
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R028AB306UT
Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South
Last updated: 6/12/2025
Accessed: 10/22/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 028A–Ancient Lake Bonneville
MLRA 28A occurs in Utah (82 percent), Nevada (16 percent), and Idaho (2 percent). It encompasses approximately 36,775 square miles (95,246 square kilometers). A large area west and southwest of Great Salt Lake is a salty playa. This area is the farthest eastern extent of the Great Basin Section of the Basin and Range Province of the Intermontane Plateaus. It is an area of nearly level basins between widely separated mountain ranges trending north to south. The basins are bordered by long, gently sloping alluvial fans. The mountains are uplifted fault blocks with steep side slopes. Most of the valleys are closed basins containing sinks or playa lakes. Elevation ranges from 3,950 to 6,560 feet (1,204 to 2000 meters) in the basins and from 6,560 to 11,150 feet (1996 to 3398 meters) in the mountains. Much of the MLRA has alluvial valley fill and playa lakebed deposits at the surface from pluvial Lake Bonneville, which dominated this MLRA 13,000 years ago. A level line of remnant lake terraces on some mountain slopes indicates the former extent of this glacial lake. The Great Salt Lake is what remains of the pluvial lake.
Mountains in the interior of this MLRA consist of tilted blocks of marine sediments from Cambrian to Mississippian age with scattered outcrops of Tertiary continental sediments and volcanic rocks. The average annual precipitation is 5 to 12 inches (13 to 30 cm) in the valleys and ranges up to 49 inches (124 cm) in the mountains. Most of the rainfall in the southern LRU occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during the growing season (April through September). The driest period is from midsummer to early autumn in the northern LRU. Precipitation in winter typically occurs as snow. The average annual temperature is 39 to 53 °F (4 to 12 °C). The freeze-free period averages 165 days and ranges from 110 to 215 days, decreasing in length with increasing elevation. The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Aridisols, Entisols, and Mollisols. Soils are dominantly in the mesic or frigid soil temperature regime, aridic or xeric soil moisture regime, and mixed mineralogy. The soils are generally well drained, loamy or loamy-skeletal, and very deep.
LRU notes
The Basin and Range South LRU has mountain ranges that are about 40 percent sedimentary/metasedimentary (limestone/quartzite dominant) and about 40 percent Tertiary volcanics. The basin floors are generally higher in the southern LRU than in the north LRU between 4,900 and 6,100 feet (1,493 to 1,859 meters) in elevation. The Basin and Range South LRU also exhibits patterns of summers with a greater relative amount of precipitation in July and August coming from convective storms (ustic trending pattern). Pinyon and juniper ecological sites have a great percentage of pinyon pine (Pinus edulis or monophylla) than Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma), with pinyon pine up to 50 percent of the tree composition in the semidesert zones and more than 50 percent in upland zones. Warm season grasses, such as James’ galleta (Pleuraphis jamesii) or blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), are present within the plant community, and can make up a large portion of the subdominant grass composition. Bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) and cliffrose (Purshia sp.) are also present and dominant on some ecological sites in the southern LRU, while they are sparse or absent in the northern LRU.
Ecological site concept
The Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South ecological site is located on foothill lake terraces and benches as well as areas of fans that are located above 14 inches of effective precipitation (14 to 16 inches of effective precipitation is the typical range of Bonneville big sagebrush). This site also receives additional precipitation in the summer from convective storms. Bonneville big sagebrush is the dominant shrub. It is typically found in the zone between Wyoming big sagebrush (lower elevation, lower precipitation) and mountain big sagebrush (higher elevation and higher precipitation) and is a recognized hybrid between those species (Garrison et al. 2013).
Associated sites
R028AB310UT |
Upland Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South This site will occur where there are fewer rock fragments. |
---|---|
R028AB320UT |
Upland Shallow Hardpan (Singleleaf pinyon-Utah juniper) South This site will occur upslope. |
R028AB334UT |
Upland Stony Loam (Wyoming sagebrush) South This site is upslope. |
R028AB338UT |
Upland Stony Loam (pinyon-Utah juniper) South This site occurs upslope and is a pinyon and juniper site. |
R028AY308UT |
Upland Gravelly Loam (Singleleaf Pinyon-Utah Juniper) This site may occur in a mosaic with the Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South ecological site, where soils are moderately deep (20 to 40 inches). |
Similar sites
R028AY066NV |
GRAVELLY LOAM 12-14 P.Z. This site is located in the Nevada portion of 28A and is similar in community dynamics. |
---|---|
R028AY306UT |
Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville Big Sagebrush) This site is located in the Basin and Range North LRU and does not recieve reliable summer precipitation to support warm season species. |
R028AY307UT |
Upland Gravelly Loam (Wyoming Big Sagebrush) The dominant sagebrush is Wyoming sagebrush. This site only occurs in the Basin and Range North LRU. |
R028AB334UT |
Upland Stony Loam (Wyoming sagebrush) South The soil has more rock fragments which effects the production of the site. |
R028AB310UT |
Upland Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South This site will have fewer rock fragments and more plant production. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. ×bonnevillensis |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Physiographic features
The Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South site occurs on alluvial fans and hills. This site is found on all aspects at elevations between 6,000 and 6,800 feet (1,829 to 2,072 meters). Slopes are gentle to slightly steep (1 to 10 percent). Runoff is low to medium and flooding is very rare on this site.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Lake terrace
(2) Bench (3) Fan |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 6,000 – 6,800 ft |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The climate is characterized by warm, dry summers, cold, snowy winters and moist springs. October through May is the wettest part of the year and July to September is the driest, except for summer convective storms that occur. These storms are intermittent and may not occur reliably every year, however they do provide enough summer moisture to alter the plant community with warm season grasses. The effective moisture for plant growth is the 50 percent that falls during the plant dormant period, which wets the soil deeply in the spring and early summer.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 13-15 in |
Frost-free period (average) | |
Freeze-free period (average) | |
Precipitation total (average) | 10 in |
Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Due to its landscape position, the Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South site is not typically influenced by streams or wetlands. It can be influenced by overland flow during heavy thunder storms and/or during wetter spring runoff periods.
Soil features
The soils are deep and well to somewhat excessively drained. They formed in alluvium derived from acid and intermediate igneous rock and/or from residuum weathered from limestone. The surface layer is coarse sandy loam to very gravelly loam with 12 to 35 percent rock fragments. The subsoil has 18 to 43 percent rock fragments. Available water capacity ranges from 4 to 6 inches in the upper 40 inches of soil. The soil moisture regime is xeric and the soil temperature regime is mesic.
Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South proposed soil map units:
Soil Survey Area: Soil Components (Map units in parentheses)
Beaver County, Western Part (UT626): Snake Hollow (106, 119, 167, 206, 207, 208)
Iron-Washington Area (UT634): Bamos (318); Manderfield (409); WYE (517)
Beaver-Cove Fort Area (UT640): Phage (PkD2); Pharo (PtD); Snake Hollow (SLD)
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Alluvium
–
igneous rock
(2) Residuum – limestone |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Coarse sandy loam (2) Gravelly loam (3) Gravelly sandy loam |
Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
Permeability class | Slow to rapid |
Soil depth | 60 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 12 – 27% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 8% |
Available water capacity (Depth not specified) |
3.6 – 5.6 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (Depth not specified) |
5% |
Electrical conductivity (Depth not specified) |
2 mmhos/cm |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (Depth not specified) |
7.9 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
18 – 35% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
8% |
Ecological dynamics
These plant communities may not represent every possibility, but they are the most prevalent and repeatable plant communities. As more data is collected, some of these plant communities may be revised or removed and new ones may be added. None of these plant communities should necessarily be thought of as the “desired plant community”. According to the USDA NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook, the desired plant community will be determined by the decision makers and will meet minimum quality criteria established by the NRCS. The main purpose for including any description of a plant community here is to capture the current knowledge and experience at the time of this revision.
The Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South ecological site is dominated by perennial deep rooted cool season bunchgrasses and deep-rooted shrubs. Bonneville big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. Bonnevillensis [tridentata ssp. vaseyana x tridentata ssp. Wyomingensis], antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata), and Utah serviceberry (Amelanchier utahensis) are the dominant shrubs. The perennial bunchgrasses that are co-dominant with the shrubs include bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudorogenaria spicata), slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), and Nevada bluegrass (Poa nevadensis syn. Poa secunda). These species generally have somewhat shallower root systems than the shrubs, but root densities are often as high as or higher than those of shrubs in the upper 0.5 m but taper off more rapidly than shrubs. General differences in root depth distributions between grasses and shrubs result in resource partitioning in these shrub/grass systems.
Bonneville big sagebrush is a hybrid between Wyoming big sagebrush and mountain big sagebrush (Garrison et al. 2013). It exhibits characteristics of both parent species and is found in the ecotone between the lower elevation Wyoming big sagebrush and higher elevation mountain big sagebrush. Bonneville big sagebrush occurs in moister areas and is often found growing with bitterbrush, serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) and mountain snowberry (Symphoricarpos oreophilus). While it can be difficult to separate Wyoming big sagebrush from Bonneville big sagebrush, it is important to identify this site because of its high utilization by native ungulates and birds (Winward 2004). Bonneville big sagebrush is found in a recurring pattern that can be predicted based on temperature, moisture, and elevation (Rivera et al. 2011). It is often found on Lake Bonneville terraces above the Wyoming sagebrush zone.
The Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South site is more productive and floristically diverse than the lower elevation Wyoming big sagebrush sites (Garrison 2006). This increase in productivity can be attributed to the increase in moisture availability due to the landscape position. Moisture used for plant growth is from water stored in the soil profile during the winter. Some precipitation may come in the summer months (June through August), it is however an unreliable source of moisture for plant growth.
Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) and singleleaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla) may be present on this site due to the proximity of the pinyon/juniper zone. This site is vulnerable to an increase in both pinyon and juniper trees without disturbances that keep the tree densities lower (i.e. fire). Singleleaf pinyon and Utah juniper may dominate the site if there is time without disturbances and eventually out-compete mountain big sagebrush for water and sunlight, severely reducing both the shrub and herbaceous understory (Miller et al. 2000, Lett and Knapp 2005). Bluegrasses may remain underneath trees on north-facing slopes. The potential for soil erosion increases as the Utah juniper woodland matures and the understory plant community cover declines (Pierson et al. 2010).
The Upland Gravelly Loam (Bonneville big sagebrush) South ecological site has moderate resilience to disturbance and moderately low resistance to invasion (Miller et al. 2015). Resilience increases with elevation, aspect, increased precipitation, and increased nutrient availability. Long-term disturbance response may be influenced by small differences in landscape topography. Concave areas receive run-in from adjacent landscapes and consequently retain more moisture to support the growth of deep-rooted perennial grasses (i.e. bluebunch wheatgrass) whereas convex areas where runoff occurs are slightly less resilient and may have more shallow-rooted perennial grasses (i.e. squirreltail (Elymus elmoides) and muttongrass (Poa fendleriana). North slopes are also more resilient than south slopes because lower soil surface temperatures operate to keep moisture content higher on northern exposures.
Fire Ecology:
Bonneville big sagebrush has not specifically been researched regarding fire tolerance, but it is likely similar to Wyoming and Mountain big sagebrush which are killed by fire, and do not resprout (Miller et al. 2013). Plant community composition after a fire is influenced by what plants were present before the fire and their densities (Miller et al. 2013). Typically, plants that are tolerant to fire will return after the fire (this also will depend on the severity of the fire). Bluebunch wheatgrass is tolerant of fire and can reestablish to pre-fire densities within 3 years. If the density of deep-rooted perennial grasses is low before the fire, they will be low after the fire (Miller et al. 2013). Post-fire recovery of Bonneville big sagebrush sites has not been researched, however, mountain and Wyoming big sagebrush have been extensively researched. These two species have different recovery potentials base on site characteristics, like available soil moisture. Mountain big sagebrush can return to a 20 to 30 percent canopy cover within 20 to 30 years while Wyoming big sagebrush may never recover to pre-burn canopy cover (Miller et al. 2013). Recovery of big sagebrush is limited in the presence of cheatgrass either before or after fire (Miller et al. 2013). Rabbitbrush, snowberry, serviceberry, and bitterbrush may increase after fire depending on the severity of the fire. (Miller et al. 2013). The sprouting ability of antelope bitterbrush is variable and depends on fire season, severity, and age of the plant (Zlatnik 1999). Plants younger than 5 years or older than 40 years do not sprout well (Zlatnik 1999).
The introduction of annual weedy species, like cheatgrass, may cause an increase in fire frequency and eventually lead to an annual dominated community (Miller et al. 2013). Infilling by singleleaf pinyon and Utah juniper may also occur with an extended fire return interval. Without fire or changes in management, pinyon and juniper will dominate the site and Bonneville big sagebrush will be severely reduced. The herbaceous understory will typically be reduced. The potential for soil erosion increases as the juniper woodland matures and the understory plant community cover declines. Catastrophic wildfire in juniper dominated sites may lead to an annual weed dominated site.
Livestock/Wildlife Grazing Interpretations:
Overgrazing leads to an increase in sagebrush and a decline in understory plants like bluebunch wheatgrass. Squirreltail will increase temporarily with further degradation. Invasion of annual weedy forbs and cheatgrass could occur with further grazing degradation, leading to a decline in squirreltail and an increase in bare ground. Wetter sites are more resistant to degradation and may end up having sagebrush and Sandberg bluegrass dominate the site. A combination of overgrazing and prolonged drought may lead to soil redistribution, increased bare ground and a loss in plant production. Bonneville big sagebrush can be utilized by native ungulates and birds (Winward 2004). Bluebunch wheatgrass is moderately grazing tolerant but is very sensitive to defoliation during the active growth period (Blaisdell and Pechanec 1949, Laycock 1967, Anderson and Scherzinger 1975). Sandberg bluegrass may slow reestablishment of deeper rooted bunchgrass, increase under grazing pressure (Tisdale and Hironaka 1981) and is capable of co-existing with cheatgrass. Reduced bunchgrass vigor or density provides an opportunity for Sandberg bluegrass expansion and/or cheatgrass and other invasive species to occupy interspaces, leading to increased fire frequency and potentially an annual plant community. Depending on the season of use, the grazer and site conditions, either Sandberg bluegrass or cheatgrass may become the dominant understory with inappropriate grazing management. For example, Daubenmire (1970) found that heavy sheep grazing favors Sandberg bluegrass, while heavy cattle grazing favors cheatgrass.
Six possible alternative stable states have been identified for this ecological site. The Reference State contains four community phases, shrub/grass dominated, shrub dominated, grass dominated, and a fire tolerant phase. The primary drivers in this state are fire, drought, and/or insect of disease. The Current Potential State is like the Reference State; however, non-native species have been introduced in the system which alters the resilience and resistance of the state. The Shrub State occurs with time and lack of disturbance and/or inappropriate grazing management. The Annual State occurs after large fires or multiple fires that promote annual invasive species dominance over native shrubs and grasses. The Tree State occurs when there has been sufficient time for junipers and/or pinyon trees to increase in density and dominate the site dynamics. The Seeded State occurs with management with seeding of deep rooted perennial bunchgrasses. Specific community phases and transitions will be described in the narratives below.
State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
States 2, 5 and 6 (additional transitions)
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 6 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
The Reference State (1) includes the plant communities that were best adapted to the unique combination of factors associated with this ecological site prior to European settlement. The site was in a natural dynamic equilibrium with the historic biotic, abiotic, and climatic factors at the time of European immigration and settlement. The dominant aspect of the plant community is Bonneville big sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass.
Characteristics and indicators. This state will only have native species in the plant community.
Community 1.1
Bonneville big sagebrush /Perennial Cool Season Grasses ≥ Forbs ≥ Other Native Shrubs
This community is described in the initial plant list. This community is represented with 55 percent grasses, 25 percent forbs, and 20 percent shrubs. The dominant shrub, visually and in production, is the Bonneville big sagebrush. The dominant grass is bluebunch wheatgrass, and the dominant forb, visually, is arrowleaf balsamroot. This community has approximately 10 to 15 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 200 | 950 | 1300 |
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 500 | 810 |
Forb | 95 | 350 | 630 |
Total | 445 | 1800 | 2740 |
Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0-1% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 10-25% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 25-45% |
Forb foliar cover | 15-25% |
Non-vascular plants | 0-1% |
Biological crusts | 0-4% |
Litter | 10-20% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-31% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-35% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-20% |
Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
---|---|---|---|---|
<0.5 | – | 1-1% | 8-10% | 5-8% |
>0.5 <= 1 | – | 1-4% | 12-15% | 8-20% |
>1 <= 2 | – | 5-10% | 20-25% | 2-5% |
>2 <= 4.5 | – | 8-30% | 0-20% | 0-2% |
>4.5 <= 13 | 0-1% | – | – | – |
>13 <= 40 | – | – | – | – |
>40 <= 80 | – | – | – | – |
>80 <= 120 | – | – | – | – |
>120 | – | – | – | – |
Figure 4. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). UT3061, PNC. Excellent Condition.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 30 | 45 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Bonneville big sagebrush ≥ Other Native Shrubs ≥ Perennial Cool Season Grasses = Forbs
This community appears when the Bonneville big sagebrush increases enough to suppress the herbaceous understory and other shrubs, such as mountain snowberry, antelope bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry. This community has approximately 10 to 20 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Community 1.3
Antelope bitterbrush ≥ Perennial Cool Season Grasses ≥ Forbs ≥ Fire Tolerant Shrubs
This plant community occurs after a fire event (usually mid-temperature, fast moving fire associated with a summer convection thunderstorm. After the fire event, the Bonneville big sagebrush has been removed and replaced with antelope bitterbrush. Recovery of the Bonneville big sagebrush in this community phase may take 5 to 10 year, along with a proper episodic weather event year.
Community 1.4
Perennial Cool Season Grasses ≥ Forbs ≥ Fire Tolerant Shrubs
This community usually occurs when an intense fast-moving fire heats the ground and damages the antelope bitterbrush changing the dominant plant community. The plant community is represented with 65 percent grasses, 25 percent forbs, and 10 percent shrubs. This community will likely have approximately 15 to 20 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2
This pathway occurs over time and without a catastrophic event. This pathway may be dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
Pathway 1.1b
Community 1.1 to 1.3
This pathway occurs during a fire event, normally in mid-summer, when the fire is hot enough, and moves fast enough to kill the sagebrush and stimulate antelope bitterbrush growth.
Pathway 1.1c
Community 1.1 to 1.4
This pathway occurs when fire, insects, prolonged drought, and/or pathogens that kill, reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most effective of these disturbances.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.3
This pathway occurs during a fire event, normally in mid-summer, when the fire is hot enough, and moves fast enough to kill the sagebrush and stimulate antelope bitterbrush growth.
Pathway 1.2b
Community 1.2 to 1.4
This pathway occurs when fire, insects, prolonged drought, and/or pathogens that kill, reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most effective of these disturbances.
Pathway 1.3b
Community 1.3 to 1.1
This pathway occurs over time and without a catastrophic event. This pathway may be dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
Pathway 1.3a
Community 1.3 to 1.4
This pathway occurs when fire, insects, prolonged drought, and/or pathogens, reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most effective of these disturbances.
Pathway 1.4a
Community 1.4 to 1.1
Time without catastrophic event. This was probably dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
State 2
Current Potential State
The Current Potential State (2) includes the biotic communities that would become established on the ecological site if all successional sequences were completed without human interference under the present environmental conditions. Natural disturbances are inherent in its development. This State may include acclimatized, naturalized, or invasive non-native species. There is no known way to effectively remove these plants from the site once they have become established. The level of occurrence of these plants is such that careful management can prevent their domination of the site. This site is irreversibly changed. Plant communities within the Current Potential State (2) may be managed and used for various purposes without significant alteration in plant community composition or production. It includes all of the plant communities that exist in the Reference State (1) with the inclusion of species that are non-native to this ecological site. All of these scenarios are very interrelated and dependent on weather patterns and events as well as fire frequency and intensity. The fire interval frequency is approximately 30 to 55 years. Any set of events that are strong enough to force the plant community out of this pattern can push it over a threshold and into another ecological state.
Characteristics and indicators. This state will be similar in community composition and dynamics to the Reference State with the exception of the inclusion of non-native species.
Community 2.1
Bonneville big sagebrush =≥ Perennial Cool Season Grass ≥ Forbs ≥ Other Native Shrubs ≥ Non-Native Species
This plant community is described in the initial plant list. This community is represented with 55 percent grasses, 25 percent forbs, and 20 percent shrubs. The dominant shrub, visually and in production, is Bonneville big sagebrush. The dominant grass is bluebunch wheatgrass and the dominant forb, visually, is arrowleaf balsamroot. This community has approximately 10 to 15 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments. This community has notable amounts of non-native species.
Community 2.2
Bonneville Big Sagebrush ≥ Other Native Shrubs ≥ Perennial Cool Season Grass ≥ Forbs ≥ Non-Native Species
This plant community appears when the Bonneville big sagebrush increases, suppressing the herbaceous understory and other shrubs such as mountain snowberry, antelope bitterbrush, and Utah serviceberry. This community has approximately 10 to 20 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments. This community has notable amounts of non-native species.
Community 2.3
Antelope Bitterbrush ≥ Perennial Cool Season Grass ≥ Forb Fire Tolerant Shrub ≥ Non-Native Species
This plant community appears after a fire (usually a mid-temperature, fast moving fire, typically associated with summer convection thunderstorms). The Bonneville big sagebrush is replaced with antelope bitterbrush. Recovery of the Bonneville big sagebrush in this community will take approximately 5 to 10 years, along with a proper episodic weather event year. This community has notable amounts of non-native species.
Community 2.4
Perennial Cool Season Grass ≥ Forbs ≥ Fire Tolerant Shrubs ≥ Non-Native Species
This community usually occurs after an intense fire that damages and reduces the antelope bitterbrush, The plant community is represented with 65 percent grasses, 25 percent forbs, and 10 percent shrubs. This community has notable amounts of non-native species.
Pathway 2.1a
Community 2.1 to 2.2
This pathway occurs over time and without a catastrophic event. This pathway may be dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
Pathway 2.1b
Community 2.1 to 2.3
This pathway occurs during a fire event, normally in mid-summer, when the fire is hot enough, and moves fast enough to kill the sagebrush and stimulate antelope bitterbrush growth.
Pathway 2.1c
Community 2.1 to 2.4
This pathway occurs when disturbances such as fire, insects, prolonged drought, pathogens, and/or overgrazing reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire and overgrazing are the most common of these disturbances.
Pathway 2.2a
Community 2.2 to 2.3
This pathway occurs during a fire event, normally in mid-summer, when the fire is hot enough, and moves fast enough to kill the sagebrush and stimulate antelope bitterbrush growth.
Pathway 2.2b
Community 2.2 to 2.4
This pathway occurs when disturbances such as fire, insects, prolonged drought, pathogens, and/or overgrazing reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire and overgrazing are the most common of these disturbances.
Pathway 2.3b
Community 2.3 to 2.1
This pathway occurs over time and without a catastrophic event. This pathway may be dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
Pathway 2.3a
Community 2.3 to 2.4
This pathway occurs when disturbances such as fire, insects, prolonged drought, pathogens, and/or overgrazing reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire and overgrazing are the most common of these disturbances.
Pathway 2.4a
Community 2.4 to 2.1
This pathway occurs over time and without a catastrophic event. This pathway may be dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
State 3
Utah Juniper/Invasive Annual State
The plant community moves to the Utah Juniper/Invasive Annual State (3) when there is a lack of fire, and a source of Utah juniper and pinyon seed. The dominate aspect of the plant community is Utah juniper and cheatgrass brome. This State can persist for a long time until an extreme event such as a fire or other management treatment such as overgrazing occurs.
Characteristics and indicators. This state will have noticeable presence of Utah juniper.
Community 3.1
Utah Juniper ≥ Bonneville big sagebrush ≥ Native Perennials ≥ Invasive Annuals
This community has a strong overstory of Utah juniper and singleleaf pinyon, the understory is similar to community 2.1. This community has approximately 20 to 35 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments. Fire may bring this community back toward the Current Potential State (2).
Community 3.2
Utah Juniper ≥ Invasive Annuals
This community is present when 99 percent of the native plants have been removed from the plant community and only pinyon and juniper with a sparse understory of invasive annuals remain on the site. This community has approximately 35 to 85 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments. Few native plants such as Sandberg bluegrass, may occur in this community phase.
Pathway 3.1a
Community 3.1 to 3.2
This pathway occurs due to overgrazing, with or without drought, over a prolonged period of time.
Pathway 3.2a
Community 3.2 to 3.1
This pathway occurs when disturbances such as fire, insects, prolonged drought, and/or pathogens, reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most effective of these disturbances.
State 4
Bonneville Big Sagebrush/Broom Snakeweed State ≥ Invasive Annuals
The Bonneville Big Sagebrush/Broom Snakeweed State (4) occurs when the site is overgrazed for a prolonged period of time. Drought, fire, mechanical disturbance, and other like disturbances will speed up the process.
Community 4.1
Bonneville Big Sagebrush ≥ Broom Snakeweed ≥ Sandberg Bluegrass ≥ Invasive Annuals
This community has approximately 35 percent Bonneville big sagebrush, 35 percent broom snakeweed, and 15 percent grass and forb. When the air dry production is considered it would approximate 35 percent Bonneville big sagebrush, 55 percent broom snakeweed, and 10 percent grasses and forbs. Most of the grasses and forbs are non-native annuals. This community has approximately 20 to 35 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Community 4.2
Broom Snakeweed ≥ Invasive Annuals ≥ Sandberg Bluegrass
This plant community has lost the Bonneville big sagebrush and the invasive annuals have reduced the areas of Sandberg bluegrass. The broom snakeweed controls about 75 percent of the annual production. This community has approximately 35 to 40 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Pathway 4.1a
Community 4.1 to 4.2
This pathway occurs when disturbances such as fire, insects, prolonged drought, and/or pathogens, reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most effective of these disturbances.
Pathway 4.2a
Community 4.2 to 4.1
This pathway occurs over time, when management practices such as grazing are used, as well as the introduction of native or perennial plant species.
State 5
Yellow Rabbitbrush/Invasive Annuals State
The Yellow Rabbitbrush/Invasive Annuals State (5) plant community occurs when it has been overgrazed and/or in a drought condition; and then burned (wild or controlled) and not seeded. The dominant aspect of the plant community is cheatgrass brome, yellow rabbitbrush, with a very small amount of Bonneville big sagebrush. The community will usually be made up of 70 percent cheatgrass brome, 10 percent forbs, and 20 percent yellow rabbitbrush with minor components of other shrubs.
Community 5.1
Yellow rabbitbrush ≥ Invasive Annuals
This plant community consists of approximately 40 percent yellow rabbitbrush, 45 percent invasive annuals, and 10 percent native perennials with a small component of other species. This community has approximately 20 to 35 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Community 5.2
Invasive Annuals
This plant community consists of approximately 85 percent invasive annuals (mostly cheatgrass brome and Japanese brome [also known as field brome]), and 10 percent native perennials with a small component of other species. This community has approximately 20 to 40 percent bare ground and surface rock fragments.
Pathway 5.1a
Community 5.1 to 5.2
This pathway occurs with increased fire frequency and intensity without follow-up management. Overgrazing can move this change along faster. In the Yellow Rabbitbrush/Invasive Annuals State (5) the fire interval frequency will remain at 3 to 5 years. This condition is self-sustaining and the site will keep deteriorating until the site potential is lost.
Pathway 5.2a
Community 5.2 to 5.1
This pathway occurs over time, when management practices such as grazing are used, as well as the introduction of native or perennial plant species.
State 6
Seeded Range State
The Seeded Range State (6) exists when the site is cultivated and/or burned, and then planted to introduced and/or native grasses and forbs.
Characteristics and indicators. This state consists of predominantly non-native seeded range species.
Community 6.1
Introduced Perennial Plants
The plant community consists of introduced and/or native grasses and forbs. Productivity levels may compare to the productivity levels in the Current Potential State (2).
Community 6.2
Native Shrubs = Introduced Perennial Plants
This pathway occurs over time, and when management practices such as grazing are used, as well as other disturbances where human intervention takes place to move the community back.
Pathway 6.1a
Community 6.1 to 6.2
Time without catastrophic event. This was probably dependent on a specific chain of climatic events
Pathway 6.2a
Community 6.2 to 6.1
Time and management of grazing alone or along with other disturbances where human intervention takes place to move the community back.
Transition T1a
State 1 to 2
This transition occurs when there is an introduction of non-native species into the ecosystem.
Transition T1b
State 1 to 4
This pathway occurs when disturbances such as fire, insects, prolonged drought, pathogens, and/or overgrazing reduce the dominant shrub overstory. Fire and overgrazing are the most common of these disturbances.
Transition T2a
State 2 to 3
This transition takes place when the sagebrush canopy is so heavy that it destroys the perennial grass and forb understory and the fire interval frequency increases to 60 to 90 years from an average of 20 to 40 years. Disturbances such as prolonged drought, overgrazing, and extreme lengthening of the fire interval frequency contribute to the introduction of Utah juniper on to the site.
Transition T2b
State 2 to 4
This transition occurs due to prolonged drought and/or prolonged overgrazing.
Transition T2c
State 2 to 5
This transition occurs due to continued overgrazing and an increase of fire frequency over a prolonged period of time.
Transition T3b
State 3 to 5
This transition occurs due to continued overgrazing and an increase of fire frequency over a prolonged period of time.
Transition T3a
State 3 to 6
This transition occurs due to disturbances caused by humans such as mechanical treatment and seeding, and/or chemical treatment and seeding.
Transition T4a
State 4 to 6
This transition occurs due to disturbances caused by humans such as mechanical treatment and seeding, and/or chemical treatment and seeding.
Transition T5a
State 5 to 6
This transition occurs due to disturbances caused by humans such as mechanical treatment and seeding, and/or chemical treatment and seeding.
Restoration pathway R6a
State 6 to 2
This restoration pathway takes approximately 25 to 50 years. Time, along with proper management that favors the native plants may return them to the site. The time frame depends on management and on the precipitation amounts. If the site is at the 15- to 16-inch zone it will respond quicker than at the 14-inch level. Proper grazing management along with rest periods for the site may reduce the time it takes the restoration process.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Grazing | |
---|---|
Grazing Management Plan - Applied |
Transition T6a
State 6 to 3
This transition takes place when the sagebrush canopy is so heavy that it destroys the perennial grass and forb understory and the fire interval frequency increases to 60 to 90 years from an average of 20 to 40 years. Prolonged drought, overgrazing, and extreme lengthening of the fire interval frequency are disturbances that contribute to the introduction of Utah juniper to the site.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | Primary Shrubs | 200–700 | ||||
Bonneville big sagebrush | ARTRB3 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. ×bonnevillensis | 145–330 | – | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 95–260 | – | ||
Utah serviceberry | AMUT | Amelanchier utahensis | 95–260 | – | ||
3 | Secondary Shrubs | 60–260 | ||||
Shrub (>.5m) | 2SHRUB | Shrub (>.5m) | 33–110 | – | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 10–39 | – | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 10–39 | – | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 10–39 | – | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 10–39 | – | ||
broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 0–26 | – | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 5–26 | – | ||
creeping barberry | MARE11 | Mahonia repens | 5–20 | – | ||
pricklypear | OPUNT | Opuntia | 5–20 | – | ||
Woods' rose | ROWO | Rosa woodsii | 5–20 | – | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | Primary Grasses | 700–1100 | ||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 250–400 | – | ||
slender wheatgrass | ELTR7 | Elymus trachycaulus | 100–300 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 100–200 | – | ||
1 | Secondary Grasses | 95–195 | ||||
Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 20–130 | – | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 9–65 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 9–65 | – | ||
thickspike wheatgrass | ELLAL | Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus | 9–65 | – | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 9–65 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 9–65 | – | ||
Grass, annual | 2GA | Grass, annual | 15–65 | – | ||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 28–65 | – | ||
muttongrass | POFE | Poa fendleriana | 28–65 | – | ||
oniongrass | MEBU | Melica bulbosa | 9–39 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 9–39 | – | ||
Douglas' sedge | CADO2 | Carex douglasii | 9–39 | – | ||
Geyer's sedge | CAGE2 | Carex geyeri | 9–39 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | Primary Forbs | 95–195 | ||||
western yarrow | ACMIO | Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis | 28–65 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLUC8 | Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. candicans | 28–65 | – | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 28–65 | – | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 28–65 | – | ||
2 | secondary forbs | 50–300 | ||||
Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 50–130 | – | ||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 50–130 | – | ||
purple milkvetch | ASAG2 | Astragalus agrestis | 10–39 | – | ||
silverleaf milkvetch | ASAR4 | Astragalus argophyllus | 10–39 | – | ||
Beckwith's milkvetch | ASBE3 | Astragalus beckwithii | 10–39 | – | ||
narrowleaf stoneseed | LIIN2 | Lithospermum incisum | 5–39 | – | ||
prairie flax | LILEL2 | Linum lewisii var. lewisii | 10–39 | – | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 10–39 | – | ||
western stoneseed | LIRU4 | Lithospermum ruderale | 5–39 | – | ||
fernleaf biscuitroot | LODI | Lomatium dissectum | 10–39 | – | ||
Torrey's milkvetch | ASCA9 | Astragalus calycosus | 10–39 | – | ||
painted milkvetch | ASCE | Astragalus ceramicus | 10–39 | – | ||
Geyer's milkvetch | ASGE | Astragalus geyeri | 10–39 | – | ||
woollypod milkvetch | ASPU9 | Astragalus purshii | 10–39 | – | ||
Utah milkvetch | ASUT | Astragalus utahensis | 10–39 | – | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 10–39 | – | ||
Anderson's larkspur | DEAN | Delphinium andersonii | 10–39 | – | ||
twolobe larkspur | DENU2 | Delphinium nuttallianum | 10–39 | – | ||
sanddune wallflower | ERCAC | Erysimum capitatum var. capitatum | 5–39 | – | ||
shaggy fleabane | ERPU2 | Erigeron pumilus | 10–39 | – | ||
Engelmann's aster | EUEN | Eucephalus engelmannii | 10–39 | – | ||
sticky purple geranium | GEVI2 | Geranium viscosissimum | 10–39 | – | ||
lambstongue ragwort | SEIN2 | Senecio integerrimus | 10–39 | – | ||
scarlet globemallow | SPCO | Sphaeralcea coccinea | 10–39 | – | ||
common sunflower | HEAN3 | Helianthus annuus | 5–39 | – | ||
showy goldeneye | HEMU3 | Heliomeris multiflora | 10–39 | – | ||
Gray's biscuitroot | LOGR | Lomatium grayi | 10–39 | – | ||
tailcup lupine | LUCAC3 | Lupinus caudatus ssp. caudatus | 10–39 | – | ||
smoothstem blazingstar | MELAL3 | Mentzelia laevicaulis var. laevicaulis | 0–39 | – | ||
lobeleaf groundsel | PAMU11 | Packera multilobata | 10–39 | – | ||
low beardtongue | PEHU | Penstemon humilis | 10–39 | – | ||
carpet phlox | PHHOC | Phlox hoodii ssp. canescens | 10–39 | – | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 10–39 | – | ||
foothill deathcamas | ZIPA2 | Zigadenus paniculatus | 10–39 | – | ||
Utah buttercup | RAJO | Ranunculus jovis | 10–26 | – | ||
longstalk springparsley | CYLO | Cymopterus longipes | 10–26 | – | ||
yellow owl's-clover | ORLU2 | Orthocarpus luteus | 0–26 | – | ||
Nevada biscuitroot | LONE | Lomatium nevadense | 10–26 | – | ||
Great Basin desertparsley | LOSIS | Lomatium simplex var. simplex | 10–26 | – | ||
manyflower stickseed | HAFL2 | Hackelia floribunda | 10–26 | – | ||
yellow fritillary | FRPU2 | Fritillaria pudica | 10–26 | – | ||
yellow avalanche-lily | ERGR9 | Erythronium grandiflorum | 10–26 | – | ||
fireweed | CHANA2 | Chamerion angustifolium ssp. angustifolium | 0–26 | – | ||
yellow spiderflower | CLLUL | Cleome lutea var. lutea | 5–26 | – | ||
miner's lettuce | CLPEP | Claytonia perfoliata ssp. perfoliata | 10–26 | – | ||
Rocky Mountain beeplant | CLSE | Cleome serrulata | 5–26 | – | ||
sego lily | CANU3 | Calochortus nuttallii | 10–26 | – | ||
Macdougal's biscuitroot | LOFOM | Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. macdougalii | 10–26 | – | ||
nettleleaf giant hyssop | AGUR | Agastache urticifolia | 10–26 | – | ||
tapertip onion | ALAC4 | Allium acuminatum | 10–26 | – | ||
Nevada onion | ALNE | Allium nevadense | 10–26 | – | ||
flatbud pricklypoppy | ARMUR | Argemone munita ssp. rotundata | 0–20 | – | ||
roundspike cryptantha | CRHU2 | Cryptantha humilis | 5–20 | – | ||
western tansymustard | DEPIH | Descurainia pinnata ssp. halictorum | 5–20 | – | ||
mountain tarweed | MAGL2 | Madia glomerata | 0–20 | – | ||
scarlet gilia | IPAGA3 | Ipomopsis aggregata ssp. aggregata | 5–20 | – | ||
flatspine stickseed | LAOC3 | Lappula occidentalis | 5–20 | – | ||
tufted evening primrose | OECAM4 | Oenothera caespitosa ssp. marginata | 5–20 | – | ||
pale evening primrose | OEPA | Oenothera pallida | 5–20 | – | ||
orpine stonecrop | SEDE | Sedum debile | 0–10 | – | ||
hookedspur violet | VIADA | Viola adunca var. adunca | 1–10 | – | ||
Nuttall's violet | VINU2 | Viola nuttallii | 1–10 | – | ||
goosefoot violet | VIPUV2 | Viola purpurea ssp. venosa | 1–10 | – |
Interpretations
Supporting information
Other references
Anderson, E. W. and R. J. Scherzinger. 1975. Improving quality of winter forage for elk by cattle grazing. Journal of Range Management:120-125.
Blaisdell, J.P. and J.F. Pechanec. 1949. Effects of herbage removal at various dates on vigor of bluebunch wheatgrass and arrowleaf balsamroot. Ecology 30(3):298-305.
Daubenmire, R. 1970. Steppe Vegetation of Washington. 131 pp.
Garrison, H. 2006. Study of a putative hybrid taxon in the Artemisia tridentata complex. Master’s thesis, College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Garrison, H. D., L. M. Shultz, and E. D. McArthur. 2013. Studies of a new hybrid taxon in the Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae: Anthemideae) complex. Western North American Naturalist 73(1):1-19.
Laycock, W. A. 1967. How heavy grazing and protection affect sagebrush-grass ranges. Journal of Range Management:206-213.
Lett, M. S., and A. K. Knapp. 2005. Woody plant encroachment and removal in mesic grassland: Production and composition responses of herbaceous vegetation. American Midland Naturalist 153:217-231.
Miller, R.F., J.C. Chambers, D.A. Pyke, F.B. Pierson, and C.J. Williams. 2013. A review of fire effects on vegetation and soils in the Great Basin Region: response and ecological site characteristics. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-308. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 126 p.
Miller, R.F., J.C. Chambers, and M. Pellant. 2015. A field guide for rapid assessment of post-wildfire recovery potential in sagebrush and pinon-juniper ecosystems in the Great Basin: Evaluating resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasive annual grasses and predicting vegetation response. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-338. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 70 p.
Miller, R. F., T. J. Svejcar, and J. A. Rose. 2000. Impacts of western juniper on plant community composition and structure. Journal of Range Management:574-585.
Pierson, F. B., C. J. Williams, P. R. Kormos, S. P. Hardegree, P. E. Clark, and B. M. Rau. 2010. Hydrologic vulnerability of sagebrush steppe following pinyon and juniper encroachment. Rangeland Ecology & Management 63:614-629.
Rivera, S., L. Schultz, A.J. Hernandez, and R.D. Ramsey. 2011. GIS ordination approach to model distribution of shrub species in northern Utah. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues 17(25):1-12.
Tisdale, E. W. and M. Hironaka. 1981. The sagebrush-grass region: A review of the ecological literature. University of Idaho, Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station.
Winward, A.H. 2004. Sagebrush of Colorado: taxonomy, distribution, ecology and management. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO.
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Purshia tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/purtri/all.html [2018, May 10].
Contributors
Brock Benson
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 6/12/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 06/13/2025 |
Approved by | Kendra Moseley |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.