgrass is able to further spread across a site.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: Establishment speed of invasive species; Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species; Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion; Continued establishment and spread of invasive species.
Context dependence. Restoration success is dependent on invasive species composition and level of establishment. Removal of cheat grass once significant establishment occurs can be resource intensive with low success rates.
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1


The primary mechanism for restoration from the Grazing Resistant state to the Reference state is rest from grazing. Reference state grasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass will not be able to re-establish while grazing pressure continues. Seeding of desired species may speed up the restoration process.
Context dependence. Time frame for restoration is highly dependent on variations in localized weather patterns. Prolonged periods of drought can dramatically increase time required to return to the Reference state, whereas periods of above normal precipitation can decrease that time frame. Grazing practices that are infrequent and of light intensity, mimicking natural grazing patterns will not impact the restoration pathway. However, continuous early-season grazing at moderate to high intensity resulting in significant defoliation will perpetuate the Grazing Resistant state.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 4


The transition from the Grazing Resistant state to the Invaded state occurs when Reference state grass species are removed through grazing which results in chronic defoliation. This leaves openings that can often be exploited by invasive species such as cheatgrass.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: Continued improper grazing techniques; Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species; Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion; Establishment of invasive species.
Context dependence. Restoration success is dependent on invasive species composition and level of establishment. Removal of cheat grass once significant establishment occurs can be resource intensive with low success rates.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1
Restoration from the Disturbed state to the Reference state is a mechanism of time without stand-destroying disturbance. Once the shrub overstory has been removed, replacement seedlings will need to reach maturity without any further disturbances.
Context dependence. Time frame for restoration is highly dependent on variations in localized weather patterns. Prolonged periods of drought can dramatically increase time required to return to the Reference state, whereas periods of above normal precipitation can decrease that time frame. Distance from a seed source of representative plants from the Reference state can impact restoration timeframes in the absence of seeding or planting.
Transition T3A
State 3 to 4
The transition from the Disturbed state to the Invaded state results when a disturbance removes native vegetation cover and is replaced by non-native or invasive species. If native vegetation is not able to repopulate a site after a disturbance occurs, opportunities exist for the recruitment of invasive species in their absence. The most common invasive species to cause this transition at the Rocky Hills ecological site is cheatgrass.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: Grazing following a disturbance; Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species; Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion; Establishment of invasive species.
Context dependence. Restoration efforts can be greatly influenced by precipitation patterns. Successful regeneration of Reference state understory species is highly dependent on moisture received post-restoration efforts. Rates of successful establishment of bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass increase when available moisture is high during critical regeneration periods (Zlatnik, 1999; Howard, 1997).
Additional community tables
Table 31. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 450–850 | |||||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 200–1045 | 2–40 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–150 | 0–3 | ||
Rocky Mountain juniper | JUSC2 | Juniperus scopulorum | 0–150 | 0–3 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 0–150 | 0–1 | ||
currant | RIBES | Ribes | 0–120 | 0–3 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–100 | 0 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–75 | 0 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 200–400 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 285–400 | 5–18 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–95 | 0–5 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–75 | 0–10 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–125 | |||||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 10–95 | 0–5 | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 0–95 | 0–1 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 5–30 | 2–30 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–30 | 0–4 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–30 | 0–3 | ||
silverleaf phacelia | PHHA | Phacelia hastata | 0–30 | 0 | ||
blue flax | LIPE2 | Linum perenne | 0–20 | 0 | ||
rockcress | ARABI2 | Arabis | 0–15 | 0–3 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 5–15 | 0–1 | ||
cryptantha | CRYPT | Cryptantha | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
tufted fleabane | ERCA2 | Erigeron caespitosus | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
mat rockspirea | PECA12 | Petrophytum caespitosum | 0–10 | 0 |
Table 32. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 175–900 | |||||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 100–350 | 3–12 | ||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 95–330 | 3–25 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 45–250 | 1–12 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 5–200 | 0–5 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–180 | 0–3 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–75 | 0–3 | ||
basin big sagebrush | ARTRT | Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 0–50 | 0–2 | ||
currant | RIBES | Ribes | 0–50 | 0–2 | ||
Rocky Mountain juniper | JUSC2 | Juniperus scopulorum | 0–1 | 0–1 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–1 | 0–1 | ||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 0–1 | 0–1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 100–550 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 75–550 | 8–30 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–100 | 0–7 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–100 | 0–5 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 5–56 | 1–4 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–25 | 0–2 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–25 | 0–2 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 10–50 | |||||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 5–30 | 1–8 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 1–25 | 1–3 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–20 | 0–3 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
longstalk phacelia | PHLO | Phacelia longipes | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
stickseed | HACKE | Hackelia | 15 | 0–1 | ||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
cushion buckwheat | EROV | Eriogonum ovalifolium | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
bluebells | MERTE | Mertensia | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0 | 1–2 |
Table 33. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 368–682 | |||||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 120–613 | 10–25 | ||
Rocky Mountain juniper | JUSC2 | Juniperus scopulorum | 0–200 | 0–6 | ||
mallow ninebark | PHMA5 | Physocarpus malvaceus | 0–120 | 0–15 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–120 | 0–9 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
chokecherry | PRVI | Prunus virginiana | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 0–50 | 0–2 | ||
Rocky Mountain maple | ACGL | Acer glabrum | 0–40 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 184–350 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 125–275 | 7–25 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–125 | 0–5 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 0–100 | 0–5 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 10–56 | 1–3 | ||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
needlegrass | ACHNA | Achnatherum | 0–25 | 0–1 | ||
spike fescue | LEKI2 | Leucopoa kingii | 0–25 | 0–1 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 18–32 | |||||
dotted blazing star | LIPU | Liatris punctata | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–20 | 0–1 | ||
thistle | CIRSI | Cirsium | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
cushion buckwheat | EROV | Eriogonum ovalifolium | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
Lewis flax | LILE3 | Linum lewisii | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
woolly mock goldenweed | STLA7 | Stenotus lanuginosus | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
common dandelion | TAOF | Taraxacum officinale | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 34. Community 1.3 forest overstory composition
Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tree
|
|||||||
Douglas-fir | PSME | Pseudotsuga menziesii | Native | – | 0–10 | – | – |
Rocky Mountain juniper | JUSC2 | Juniperus scopulorum | Native | – | 0–5 | – | – |
limber pine | PIFL2 | Pinus flexilis | Native | – | 0–2 | – | – |
Table 35. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 175–375 | |||||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 100–325 | 5–40 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 0–100 | 0–8 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–100 | 0–6 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 0–75 | 0–6 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 150–225 | |||||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 50–200 | 4–15 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 25–150 | 2–10 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 25–100 | 2–10 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 25–150 | |||||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 10–60 | 2–15 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 10–60 | 2–7 | ||
rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
cushion buckwheat | EROV | Eriogonum ovalifolium | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–35 | 0–2 |
Table 36. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 75–225 | |||||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 50–175 | 2–15 | ||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 0–150 | 0–10 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–100 | 0–5 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 200–500 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 50–350 | 5–35 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 25–150 | 3–15 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–100 | 0–8 | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 50–150 | |||||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 25–75 | 2–6 | ||
rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | 15–50 | 2–6 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
maiden blue eyed Mary | COPA3 | Collinsia parviflora | 0–15 | 0–5 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–15 | 0–2 |
Table 37. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 200–700 | |||||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 150–650 | 5–30 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–125 | 0–10 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
chokecherry | PRVI | Prunus virginiana | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 150–400 | |||||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 50–375 | 5–30 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 100–250 | 4–10 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–200 | 0–10 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 50–150 | |||||
spotted knapweed | CEST8 | Centaurea stoebe | 0–60 | 0–8 | ||
rush skeletonweed | CHJU | Chondrilla juncea | 0–60 | 0–8 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 5–50 | 0–5 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
sulphur-flower buckwheat | ERUM | Eriogonum umbellatum | 0–40 | 0–3 | ||
stickseed | HACKE | Hackelia | 0–25 | 0–2 | ||
yellow salsify | TRDU | Tragopogon dubius | 0–25 | 0–2 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Rocky Hills ecological site within the 15 to 19-inch climatic subset. These values can be used to estimate stocking rates; however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at a location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre) for each state and community are as follows: In the Reference state, Community 1.1 has a range of 800 to 1,300, averaging 1,000; Community 1.2 has a range of 450 to 1,150, averaging 950; Community 1.3 has a range of 700 to 950, averaging 800. In the Grazed state, Community 2.1 has a production range of 350 to 750, averaging 500. In the Disturbed state, Community 3.1 has a production range of 500 to 900, averaging 650. The Invaded state has a production range in Community 4.1 that is 400 to 1,000, averaging 750.
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush grasslands in the Lost River Mountain LRU provide critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain ranges. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working Group in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, the northern end of the Pahsimeroi Mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob Mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Curl-Leaf Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus ledofolius) - All states/communities:
Curl-leaf mountain mahogany is a very important food source and provides valuable cover for many large ungulates in Central Idaho. This includes mule deer, elk, moose, and bighorn sheep. Utilization for elk and deer is especially high in the summer and fall.
Curl-leaf mountain mahogany stands also provide valuable breeding and hunting grounds for mountain lions. A variety of small mammals, including deer mice consume mountain mahogany seeds. Curl-leaf mountain mahogany stands are an important nesting site for many bird species including dusky grouse, dusky flycatchers, rock wrens, and American kestrels (Gucker, 2006).
Mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana) - Communities 1.3:
Mountain big sagebrush is considered to be highly palatable by most wildlife browsers (Rosenstrater, 2005). Sage grouse, ungulates, and rodents browse mountain big sagebrush primarily during the winter when it becomes one of the more palatable available forages. However, seasonal snow levels can exclude many browsing species. Several studies have shown that mountain big sagebrush is preferred forage by elk, mule deer, and sage grouse when compared to the other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017). Sage grouse are considered obligate species of mountain big sagebrush and other big sagebrush varieties. These species are generally preferred over the low sagebrush species; Artemisia nova and Artemisia arbuscula (Dalke et al., 1963).
Threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita) - Community 2.1:
Threetip sagebrush is not a preferred browse species for most wild ungulates. It can be used to a minor extent by mule deer in both the winter and summer and as emergency forage for other large ungulates (Tirmenstein, 1999.)
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata) - All states/communities:
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on Western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, utilization of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) - Communities 1.2, 1.3, 2.1
When available, Idaho fescue can be a dominant component to many wild ungulate diets, including pronghorn, deer, elk, and bighorn sheep. In some instances, depending on other available forage, the species can be considered as valuable but not preferred forage for ungulates. The species is a valuable component of the diet of the northern pocket gopher and grizzly bear when it is found within their range.
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) - Communities 1.2, 1.3, 2.1
Sandberg bluegrass is one of the earliest grasses to green up during the spring and become available forage for wildlife; however, becomes less utilized during the later summer months. Degree of use for elk and pronghorn is good to poor, and good to fair for mule deer, small mammals, small nongame birds, and upland game birds. Usage is fair to poor by waterfowl (Howard, 1997).
Black sagebrush (Artemisia nova): Communities 1.1, 1.2
Mule deer and pronghorn use black sagebrush habitats extensively. Use is especially heavy by mule deer in the early decades post-fire disturbance (Communities 1.3 and 3.1). This is most prevalent within the first three decades after the fire event (Fryer, 2009). Black sagebrush dominated sites have been shown to be great winter range for pronghorn (Kindschy et al., 1982) and winter distribution has been strongly associated with black sagebrush communities (Clary and Beale, 1983). Sage grouse are obligate species of black and other sagebrush varieties. Generally, big sagebrush communities are preferred by sage grouse; however, some black sagebrush sites on the Snake River Plains and in Nevada have been shown to be preferred winter grounds for feeding and cover (Dalke et al., 1963).
Other species of note that rely on black sagebrush communities include great basin pocket mice, Ord's kangaroo rats, sage thrashers, and a large variety of insect pollinator species (Fryer, 2009).
Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba): Communities 1.1, 1.2
In early spring and winter, little sagebrush is often a preferred forage species for mule deer (Blaisdell et al., 1982). In the Great Basin, little sagebrush dominated sites are heavily utilized by pronghorn during the summer (Kindschy et al., 1982). Little sagebrush, among other varieties is an important forage source for sage grouse throughout the year (Steinberg, 2002).
Hydrological functions
Water in the form of annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid, and soil permeability is moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals, including pronghorn, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies.
The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site IDs and data collection intensity for each site used in the development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involve a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
Other references
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Esipinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A. Wuenschel. 2014. Using resistance and resilience concepts to reduce impacts of invasive annual grasses and altered fire regimes on the sagebrush ecosystem and greater sage-grouse: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-326.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station., Fort Collins, CO. 73.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Forest Service Remote Automoted Weather Station (Bonanza & Copper Basin). Retrieved from: Western Regional Climate Center. October, 2022. https://wrcc.dri.edu/
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html [2024, March 12].
Gucker, Corey L. 2006. Cercocarpus ledifolius. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/tree/cerled/all.html [2024, February 22].
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/tree/psemeng/all.html [ 2024, March 13 ].
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [1]. 2012. Plant Guide for black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tripartita. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2024, March 12].
Contributors
Zachary Van Abbema
Carla Rebernak
Grant Petersen
Kirt Walstad
Karen Clause
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/19/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Katelyn Palmer
Nicholas Kozlowski
Salmon-Challis FS Staff
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Zachary Van Abbema |
---|---|
Contact for lead author |
Zachary Van Abbema zachary.vanabbema@usda.gov |
Date | 10/11/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not present in the reference condition. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon in the reference condition. When present, they usually occur on steeper slopes (>15 percent) and are inconspicuous, disconnected, and very short in length. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes: Pedestals are not evident in the reference condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is between zero and 15 percent, averaging eight percent. This refers to exposed mineral soil not covered by litter, rock, basal cover, plant cover, standing dead, lichen and/or moss. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gullies are not present in the reference condition. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind scoured, or depositional areas are not evident in the reference condition. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Movement of fine herbaceous litter may occur within 1 foot from where it originated. Litter consists of fine, herbaceous material and slope can impact the distance it travels. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface is stable with stability ratings of 4-6 (both under canopy and bare). Abiotic crusts and or root mats may be present. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface structure is granular with the A horizon ranging from 0 - 16.5 inches thick, averaging 7 inches thick. A horizon colors are primarily 10YR 3/3 and 10YR 3/2. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plants are evenly distributed across the ecological site and the shrubs and bunchgrasses present improved infiltration as well as protect against runoff. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Not present. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Curlleaf mountain mahogany > bluebunch wheatgrassSub-dominant:
Remaining shrub species > remaining grass speciesOther:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Mortality in herbaceous species is not evident. Species with bunch growth forms may have some natural mortality in centers. Sagebrush species will become decadent in the absence of historical fire return intervals. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Total ground litter cover varies but can range from 17 - 50 percent averaging 30 percent. Depth is usually shallow at less than 1/8 inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production ranges from 450-1,300 pounds per acre, averaging 850 pounds per acre. Production varies based on effective precipitation and natural variability of soil properties for this ecological site. Total production is slightly higher for perennial grass species, but tends to be split mostly equal between grasses and shrubs. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invasive species include cheatgrass, spotted knapweed, toadflax, and crested wheatgrass. Native species such a yellow rabbitbrush or significant populations of Sandberg bluegrass or rhizomatous wheatgrasses can indicate a departure from the reference state. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in most years. Bluebunch wheatgrass may not reproduce during extended periods of drought.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.