

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02B020
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/19/2025
Accessed: 05/20/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 012X, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in Idaho. MLRA 012X is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources, and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mt. Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869 meters). Annual precipitation has a significant range from six to 47 inches, the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly east of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from Salmon, Idaho to the north, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the south, the Beaverhead Mountain Range to the east, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the west. This LRU borders MLRA 043B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 010X - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet). The boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M170 Great Basin-Intermountain Dry Shrubland & Grassland Macrogroup
G308 Intermountain Low & Black Sagebrush Steppe & Shrubland Group
A3222 Black Sagebrush Steppe & Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001424 Black Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Shrubland Association
Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 Northwestern Forested Mountains
Level II: 10.1 Western Cordillera
Level III: 10.1.4 Middle Rockies
Ecological site concept
The Limy 10 to 14 inch (Li 10 to 14 inch) is an upland ecological site primarily distinguished by the presence of highly calcareous soils at or near the surface. The site is moderately deep or deep to lithic contact, but very shallow to calcareous soils.
• This site does not receive additional water.
• These soils:
o Are not saline , saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are moderately deep, deep, or very deep
o Have greater than 15 percent calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) within the top 10 centimeters of the soil profile.
The primary limiting factors shaping plant communities for this ecological site involve soil chemistry and low relative effective annual precipitation. Having highly calcareous soils in the top 10 centimeters (greater than 15 percent CCE) creates conditions suitable to a specific group of species. Low relative effective annual precipitation at this site helps preserve the calcium carbonate concentration at the soil surface.
Associated sites
BX012X02B026 |
Loamy Calcareous 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also found on limestone parent material where calcareous soils are deeper in the soil profile. |
---|---|
BX012X02C034 |
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found on rock outcroppings and ridges where soil is intermittently shallow to bedrock. It is often found on limestone parent material. |
BX012X02C072 |
Steep Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found adjacent to the Limy ecological site where calcareous soils are not present and a high volume of coarse fragments exist in the soil profile. |
BX012X02C063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also found on limestone parent material where calcareous soils are deeper in the soil profile. |
BX012X02C068 |
Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found adjacent on slopes less than 30 percent and calcareous soils are not present in the top 50 centimeters (20 inches). |
Similar sites
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has highly calcareous soils in the 25 to 50 centimeters portion of the soil profile. |
---|---|
BX012X02C063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has highly calcareous soils in the 10 to 25 centimeters portion of the soil profile. |
BX012X02C034 |
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site often has highly calcareous soils, but it is characterized by outcrops of bedrock close to the surface and the presence of curl leaf mountain mahogany. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia nova |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XB020ID
Physiographic features
This site can occur on mountain slopes, eroded fan remnants, and swales on mountain slopes all within the mountain landscape. This site is not elevation dependent, however, elevation can influence relative effective annual precipitation. This site is not slope dependent but occurs on slopes ranging from 15 to 65 percent. Runoff is low to moderate and flooding/ponding does not occur.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Eroded fan remnant -- All, or a portion of an alluvial fan that is much more extensively
eroded and dissected than a fan remnant; sometimes called an erosional fan remnant.
Swale -- A shallow, open depression in unconsolidated materials that lacks a defined channel but can funnel overland or subsurface flow into a drainageway.

Figure 1. Aspect and Elevation of 12 Limy 10-14" Sites
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Eroded fan remnant (3) Mountains > Mountain slope > Swale |
---|---|
Runoff class | Very low to low |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 6,303 – 7,049 ft |
Slope | 35 – 51% |
Aspect | W, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class | Not specified |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | Not specified |
Ponding frequency | Not specified |
Elevation | 6,178 – 7,496 ft |
Slope | 29 – 57% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity's and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this Limy ecological site, effective precipitation is 10 to 14 inches. Effective precipitation is a modeled value that considers annual precipitation, aspect, elevation, slope, and slope shape. Often this value will be greater than or less than annual precipitation values in relation to these other characteristics.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 31-48 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 54-95 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 11-13 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 27-52 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 44-105 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 11-14 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 40 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 75 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 12 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) ARCO [USC00100375], Arco, ID
-
(2) GROUSE [USC00103882], Mackay, ID
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this site are moderately deep to very deep, ranging from 20 to greater than 40 inches (50 to 100 centimeters) and consist of textures ranging from extremely gravelly or gravelly loams to silt loams. Soils can be skeletal (greater than 35 percent coarse fragments) and are primarily formed from colluvium derived from limestone and quartzite. Soils are highly calcareous within the zero to four inch (zero to 10 centimeter) section of the soil profile. This is represented by a calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) greater than 15 percent which is identified by having a pH of 7.8 or greater coupled with an effervescence of strong or higher. These soils are well drained.
Representative Taxonomy:
1. Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Calcixerepts
2. Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Xeric Calcicryepts

Figure 8. pH of Horizons at Limy 10-14" Sites in the Lost River Mountain LRU

Figure 9. Soil textures of Horizons in the Limy 10-14" Sites in the Lost River Mountain LRU

Figure 10. Soil profile of Limy 10-14" ecological site: 2020ID7032215
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
limestone
(2) Colluvium – quartzite |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly loam (2) Loam (3) Silt loam (4) Sandy loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy-skeletal |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate to rapid |
Soil depth | 20 – 80 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 8 – 48% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 15% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
1.9 – 2 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-4in) |
15 – 30% |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-4in) |
8 – 8.2 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
22 – 46% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
1 – 4% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Not specified |
---|---|
Permeability class | Not specified |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 65% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 19% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
1.9 – 2.1 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-4in) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-4in) |
7.8 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
13 – 56% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
7% |
Ecological dynamics
The Limy 10 to 14 inch ecological site exists in three known states; Reference state, Grazing Resistant state, and Disturbed state. Within the submodels of those states there are six different communities. Transitions between the states are primarily disturbance driven, either through chronic defoliation from grazing or moderate to severe wildfire. Dominant vegetation at this site is well adapted to high volume of calcium carbonates present in the rooting depth this ecological site.
State-and-transition Model Information:
A state-and-transition model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the state-and-transition model. This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference state. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the state-and-transition model, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between reference states and degraded states in this ecological site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference

Figure 11. Limy 10-14" Ecological Site
The Reference state in the Limy ecological site consists of four communities: the black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) community, the little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula longiloba) community, the mixed overstory community where black sagebrush and little sagebrush are co-dominant, and the bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegnaria spicata) dominated community. Although the Black Sagebrush/Bluebunch wheatgrass community is the typical community associated with this site due to it's tolerance of calcareous soils derived from limestone, it is not the most common. Range for black sagebrush in the Lost River Mountain LRU is limited as a result of it's climatic requirements. Although black sagebrush has been shown to successfully establish in frigid soil temperature and xeric soil moisture regimes, the species tends to be more prominent in areas that border mesic and aridic. Available moisture increases rapidly with elevation gain in the Lost River Mountain LRU, creating conditions more favorable to black sagebrush/little sagebrush mixed communities, or communities with overstories dominated by little sagebrush (Steinberg, 2002; Fryer, 2009). The primary driver in community change in the ecological site is local climatic conditions, however, processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that can result in community changes. These include but are not limited to frequent or severe fire occurrence, grazing that results in chronic defoliation limiting regrowth, land use change, and occurrence of invasive species (Davies et al., 2011). These processes can result in sagebrush overstory removal, shifting to community 1.4, the bluebunch wheatgrass dominated community. The low to moderate severity disturbances can decrease sagebrush populations leading to local (although usually temporary) dominance of bunchgrass populations. Production values in the Reference state of this ecological site can be wide ranging depending on local site conditions and seasonal weather patterns and trends. Total production varies from 400 to 1200 pounds per acre, with average production at 719 pounds per acre.
Characteristics and indicators. Overstory sagebrush canopy cover in this state is generally high, averaging 15 percent canopy cover regardless of sagebrush species dominance. The understory is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass, Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), and a mix of drier climate forbs. Bluebunch wheat grass canopy cover can vary, ranging from five to 40 percent. The higher end usually occurs in community 1.4. Lack of diversity at this site can be attributed to soil chemistry. Because calcium carbonate equivalency is greater than 15 percent in the top four inches (10 centimeters) of the soil profile, plants must be specifically adapted to those conditions to establish populations. The lack of diversity favors the bunchgrass understory by decreasing competition and allowing for higher canopy cover and production of the species. Although effective precipitation at this site is low (10 to 14 inches), site production can exceed 1000 pounds per acre with over half of that attributed to bluebunch wheatgrass and other grasses present.
Resilience management. This site has moderate resilience resulting from the frigid temperature regime and xeric moisture regime. Resistance and resilience of a specific site has been attributed with abiotic conditions favorable to plant growth and reproduction (Maestas et al., 2016). Soils that fall within the frigid temperature regime and xeric moisture regime present moderately favorable conditions for regeneration and production and therefore promote moderate resilience post disturbance. This is specifically true in terms of resisting or recovering from site invasion after a disturbance has occurred (Maestas et al., 2016). On the LRU scale, this site may also have increased resistance to invasion of annual grasses due to the calcium carbonate concentration found in the zero to four inch (0 to 10cm) range of the soil profile. Calcareous soils have shown to provide a deterrent to establishment of invasive grasses such as Bromus techtorum (Miller et al., 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
Community 1.1
Black Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 12. Black sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass community
This community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU, specifically when soils are shallow to calcareous soils. Although composition, foliar cover, and production at this ecological site can vary throughout the shrub overstory, black sagebrush tends to occur more often as a singular dominant overstory species. Black sagebrush thrives at dryer sites, making it more common on the Southern end of the LRU and near the borders with the Lost River Valley LRU where relative annual effective precipitation (REAP) is lower. The more pronounced these dry climatic and calcareous soil conditions become, the more likely the community shifts towards a black sagebrush dominated community (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012). At the landscape scale, mosaics between little and black sagebrush dominated sites can represent slight localized differences in soil conditions and REAP (McArthur & Stevens, 2009). This community is drought-tolerant and plant mortality is generally low during extended periods of lower than average precipitation. Black sagebrush communities can form in a mosaic distribution with the other communities in this state (1.2, 1.3, & 1.4) across the range of relative annual effective precipitation. Black sagebrush-dominated sites are generally more common at the lower end of the effective precipitation range (10 inch), and cover of little sagebrush tends to increase towards the upper end of 14 inches (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012). Of the surveys and site visits completed in this community, average foliar cover of black sagebrush is 20 percent, with bluebunch wheatgrasse averaging eight percent. Although canopy cover of black sagebrush is higher than bluebunch in this community, plant production is more evenly split. Bluebunch wheatgrass (and other minor grasses) averages 45 percent of the site production value, while black sagebrush and other minor shrubs account for 55 percent. Forbs are a minor community component, averaging one to three percent canopy cover. Basal gaps are numerous, but minimal in length (one to three feet). Surface gravel cover is usually high compared to other ecological sites in the LRU reaching as high as 50 percent, and exposed bare ground can be extensive, with a maximum near 55 percent.
Resilience management. This community has moderate resilience as a result of the frigid soil temperature regime and xeric soil moisture regime. These conditions are moderately favorable for regeneration and production relating to post disturbance recovery (Maestas et al., 2016). Local site conditions can play a significant role in site resilience. Black sagebrush communities in montane environments are more resistant to annual grass invasion than in valleys and lowlands, and annual grass establishment post disturbance can vary based on moisture patterns, location, and seed source vicinity. Under certain conditions, annual grass invasion (specifically by Bromus techtorum - cheatgrass) can drive conversion from black sagebrush to annual grassland communities (Steinberg, 2002). However, the calcareous soils present at this site may provide additional resistance to annual grass establishment. Calcareous soils have shown to provide a deterrent to establishment of invasive grasses such as Bromus techtorum (Miller et al., 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
Figure 13. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 125 | 200 | 400 |
Shrub/Vine | 200 | 250 | 350 |
Forb | 2 | 20 | 50 |
Total | 327 | 470 | 800 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-25% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-20% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-5% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 2-30% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-50% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-8% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 4-25% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-5% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-50% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-8% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-55% |
Figure 14. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0810, ARNO4/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Little Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 15. Little Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Community
In community 1.2, the dominant overstory species shifts from black sagebrush to Artemisia arbuscula var. longiloba (little sagebrush). Like community 1.1, this community is also well adapted to the abiotic conditions in the Lost River Mountain LRU, specifically in the Limy ecological site. Similar to black sagebrush, little sagebrush is tolerant of the highly calcareous surface soils present which are derived from the limestone parent material. The shift in overstory canopy from black to little sagebrush is at least in part a result of increased coarse fragments in the rooting zone. Little sagebrush has shown to typically grow where a root restricting layer is present in the form of a claypan, bedrock, or in the case of this LRU, where coarse fragments in the soil consisting of cobbles and gravels exceed 30 percent (Steinberg, 2002). Like Community 1.1, the primary understory species is bluebunch wheatgrass. Bluebunch wheatgrass can be a dominant understory grass at many different elevation and precipitation levels across the LRU. It is tolerant of calcareous soils and primarily occupies the sagebrush canopy gaps in well drained soils where it can receive full sunlight (Zlatnick, 1999). Of the surveys completed in this community of the Limy ecological site, average canopy cover of little sagebrush is 15 percent, while cover of bluebunch wheatgrass is 25 percent. Gaps in vegetation canopy per 100 foot transect averaged a total of 47 feet with gaps ranging in size from one to six feet.
Resilience management. This community is moderately resilient. Little sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass are both drought-tolerant species which increases resistance to climate-related disturbances such as prolonged periods with below average precipitation. However, with this site occurring in the 10 to 14 inch effective precipitation range, recovery from other disturbances can be slow (Chambers et al., 2014). Slow returns to pre-disturbance conditions can create opportunities for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Additional resistance to invasion of annual grasses can be attributed to the calcareous soils. Calcareous soils, when high enough in the soil profile, have been shown to act as a deterrent towards the establishment of invasive annual grasses (Miller et al., 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Figure 16. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 10. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 300 | 541 | 920 |
Shrub/Vine | 50 | 73 | 150 |
Forb | 0 | 15 | 80 |
Total | 350 | 629 | 1150 |
Table 11. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-25% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 10-35% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-25% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-45% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 4-25% |
Table 12. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-8% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-60% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-55% |
Figure 17. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0812, ARARL/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.3
Mixed Black and Little Sagebrush

Figure 18. Mixed Black and Little Sagebrush Community
Community 1.3 is a co-dominated overstory that includes both little and black sagebrush. This is usually represented in a mosaic across the ecological sites and often represents slight local differences in soil depths or volume of coarse fragments in the soil profile. While both species can tolerate calcareous soils, black sagebrush tends to establish better when calcium carbonate equivalency is higher and soils are deeper to a root-restricting layer. Little sagebrush establishes better where soils are shallow to a root restriction. In this LRU, root restrictions generally consist of bedrock or a high volume of coarse fragments (gravels and cobbles) in the soil profile (Steinberg, 2002; Tilley and St. John [2], 2012). Canopy cover between the two sagebrush species can vary on any given site with one of the two comprising the majority of cover. They can also exist in nearly equal canopy cover distribution. Similar to Communities 1.1 and 1.2, the dominant understory species is bluebunch wheatgrass. Bluebunch wheatgrass can be a dominant understory grass at many different elevation and precipitation levels across the LRU. It is tolerant of calcareous soils and primarily occupies the sagebrush canopy gaps in well drained soils where it can receive full sunlight (Zlatnick, 1999). Other perennial grasses such as Poa secunda (Sandberg bluegrass) can exist within this community, generally at less than five percent of the total canopy cover. Total annual production at this site is similar to that of Communities 1.1 and 1.2 ranging from 400 to 1200 pounds per acre with average annual production of 650 pounds per acre. Average combined canopy cover of little and black sagebrush is near 20 percent. Combined perennial grass understory (Sandberg bluegrass and bluebunch wheatgrass) average 25 percent.
Resilience management. This community is slightly more resilient than communities 1.1 and 1.2 . The increased diversity of the mixed overstory canopy provides additional protection against insect and disease disturbances that could potentially only impact one of the two species. However, with this site occurring in the 10 to 14 inch effective precipitation range, recovery from other disturbances can be slow (Chambers et al., 2014). Slow returns to pre-disturbance conditions can open opportunities for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Additional resistance to invasion of annual grasses can be attributed to the calcareous soils. Calcareous soils, when high enough in the soil profile, have shown to act as a deterrent towards the establishment of invasive annual grasses (Miller et al., 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Figure 19. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 13. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 175 | 250 | 450 |
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 200 | 350 |
Forb | 0 | 10 | 50 |
Total | 325 | 460 | 850 |
Table 14. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-30% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-30% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-8% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0% |
Table 15. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 0% |
Forb basal cover | 0% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-60% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-7% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-10% |
Figure 20. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0810, ARNO4/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.4
Bluebunch Wheatgrass and Little Sagebrush

Figure 21. Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Little Sagebrush
This community is characterized by a change in dominant foliar cover from sagebrush (black sagebrush, little sagebrush, or a combination of the two) to a dominant foliar cover of bunchgrasses including bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass. The shift in dominant foliar cover to bunchgrasses can be a result of local site characteristics that allow the bunchgrasses to establish and minimize additional growth of sagebrush, or by a sagebrush mortality event. These events can include fire, flooding, intense freezing periods, insect and disease, or anthropogenic disturbances. These sagebrush mortality events are of a low to moderate-severity nature, leaving behind enough sagebrush plants to maintain a reduced population and seed source. Severe disturbance events that remove the majority or all of the sagebrush population in an area generally move the ecological site into state three, the Disturbance state. Production values within this community are wide-ranging, having the ability to outproduce Communities 1.1 and 1.2 due to the increased opportunity for bunchgrass establishment. At the high end of the production range (1200 pounds per acre), grasses can account for over half of the total production value (650 pounds per acre).
Resilience management. This community is moderate to highly resilient when bluebunch wheatgrass dominates the canopy cover and production at the ecological site. Bluebunch wheatgrass is well-suited to the variable climate experienced in the Lost River Mountains and is resilient to many natural disturbances, including drought and fire. Bluebunch wheatgrass has been shown to recover to pre-fire disturbance numbers in one to seven years post disturbance and, under certain conditions, canopy cover and production of the species can exceed pre-fire values (Zlatnik, 1999). Bluebunch wheatgrass is a decreaser, reducing canopy cover and production in relation to grazing pressure. Under heavy grazing pressure, the species will shift towards occurring in more protected areas such as the under the canopy of shrubs, opening the canopy for rhizomatous grass species, invasive species, or bare ground establishment. If grazing pressure is significant enough in intensity and duration, this ecological site will shift into the Grazing Resistant state.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
Figure 22. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 16. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 350 | 700 | 900 |
Shrub/Vine | 75 | 150 | 250 |
Forb | 0 | 50 | 100 |
Total | 425 | 900 | 1250 |
Figure 23. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0812, ARARL/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.4


The transition from community 1.1 to 1.4 is a result of a sagebrush removal disturbance. These disturbances can be either anthropogenic or naturally occurring. Natural disturbances include low to moderate severity fire, sagebrush die-off events from freeze kill, drought, or prolonged saturation (flooding). Anthropogenic disturbances include mechanical or chemical brush thinning, land conversion, and herbivory. These disturbances are not severe enough to remove entire sagebrush populations, which would transition the site to the disturbed state.
Context dependence. Climatic variation such as prolonged periods of drought or above average temperatures can result in a higher likelihood of a fire-related disturbance occurring at this ecological site. The likelihood or severity of insect and disease disturbances specific to these sagebrush species has not been shown to increase in relation to climatic factors (Evers et al., 2013).
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.4


The transition from community 1.2 to 1.4 is a result of a sagebrush removal disturbance. These disturbances can be either anthropogenic or naturally occurring. Natural disturbances include low to moderate severity fire, sagebrush die-off events from freeze kill, drought, of prolonged saturation (flooding). Anthropogenic disturbances include mechanical or chemical brush thinning, land conversion, and herbivory. These disturbances are not severe enough to remove entire sagebrush populations, which would transition the site to the disturbed state.
Context dependence. Climatic variation such as prolonged periods of drought or above average temperatures can result in a higher likelihood of a fire-related disturbance occurring at this ecological site. The likelihood or severity of insect and disease disturbances specific to these sagebrush species has not been shown to increase in relation to climatic factors (Evers et al., 2013).
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1


Shifting from Community 1.3 (Mixed Back and Little Sagebrush community) to Community 1.1 (Black Sagebrush community) is primarily a result of a sagebrush removing disturbance that would only impact the low sagebrush species. This would likely be the result of an insect or disease disturbance that only targeted a single species or a mechanical treatment aimed at removing a single species.
Context dependence. Little evidence suggests that climatic factors such as drought or increased average temperature play a role in the insect and disease-related disturbances that impact sagebrush (Evers et al., 2013). Therefore, these events are considered cyclical and more dependent on time and spatial influences.
Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.2


Shifting from Community 1.3 (Mixed Black and Little Sagebrush community) to Community 1.2 (Little Sagebrush community) is primarily a result of a sagebrush removing disturbance that would only impact the black sagebrush species. This would likely be the result of an insect or disease-related disturbance that only targeted a single species or a mechanical treatment aimed at removing a single species.
Context dependence. Little evidence suggests that climatic factors such as drought or increased average temperature play a role in the insect and disease-related disturbances that impact sagebrush (Evers et al., 2013). Therefore, these events are considered cyclical and more dependent on time and spatial influences.
Pathway 1.3C
Community 1.3 to 1.4


The transition from Community 1.3 to 1.4 is a result of a sagebrush removal disturbance. These disturbances can be either anthropogenic or naturally occurring. Natural disturbances include low to moderate-severity fire, sagebrush die-off events from freeze kill, drought, or prolonged saturation (flooding). Anthropogenic disturbances include mechanical or chemical brush thinning, land conversion, and herbivory. These disturbances are not severe enough to remove entire sagebrush populations, which would transition the site to the disturbed state.
Context dependence. Climatic variation such as prolonged periods of drought or above average temperatures can result in a higher likelihood of a fire-related disturbance occurring at this ecological site. The likelihood or severity of insect and disease disturbances specific to these sagebrush species has not been shown to increase in relation to climatic factors (Evers et al., 2013).
Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.1


The transition from Community 1.4 to Community 1.1 requires time without a sagebrush removing disturbance. In the absence of disturbance, sagebrush species will repopulate the site. The timeframe of this transition is highly dependent on local climate and weather conditions, as well as distance to seed source.
Context dependence. This transition requires time without a sagebrush removing disturbance. Disturbances that occur when the sagebrush overstory is developing can delay or restart the transition back to Community 1.1.
Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.2


The transition from Community 1.4 to Community 1.2 requires time without a sagebrush removing disturbance. In the absence of disturbance, sagebrush species will repopulate the site. The timeframe of this transition is highly dependent on local climate and weather conditions, as well as distance to seed source.
Context dependence. This transition requires time without a sagebrush removing disturbance. Disturbances that occur when the sagebrush overstory is developing can delay or restart the transition back to Community 1.2.
Pathway 1.4C
Community 1.4 to 1.3


Transition from Community 1.4 to Community 1.3 requires time without a sagebrush removing disturbance. In the absence of disturbance, sagebrush species will repopulate the site. The timeframe of this transition is highly dependent on local climate and weather conditions, as well as distance to seed source.
Context dependence. This transition requires time without a sagebrush removing disturbance. Disturbances that occur when the sagebrush overstory is developing can delay or restart the transition back to Community 1.3.
State 2
Grazing Resistant

When a Limy site in the Lost River Mountain LRU enters the Grazing Resistant state, the primary shift occurs in the understory vegetation. Grazing pressure that results in chronic defoliation from livestock, native ungulates, or a combination of the two drives a shift from the cool-season bunchgrasses present in the Reference state (primarily bluebunch wheatgrass) towards rhizomatous wheatgrasses, short stature bunchgrasses, and ground covering forbs. This state is generally a result of current or historic improper grazing practices that potentially included higher stocking rates and repeated heavy grazing during the growing season.
Characteristics and indicators. In this state, total canopy cover and production values for mid-statured size bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass will decrease. These understory grasses will be relegated to the protected areas under the sagebrush canopies where they are sheltered from grazing. As they are removed from the canopy gaps, they will be replaced with grazing-resistant short-stature bunchgrasses like Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) and rhizomatous wheatgrasses such as thickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus), and western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii). Openings in the canopy gaps vacated by bunchgrasses present opportunities for an increase in disturbance-tolerant forbs such as spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), vetch species (Vicia sp.) and Indian paintbrush species (Castilleja sp.). Opportunities for invasive annual grasses increase as competition from native grasses are removed from the canopy structure. Depending on how well grazing-resistant rhizomatous and bunchgrasses occupy the canopy gaps, an increase in bare ground cover usually occurs. This can lead to increased erosion and decreased infiltration, decreasing available moisture at the site. Because of this, productivity and canopy cover will be lower than at the reference state.
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is lower than in the Reference state, primarily due to the decrease in available moisture and the opportunity for invasive species recruitment. The ability to recover from disturbance in rangeland systems has shown to be related to local climatic conditions. As available moisture increases and temperature decreases, resilience to disturbance increases (Chambers, et al. 2014). Resilience to erosion and invasive species establishment would be dependent on how well rhizomatous grasses and forbs occupy the bare ground spaces left by the removal of bunchgrasses. Rhizomatous grasses are mat-forming and if able to establish relatively quickly, can aid in reducing erosion. Additionally, if native rhizomatous grasses and forbs are able to quickly establish, this decreases the ability of invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass to occupy bare soil openings within the site.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
Community 2.1
Little Sagebrush and Rhizomatous Wheatgrass
This plant community is identified by its sagebrush overstory and diminished short stature bunch grass and rhizomatous wheatgrass understory. The shrub overstory will consist of black sagebrush, little sagebrush, or a combination of the two. Within this state and community, the bluebunch wheatgrass dominated understory present in the Reference State is replaced by short stature bunchgrasses such as Sandberg bluegrass and rhizomatous wheatgrasses. Remaining bluebunch wheatgrass is concentrated tightly under sagebrush canopies where it is protected from grazers. Sagebrush canopy cover will often be higher than that of the reference state as opportunities for sagebrush to migrate into the openings left by previous bluebunch wheatgrass plants are created. Sagebrush canopy cover in the Reference communities ranges between 10 to 31 percent and 14 to 35 percent in the grazing resistant community. The diminished understory in this community also leads to lower annual production values. Production in the reference state ranges from 400 to 1200 pounds per acre, whereas production in the Grazing Resistant state ranges from 200 to 535 pounds per acre. The greatest difference is caused by the decrease in bluebunch wheatgrass density. Bluebunch wheatgrass accounts for 150 to 250 pounds per acre in the Reference communities, and decreases to zero to 50 pounds per acre in the Grazing Resistant state.
Resilience management. This community has moderate resilience, mostly in relation to the understory grass species that replace bluebunch wheatgrass in the Reference communities. Sandberg bluegrass is a highly drought-resistant species of bunchgrass that is also resistant to grazing stress. Even when tilled, Sandberg bluegrass is able to re-establish to pre-disturbance levels within seven years (Howard, 1997). Although not as resilient to grazing pressures as Sandberg bluegrass, the rhizomatous wheatgrasses that can occur on this site can tolerate moderate grazing that does not result in complete or chronic defoliation. On upland sites, Western wheatgrass is considered to be a decreaser under heavy grazing pressure when annual precipitation is under 20 inches, however, it switches to an increaser when annual precipitation is over 20 inches (Tirmenstein, 1999). Alternately, resilience in this community is lowered through the decrease in available soil moisture that occurs from the shift to rhizomatous grasses and the increase in bare soil cover (Chambers, 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
Figure 24. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 17. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 220 | 285 |
Grass/Grasslike | 50 | 125 | 200 |
Forb | 0 | 20 | 50 |
Total | 200 | 365 | 535 |
Table 18. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 20-31% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-15% |
Forb foliar cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-40% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 19-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-1% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 20-45% |
Figure 25. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0812, ARARL/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 3
Disturbed

Figure 26. Fire Disturbed Limy Ecological Site
The Disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance events that result in widespread sagebrush mortality at a given site. The primary natural disturbance resulting in sagebrush mortality at this ecological site is wildfire, however, intense freeze events, and insect and disease can also occur. Because this LRU exists primarily on publicly managed lands (US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and State of Idaho), widespread anthropogenic disturbance events are infrequent. Examples of anthropogenic disturbance events include brush management through sagebrush mowing or removal treatments, chemical treatments, or improper grazing techniques that result in high-intensity hoof disturbance eliminating the shrub overstory. A combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbance is possible and can result in increased severity of disturbance, decreased resilience, and greater difficulty returning to the Reference state. For example, improper grazing practices that defoliate new growth following a fire disturbance can increase bare ground cover, increase erosion potential, and slow the reestablishment of grass species that preclude the return of overstory sagebrush canopy (Zlatnik, 1999). The primary contributor to production is bluebunch wheatgrass and can consist of nearly 80 percent of the total depending on local site conditions.
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the Disturbed state is a nearly complete to complete loss of overstory sagebrush species (black sagebrush and little sagebrush). A shift towards an increase in native and disturbance-tolerant grasses and forbs is likely with the removal of resource competition associated with the sagebrush overstory presence. Additionally, canopy cover of disturbance-tolerant shrubs such as yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) and rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa) may increase. Severe disturbance events also increase the opportunity for invasion of annual grasses and weeds such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and thistle species. The canopy cover percentage of these species is usually dependent on the distance of a seed source post disturbance, but mostly stays under five percent (Zlatnik, 1999).
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is moderate. Many of the post-disturbance grasses and shrubs that are common in this state establish quickly and reach a representative canopy within 10 years, and continue to increase until overstory canopy of sagebrush begins to return. However, local resilience of these sites in this state is highly dependent on current soil moisture availability, seed sources, timing and severity of the disturbance. In the instance of fire disturbance, bluebunch wheatgrass mortality can be significantly lower if the fire occurs in the spring as opposed to fall. Recovery can be impacted by quantity of immediate post-fire precipitation (Zlatnik, 1999). More severe disturbances increase the possibility of post-disturbance invasion. The greater the establishment of invasives, the lower the site resilience becomes.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
Community 3.1
Mixed Grass and Forb

Figure 27. Limy site in disturbed state due to past wildfire event
The mixed grass and forb community is driven by the removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in complete or nearly complete removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment and canopy cover of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance-tolerant shrubs. The primary sagebrush removing disturbance at this ecological site is fire. The frequency and severity of these fire disturbances are highly influenced by the overstory composition of the specific site in the Reference state. The composition and extent of the sagebrush species in the overstory impacts the respective fire regime. At sites dominated either solely by black sage, alkali sage, or varying combinations of the two, fire return intervals are less frequent. Additionally, fires are usually low to moderate in severity and don't cover a large spatial extent (Steinberg, 2002; Fryer, 2009). Black and little sagebrush communities often lack fuels sufficient for frequent fire return intervals, severe fire events, or large fire events (Fryer, 2009). Total annual production in this state ranges from 200 to 675 pounds per acre, averaging 410 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This plant community is moderately resilient because the grasses and forbs that dominate the composition are resistant to a variety of disturbances and able to re-establish quickly in the event of more severe disturbances. Both bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegenaria spicata) and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) are rarely harmed by fire events except for in the most severe instances. Both plants are able to reduce the amount of transfer to the root systems, leaving them able to regrow successfully (Zlatnik, 1999; Howard, 1997). Studies have shown that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass dominated systems are able to return to pre-fire production levels eight years post disturbance (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg bluegrass has been shown to fully re-establish post plowing disturbance events in as little as seven years after the plowing (Howard, 1997). Although many of the species in this state are at least somewhat resilient to many of the disturbances encountered, available soil moisture, weather, and rest from grazing play an important role in how quickly a site can recover. Both of the common shrub species found in this community are not only disturbance-tolerant, but tend to increase with disturbance. Both yellow rabbitbrush and rubber rabbitbrush are often the first shrub species to re-establish on this ecological site following a disturbance, and can increase in relation to the severity or frequency of the disturbance. Although yellow rabbitbrush can exist in relatively small numbers within the Reference state, it can only become the dominant shrub species in highly disturbed systems (Terminstein, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Figure 28. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 19. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 175 | 300 | 500 |
Shrub/Vine | 25 | 75 | 125 |
Forb | 0 | 32 | 50 |
Total | 200 | 407 | 675 |
Table 20. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0-15% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-45% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-5% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-20% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-35% |
Table 21. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-7% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-25% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-35% |
Figure 29. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0812, ARARL/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2


The transition from the Reference state to the Grazing Resistant state is a product of current or historical improper grazing practices. Continual overstocking and overgrazing during critical growing periods can result in a significant functional and compositional shift in the understory vegetation of the Limy ecological site. In perennial bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass, which is the dominant understory vegetation in the Reference state, repeated overgrazing weakens the underground structures through undernourishment caused by the continual removal of photosynthetic tissue (Daubenmire, 1940). This eventually results in the death of these grasses, opening that position for more grazing resistant grasses like Sandberg bluegrass, or bare soil. Because most of this LRU exists on publicly managed lands with regulated grazing policies, new transitions to this state are rare. Historical practices and regulations may have differed, leading to the current existence of this state.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: o Continued improper grazing techniques o Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species o Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion o Establishment of invasive species
Context dependence. Restoration efforts can be greatly influenced by precipitation patterns. Successful regeneration of Reference state understory species is highly dependent on moisture received after restoration efforts. Rates of successful establishment of bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass increase when available moisture is high during the critical periods post regeneration (Zlatnik, 1999; Howard, 1997).
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3


The transition from the Reference to the Disturbed state is primarily a mechanism of severe disturbance, both natural and anthropogenic. At this ecological site, the most likely disturbance to cause this transition is wildfire. Other disturbances include, but are not limited to, flooding events, freeze kill events, insect, disease, and mechanical brush removal.
Constraints to recovery. The primary constraint to recovery is distance to a seed source. When the disturbance is severe enough and the extent is great, seed source populations for sagebrush species may be removed from the vicinity. In this case, immigration and re-establishment of overstory sagebrush species can be slow. This time period can be greatly reduced through seeding and planting interventions.
Context dependence. The primary factor driving the likelihood of restoration success is weather patterns. A prolonged period of drought can slow restoration processes, whereas average to above average precipitation can greatly increase speed and success in the re-establishment of sagebrush species (Innes, 2017; Steinberg, 2002; and Fryer, 2009).
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1


The primary mechanism of restoration back to the Reference state is time without grazing. Seeding of desired Reference state species can speed up the restoration process.
Context dependence. The time frame for restoration is highly dependent on variations in localized weather patterns. Prolonged periods of drought can dramatically increase time required to return to the Reference state, whereas periods of above normal precipitation can decrease that time frame. Grazing practices that are infrequent and of light intensity, mimicking natural historic grazing patterns, will not impact the restoration pathway. However, continuous early-season grazing at moderate to high intensity will perpetuate the Grazing Resistant state.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3


The transition from the Grazing Resistant to the Disturbed state is a result of moderate to severe sagebrush removing disturbances. These can include both natural and anthropogenic disturbances, however unlike the Reference state, the possibility of moderate to severe fire events is reduced as a result of the diminished understory composition present in the Grazing Resistant state.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1


The most important mechanism driving restoration from the Disturbed state to the Reference state is time without sagebrush removing disturbances and distance from a sagebrush seed source. Seeding or planting of desired overstory species in the Reference state can speed restoration efforts.
Context dependence. Restoration is highly dependent on time without disturbance. New sagebrush seedlings that are able to establish on site are moderately sensitive to disturbances such like intense freeze events, insect, and disease. They are highly sensitive to herbivory and even low-severity fire occurrence (Fryer, 2009; Steinberg 2002). Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process. Regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during this restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above-normal precipitation aid in sagebrush regeneration and establishment (Innes, 2017; Steinberg 2002; Fryer, 2009).
Transition T3A
State 3 to 2


The transition from the Disturbed state to the Grazing Resistant state results from improper grazing practices. Plant communities in the Disturbed state are particularly vulnerable to heavy grazing in the years immediately following the disturbance that caused the transition from the Reference state to the Disturbed state. If bunchgrasses are unable to establish, plant composition could shift to higher volumes of grazing-resistant, rhizomatous grass species.
Context dependence. Years of drought or below average precipitation in combination with improper grazing can speed transition to the Grazing Resistant state.
Additional community tables
Table 22. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–350 | |||||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 100–350 | 10–31 | ||
shadscale saltbush | ATCO | Atriplex confertifolia | 0–100 | 0–5 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–75 | 0–4 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 125–400 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 150–250 | 10–30 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 5–50 | 1–5 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–25 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 2–50 | |||||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–44 | 0–2 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–44 | 0–1 | ||
goldenrod | SOLID | Solidago | 0–18 | 0–1 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–14 | 0–1 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–12 | 0–1 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–12 | 0–1 | ||
onion | ALLIU | Allium | 0–11 | 0–1 | ||
rockcress | ARABI2 | Arabis | 0–11 | 0–1 | ||
cushion buckwheat | EROV | Eriogonum ovalifolium | 0–9 | 0–1 | ||
aster | ASTER | Aster | 0–7 | 0–1 | ||
common dandelion | TAOF | Taraxacum officinale | 0–4 | 0–1 | ||
Lewis flax | LILE3 | Linum lewisii | 0–4 | 0–1 | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 0–4 | 0–1 | ||
bluebells | MERTE | Mertensia | 0 | 0–1 | ||
plains pricklypear | OPPO | Opuntia polyacantha | 0 | 0–1 | ||
pricklypear | OPUNT | Opuntia | 0 | 0–1 | ||
scabland penstemon | PEDE4 | Penstemon deustus | 0 | 0–1 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0 | 0–1 | ||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 0 | 0–1 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0 | 0–1 | ||
ballhead sandwort | ARCO5 | Arenaria congesta | 0 | 0–1 | ||
sego lily | CANU3 | Calochortus nuttallii | 0 | 0–1 |
Table 23. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 50–150 | |||||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 50–200 | 10–25 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–25 | 0–5 | ||
winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 0–15 | 0–5 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 200–950 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 250–900 | 15–35 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–75 | 0–10 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–100 | |||||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–15 | 0–5 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–10 | 0–7 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0–10 | 0–5 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–5 | 0–5 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–5 | 0–5 | ||
goldenrod | SOLID | Solidago | 0–5 | 0–5 |
Table 24. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–350 | |||||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 50–200 | 5–15 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 50–150 | 3–10 | ||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
shadscale saltbush | ATCO | Atriplex confertifolia | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–18 | 0–1 | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 0–18 | 0–1 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 175–450 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 75–300 | 5–25 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 50–125 | 2–10 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–50 | |||||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0–20 | 0–3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–20 | 0–3 |
Table 25. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 75–250 | |||||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 50–200 | 5–15 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 350–900 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 350–900 | 30–45 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
slender wheatgrass | ELTR7 | Elymus trachycaulus | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–100 | |||||
rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–15 | 0–3 | ||
yellow salsify | TRDU | Tragopogon dubius | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
onion | ALLIU | Allium | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 26. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–285 | |||||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 150–275 | 15–30 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–25 | 0–2 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 100–200 | |||||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–50 |
Table 27. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 25–125 | |||||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
shadscale saltbush | ATCO | Atriplex confertifolia | 0–75 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 175–500 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 175–450 | 10–30 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–50 | |||||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–15 | 0–3 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 0–5 | 0–1 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Limy ecological site at 10 to 14 inch relative annual effective precipitation range. These numbers can be used to estimate stocking rates, however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at a specific location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre): Low - Average - High
Reference State:
1.1 - 400-719-1200
1.2 - 350-629-1150
1.3 - 400-650-1200
1.4 - 425-900-1250
Grazing Resistant State:
2.1 - 200-365-535
Disturbed State:
3.1 - 200-407-675
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush steppe in the Lost River Mountain LRU provide critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountains. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG) in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, northern end of the Pahsimeroi mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Black sagebrush (Artemisia nova):
Mule deer and pronghorn use black sagebrush habitats extensively. Use is especially heavy by mule deer in early decades post fire disturbance (Communities 1.3 and 3.1). This is most prevalent within the first three decades after the fire event (Fryer, 2009). Black sagebrush dominated sites have been shown as great winter ranges for pronghorn (Kindschy et al., 1982) and pronghorn winter distribution has been strongly associated with black sagebrush communities (Clary & Beale, 1983).
Sage grouse are obligate species of black and other sagebrush varieties. Generally, big sagebrush communities are preferred by sage grouse, however some black sagebrush sites on the Snake River Plains and in Nevada have shown to be preferred winter grounds for feeding and cover (Dalke et al., 1963).
Other species of note that have shown to rely on black sagebrush communities include great basin pocket mice, Ord's kangaroo rats, sage thrashers, and a large variety of insect pollinator species (Fryer, 2009).
Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula longiloba):
In early spring and winter, little sagebrush is often a preferred forage species for mule deer (Blaisdell et al., 1982). In the Great Basin, little sagebrush dominated sites have shown to be heavily utilized by pronghorn during the summer (Kindschy et al., 1982). Little sagebrush, among other varieties is an important forage source for sage grouse throughout the year (Steinberg, 2002).
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata):
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, use of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda):
Sandberg bluegrass is one of the earliest grasses to green up during the spring and become available forage for wildlife; however, becomes less utilized during the later summer months. Degree of use for Elk and pronghorn is good to poor, and good to fair for mule deer, small mammals, small nongame birds, and upland game birds. Usage is fair to poor by waterfowl (Howard, 1997).
Hydrological functions
Annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid and soil permeability is moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals including antelope, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies. The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site ID's and data collection intensity for each site used in development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include Line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involved a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
Reference State:
Community 1.1:
Tier III -2021ID7033171
Tier I - 2021ID7033181
Community 1.2:
Tier I - 2021ID7033182
Community 1.3
Tier I - 2020ID7033128, 2021ID7033170, 2021ID7033186
Community 1.4:
Tier III - 2020ID7031122, 2020ID7031123
Community 2.1:
Observation and similar site data
Community 3.1
Tier I - 2021ID7033141
Type locality
Location 1: Butte County, ID | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T7N R29E S36 |
Other references
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Chambers, J.C., J.L. Beck, T.J. Christiansen, K.J. Clause, J.B. Dinkins, K.E. Doherty, K.A. Griffin, D.W. Havlina, K.F. Henke, L.L. Kurth, J.D. Maestas, M. Manning, K.E. Mayer, B.A. Mealor, C. McCarthy, M.A. Perea, and D.A. Pyke. 2016. Using resilience and resistance concepts to manage threats to sagebrush ecosystems, Gunnison sage-grouse, and Greater sage-grouse in their eastern range: A strategic multi- scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-356.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 1–143.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Esipinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Daubenmire, R. F. (1940). Plant Succession Due to Overgrazing in the Agropyron Bunchgrass Prairie of Southeastern Washington. Ecology, 21(1), 55–64.
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html
Francis, John K. ed. 2004. Wildland shrubs of the United States and its Territories: thamnic descriptions: volume 1. Gen. Tech. Rep. IITF- GTR-26. San Juan, PR: USDA, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, and Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 830 p.
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
McArthur and Stevens. 2009. Composite Shrubs. In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw [compilers]. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-136-vol-2. p. 493-537.
Miller, M., Belnap, J., Beatty, S., Reynolds, R. (2006). Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in Relation to Soil Properties, Water Additions, and Chemical Amendments in Calcareous Soils of Southeastern Utah, USA. Canyonlands Research. 288. 10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife- Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [1]. 2012. Plant Guide for black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [2]. 2012. Plant Guide for low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Pascopyrum smithii. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov
/database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2022, October 25].
Contributors
Zach Van Abbema
Carla Rebernak
Kirt Walstead
Karen Clause
Grant Petersen
Salmon-Challis Forest Service Staff
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/19/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Nicholas Kozlowski
Katelyn Palmer
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Zachary Van Abbema |
---|---|
Contact for lead author |
Zachary Van Abbema zachary.vanabbema@usda.gov |
Date | 10/11/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not present in the Reference state condition. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon in the reference condition. When present, they usually occur on steeper slopes (>15 percent) and are inconspicuous, disconnected, and very short in length. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes: Pedestals are not evident in the reference condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is 10 to 18 percent. This refers to exposed mineral soil not covered by litter, rock, basal cover, plant cover, standing dead, lichen and/or moss. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gullies are not present in the reference condition. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind scoured, or depositional areas are not evident in the reference condition. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Movement of fine herbaceous litter may occur within less than a foot from where it originated. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil Surface Stable with Stability Ratings of 4 to 6 (both under canopy and bare). Abiotic crusts and or root mats may be present. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface structure is granular with the A horizon ranging from 0 to 20cm thick, averaging 10 cm thick. A horizon colors are 10YR 3/3 or 10YR 3/4 - dark brown to dark yellowish brown. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plants are evenly distributed across the ecological site and the shrubs and bunchgrasses present improved infiltration as well as protect against runoff. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Not present. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Bluebunch wheatgrass = black sagebrush/alkali sagebrushSub-dominant:
Remaining shrubs (shadscale saltbush, yellow rabbitbrush, rubber rabbitbrush) > Sandberg bluegrass = Indian ricegrass.Other:
Indian paintbrush = Spiny phlox > pink pussytoesAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Mortality in herbaceous species is not evident. Species with bunch growth forms may have some natural mortality in centers. Sagebrush species will become decadent in the absence of historical fire return intervals. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Total ground litter cover varies but can range from two to 45 percent, averaging 20 percent. Depth is usually shallow at less than 1/8 inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production is 400 to 1200 lbs/acre, averaging 720 lbs/per acre. Production varies based on effective precipitation and natural variability of soil properties for this ecological site. Total production is slightly higher for perennial grass species, but tends to be split mostly equal between grasses and shrubs. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invasive species include cheatgrass, spotted knapweed, toadflax, and crested wheatgrass. Native species such a yellow rabbitbrush or significant populations of Sandberg bluegrass or rhizomatous wheatgrasses can indicate a departure from the Reference state. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in most years. Bluebunch wheatgrass may not reproduce during extended periods of drought.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.