

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02B026
Loamy Calcareous 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/07/2025
Accessed: 05/20/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 012X, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in Idaho. MLRA 012X is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources, and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mt. Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869 meters). Annual precipitation has a significant range from six to 47 inches, the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly east of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from Salmon, Idaho to the north, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the south, the Beaverhead Mountain Range to the east, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the west. This LRU borders MLRA 043B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 010X - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet). The boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M170 Great Basin-Intermountain Dwarf Sagebrush Steppe & Shrubland Macrogroup
G308 Intermountain Low and Black Sagebrush Steppe and Shrubland Group
A3219 Little Sagebrush Steppe and Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001412 Little Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Shrub Grassland Association
Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 Northwestern Forested Mountains
Level II: 10.1 Western Cordillera
Level III: 10.1.4 Middle Rockies
Ecological site concept
This site does not receive additional water, and is not greatly impacted by slope or aspect.
These soils:
o Are not saline , saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are highly calcareous within the 10 to 20 inch (25 to 50 centimeter) portion of the soil profile.
o Are moderately deep, deep, or very deep
o Consist of fine sandy loam to clay loam textures (includes silt loams, loams, and sandy clay loams)
o Are moderately productive
The primary resource limitation for this ecological site is relative effective annual precipitation and soil chemistry. This site is not impacted by depth to a restriction, slope steepness, or high volumes of course fragments within the soil profile.
Associated sites
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This ecological site can exist adjacent when effective precipitation increases above 15 inches. |
---|---|
BX012X02B034 |
Rocky Hills 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found on rock outcroppings and ridges where soil is intermittently shallow to bedrock. |
BX012X02B063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also found on limestone parent material. |
BX012X02B020 |
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also found on limestone parent material where highly calcareous soils occur at the surface. |
Similar sites
BX012X02B034 |
Rocky Hills 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site will often have calcareous soils in the top 20 inches (50cm), but usually occurs on ridges and rock outcroppings where depth to bedrock is intermittently shallow, and is dominated by curl-leaf mountain mahogany. |
---|---|
BX012X02B063 |
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 10-14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has highly calcareous soils in the 4-10 inch (10-25cm) range of the soil profile. |
BX012X02B020 |
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has highly calcareous soils in the top 4 inches (10cm). |
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also has highly calcareous soils in the 10-20 inch (25-20cm) range of the soil profile. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia nova |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XB026ID
Physiographic features
This site can occur on mountain slope, alluvial fan, and outwash fans, all within the mountain landscape. The site is not aspect dependent, though tends to occur on southwest, south or southeast aspects. Aspect may influence the elevation at which it occurs. Additionally, this site is not influenced by slope percentage, however occurs on slopes ranging from six to 60 percent. Runoff is low to moderate. Flooding and ponding do not occur on this site.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Alluvial Fan -- A low, outspread mass of loose materials and/or rock material, commonly
with gentle slopes, shaped like an open fan or a segment of a cone, deposited by a stream
(best expressed in semiarid regions) at the place where it issues from a narrow mountain or
upland valley.
Outwash Fan -- A fan-shaped accumulation of outwash deposited by meltwater streams in front of the end or recessional moraine of a glacier.

Figure 1.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Alluvial fan (3) Mountains > Outwash fan |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 6,201 – 7,035 ft |
Slope | 17 – 50% |
Aspect | SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Flooding frequency | Not specified |
---|---|
Ponding frequency | Not specified |
Elevation | 5,642 – 7,163 ft |
Slope | 6 – 60% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this Loamy Calcareous ecological site, the effective precipitation is 10 to 14 inches. Effective precipitation is a modeled value that considers annual precipitation, aspect, elevation, slope, and slope shape. Often this value will be greater than or less than annual precipitation values in relation to these other characteristics. Below 10 inches and above 14 inches, a notable shift will occur in dominant plant community composition, canopy cover, and production value. Because of the loamy textures present at this ecological site, higher amounts of available moisture may be present when compared to adjacent ecological sites in the same climatic subset.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 29-47 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 57-99 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 9-12 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 27-54 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 45-109 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 8-13 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 38 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 78 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 11 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) MACKAY LOST RIVER RS [USC00105462], Mackay, ID
-
(2) GROUSE [USC00103882], Mackay, ID
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this site are moderately deep to very deep, ranging from 20 to greater than 60 inches (50 to 150 centimeters) and consist of textures ranging from fine sandy loams to clay loams. Soils can be skeletal (greater than 35 percent coarse fragments) and are primarily formed from slope alluvium and colluvium derived from limestone. Soils are highly calcareous within the 10 to 20-inch (25 to 50-centimeter) section of the soil profile. This is represented by a calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) greater than 15 percent which is identified by having a pH of 7.8 or greater coupled with an effervescence of strong or higher. These soils are well drained.

Figure 8. Soil textures of eight Loamy Calcareous ecological sites.

Figure 9. pH measurements for eight Loamy Calcareous ecological sites.

Figure 10. Soil profile photo: Site ID - 2021ID7031195
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
limestone
(2) Colluvium – quartzite (3) Colluvium – volcanic rock (4) Alluvium – limestone (5) Alluvium – quartzite (6) Alluvium – volcanic rock |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly loam (2) Gravelly silt loam (3) Gravelly coarse sandy loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy-skeletal |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate |
Soil depth | 40 – 80 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 16% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 8% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
2.3 – 2.6 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (10-20in) |
15 – 30% |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6.5 – 7.8 |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Not specified |
---|---|
Permeability class | Not specified |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 46% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 18% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
2.3 – 2.74 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (10-20in) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
5.6 – 8 |
Ecological dynamics
The Loamy Calcareous ecological site in the 10 to 14 inch precipitation zone is dominated by little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula) and bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoroegneria spicata); however, multiple sagebrush species can be present in the shrub canopy. The ecological site consists of three states, a Reference, Disturbed, and Invaded state. Within those states are four different plant communities. The primary driver for state transitions is disturbance, with frequent or severe fire and intense grazing that results in chronic defoliation being the most prominent.
A state-and-transition model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the state-and-transition model. This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference state. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the state-and-transition model, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between Reference state and Degraded state in this ecological site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference

The Reference state consists of two dominant plant communities: The Little Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass community and the Mixed Sagebrush/Bunchgrass community. The greatest difference between the two plant communities is the composition and foliar cover of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) species. Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) transitions to mountain big sagebrush at the higher end of the effective precipitation range (10 to 14 inches). Little sagebrush and black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) transition to big sagebrush species when the calcium carbonate concentration in the soil is focused lower in the soil profile or less calcareous, closer to the minimum 15 percent required in the site concept. Processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that can result in state and community changes include fire, grazing, land use change, and establishment of invasive species (Davies et al., 2011).
Characteristics and indicators. The shift between plant communities at this site is generally driven by calcium carbonate concentration in soils, effective precipitation, and sagebrush-killing disturbances or lack thereof. Historically, low to mixed-severity fires occurred at relatively frequent fire return intervals of 10 to 25 years, limiting sagebrush canopy density and creating a mosaic of sagebrush stands and more open grasslands (Knick, Holmes, & Miller, 2005). Exclusion of fire (in conjunction with climate change) increases sagebrush canopy cover and can lead to more severe stand-replacing fires, oftentimes at more frequent intervals. These severe fires can drive shifts to grassland communities as well as create opportunities for invasive species establishment (Roadhouse, Irvine, & Bowerstock, 2020; Knick et al., 2005). Improper grazing practices can also lead to an increase in sagebrush canopy cover and an increased risk of severe, stand-replacing fire occurrence. Removal of understory grasses can lessen the opportunities for low severity fire occurrence which leads to increased canopy densities and increases potential for severe fire disturbance events (Knick et al., 2005).
Resilience management. This site has moderate resilience as a result of the cryic soil temperature regime and the xeric soil moisture regime. Resistance and resilience of a specific site have been attributed to abiotic conditions favorable to plant growth and reproduction (Maestas et al. 2016). Soils that fall within the cryic (cold) temperature regime and xeric (wet) moisture regime tend to have higher diversity and production and are therefore more resilient, specifically in terms of resisting or recovering from invasion post-disturbance (Maestas et al., 2016). Although both black sagebrush and little sagebrush species are susceptible to fire damage and usually killed by fire events, fire events within these communities are usually rare. These communities generally lack the fine fuels required to carry fire, promoting relatively infrequent fire return intervals (Steinberg, 2002). Mountain big sagebrush is also highly susceptible to damage and mortality from fire events. These communities also tend to have higher fuel loading and carry fire more easily and frequently than the black and little sagebrush communities (Innes, 2017).
Community 1.1
Little Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Community 1.1 is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU. Both little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula) and black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) have adaptations that allow them to thrive on the highly calcareous soils that form from limestone parent material. Little sagebrush more often dominates the canopy at this ecological site; however, it is not uncommon for the percent composition between black sagebrush and little sagebrush to be nearly equal. It is also possible that one of the two species is missing from the canopy completely. Black sagebrush prefers conditions where the highly calcareous soils are closer to the surface. Because the depth to calcareous soils in the Loamy Calcareous ecological site is 10 inches (25cm), little sagebrush can outcompete black sagebrush (McArthur & Stevens 2009; Tilley & St. John [2] 2012). Therefore, little sagebrush has a higher canopy cover and contributes more volume to overall ecological site production value. Little sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass communities can form in a mosaic distribution with other Community 1.2 across the range of relative effective annual precipitation. As effective precipitation increases and the concentration of calcium carbonates decreases, the overstory shifts to other sagebrush species and subspecies. Other bunchgrasses such as Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) increase in canopy cover as available moisture increases. Production in Community 1.1 ranges from 400 to 850 pounds per acre, averaging 650 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. Resilience is moderate in Community 1.1. Black sagebrush and little sagebrush are both drought-tolerant species able to withstand periods of below-average precipitation. Bluebunch wheatgrass is well suited to the variable climate experienced in the Lost River Mountains and is resilient to many natural disturbances including drought and fire. Bluebunch wheatgrass has been shown to recover to pre-fire disturbance population levels in one to seven years post-disturbance. Under certain conditions, canopy cover and production can exceed pre-fire values (Zlatnik, 1999). Bluebunch wheatgrass is a decreaser, reducing canopy cover and production in relation to grazing pressure. Under heavy grazing pressure, the species will shift towards areas such as under the canopy of shrubs, opening the canopy for the establishment of rhizomatous grass species, invasive species, or bare ground.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Figure 11. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 175 | 225 | 375 |
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 250 | 350 |
Forb | 50 | 100 | 150 |
Total | 375 | 575 | 875 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 12-30% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 10-32% |
Forb foliar cover | 7-17% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-3% |
Litter | 9-28% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 1-7% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-2% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 4-14% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-5% |
Forb basal cover | 1-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 3-12% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-4% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 60-90% |
Figure 12. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0810, ARNO4/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Mixed Sagebrush/Bunchgrass

Figure 13. Community 1.2: Site ID - 2019ID7031080
The Mixed Sagebrush/Bunchgrass community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU. Wyoming big sagebrush and mountain big sagebrush can occur on Mollisols, Aridisols, and Inceptisols, however, are most abundant on Mollisols (Innes, 2017). Wyoming big sagebrush is well adapted to the drier conditions and often dominates sites at the lower end of the 10 to 14 inch climatic subset. Mountain big sagebrush becomes more prevalent at the upper end of the climatic subset, however, both species can be present on a site. Low sagebrush species (black and little sagebrush) have a higher canopy cover on sites with soils with a greater influence of calcium carbonates. In this community, all or a mix of these sagebrush species can be present on a site. The distinguishing feature between this community and Community 1.1 is the presence of big sagebrush species. The understory is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass, though other bunchgrasses such as Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) and Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides) can be present in significant quantities. A variety of forbs such as spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis) and varieties of Indian paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) occur in the understory as well. Production for this site is slightly higher than Community 1.1 due to the addition of big sagebrush species. Production ranges from 675 to 850 pounds per acre, averaging 675 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This community has moderately low resilience. Mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant of the big sagebrush species with Wyoming big sagebrush being slightly more drought tolerant. Both mountain and Wyoming big sagebrush are highly flammable and fire typically kills plants within the disturbance area. Because these species reproduce via seed that is dispersed through wind, water, and zoochory, distance from a viable source population plays a major role in post-disturbance regeneration. When disturbance events cover a large area spatially, the regeneration timespan increases and the likelihood of transitioning to another state or community increases (Innes, 2017). Slow regeneration can open windows for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Post-disturbance seeding and planting can increase restoration success. Bluebunch wheatgrass is a much more resilient species to the local disturbance regimes. The species is drought tolerant and usually is not killed except during the most severe wildfire events. During severe disturbances that remove the sagebrush overstory, bluebunch wheatgrass can persist as the dominant vegetation on this ecological site (Zlatnik, 1999). When Idaho fescue is the dominant understory or shares dominance in the understory, fire return intervals can be as frequent as 10 to 15 years. Severe fire events prompt a shift into the Disturbed state. The lower effective precipitation at this site (10 to 14 inches) also decreases this sites ability to successfully recover post-disturbance.
Dominant plant species
-
Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis), other herbaceous
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Figure 14. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 10. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 240 | 308 | 346 |
Grass/Grasslike | 180 | 223 | 266 |
Forb | 50 | 75 | 110 |
Total | 470 | 606 | 722 |
Table 11. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 20-28% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-21% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-11% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 10-29% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-5% |
Surface fragments >3" | 3-12% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 4-13% |
Table 12. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-5% |
Forb basal cover | 1-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-9% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-13% |
Surface fragments >3" | 12-36% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 35-65% |
Figure 15. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0605, ARTRW8 -PSSPS . State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 15 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Pathway P1-2
Community 1.1 to 1.2


The primary driver that differentiates Community 1.1 and Community 1.2 is a slight increase in relative effective annual precipitation (REAP) or a decrease in the concentration of soil calcium carbonates. As carbonates occur deeper into the soil profile, or effective precipitation trends toward the higher end of the 10 to 14-inch range, overstory composition changes. It may still include the low sagebrush species but will also have big sagebrush species such as Wyoming big sagebrush and mountain big sagebrush occupying the canopy.
Context dependence. The abiotic conditions that result in community transitions from Community 1.1 to 1.2 are site-specific and not directly influenced by anthropogenic or biotic interactions.
State 2
Disturbed

The Disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance events that result in widespread sagebrush mortality at a given site. The primary natural disturbance resulting in sagebrush mortality at this ecological site is wildfire; however, intense freeze events, insect damage, and disease can also occur. Big sagebrush species and, to a lesser extent, little sagebrush species are highly susceptible to stand-replacing fires and often experience complete canopy loss during moderate and severe wildfire events (Innes, 2017; Tirmenstein, 1999). Because this LRU exists primarily on publicly managed lands (US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and State of Idaho), widespread anthropogenic disturbance events are infrequent. Examples of anthropogenic disturbance events include brush management through sagebrush mowing or removal treatments, chemical treatments, or improper grazing techniques that result in high-intensity hoof disturbance. A combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbance is possible and can result in increased severity of disturbance, decreased resilience, and greater difficulty returning to the Reference state. For example, improper grazing practices post-fire disturbance can increase bare ground cover, increase erosion potential, and slow the reestablishment of grass species that preclude the return of overstory sagebrush canopy (Zlatnik, 1999).
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the Disturbed state is a near-complete loss of overstory sagebrush species, often replaced by shrub species that are able to take advantage of the local disturbance regime. Common replacement species include Artemisia tripartita (threetip sagebrush) and Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus (yellow rabbitbrush). A shift towards an increase in native and disturbance-tolerant grasses and forbs is likely with the removal of resource competition associated with the sagebrush overstory presence. Severe disturbance events also increase the opportunity for invasion of annual grasses and weeds such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and thistle species. The canopy cover percentage of these species is usually dependent on the distance of a seed source post-disturbance but mostly stays under five percent (Zlatnik, 1999).
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is moderate. Many of the post-disturbance grasses and shrubs that are common in this state establish quickly and reach a representative canopy within 10 years post-disturbance. Grasses and shrubs continue to increase until the overstory canopy of sagebrush begins to return. However, local resilience in this state is highly dependent on current soil moisture availability, seed sources, timing and severity of the disturbance. In the instance of fire disturbance, bluebunch wheatgrass mortality can be significantly lower if the fire occurs in the spring as opposed to fall. Recovery can be impacted by the quantity of immediate post-fire precipitation (Zlatnik, 1999). More severe disturbances increase the possibility of post-disturbance invasion. The greater the establishment of invasives, the lower the site resilience becomes
Dominant plant species
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
Community 2.1
Disturbance Shrub and Bunchgrass

Figure 16. Site: 2020ID7032179

Figure 17. Canopy Cover by Plant Type Group: Disturbance Shrub and Bunchgrass Community
Community 2.1 is driven by the disturbance-related removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in near complete removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance tolerant shrubs. In this community, the primary sagebrush removing disturbance at this ecological site is frequent or severe fire. The frequency and severity of these fire disturbances are highly influenced by the overstory composition of the specific site in the Reference state, prior to disturbance. The composition and extent of the sagebrush species in the overstory impacts that respective fire regime. Communities in the Reference state with mountain big sagebrush in the overstory are highly susceptible to stand-replacing fire events with fire return intervals ranging from five to 70 years (Innes, 2017; Termenstein, 1999). This increases the likelihood of transition from the Reference state to the Disturbed state (Community 2.1) following fire disturbances. In Community 2.1, the overstory is comprised of disturbance-tolerant shrubs at a reduced canopy. The primary overstory species include yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) and threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita). Bunchgrasses, primarily bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) primarily occupy the understory. Canopy cover of bunchgrasses is often higher early in the successional period following a disturbance, decreasing as the yellow rabbitbrush or threetip sagebrush canopy increases. Production at this site has a wide range which varies in relation to time since disturbance and the impact to the original canopy. Sites where shrub canopies have been removed can become highly productive in the grass and forb functional groups if conditions are ideal. Production ranges from 275 to 900 pounds per acre, averaging 500 pounds per acre.
Resilience management. This plant community is moderately resilient because the grasses and forbs that dominate the composition are resistant to a variety of disturbances and able to re-establish quickly in the event of more severe disturbances. Both bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegenaria spicata) and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) are rarely harmed by fire events except for in the most severe instances. Both plants can reduce the amount of heat transfer to the root systems, allowing successful regrowth (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997). Studies show that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass-dominated systems are able to return to pre-fire production levels eight years post-disturbance (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg bluegrass has been shown to fully re-establish post-plowing events in as little as 7 years (Howard, 1997). Both yellow rabbitbrush and threetip sagebrush are often the first shrub species to re-establish on this ecological site following a disturbance and can increase in relation to the severity or frequency of the disturbance. Although yellow rabbitbrush can exist in relatively small numbers within the Reference state, it becomes the dominant shrub species in highly disturbed systems (Terminstein, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
rosy pussytoes (Antennaria rosea), other herbaceous
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Figure 18. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 13. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 117 | 205 | 375 |
Shrub/Vine | 100 | 205 | 350 |
Forb | 50 | 130 | 222 |
Total | 267 | 540 | 947 |
Table 14. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 4-22% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 20-45% |
Forb foliar cover | 6-12% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 35-52% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 4-11% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 4-18% |
Table 15. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-5% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 8-23% |
Surface fragments >3" | 1-6% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 52-78% |
State 3
Invaded

Figure 19. Site ID: 2021ID7033160
The Invaded state is represented by a shift from native grasses and forbs in the understory to an understory dominated by invasive species. Transition to this state occurs after a severe disturbance that creates openings in the canopy for invasive species to establish. The primary invasive species that becomes dominant in the Invaded state is cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum). This state is especially prevalent on steep, rocky slopes where colluvial movement is active. As the soil is disturbed through the movement of material downhill, ideal conditions are presented for cheatgrass recruitment. Once established and a seed source is readily available, cheatgrass is well adapted to increasing its coverage area.
Characteristics and indicators. This state is indicated by any single invasive species occupying five percent or more of the canopy, or a group of invasive species occupying 10 percent of the canopy collectively.
Resilience management. This state exhibits low resilience due to the establishment of invasive and non-native species. Once established, non-native vegetation tends to increase in canopy cover and can often be promoted by further disturbances.
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
Community 3.1
Invasive Grass and Forb

Figure 20. Site ID: 2021ID703306
This community may resemble other communities within other states of the ecological site; however, will have a canopy cover of five percent or greater for a single invasive species, or 10 percent or greater for all invasive species on site. Production can be high, however may not occur in desirable species. The production range for this community is 300 to 750 lbs/acre, averaging 575 lbs/acre.
Resilience management. This community is perpetuated by continued, frequent disturbances. The invasive species that occupy the site thrive when disturbance regimes shift outside the historic range of variability.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Figure 21. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 16. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 135 | 250 | 350 |
Shrub/Vine | 100 | 175 | 300 |
Forb | 15 | 50 | 125 |
Total | 250 | 475 | 775 |
Transition T1-2
State 1 to 2


Transition from the Reference to the Disturbed state is a mechanism of moderate to severe disturbance, both natural and anthropogenic. The most likely disturbance to cause this transition is wildfire. Other disturbances include but are not limited to freeze-kill events, insect damage, disease, overgrazing, and mechanical brush removal.
Constraints to recovery. The primary constraint to recovery is the distance to a seed source and time. When the disturbance is severe and the extent is great, seed source populations for sagebrush species may be removed from the vicinity. In this case, immigration and re-establishment of overstory sagebrush species can be slow. Re-establishment to pre-disturbance canopy cover and extent of mountain big sagebrush cover generally exceeds 25 years even in ideal conditions (Innes, 2017). The recovery time period can be greatly reduced through seeding and planting interventions.
Context dependence. The primary factors driving the likelihood of restoration success are post-disturbance weather patterns and distance from viable seed sources. Disturbances that cover a larger extent increase the distance to seed sources. Prolonged periods of drought can slow restoration processes. Alternately, average to above-average precipitation post-disturbance can greatly increase speed and success in the re-establishment of sagebrush species (Robin, 2017; Steinberg, 2002; and Fryer, 2009).
Transition T1-3
State 1 to 3


The transition from the Reference state to the Invaded state is usually a result of vegetative canopy removing disturbances that create openings and opportunities for invasive species establishment. On steeper slopes, soil movement downslope that disturbs the surface creates ideal conditions for the establishment of invasive species, one of the most prominent species being cheatgrass. Once locally established, cheatgrass can further spread across a site.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include the establishment speed of invasive species, prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species, loss of nutrient-rich topsoil due to increased erosion, and continued establishment and spread of invasive species.
Context dependence. Restoration success is dependent on invasive species composition and level of establishment. Removal of cheatgrass once significant establishment occurs can be resource-intensive with low success rates.
Restoration pathway R2-1
State 2 to 1


The most important mechanism driving restoration from the Disturbed state to the reference is time without sagebrush removing disturbance. Distance from overstory species (sagebrush) seed source can also impact the speed of restoration. Seeding or planting of desired overstory species found in the Reference state can speed restoration efforts.
Context dependence. Restoration is highly dependent on time without disturbance. New sagebrush seedlings are moderately sensitive to disturbances such as freeze-kill, insect damage, and disease. They are highly sensitive to herbivory and even low-severity fire events (Fryer 2009; Steinberg 2002). Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process, however; regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during the restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above-normal precipitation aid in sagebrush regeneration and establishment (Innes 2017; Steinberg 2002; Fryer 2009).
Transition T2-3
State 2 to 3


The transition from the Disturbed state to the Invaded state usually occurs if the disturbance that occurred removes native vegetative canopy cover creating opportunities for invasive species to establish in their place. Soil movement downslope that disturbs the surface creates ideal conditions for the establishment of invasive species, one of the most prominent species being cheatgrass. Once locally established, cheatgrass can further spread across a site.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: The establishment speed of invasive species; Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species; Loss of nutrient-rich topsoil due to increased erosion; and Continued establishment and spread of invasive species.
Context dependence. Restoration success is dependent on invasive species composition and level of establishment. Removal of cheatgrass once significant establishment occurs can be resource intensive with low success rates.
Restoration pathway R3-1
State 3 to 1


Restoration from the Invaded state to the Reference state requires removal of invasive species through treatment and often planting or seeding of native vegetation to prevent re-establishment.
Context dependence. The restoration process is resource intensive with low success rates if invasive species are well established. Planting or seeding of native vegetation after the removal of invasive species can increase overall restoration success.
Additional community tables
Table 17. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–350 | |||||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 50–175 | 5–15 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 30–125 | 3–12 | ||
Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | 0–70 | 0–5 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–70 | 0–5 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 20–60 | 1–5 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 175–375 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 80–250 | 10–25 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 30–125 | 3–15 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–85 | 0–5 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–85 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 50–150 | |||||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 15–40 | 2–6 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 15–35 | 2–5 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 10–25 | 1–3 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 18. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 24–389 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 50–319 | 2–22 | ||
Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | 50–305 | 2–25 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 25–115 | 2–6 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 20–75 | 2–5 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 20–60 | 1–4 | ||
curl-leaf mountain mahogany | CELE3 | Cercocarpus ledifolius | 0–40 | 0–1 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–35 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 266–310 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 150–268 | 8–20 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 50–150 | 3–10 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–40 | 0–3 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–35 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 20–95 | |||||
mountain tarweed | MAGL2 | Madia glomerata | 0–65 | 0–10 | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 10–25 | 1–3 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 10–25 | 1–3 | ||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 10–25 | 1–3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 5–20 | 1–3 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 19. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 100–350 | |||||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 45–188 | 3–10 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 45–150 | 3–8 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–150 | 0–7 | ||
Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | 0–150 | 0–7 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 0–85 | 0–5 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 0–85 | 0–5 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 117–375 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 95–205 | 8–35 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 40–120 | 3–12 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 15–50 | 1–5 | ||
needlegrass | ACHNA | Achnatherum | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–20 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 50–222 | |||||
rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | 20–64 | 2–7 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 10–45 | 2–5 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 5–28 | 1–4 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0–20 | 0–3 | ||
ballhead sandwort | ARCO5 | Arenaria congesta | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 0–15 | 0–2 |
Table 20. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 100–300 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 75–140 | 3–12 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 25–100 | 2–8 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 40–100 | 3–8 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 40–100 | 3–8 | ||
American red raspberry | RUID | Rubus idaeus | 0–60 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 135–350 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 35–150 | 2–15 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 35–135 | 2–12 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 25–100 | 2–8 | ||
crested wheatgrass | AGCR | Agropyron cristatum | 0–75 | 0–6 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
needlegrass | ACHNA | Achnatherum | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 15–125 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Loamy ecological site within the 10 to 14 inch climatic subset. These values can be used to estimate stocking rates, however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match the current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at a location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre):
Reference State:
1.1 - 400 - 650 - 750
1.2 - 500 - 675 - 850
2.1 - 275 - 500 - 925
Disturbed:
3.1 - 350 - 550 - 750
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush grasslands in the Lost River Mountain LRU provide critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain mountain ranges. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working Group in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, northern end of the Pahsimeroi Mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob Mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana) - Communities 1.2:
Mountain big sagebrush is considered to be highly palatable by most wildlife browsers (Rosenstrater, 2005). Sage grouse, ungulates, and rodents browse mountain big sagebrush primarily during the winter when it becomes one of the more palatable available forages. However, seasonal snow levels can exclude many browsing species. Several studies have shown that Mountain big sagebrush is preferred forage by elk, mule deer, and sage grouse when compared to the other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017). Sage grouse are considered obligate species of mountain big sagebrush and other big sagebrush varieties. These species are generally preferred over the low sagebrush species; Artemisia nova and Artemisia arbuscula (Dalke et al., 1963).
Threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. tripartita) - Community 2.1:
Threetip sagebrush is not a preferred browse species for most wild ungulates. It can be used to a minor extent by mule deer in both the winter and summer and as an emergency forage for other large ungulates (Tirmenstein, 1999.)
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata) - All states/communities:
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on Western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, utilization of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) - All states/communities:
Sandberg bluegrass is one of the earliest grasses to green up during the spring and become available forage for wildlife; however becomes less utilized during the later summer months. The degree of use for elk and pronghorn is good to poor, and good to fair for mule deer, small mammals, small nongame birds, and upland game birds. Usage is fair to poor by waterfowl (Howard, 1997).
Black sagebrush (Artemisia nova): All states/communities:
Mule deer and pronghorn use black sagebrush habitats extensively. Use is especially heavy by mule deer in the early decades post-fire disturbance (communities 1.3 and 3.1). This is most prevalent within the first three decades after the fire event (Fryer, 2009). Black sagebrush-dominated sites have been shown as a great winter range for pronghorn (Kindschy et al., 1982) and winter distribution has been strongly associated with black sagebrush communities (Clary & Beale, 1983). Sage grouse are obligate species of black and other sagebrush varieties. Generally, big sagebrush communities are preferred by sage grouse; however, some black sagebrush sites on the Snake River Plains and in Nevada have shown to be preferred winter grounds for feeding and cover (Dalke et al., 1963).
Other species of note that rely on black sagebrush communities include great basin pocket mice, Ord's kangaroo rats, sage thrashers, and a large variety of insect pollinator species (Fryer, 2009).
Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula longiloba): All states/communities:
In early spring and winter, little sagebrush is often a preferred forage species for mule deer (Blaisdell et al., 1982). In the Great Basin, little sagebrush-dominated sites are heavily utilized by pronghorn during the summer (Kindschy et al., 1982). Little sagebrush, among other varieties, is an important forage source for sage grouse throughout the year (Steinberg, 2002).
Hydrological functions
Annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid and soil permeability is moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals including pronghorn, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies.
The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site ID's and data collection intensity for each site used in the development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include Line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involved a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
Reference State:
Community 1.1:
Tier III: 2021ID7031195,
Community 1.2: 2021ID7033191, 2021ID7033173, 2019ID7031080
Disturbed State:
Community 2.1:
Tier III:2020ID7032179
Invaded State:
Community 3.1:
Tier III: 2024ID7001611
Tier I: 2021ID7033160
Other references
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Davies, K. Boyd, C. Bates, J. Eighty Years of Grazing by Cattle Modifies Sagebrush and Bunchgrass Structure. 2018. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(3):27
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
Knick, S.T.; Holmes, A.L.; Miller, Richard F. 2005. The role of fire in structuring sagebrush habitats and bird communities. Pages 63-75 In: Saab, Victoria A.; Powell, Hugh D. W. (eds.). Fire and Avian Ecology in North America. Studies in Avian Biology No. 30. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.
McArthur and Stevens. 2009. Composite Shrubs. In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw [compilers]. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-136-vol-2. p. 493-537.
Miller, M., Belnap, J., Beatty, S., Reynolds, R. (2006). Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in Relation to Soil Properties, Water Additions, and Chemical Amendments in Calcareous Soils of Southeastern Utah, USA. Canyonlands Research. 288. 10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Schoeneberger, P.J., and Wysocki, D.A. 2017. Geomorphic Description System, Version 5.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [2]. 2012. Plant Guide for low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tripartita. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2022, October 25].
Contributors
Zachary Van Abbema
Carla Rebernak
Grant Petersen
Kirt Walstad
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/07/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Katelyn Palmer
Nicholas Kozlowski
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Zachary Van Abbema |
---|---|
Contact for lead author |
Zachary Van Abbema zachary.vanabbema@usda.gov |
Date | 02/19/2025 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not present in the reference condition. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon in the reference condition. When present, they usually occur on steeper slopes (greater than 15 percent) and are inconspicuous, disconnected, and very short in length. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes: Pedestals are not evident in the reference condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is between four to 14 percent. This refers to exposed mineral soil not covered by litter, rock, basal cover, plant cover, standing dead, lichen and/or moss. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gullies are not present in the reference condition. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind-scoured, or depositional areas are not evident in the reference condition. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Movement of fine herbaceous litter may occur within less than a foot from where it originated. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil Surface Stable with Stability Ratings of 4 to 6 (both under canopy and bare). Abiotic crusts and or root mats may be present. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface structure is granular with the A horizon ranging from 0 - 20cm thick, averaging 13 cm thick. Predominant A horizon colors are 10YR 3/3 and 10YR 4/3. Surface textures include loam, gravelly loam, and gravelly silt loam. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plants are evenly distributed across the ecological site and the shrubs and bunchgrasses present improved infiltration as well as protect against runoff. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Not present. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Little sagebrush = Bluebunch wheatgrassSub-dominant:
Big sagebrush = Other bunchgrassesOther:
Spiny phlox = Pink pussytoes = Stemless mock goldenweedAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Mortality in herbaceous species is not evident. Species with bunch growth forms may have some natural mortality in centers. Sagebrush species will become decadent in the absence of historical fire return intervals. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Total ground litter cover varies but can range from nine to 29 percent, averaging 65 percent. Depth is usually shallow at less than 1/8 inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production ranges from 400 to 850 lbs/acre, averaging 600 lbs/per acre. Production varies based on effective precipitation and natural variability of soil properties for this ecological site. Total production is slightly higher for perennial grass species but tends to be slightly higher for shrubs than grasses. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invasive species include cheatgrass, spotted knapweed, toadflax, and crested wheatgrass. Native species such as yellow rabbitbrush or significant populations of Sandberg bluegrass or rhizomatous wheatgrasses can indicate a departure from the reference state. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in most years. Bluebunch wheatgrass may not reproduce during extended periods of drought.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.