
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R008XY112WA
Shallow Stony sagebrush
Last updated: 5/20/2025
Accessed: 10/18/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 008X–Columbia Plateau
MLRA 8 encompasses about 50,100 square kilometers mainly in Washington and Oregon, with a small area in Idaho. This MLRA is characterized by loess hills, surrounding scablands, and alluvial deposits. This MLRA consists mostly of Miocene Columbia River Basalt covered with up to 200 feet of loess and volcanic ash. The dominant soil order in this MLRA is Mollisols. Soils in this MLRA dominantly have a mesic temperature regime, a xeric moisture regime, and mixed minerology.
Classification relationships
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 8 – Columbia Plateau
LRU – Common Resource Areas (CRA):
8.1 - Channeled Scablands
8.2 - Loess Islands
8.3 - Okanogan Drift Hills
8.4 - Moist Pleistocene Lake Basins
8.5 - Moist Yakima Folds
8.6 - Lower Snake and Clearwater Canyons
8.7 - Okanogan Valley
Ecological site concept
Diagnostics:
Shallow Stony is a sparsely vegetated upland site in the sagebrush steppe areas of MLRA 8 occurring on soils that are both shallow (10 to 20 inches deep) and stony to extremely stony. Soils have a stony or cobbly surface and rock fragments (35% or more) throughout the profile. Soil textures loam, silt loam, clay loam and clay are most common. The soil surface is mostly bare soil, soil biotic crust or rock.
Plants on Shallow Stony are widely scattered. Fire-sensitive shrubs dominate the reference state overstory, while perennial bunchgrasses and forbs provide the understory. The shrub layer is typically 18 to 24 inches high Wyoming sagebrush. Cool-season bunchgrasses form two distinct layers. Bluebunch wheatgrass is the dominant bunchgrass in the top grass layer, while Sandberg bluegrass is the major grass of the lower grass layer.
Principle Vegetative Drivers:
The soil depth and stones throughout the profile drive the vegetative expression of this site. The shallow soil depth limits rooting, while the soil depth and stones limit the water holding capacity in the profile. Thus, plant production is quite limited for Shallow Stony sites.
Associated sites
R008XY120WA |
Stony sagebrush |
---|---|
R008XY130WA |
Loamy sagebrush |
R008XY153WA |
Cool Loamy threetip sagebrush |
Similar sites
R008XY120WA |
Stony sagebrush |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Physiographic features
The landscape is part of the Columbia basalt plateau. Shallow Stony sites occur on sideslopes of ridges and plateaus, ridges & benches, footslopes and hillslopes, and canyon walls.
Physiographic Division: Intermontane Plateau
Physiographic Province: Columbia Plateau
Physiographic Sections: Walla Walla Plateau Section
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Geomorphic position, hills |
(1) Nose Slope (2) Side Slope |
---|---|
Landforms |
(1)
Hills
(2) Valley (3) Scabland (4) Plateau (5) Terrace (6) Alluvial fan |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 600 – 4,000 ft |
Slope | 2 – 35% |
Water table depth | 60 in |
Aspect | W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Flooding frequency | Not specified |
---|---|
Ponding frequency | Not specified |
Elevation | Not specified |
Slope | 65% |
Water table depth | Not specified |
Climatic features
The Wyoming sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass areas are both warmer and drier than grasslands or other shrub steppe sites (Daubenmire). The climate is characterized by moderately cold, wet winters, and hot, dry summers, with limited precipitation due to the rain shadow effect of the Cascades. Taxonomic soil climate is either xeric (12 to 16 inches PPT) or aridic moisture regimes (10 to 12 inches PPT) with a mesic temperature regime.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 120-160 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 10-16 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 90-210 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | |
Precipitation total (actual range) |
Influencing water features
A plant’s ability to grow on a site and overall plant production is determined by soil-water-plant relationships:
1. Whether rain and melting snow runs off-site or infiltrates into the soil
2. Whether soil conditions remain aerobic or become saturated and become anaerobic
3. Water drainage and how quickly the soil reaches the wilting point
With adequate cover of live plants and litter, there are no restrictions on this ecological site with water infiltrating into the soil. In some years Shallow Stony sites can become saturated due to the shallow soil depth, but with good drainage would remain anaerobic for only a short period of time. This site has an extremely restricted water holding capacity, so plant production is quite limited.
Soil features
This ecological site components are dominantly Lithic, Aridic and Argiduridic taxonomic subgroups of Haploxerolls, Durixerolls and Argixerolls great groups of the Mollisols taxonomic order, with Aridisols occurring as well. Soils are dominantly shallow. Average available water capacity of about five inches (12.7 cm) in the zero to 40 inches (zero to 100 cm) depth range.
Soil parent material is dominantly mixed loess, colluvium and residuum, with mixed ash possible.
The associated soils are Camaspatch, Disage, Durtash, Fortyday, Horseflat, Lickskillet, Rock Creek, Starbuck, Vantage and similar soils.
Dominate soil surface is clay to very cobbly loam, with ashy modifier sometimes occurring as well.
Dominant particle-size class is clayey to loamy-skeletal
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Loess
(2) Colluvium (3) Residuum |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Clay (2) Very cobbly loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Clayey (2) Loamy-skeletal |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Depth to restrictive layer | 10 – 20 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 10% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 10% |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
5 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (Depth not specified) |
5% |
Electrical conductivity (Depth not specified) |
5 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (Depth not specified) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-10in) |
5.6 – 9 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
25% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
20% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Not specified |
---|---|
Depth to restrictive layer | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 30% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 5 – 30% |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
1 – 7.9 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (Depth not specified) |
Not specified |
Electrical conductivity (Depth not specified) |
Not specified |
Sodium adsorption ratio (Depth not specified) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-10in) |
Not specified |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
15 – 45% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
10 – 40% |
Ecological dynamics
Shallow Stony produces about 200 to 450 pounds per acre of biomass annually.
Wyoming big sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass are at the core of the Shallow Stony ecological site and warrant a degree of understanding.
Wyoming sagebrush in a long-lived, multi-branched, evergreen shrub. Size is no more than 18 inches to two feet high on Shallow Stony. Wyoming big sagebrush has a significant rooting system, composed of a two-part rooting structure with a primary deep taproot, and a shallow extensive network of finer roots that spread laterally. This rooting system allows Wyoming big sagebrush to survive in the hottest and driest portions of the sagebrush range by tapping into groundwater sources deep into the soil profile itself. This also allows Wyoming big sagebrush to be more competitive with bunchgrasses when the landscape positions and/or soils are less ideal for grass species to maintain the competitive advantage.
Bluebunch wheatgrass is a long-lived, mid-sized bunchgrass with an awned or awnless seed head arranged in a spike. Bluebunch provides a crucial and extensive network of roots to fill the soil profile on Shallow Stony. These roots create a massive underground source to stabilize the soils, provide organic matter and nutrients inputs, and help maintain soil pore space for water infiltration and water retention in the soil profile. The extensive rooting system of mid-sized bunchgrasses leave very little soil niche space available for invasion by other species. This drought resistant root can compete with, and suppress, the spread of exotic weeds.
The stability and resiliency of the reference communities is directly linked to the health and vigor of bluebunch wheatgrass. As long as bluebunch wheatgrass plants occupy the site, the system holds together. If we lose the bluebunch the ecosystem crashes or unravels.
Shallow Stony is resistant to most natural disturbances and ecologically stable. Due to 35 to 75 percent surface rocks and limited forage, this ecological site is not attractive to grazing animals and so are rarely if ever grazed. The vegetative cover is too low to carry fire, so these sites rarely burn. Based on inherent protection from both fire and grazing, most Shallow Stony sites are stable.
In many pastures, However, if this site does experience a major disturbance it is not resilient and may be extremely difficult to stabilize once altered. For example, vehicle traffic when the soil is saturated will leave ruts that remain for years to come.
For sites that are grazed, as grazing pressure increases the plant community unravels in stages:
1. Bluebunch wheatgrass declines while sagebrush and buckwheat species increase
2. As bluebunch wheatgrass continues to decline, invasive species such as cheatgrass and knapweed colonize the site
3. Shallow Stony sites rarely have more than thinly scattered cheatgrass.
For more grazing management information refer to Range Technical Notes found in Section I Reference Lists of NRCS Field Office Technical Guide for Washington State.
In Washington, Wyoming sagebrush – bluebunch wheatgrass communities provide habitat for a variety of upland wildlife species.
State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference
State 1 represents sagebrush steppe with no invasive or exotic weed species. Communities with heavy sagebrush or a dominance of annual grasses have never been seen on Shallow Stony. Reference community 1.1 is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass and Wyoming sagebrush. Reference State Community Phases: 1.1 Reference Bluebunch wheatgrass-Wyoming sagebrush Dominate Reference State Species: Wyoming big sagebrush (overstory) and bluebunch wheatgrass At-risk Communities: • Any community in the reference state is at risk of moving to State 2. The seed source of cheatgrass is nearby and blowing onto most sites annually. • Reference community is quite stable as it receives limited grazing pressure and rarely burns • State 3 has not been seen on Shallow Stony sites in the sagebrush steppe region
Community 1.1
Bluebunch Wheatgrass, Wyoming Big Sagebrush, Sandberg Bluegrass, and Perennial Forbs
Figure 1. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
State 2
Sagebrush Steppe with Invasive Species
State 2 represents sagebrush steppe, similar to the Reference State, but with the inclusion of minor amounts of invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass. Most Shallow Stony sites never cross the threshold into State 2. They stay at climax or near climax condition, as these sites generally receive limited grazing pressure and rarely burn. Community Phases for State 2: 2.1 Reference w/ Annual Grasses Bluebunch wheatgrass-Wyo. sagebrush Dominate Species in State 2: Bluebunch wheatgrass, Wyoming sagebrush
Community 2.1
Bluebunch Wheatgrass, Wyoming Big Sagebrush, Perennial Forbs, and Cheatgrass
State 3
Invasive Annual Grasses
State 3 represents sites that have invasive annual grasses and sagebrush as co-dominants, and have crossed a biological threshold. State 3 is rare for Shallow Stony sites. Cheatgrass is the major invasive species. Mustard, prickly lettuce or diffuse knapweed may also be present. Invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass, are not as competitive as on adjoining deeper ecological sites. But a micro-burst of cheatgrass can occur. Cheatgrass seed blows onto Shallow Stony sites annually. In a year with heavy snowfall and early spring rain, such as 2017, the site has far more moisture than the plant community can utilize. This is the opportunity for cheatgrass seed to germinate and produce a huge flush of cheatgrass plants. In following years when moisture is normal or below normal cheatgrass seed will not germinate or make viable plants. So, these micro-bursts of cheatgrass are episodic and mostly a temporary condition in MLRA 8 Shallow Stony sites. Within a couple of years cheatgrass will be nonexistent to at most a very minor component. Community Phases for State 3: Shrub – Annual Grass Wyoming sagebrush – cheatgrass Dominate Species in State 3: Cheatgrass, Wyoming sagebrush State 3 is considered non-reversible. Due to shallow soil depth, surface rock and rock within the soil profile, and the equipment limitations thereof, seeding is not practical for the Shallow Stony ecological site. Restoration of bluebunch wheatgrass, sagebrush, native forbs and the soil biotic crust would be very problematic at best on Shallow Stony. Seeds must germinate. Seedlings and plugged plants need soil moisture and time to become established. In most years, seeds and plugs may not have a chance as site conditions on Shallow Stony can change quickly. Drying winds and bright sun can turn a snowy or muddy site into a hard crust before plants are established. So, the timing of all recovery efforts would have an extremely narrow window of opportunity on Shallow Stony. Perhaps the only avenue for recovery would be to plant plugs of native species which is a very costly and risky proposition.
Community 3.1
Cheatgrass and Shrubs
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
Result: shift from State 1 (bunchgrass-shrub) to State 2 with minor additions of cheatgrass. Primary Triggers: A high moisture year causes a micro-burst of cheatgrass and is the principle means of colonization. Loss of soil biological crusts contributes to the invasion. Also, soil disturbances (rodents, badgers) create openings in the community and encourage weed germination. Ecological process: Most sites in the Reference State have cheatgrass seed as the seed blows onto the sites annually. Cheatgrass is a prolific seeder and the seed is waiting for enough moisture to germinate and to compete with the native species for space, light and moisture. When there is more moisture available than the plant community can utilize, even pristine communities in the Reference State are susceptible to colonization by cheatgrass. The addition of cheatgrass to the community is generally a temporary condition on Shallow Stony sites. Indicators: The occurrence of annual grasses on sites where they had been absent.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 1
Result: shift from State 2 community with minor amount of cheatgrass back to State 1 community with no cheatgrass. Primary Trigger: normal to below normal precipitation year. Ecological process: with normal to below normal precipitation the native species in the community utilize all available moisture and cheatgrass is unable to compete with the native species.
Transition T2B
State 2 to 3
Result: Shift from State 2 to State 3 which is dominated by annuals. State 3 is rare and has not been seen on Shallow Stony sites. This transition occurs once the cover of invasive species is co-dominate with sagebrush and the cover of bluebunch wheatgrass is minor. Primary Trigger: Chronic heavy grazing, season-long grazing, or late spring grazing causes poor vigor and bluebunch wheatgrass has a significant reduction in cover. Ecological Process: With consistent defoliation pressures bluebunch wheatgrass cover declines due to shrinking crowns and some mortality. More and more of the soil surface and upper soil rooting surface become open to opportunistic, exotic weeds that take advantage of the available niche space to colonize and expand. The invasive annual grasses in State 2 communities make a dramatic increase to dominate the community. Indicators: Decreasing cover of bluebunch wheatgrass and increasing cover of invasive annual species. Increasing distance between perennial bunchgrass plants. Decreasing soil organic matter, soil water retention, limited water infiltration and percolation in the soil profile.
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | Dominant Shrubs | 100 | ||||
Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | – | – | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | – | – | ||
rabbitbrush | CHRYS9 | Chrysothamnus | – | – | ||
purple sage | SADOI | Salvia dorrii ssp. dorrii var. incana | – | – | ||
scabland sagebrush | ARRI2 | Artemisia rigida | – | – | ||
rock buckwheat | ERSP7 | Eriogonum sphaerocephalum | – | – | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | Dominant Mid-Size Bunchgrass | 225 | ||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | – | – | ||
3 | Other Mid-Size Bunchgrass - Minor | 25 | ||||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | – | – | ||
Thurber's needlegrass | ACTH7 | Achnatherum thurberianum | – | – | ||
4 | Short Grass - Subdominant | 45 | ||||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | – | – | ||
sixweeks fescue | VUOC | Vulpia octoflora | – | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
5 | Native Forbs - Subdominant | 70 | ||||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | – | – | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | – | – | ||
narrowleaf mock goldenweed | NEST5 | Nestotus stenophyllus | – | – | ||
onion | ALLIU | Allium | – | – | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | – | – | ||
woolly plantain | PLPA2 | Plantago patagonica | – | – | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | – | – | ||
Hooker's balsamroot | BAHO | Balsamorhiza hookeri | – | – | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | – | – | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | – | – | ||
low pussytoes | ANDI2 | Antennaria dimorpha | – | – | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | – | – |
Interpretations
Supporting information
Other references
Boling M., Frazier B., Busacca, A., General Soil Map of Washington, Washington State University, 1998 Daubenmire, R., Steppe Vegetation of Washington, EB1446, March 1968 Davies, Kirk, Medusahead Dispersal and Establishment in Sagebrush Steppe Plant Communities, Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2008 Environmental Protection Agency, map of Level III and IV Ecoregions of Washington, June 2010 Miller, Baisan, Rose and Pacioretty, “Pre and Post Settlement Fire regimes in mountain Sagebrush communities: The Northern Intermountain Region Natural Resources Conservation Service, map of Common Resource Areas of Washington, 2003 Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model for Wyoming sagebrush, LANDFIRE project, 2008 Rocchio, Joseph & Crawford, Rex C., Ecological Systems of Washington State. A Guide to Identification. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, October 2015. Pages 156-161 Inter-Mountain Basin Big Sagebrush. Rouse, Gerald, MLRA 8 Ecological Sites as referenced from Natural Resources Conservation Service-Washington FOTG, 2004 Soil Conservation Service, Range Sites for MLRA 8 from 1980s and 1990s Tart, D., Kelley, P., and Schlafly, P., Rangeland Vegetation of the Yakima Indian reservation, August 1987, YIN Soil and Vegetation Survey.
Contributors
Kevin Guinn
K. Moseley
G. Fults
R. Fleenor
W. Keller
C. Smith
K. Bomberger
C. Gaines
K. Paup-Lefferts
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/20/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 03/10/2025 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.