Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site PX136X00X830

Acidic Upland Forest, Depth Restriction, Dry-moist

Last updated: 5/02/2025
Accessed: 05/20/2025

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 136X / Ecological site PX136X00X830

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 136X–Southern Piedmont

This MLRA is on a large piedmont underlain by metamorphic and igneous bedrock. It stretches from north-central Virginia to east-central Alabama, running parallel to the Appalachian highlands to the northwest and the Atlantic coast to the southeast.

MLRA 136 has only subtle climatic differences with MLRA 148 (Northern Piedmont), with which it shares a common geologic origin. This adjacent MLRA sits to the north. Along the fall line, it shares a boundary with MLRA 133A (Southern Coastal Plain), MLRA 137 (Carolina and Georgia Sand Hills), and 133C (Gulf Coastal Plain). Here, unconsolidated Coastal Plain sediments intersect the much older Piedmont bedrock. Along it's northwestern boundary, it sits adjacent to MLRAs 130B (Southern Blue Ridge), 130A (Northern Blue Ridge), and 128 (Southern Appalachian Ridges and Valleys). These MLRAs are distinguished from the Southern Piedmont by topographic and elevational differences, as well as differences in the age, origin, and degree of metamorphism of the underlying bedrock.

Five states are intersected by the MLRA, including North Carolina (29 percent), Georgia (27 percent), Virginia (20 percent), South Carolina (17 percent), and Alabama (7 percent). The MLRA extent makes up about 63,720 square miles (165,034 square kilometers).

MLRA PHYSIOGRAPHY
The landscape is generally rolling to hilly, with a well-defined drainage pattern. Streams have dissected the original Piedmont plateau, forming narrow ridgetops, somewhat broad interfluves, and short, steep side slopes adjacent to the streams and drainageways. With some exceptions, the valley floors are generally narrow and make up about 10 percent or less of the land area. The associated stream terraces are generally small and of minor extent.

The landscape is moderately dissected overall, with isolated erosional remnants (monadnocks) and other areas of high topographic relief interspersed. Over most of the MLRA, elevation ranges from approximately 325 to 1,315 feet (100 to 400 meters), with elevations generally increasing toward the Appalachian Highlands, in the upper Piedmont, and decreasing toward the Coastal Plain, in the lower Piedmont.

The major rivers that cross this area en route to the ocean include, from north to south, the James, Roanoke, Cape Fear, Savannah, Altamaha, Chattahoochee, and Alabama Rivers. These rivers typically originate within the Piedmont or in the Blue Ridge. They flow east and south across the Coastal Plain and empty into the Atlantic Ocean or the Gulf of America.

MLRA GEOLOGY
Precambrian and Paleozoic metamorphic and igneous rocks underlie almost all of this MLRA. The dominant metamorphic rock types include gneiss, schist, slate, argillite, and phyllite, among others. Dominant igneous rock types include granite and other related felsic crystalline rocks. Mafic intrusive rocks, including gabbro, diabase, amphibolite, and other dark colored rocks, underlie a minority of the upland landscape. These mafic intrusions crop out in the form of dikes and sills, and often weather to produce soils high in base cations.

The Carolina Slate Belt runs lengthwise through the east-central part of the MLRA, in southern Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and the eastern-most part of the Georgia Piedmont. This region is underlain by fine-grained metasedimentary and metavolcanic rock, which generally weathers to produce soils high in silt.

From Virginia to North Carolina, and in a single county in South Carolina, fault-bounded Triassic Basins are scattered amongst the igneous and metamorphic uplands. These basins are underlain by Triassic and Jurassic siltstone, shale, sandstone, and mudstone, which were laid down in response to continental rifting and subsequent erosion during the Mesozoic era.

MLRA SOILS
The dominant soil orders of the MLRA are Ultisols, Inceptisols, and Alfisols. Ultisols and Alfisols are typically found on more stable landforms, such as interfluves, gentle hillslopes, broad ridgetops, and stream terraces, while Inceptisols are typically found on less stable landforms, including flood plains, steep hillslopes, and narrow ridgetops.

Soils of the region predominantly have a thermic temperature regime, a udic moisture regime, and generally have kaolinitic or mixed mineralogy. In the upper Piedmont of Virginia and North Carolina however, soils have a mesic soil temperature regime, as depicted in figure 2. The mesic soil temperature regime portion of the MLRA is oriented from northeast to southwest and occupies approximately 18 percent of the MLRA extent, or 11,729 square miles (30,377 square kilometers).

Broadly speaking, soils of the Southern Piedmont uplands are shallow to very deep, well drained, and loamy or clayey. Soils of the river valleys are generally very deep, well to poorly drained, and loamy. Soils tend to be finer-textured than in Coastal Plain regions.

MLRA CLIMATE
In general, precipitation is evenly distributed throughout the year in this MLRA, with occasional drought-like conditions extending from late summer into autumn. During the growing season, most of the rainfall comes from high-intensity, convective thunderstorms. Significant moisture also comes from the movement of warm and cold fronts across the MLRA from November to April. High amounts of rain can also occur during hurricanes, usually during the months of August through October.

Over most of the MLRA, snowfall is typically light, though overall, the mesic soil temperature regime portion of the MLRA features colder temperatures, more snowfall, and a shorter growing season than in the thermic portion. The cooler climate in this region supports an increase in species with northern or Blue Ridge affinities. Both the mean annual temperature and the length of the freeze-free period increase from north to south and with decreasing elevation from the upper to the lower Piedmont.

MLRA LAND USE AND RESOURCES
Once largely cultivated, much of this region is now planted to loblolly pine or has reverted to successional pine and hardwood forests. The more productive lands support small to medium-size family farms that produce crops and livestock, while the less productive lands have been in forest for some time. Most of the open areas are used for grazing beef cattle, though in years past, dairy cattle were also important to the local economy. The principal crops of the region include corn, soybeans, and small grains. Burley tobacco remains a crop of local importance. Cotton is grown in the thermic soil temperature regime portion of the MLRA.

Several major land cover transformations have occurred in the Southern Piedmont over the past several centuries; from open woodlands sculpted by fire, to farmland, to closed forests and planted pine, past land uses have played an outsized role in shaping present-day soils and vegetation patterns in the region. Land-use intensity peaked with the arrival of the industrial revolution, which gradually increased demand for textiles. Cotton became the dominant crop over much of the region.

In spite of early successes, two centuries of poor management practices accelerated soil erosion, stripping away the fertility and moisture-supplying capacity of soils. In addition to soil losses in the uplands, legacy sediments derived from the eroded land rapidly accumulated in the river valleys below, often leading to changes in hydrology and flooding frequency.

After being stripped of it's loamy topsoil, many areas of the Piedmont had been so badly eroded as to render the land unsuitable or economically impractical for agriculture. The effects of erosion were widespread, with cumulative soil loss estimates ranging from 5 to 10 inches on average. The steeper slopes, which had often been cleared and farmed at the height of the Cotton era, generally suffered greater losses. By the 1930's, crop production was in rapid decline in the Southern Piedmont. The loss of soil productivity due to erosion, losses to the cotton boll weevil, development of synthetic fibers, and the onset of the Great Depression all contributed to rapid abandonment of cropland. By 1960, cropland acres had decreased by more than 50 percent in nearly every county in the Southern Piedmont.

While crop production is still important today on the more productive lands, those of lower productivity, or those that were subject to severe erosion, were often abandoned some time ago. Typically, they have either reverted to forest, or have been converted to other uses. Although the productivity of soils was greatly reduced through erosion, less intensive land uses such as grazing and forestry were still feasible. These land uses gained popularity as patterns of urban migration, low commodity prices, and other factors gradually made crop production less economical on the marginal lands.

In recent years, large-scale adoption of soil conservation practices have led to better outcomes with respect to erosion in much of MLRA, increasing the economic viability and long-term sustainability of Piedmont farms. Despite some success, water erosion remains one of the most important soil resource concerns in the MLRA.

Other major resource concerns include increasing conversion of prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance to urban uses. Throughout the MLRA, metropolitan areas are expanding into lands that have historically been used for timber or agriculture. This change in land use is occurring rapidly in the corridor called the Piedmont Crescent, which extends from Atlanta, Georgia, to Raleigh, North Carolina.

HISTORIC VEGETATION COVER
Over most of the Southern Piedmont uplands, the historic oak-hickory, or oak-hickory-pine forest, once covered large portions of the landscape. It was dominated by upland oaks, such as white oak (Quercus alba), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), and southern red oak (Quercus falcata), with a smaller contribution from hickories (Carya spp.) and pines. The principal pine species are shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and to the north and west, Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana). In the southernmost and easternmost portions of the MLRA, the historic montane longleaf pine forest, dominated by longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), shortleaf pine (P. echinata), and dry-site oaks, was found on ridgetops and steep south or west-facing slopes.

According to historic accounts, forests and woodlands of the past were generally more open and park-like, having been exposed to a more frequent fire regime. Piedmont prairies, likely maintained by Native Americans, were also reportedly common across the landscape, as were fire-maintained canebrakes along the streams (Trimble 1974; Daniels 1987; Griffith et al. 2002; Van Lear et al. 2004; Dearman and James 2019; Schomberg et al. 2020; USDA-NRCS 2022).

LRU notes

MLRA 136 is one of the largest MLRAs in the United States. It has a broad north-south and east-west extent and covers a wide range of elevations. The MLRA is partitioned by the mesic-thermic line, which divides the MLRA into mesic and thermic soil temperature regimes (figure 2.). The mesic soil temperature regime was delineated based on estimates of the native range of loblolly pine, which was historically absent in this part of the MLRA. In addition, this region is said to represent the northern and western limits of cotton production, an important crop to the south and east.

ESDs developed for this MLRA were split geographically into mesic and thermic ecological site concepts. Climate variation across the MLRA extent warrants the development of Land Resource Unit (LRU) classifications, to further subdivide the MLRA and support more precise Ecological Site Descriptions.

Classification relationships

APPLICABLE USNVC ASSOCIATIONS
CEGL007927 Quercus falcata - Quercus alba - Carya tomentosa / Oxydendrum arboreum

APPLICABLE EPA ECOREGIONS
Level III: 45. Piedmont
Level IV: 45a. Southern Inner Piedmont; 45b. Southern Outer Piedmont; 45c. Carolina Slate Belt; 45f. Northern Outer Piedmont; 45i. Kings Mountain (EPA 2013).

APPLICABLE USFS ECOLOGICAL UNITS
Domain: Humid Temperate
Division: Subtropical
Ecological province: 231. Southeastern Mixed Forest
Ecological sections: 231I.Central Appalachian Piedmont; 231A. Southern Appalachian Piedmont (Cleland et al. 2007).

Based on the USGS physiographic classification system (Fenneman and Johnson 1946), most of MLRA 136 is in the Piedmont Upland section of the Piedmont province, in the Appalachian Highlands division.

Ecological site concept

This ecological site includes dry-moist acidic uplands on narrow ridges, shoulders and backslopes, on typical rolling to moderately dissected topography of the Southern Piedmont. It is geographically restricted to the thermic soil temperature regime portion of the MLRA.

Soils on this ecological site are typically moderately deep, well drained Ultisols. Unweathered or partially weathered bedrock is typically found within 40 inches of the surface. Parent materials are typically residuum derived from acidic igneous or metamorphic rock. Base saturation is less than 35 percent in the subsoil.

The reference state supports a closed to partly open canopy acidic oak-hickory forest with a greater proportion of dry-site oaks than is typical of moister oak-hickory forest types. Important canopy species include southern red oak (Quercus falcata), white oak (Quercus alba), black oak (Quercus velutina), post oak (Quercus stellata), and several species of hickory (Carya spp.). Dominant land uses include pasture and hayland, planted pine, cropland, and various urban or suburban uses.

ES CHARACTERISTICS SUMMARY
• Thermic soil temperature regime
• Occurs on Piedmont uplands, on narrow ridges, shoulders and backslopes, on typical rolling to moderately dissected Piedmont landscapes
• Base saturation: < 35 percent in the subsoil
• Seasonal high water table: usually absent within 72 inches of the soil surface
• Depth to bedrock is < 40 inches, OR the available water storage capacity of the profile (from the soil surface to 80 inches, or to paralithic or lithic bedrock, whichever is shallower) is within 4 to 6 inches
• The particle-size family is coarse-loamy or finer
• The available water storage capacity of the profile (from the soil surface to 80 inches, or to paralithic or lithic bedrock, whichever is shallower) is within 4 to 6 inches
• Soils: moderately deep, well drained Ultisols

Associated sites

PX136X00X820	Acidic Upland Forest, Moist Found in similar landscape positions, but on the more stable parts of the landscape (e.g., broader ridges, interfluves, gentler hillslopes), where the potential for soil weathering greatly exceeds the potential for geologic erosion. Soils are deeper to bedrock (≥ 40 inches from the soil surface) and less droughty. Moisture-loving plant species generally increase in abundance, of which northern red oak (Quercus rubra) is most notable.
PX136X00X870	Lower Piedmont Acidic Upland Woodland, Depth Restriction, Dry Found in similar landscape positions, but on the less stable parts of the landscape (e.g., steeper slopes, narrower ridges), where the potential for soil weathering is outpaced by the potential for geologic erosion. Soils are generally shallower, less developed, more droughty, and with lower natural fertility. Dry-site species, such as post oak (Quercus stellata) and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), generally increase in abundance, while hickory species become less numerous.
PX136X00X810	Acidic Upland Forest, Seasonally Wet Usually found in lower landscape positions. The seasonal high water table is shallower (12-40 inches from the soil surface) and soils are generally deeper (≥ 40 inches). Species tolerant of short-lived anaerobic conditions usually occupy some portion of the canopy, including willow oak (Quercus phellos) or water oak (Quercus nigra). Dry-site species are less abundant in the canopy.

PX136X00X820

Acidic Upland Forest, Moist

Found in similar landscape positions, but on the more stable parts of the landscape (e.g., broader ridges, interfluves, gentler hillslopes), where the potential for soil weathering greatly exceeds the potential for geologic erosion. Soils are deeper to bedrock (≥ 40 inches from the soil surface) and less droughty. Moisture-loving plant species generally increase in abundance, of which northern red oak (Quercus rubra) is most notable.

PX136X00X870

Lower Piedmont Acidic Upland Woodland, Depth Restriction, Dry

Found in similar landscape positions, but on the less stable parts of the landscape (e.g., steeper slopes, narrower ridges), where the potential for soil weathering is outpaced by the potential for geologic erosion. Soils are generally shallower, less developed, more droughty, and with lower natural fertility. Dry-site species, such as post oak (Quercus stellata) and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), generally increase in abundance, while hickory species become less numerous.

PX136X00X810

Acidic Upland Forest, Seasonally Wet

Usually found in lower landscape positions. The seasonal high water table is shallower (12-40 inches from the soil surface) and soils are generally deeper (≥ 40 inches). Species tolerant of short-lived anaerobic conditions usually occupy some portion of the canopy, including willow oak (Quercus phellos) or water oak (Quercus nigra). Dry-site species are less abundant in the canopy.

Similar sites

PX136X00X330	Mesic Temperature Regime, Acidic Upland Forest, Depth Restriction, Dry-moist The soil temperature regime is mesic, occurring outside of the native range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda).
PX136X00X820	Acidic Upland Forest, Moist Soils are deeper (≥ 40 inches from the soil surface) and less droughty, supporting higher cover from moisture-loving plant species.

PX136X00X330

Mesic Temperature Regime, Acidic Upland Forest, Depth Restriction, Dry-moist

The soil temperature regime is mesic, occurring outside of the native range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda).

PX136X00X820

Acidic Upland Forest, Moist

Soils are deeper (≥ 40 inches from the soil surface) and less droughty, supporting higher cover from moisture-loving plant species.

Figure 1. EPA level IV ecoregions of the Southern Piedmont (45).

Figure 2. Spatial illustration of soil temperature regimes of the Southern Piedmont.

Figure 3. Spatial extent of this ecological site representing the major areas where this site is important on the landscape.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	(1) Quercus falcata (2) Quercus alba
Shrub	(1) Vaccinium
Herbaceous	(1) Danthonia (2) Chimaphila maculata

Legacy ID

F136XY830NC

Download full description

Physiographic features

This ecological site includes dry-moist acidic uplands on narrow ridges, shoulders and backslopes, on rolling to moderately dissected topography of the Piedmont. Representative locations are gently sloping to steep, with a representative slope of 8 to 20 percent and a maximum slope of 45 percent.

The geologic substrate is typically low in ferromagnesian minerals and high in silica. Soils typically formed in residuum derived felsic crystalline, fine-grained metasedimentary, or metavolcanic rock, including schist, granite, gneiss, and argillite. Also included in this ecological site concept are soils weathered from mafic or mixed-mafic rocks which have been deeply weathered over geologic time and leached extensively of base cations.

Figure 4. Typical soil-landscape relationships of the Southern Piedmont Felsic Crystalline Soil System. Bethlehem soils are associated with this ecological site, depicted here on narrow ridgetops.

Figure 5. Typical soil-landscape relationships of the Southern Piedmont Felsic Crystalline Soil System. Saw soils are associated with this ecological site, depicted here on narrow ridgetops and backslopes.

Figure 6. Typical soil-landscape relationships of the Southern Piedmont Carolina Slate Belt Soil System. Badin soils are associated with this ecological site, depicted here on narrow ridgetops and backslopes.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Hillslope profile	(1) Backslope (2) Summit (3) Shoulder
Landforms	(1) Piedmont > Hillslope (2) Piedmont > Ridge
Runoff class	Medium to high
Flooding frequency	None
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	400 – 880 ft
Slope	8 – 20%
Water table depth	72 – 999 in
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)

Runoff class	Low to very high
Flooding frequency	None
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	190 – 1,470 ft
Slope	2 – 45%
Water table depth	72 – 999 in

Climatic features

On this ecological site, the average mean annual precipitation is 49 inches. On average, the rainiest months occur in July and August, as well as in March. The driest months occur in April, May, and October.

Table 4. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	171-192 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	196-223 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	45-54 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	164-197 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	188-234 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	43-58 in
Frost-free period (average)	181 days
Freeze-free period (average)	213 days
Precipitation total (average)	49 in

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 7. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 8. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 9. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 10. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 11. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 12. Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) AMELIA 8 NE [USC00440188], Amelia Court House, VA
(2) CHARLOTTE COURT HOUSE [USC00441585], Keysville, VA
(3) JOHN H KERR DAM [USC00444414], Boydton, VA
(4) ARCOLA [USC00310241], Macon, NC
(5) ROXBORO 7 ESE [USC00317516], Roxboro, NC
(6) HAW RIVER 1E [USC00313919], Graham, NC
(7) CLAYTON WTP [USC00311820], Clayton, NC
(8) APEX [USC00310212], Apex, NC
(9) SILER CITY 2 N [USC00317924], Siler City, NC
(10) ASHEBORO 2 W [USC00310286], Asheboro, NC
(11) SHELBY 2 NNE [USC00317845], Shelby, NC
(12) LINCOLNTON 4 W [USC00314996], Crouse, NC
(13) CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS AP [USW00013881], Charlotte, NC
(14) MONROE 2 SE [USC00315771], Monroe, NC
(15) KERSHAW 1SW [USC00384690], Kershaw, SC
(16) PICKENS [USC00386831], Pickens, SC
(17) NINETY NINE ISLANDS [USC00386293], Blacksburg, SC
(18) WINTHROP UNIV [USC00389350], Rock Hill, SC
(19) SANTUCK [USC00387722], Union, SC
(20) NEWBERRY [USC00386209], Newberry, SC
(21) WALHALLA [USC00388887], Walhalla, SC
(22) GREER [USW00003870], Greer, SC
(23) SAUTEE 3W [USC00097827], Cleveland, GA
(24) TOCCOA [USC00098740], Toccoa, GA
(25) CORNELIA [USC00092283], Cornelia, GA
(26) DANIELSVILLE [USC00092517], Danielsville, GA
(27) SILOAM 3N [USC00098064], Greensboro, GA
(28) CUMMING 2N [USC00092408], Cumming, GA
(29) COVINGTON [USC00092318], Covington, GA
(30) MONTICELLO [USC00095988], Monticello, GA
(31) CARROLLTON [USC00091640], Carrollton, GA
(32) TALBOTTON [USC00098535], Talbotton, GA
(33) ATLANTA FULTON CO AP [USW00003888], Mableton, GA
(34) HEFLIN [USC00013775], Heflin, AL
(35) ROCK MILLS [USC00017025], Roanoke, AL
(36) MULBERRY GROVE [USC00096148], Smiths Station, GA
(37) ASHLAND 3 ENE [USC00010369], Ashland, AL
(38) ROCKFORD 3 ESE [USC00017020], Rockford, AL
(39) CAMP HILL 2NW [USC00011324], Camp Hill, AL
(40) LAFAYETTE 2W [USC00014502], Lafayette, AL
(41) OPELIKA [USC00016129], Opelika, AL
(42) MONROE AP [USW00053872], Monroe, NC
(43) CONCORD [USC00311975], Concord, NC
(44) YANCEYVILLE 4 SE [USC00319704], Yanceyville, NC
(45) GASTONIA MUNI AP [USW00053870], Gastonia, NC
(46) GASTONIA [USC00313356], Gastonia, NC
(47) FOREST CITY 6 SW [USC00313150], Forest City, NC

Soil features

Soils on this ecological site are typically well drained, moderately deep Ultisols. Unweathered or partially weathered bedrock is typically found within 40 inches of the surface. Soils often have a high content of rock fragments, leaving less volume for roots to extract water. The available water storage capacity of the profile typically falls between 4 and 6 inches. Parent materials are residuum derived from acidic igneous or metamorphic rock, including felsic crystalline rock and fine-grained metasedimentary or metavolcanic rock.

Reaction in the subsoil is typically strongly acid to very strongly acid (pH 4.5 to 5.5). In the surface layers, reaction varies with land use and management. Under low input or forested conditions, it generally falls somewhere between pH 4.5 and 6.0. Base saturation is less than 35 percent in the subsoil. These soils are typically in a fine or fine-loamy particle size family.

Soils on this ecological site have a thermic soil temperature regime, which is characterized by a mean annual soil temperature of 15°C to 22°C and a winter to summer temperature differential of 6°C or more in the subsoil.

Modal soil taxa include: Typic Kanhapludults, Typic Hapludults.
Modal soil series include: Badin, Saw, Bethlehem
Other soils attributed to this ecological site include Rawlings, Mountain Park, Laroque, and Agricola.

Figure 13. An illustration of a soil profile belonging to the Saw series, a representative soil series associated with this ecological site.

Figure 14. A soil profile of the Badin series, a representative soil series associated with this ecological site.

Figure 15. A soil profile of the Bethlehem series, a representative soil series associated with this ecological site.

Table 5. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Residuum – metasedimentary rock (2) Residuum – metavolcanics (3) Residuum – igneous and metamorphic rock
Surface texture	(1) Silt loam (2) Sandy loam (3) Channery silt loam (4) Gravelly sandy loam (5) Gravelly sandy clay loam (6) Silty clay loam
Family particle size	(1) Fine (2) Fine-loamy
Drainage class	Well drained
Permeability class	Moderately rapid
Depth to restrictive layer	29 – 36 in
Soil depth	29 – 36 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (0-80in)	4 – 6 in
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-10in)	4.5 – 6
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-80in)	14%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-80in)	2%

Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)

Drainage class	Well drained
Permeability class	Moderate to moderately rapid
Depth to restrictive layer	26 – 40 in
Soil depth	26 – 40 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (0-80in)	3 – 7 in
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-10in)	3.5 – 6.5
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-80in)	23%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-80in)	14%

Ecological dynamics

U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) associations that are consistent with reference conditions on this ecological site include CEGL007927 Quercus falcata - Quercus alba - Carya tomentosa / Oxydendrum arboreum. This concept is closely related to the reference state (USNVC 2022).

MATURE FORESTS
The reference state supports a closed to partly open canopy acidic oak-hickory forest with a greater proportion of dry-site oaks than is typical of moister oak-hickory forest types. Important canopy species include southern red oak (Quercus falcata), white oak (Quercus alba), black oak (Quercus velutina), and post oak (Quercus stellata). These are among the driest oak-hickory forests in the region. Mesophytic oaks less drought-tolerant than white oak (Q. alba) (e.g., northern red oak (Quercus rubra)), are usually absent or scarce. Hickory (Carya spp.), though consistently present, is typically a minor component of the canopy. Of the hickory species, mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa) and pignut hickory (Carya glabra) are usually most abundant.

In mature stands, pines are typically scattered throughout the forest. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata) are the principle species in most of the thermic soil temperature regime portion of the MLRA. According to historical accounts and witness tree records, the importance of the pine component naturally increases, though very gradually, from north to south. Shortleaf pine likely dominated the pine component in the past, though loblolly is of equal or greater importance in contemporary stands. Prior to the European settlement, loblolly pine was largely confined to drainageways and adjacent lower slopes in the uplands of the Southern Piedmont.

The understory is dominated by acid-loving species. Typical of the subcanopy are sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), red maple (Acer rubrum), and hickory (Carya spp.). The shrub layer is generally dominated by members of the heath family. Characteristic species include deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum), Blue Ridge blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), and in the lower Piedmont small black blueberry (Vaccinium tenellum). Basic indicator species are absent or scarce.

Unless fire has been reintroduced, the herb layer is typically sparse. Representative species include striped prince's pine (Chimaphila maculata), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), and rattlesnakeweed (Hieracium venosum). In fire maintained stands, grasses such as poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), rosettegrasses (Dichanthelium spp.), and Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans) typically become more important in the herb layer. Representative forbs in fire-maintained stands include devil's grandmother (Elephantopus tomentosus), anisescented goldenrod (Solidago odora), gray goldenrod (Solidago nemoralis), woodland sunflower (Helianthus divaricatus), woman's tobacco (Antennaria plantaginifolia), hairy bedstraw (Galium pilosum), and several species of lespedeza (Lespedeza spp.) and ticktrefoil (Desmodium spp.).

DYNAMICS OF NATURAL SUCCESSION AND FIRE ECOLOGY
On Piedmont uplands, the historical influence of fire on successional dynamics was likely expressed on a continuum, from dry to moist, where moist or sheltered sites were shaped more by gap-driven dynamics and dry or exposed sites more by fire. On intermediate sites, such as those associated with this ecological site, their respective influence on successional dynamics probably fell somewhere in between. While the historic fire return interval is thought to be relatively similar across most of the Southern Piedmont uplands, drier sites were more prone to fire and hence burned more completely and at higher intensities than moister sites.

Like other oak-hickory forests in the region, small-scale natural disturbances such as windthrow, drought, and disease, are important drivers of natural succession in contemporary stands. Presumably these localized events made a rather large contribution to the disturbance regime in the past, though fire likely had shared influence in shaping the competitive environment for plants on this ecological site.

In the past, regular low-intensity fires would have kept the understory somewhat more open than at present and constrained the growth of fire-intolerant woody species. Periodic severe fires would have likely occurred during unusually dry and windy conditions, presumably resulting in catastrophic tree mortality and stand replacing changes. The reduction in the frequency of fires over the past century has allowed shade-tolerant, fire-sensitive trees such as red maple (Acer rubrum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), and American holly (Ilex opaca) to become more abundant in many upland forests in the Southeast.

A combination of prescribed burns and selective removals can open up the understory and constrain the growth of fire-intolerant opportunistic species, thereby restoring the health and vigor of forests that evolved under a more regular fire regime.

YOUNG SECONDARY FORESTS
On relatively undisturbed sites, stands are uneven-aged, with at least some old trees present. In areas that were cultivated in the recent past, even-aged pine stands dominate the landscape, being replaced by oaks and hickories only as the pines die.

In general, young secondary forests on this ecological site are dominated by loblolly and shortleaf pines, along with opportunistic hardwoods such as sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and red maple (Acer rubrum). Oaks and hickories are usually confined to the understory of young secondary stands. Their growth is temporarily suppressed by the cover of faster growing tree species.

In the central Piedmont of North Carolina and Virginia, Virginia pine (P. virginiana) becomes increasingly important in young secondary stands, particularly in the Carolina Slate Belt and even more so in regions to the west or north. In regions further south, loblolly pine is typically the more competitive pioneer under most site conditions, apart from higher elevation areas of the upper Piedmont where Virginia pine becomes more abundant (Oosting 1942; Nelson 1957; Wharton 1978; Golden 1979; Barry 1980; Peet and Christensen 1980, 1987; Schafale and Weakley 1990; Cowell 1998; Spira 2011; Fleming 2012; Guyette et al. 2012; Schafale 2012a, 2012b; Edwards et al. 2013; Vander Yacht et al. 2020; Fleming et al. 2021; Greenberg et al. 2021; Spooner et al. 2021).

SPECIES LIST
Canopy layer: Quercus falcata, Quercus alba, Quercus velutina, Quercus stellata, Carya tomentosa, Carya glabra, Pinus echinata, Pinus taeda, Pinus virginiana,

Subcanopy layer: Oxydendrum arboreum, Cornus florida, Nyssa sylvatica, Sassafras albidum, Acer rubrum, Carya spp., Fagus grandifolia,

Shrub layer: Vaccinium stamineum, Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium arboreum, Vaccinium tenellum, Gaylussacia dumosa, Viburnum acerifolium, Hypericum hypericoides ssp. multicaule, Gaylussacia baccata,

Vines/lianas: Smilax glauca, Vitis rotundifolia, Gelsemium sempervirens, Smilax bona-nox, Lonicera japonica (I),

Herb layer - forbs: Chimaphila maculata, Asplenium platyneuron, Hieracium venosum, Desmodium nudiflorum, Desmodium rotundifolium, Desmodium laevigatum, Tipularia discolor, Erythronium umbilicatum, Lespedeza virginica, Lespedeza hirta, Elephantopus tomentosus, Solidago odora, Solidago nemoralis, Helianthus divaricatus, Antennaria plantaginifolia, Galium pilosum, Hypoxis hirsuta, Epigaea repens, Hieracium gronovii, Uvularia puberula, Coreopsis major, Goodyera pubescens, Vernonia glauca, Cunila origanoides, Lespedeza cuneata (I),

Herb layer - graminoids: Danthonia spicata, Danthonia sericea, Dichanthelium spp., Carex nigromarginata, Carex albicans, Andropogon ternarius, Sorghastrum nutans, Schizachyrium scoparium, Saccharum alopecuroides, Saccharum brevibarbe var. contortum,

(I) = introduced

State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

T1A	-	Clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.
T1B	-	Selective removals of the most valuable timber specimens, leaving inferior trees behind.
T1C	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T1D	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, and planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T2A	-	Long-term natural succession.
T2B	-	Site preparation and tree planting.
T2C	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T2D	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, weed control, planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T3A	-	Clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.
T3C	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T3D	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, weed control, planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T4A	-	Abandonment of forestry practices.
T4B	-	Timber harvest, mechanical stump and debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T4C	-	Timber harvest, mechanical stump and debris removal, seedbed preparation, fertilizer/lime, weed control, planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T5A	-	Long-term cessation of grazing.
T5B	-	Site preparation and tree planting.
T5C	-	Seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, weed control, and planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T6A	-	Agricultural abandonment.
T6B	-	Site preparation and tree planting.
T6C	-	Seedbed preparation, weed control, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Dry Acidic Oak-Hickory Forest - Fire Maintained Phase

1.2. Dry Acidic Oak-Hickory Forest - Fire Suppressed Phase

1.1A	-	Long-term exclusion of fire.
1.2A	-	Prescribed burns and selective removals.

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Old-field Pine-Hardwood Forest Phase

2.2. Shrub-dominated Successional Phase

2.3. Herbaceous Early Successional Phase

2.1A	-	Clearcut logging.
2.2A	-	Natural succession.
2.2B	-	Brush management.
2.3A	-	Natural succession.

State 6 submodel, plant communities

6.1. Conservation-management Cropland Phase

6.2. Conventional-management Cropland Phase

6.1A	-	Conventional tillage is reintroduced.
6.2A	-	Implementation of conservation tillage and other soil conservation practices

State 1
Reference State

This mature forest state supports an oak-hickory forest with a greater proportion of dry-site oaks than is typical of moister oak-hickory forest types, with a much smaller contribution from hickories and pines

Characteristics and indicators. Stands are uneven-aged with at least some old trees present. Pines make up a minority of the canopy cover.

Resilience management. Deer population management is critical to sustaining the diversity of herbaceous understory species.

Community 1.1
Dry Acidic Oak-Hickory Forest - Fire Maintained Phase

This is a mature forest community/phase with a partially open canopy. Regular low-intensity fires have been reintroduced, keeping the understory open, increasing the cover and diversity of herbaceous species and limiting the importance of fire-intolerant woody species.

Resilience management. This community/phase is maintained through regular prescribed burns. The recruitment of fire-adapted oaks and pines benefits from regular low-intensity ground fires, as these forests evolved under a more regular fire regime. Tree ring data suggests that the mean fire return interval of the past in the Southern Piedmont is approximately 6 years, though the actual return interval varied from 3 to 16 years. To approximate the pre-colonial fire regime, prescribed burns should be carried out every 4 to 8 years.

Forest overstory. The overstory is dominated by upland oaks. Representative species include southern red oak (Quercus falcata), white oak (Quercus alba), black oak (Quercus velutina), and post oak (Quercus stellata). Hickories and pines make a smaller contribution to the canopy. Mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa) and pignut hickory (Carya glabra) are most representative of the hickory component, while shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) is most representative of the pine component.

Forest understory. Representative understory tree species include sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), and sassafras (Sassafras albidum).

Representative understory shrub species include deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum), Blue Ridge blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), and St. Andrew's cross (Hypericum hypericoides ssp. multicaule).

The herb layer is usually denser and grassier than in the fire suppressed phase.

Dominant plant species

southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
black oak (Quercus velutina), tree
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), tree
sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), tree
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), tree
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), tree
sassafras (Sassafras albidum), tree
deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum), shrub
Blue Ridge blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), shrub
farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), shrub
small black blueberry (Vaccinium tenellum), shrub
mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), shrub
St. Andrew's cross (Hypericum hypericoides ssp. multicaule), shrub
dwarf huckleberry (Gaylussacia dumosa), shrub
evening trumpetflower (Gelsemium sempervirens), shrub
blackberry (Rubus), shrub
poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), grass
downy danthonia (Danthonia sericea), grass
rosette grass (Dichanthelium), grass
black edge sedge (Carex nigromarginata), grass
whitetinge sedge (Carex albicans), grass
splitbeard bluestem (Andropogon ternarius), grass
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), grass
silver plumegrass (Saccharum alopecuroides), grass
sortbeard plumegrass (Saccharum brevibarbe var. contortum), grass
ticktrefoil (Desmodium), other herbaceous
lespedeza (Lespedeza), other herbaceous
rattlesnakeweed (Hieracium venosum), other herbaceous
crippled cranefly (Tipularia discolor), other herbaceous
dimpled troutlily (Erythronium umbilicatum), other herbaceous
devil's grandmother (Elephantopus tomentosus), other herbaceous
anisescented goldenrod (Solidago odora), other herbaceous
gray goldenrod (Solidago nemoralis), other herbaceous
woodland sunflower (Helianthus divaricatus), other herbaceous
woman's tobacco (Antennaria plantaginifolia), other herbaceous

Community 1.2
Dry Acidic Oak-Hickory Forest - Fire Suppressed Phase

This is a closed canopy mature forest community/phase. This phase accounts for the majority of contemporary examples. Canopy cover is higher than in stands in which fire has been reintroduced. The pine component can have a greater proportion of loblolly or Virginia pine and the understory usually contains a greater proportion of fire-intolerant species. The herbaceous understory is typically sparse.

Forest overstory. The overstory is dominated by upland oaks. Representative species include southern red oak (Quercus falcata), white oak (Quercus alba), black oak (Quercus velutina), and post oak (Quercus stellata). Hickories and pines make a smaller contribution to the canopy. Mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa) and pignut hickory (Carya glabra) are most representative of the hickory component, while loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) are most representative of the pine component. In portions of the MLRA, Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana) can be equally important in fire suppressed stands.

Forest understory. Representative understory tree species include sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), along with fire-intolerant species such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and American beech (Fagus grandifolia).

Representative understory shrub species include deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum), Blue Ridge blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), American holly (Ilex opaca), and mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), along with several vines.

The herb layer is sparser overall and is less grassy than in the fire maintained phase.

Dominant plant species

southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
black oak (Quercus velutina), tree
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), tree
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), tree
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), tree
deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum), shrub
Blue Ridge blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), shrub
farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), shrub
American holly (Ilex opaca), shrub
cat greenbrier (Smilax glauca), shrub
small black blueberry (Vaccinium tenellum), shrub
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), shrub
mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), shrub
dwarf huckleberry (Gaylussacia dumosa), shrub
black edge sedge (Carex nigromarginata), grass
whitetinge sedge (Carex albicans), grass
striped prince's pine (Chimaphila maculata), other herbaceous
ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), other herbaceous
crippled cranefly (Tipularia discolor), other herbaceous
dimpled troutlily (Erythronium umbilicatum), other herbaceous
trailing arbutus (Epigaea repens), other herbaceous

Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2

Long-term exclusion of fire causes an increase in fire-intolerant understory species and a deterioration of the abundance and diversity of herbaceous species.

Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1

The fire suppressed phase can be managed towards the fire maintained phase through a combination of prescribed burns and selective removals. To approximate the pre-colonial fire regime, prescribed burns should be carried out every 4 to 8 years.

Context dependence. After decades of fire suppression, most upland hardwood forests of the Southeast have undergone mesophication, or succession toward forest systems that are less apt to burn. If prescribed fire is to be used as a management tool in fire suppressed ecosystems of the Piedmont, planning will be needed in some forest systems to overcome the effects of mesophication in the early stages of fire reintroduction.

State 2
Secondary Succession State

This state develops in the immediate aftermath of agricultural abandonment, clearcut logging, or other large-scale disturbances that lead to canopy removal. Which species colonize a particular location in the wake of a disturbance does involve a considerable degree of chance. It also depends a great deal on the type, duration, and magnitude of the disturbance event.

Characteristics and indicators. Plant age distribution is even. Plants exhibit pioneering traits such as rapid growth, early reproduction, and shade-intolerance.

Community 2.1
Old-field Pine-Hardwood Forest Phase

This forested successional phase develops in the wake of long-term agricultural abandonment or other large-scale disturbances that have led to canopy removal in the recent past. Stands are even-aged and species diversity is low. The canopy is usually dominated by pines, though opportunistic hardwoods can also be important, particularly in the early stages of tree establishment. Species that exhibit pioneering traits are usually most abundant.

Forest overstory. The overstory is dominated by pines. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) is the most characteristic species, followed by shortleaf pine (P. echinata), and to the north and west Virginia pine (P. virginiana).

Forest understory. Common understory tree species include red maple (Acer rubrum), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and sassafras (Sassafras albidum). Seedlings of oaks and hickories are usually present in the understory. These seedlings are released gradually as the forest matures and the pines begin to die off.

In the shrub layer, representative species include various blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), American holly (Ilex opaca), Sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and several vines.

Dominant plant species

loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), tree
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), tree
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tree
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), tree
sassafras (Sassafras albidum), tree
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), tree
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), shrub
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), shrub
blueberry (Vaccinium), shrub
evening trumpetflower (Gelsemium sempervirens), shrub
greenbrier (Smilax), shrub
American holly (Ilex opaca), shrub
striped prince's pine (Chimaphila maculata), other herbaceous
ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), other herbaceous

Community 2.2
Shrub-dominated Successional Phase

This successional phase is dominated by shrubs and vines, along with seedlings of opportunistic hardwoods and pines. It typically develops beginning in the third year after agricultural abandonment or clearcut logging. It grades into the forested successional phase as tree seedlings become saplings and begin to occupy more of the canopy cover.

Forest overstory. Species composition varies considerably from location to location. Non-native species usually occupy some portion of the vine or shrub cover in most examples.

Dominant plant species

loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana), tree
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tree
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), tree
winged elm (Ulmus alata), tree
silktree (Albizia julibrissin), tree
black cherry (Prunus serotina), tree
tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), tree
Chinaberrytree (Melia azedarach), tree
Chickasaw plum (Prunus angustifolia), tree
blackberry (Rubus), shrub
rose (Rosa), shrub
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), shrub
winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), shrub
evening trumpetflower (Gelsemium sempervirens), shrub
greenbrier (Smilax), shrub
grape (Vitis), shrub
sassafras (Sassafras albidum), shrub
trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), shrub
smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), shrub
Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), grass
broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), grass
Canada goldenrod (Solidago altissima), other herbaceous
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), other herbaceous
aster (Symphyotrichum), other herbaceous
sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), other herbaceous
Indianhemp (Apocynum cannabinum), other herbaceous

Community 2.3
Herbaceous Early Successional Phase

This transient community is composed of the first herbaceous invaders in the aftermath of agricultural abandonment, clearcut logging, or other large-scale natural disturbances that lead to canopy removal. Species composition is highly variable at this stage of succession. In addition to the named species, other herbaceous pioneers common to this ecological site include dwarf dandelion (Krigia virginica), camphorweed (Heterotheca subaxillaris), evening primrose (Oenothera spp.), hairy cat's ear (Hypochaeris radicata), dwarf cinquefoil (Potentilla canadensis), common mullein (Verbascum thapsus), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), cudweed (Pseudognaphalium spp.), slender yellow woodsorrel (Oxalis dillenii), Brazilian vervain (Verbena brasiliensis), morning-glory (Ipomoea spp.), garden cornflower (Centaurea cyanus), Small's ragwort (Packera anonyma), several species of thoroughwort (Eupatorium spp.), and many others.

Resilience management. If the user wishes to maintain this community/phase for wildlife or pollinator habitat, a prescribed burn, mowing, or prescribed grazing will be needed at least once annually to prevent community pathway 2.3A. To that end, as part of long-term maintenance, periodic overseeding of wildlife or pollinator seed mixtures can be helpful in ensuring the viability of certain desired species and maintaining the desired composition of species for user goals.

Dominant plant species

Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), shrub
greenbrier (Smilax), shrub
broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), grass
hairy crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), grass
smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum), grass
southern crabgrass (Digitaria ciliaris), grass
Japanese bristlegrass (Setaria faberi), grass
Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), grass
lovegrass (Eragrostis), grass
annual bluegrass (Poa annua), grass
American burnweed (Erechtites hieraciifolius), other herbaceous
American pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), other herbaceous
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), other herbaceous
Canada goldenrod (Solidago altissima), other herbaceous
aster (Symphyotrichum), other herbaceous
fleabane (Erigeron), other herbaceous
sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), other herbaceous
Carolina horsenettle (Solanum carolinense), other herbaceous
Canadian horseweed (Conyza canadensis), other herbaceous
annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), other herbaceous

Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.3

The old-field pine-hardwood forest phase can return to the herbaceous early successional phase through clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.

Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1

The shrub-dominated successional phase naturally moves towards the old-field pine-hardwood forest through natural succession.

Pathway 2.2B
Community 2.2 to 2.3

The shrub-dominated successional phase can return to the herbaceous early successional phase through brush management, including herbicide application, mechanical removal, prescribed grazing, or fire.

Context dependence. Note: if the user wishes to use this community pathway to create wildlife or pollinator habitat, please contact a local NRCS office for a species list specific to the area of interest and user needs. If the user wishes to maintain the shrub-dominated successional phase long term, for wildlife habitat or other uses, periodic use of this community pathway is necessary to prevent community pathway 2.2A, which happens inevitably unless natural succession is set back through disturbance.

Pathway 2.3A
Community 2.3 to 2.2

The herbaceous early successional phase naturally moves towards the shrub-dominated successional phase through natural succession. The process takes approximately 3 years on average, barring any major disturbances capable of inhibiting natural succession.

State 3
High-graded Hardwood Forest State

This state develops as a consequence of high-grading, where the most valuable trees are removed, leaving less desirable timber specimens behind. Trees left behind include undesirable timber species, trees of poor form, diseased trees, or genetically inferior trees.

Characteristics and indicators. Typically, high-graded stands consist of a combination of residual stems from the previous stand, a high proportion of undesirable shade-tolerant species, along with some regrowth from desirable timber species. In some cases, large-diameter trees of desirable timber species may be present, but upon closer inspection, these trees usually have serious defects that resulted in their being left behind in earlier cuts.

Resilience management. Landowners with high-graded stands have two options for improving timber production: 1) rehabilitate, or 2) regenerate. To rehabilitate a stand, the landowner must evaluate existing trees to determine if rehabilitation is justified. If the proportion of high-quality specimens present in the stand is low, then the stand should be regenerated. In many cases, poor quality of the existing stand is the result of decades of mismanagement. Drastic measures are often required to get the stand back into good timber production.

Dominant plant species

red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), tree
common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), tree
sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), tree
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), tree
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), tree
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tree
oak (Quercus), tree
hybrid hickory (Carya), tree
pine (Pinus), tree

State 4
Managed Pine Plantation State

This converted state is dominated by planted timber trees. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) is the most commonly planted species. Even-aged management is the most common timber management system. Note: if the user wishes to convert stands dominated by hardwoods to planted pine, clearcutting will usually be necessary first, allowing herbaceous pioneers to establish on the site in the weeks or months prior to planting. Users should utilize measures described in transition T2B under these circumstances.

Resilience management. Hardwood Encroachment: Hardwood encroachment can be problematic in managed pine plantations. Good site preparation, proper stocking, and periodic thinning are advisable to reduce hardwood competition. Overstocking: The overstocked condition commonly occurs in naturally regenerated stands. When competition from other pines begins to impact the health and productivity of the stand, precommercial thinning should be considered. At this point, the benefit of thinning usually outweighs the potential for invasion and competition from non-pine species. As the target window for thinning passes, the condition of the stand can slowly deteriorate if no action is taken. Under long-term overstocked conditions, trees are more prone to stresses, including pine bark beetle infestation and damage from wind or ice. High-grading: In subsequent commercial thinnings, care should be taken in tree selection. High quality specimens should be left to reach maturity, while slower growing trees or those with defects should be removed sooner. If high quality specimens are harvested first, trees left behind are often structurally unsound, diseased, genetically inferior, or of poor form. This can have long-term implications for tree genetics and for the condition of the stand (Felix III 1983; Miller et al. 1995, 2003; Megalos 2019).

Dominant plant species

loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tree
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), tree
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), tree
sassafras (Sassafras albidum), tree
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), tree
oak (Quercus), tree
hybrid hickory (Carya), tree
blueberry (Vaccinium), shrub
grape (Vitis), shrub
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), shrub
greenbrier (Smilax), shrub
blackberry (Rubus), shrub
evening trumpetflower (Gelsemium sempervirens), shrub
St. Johnswort (Hypericum), shrub
American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), shrub
rosette grass (Dichanthelium), grass
littlehead nutrush (Scleria oligantha), grass
longleaf woodoats (Chasmanthium sessiliflorum), grass
silver plumegrass (Saccharum alopecuroides), grass
broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), grass
striped prince's pine (Chimaphila maculata), other herbaceous
ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), other herbaceous
sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), other herbaceous
aster (Symphyotrichum), other herbaceous
thoroughwort (Eupatorium), other herbaceous

State 5
Pasture/Hayland State

This converted state is dominated by herbaceous forage species.

Resilience management. Overgrazing and High Foot Traffic: In areas that are subject to high foot traffic from livestock and equipment, and/or long-term overgrazing, unpalatable weedy species tend to invade, as most desirable forage species are less competitive under these conditions. High risk areas include locations where livestock congregate for water, shade, or feed, and in travel lanes, gates, and other areas of heavy use. Plant species that are indicative of overgrazing or excessive foot traffic on this ecological site include buttercup (Ranunculus spp.), plantain (Plantago spp.), curly dock (Rumex crispus), sneezeweed (Helenium amarum), cudweed (Pseudognaphalium spp.), slender yellow woodsorrel (Oxalis dillenii), Carolina horsenettle (Solanum carolinense), Virginia pepperweed (Lepidium virginicum), black medick (Medicago lupulina), Japanese clover (Kummerowia striata), annual bluegrass (Poa annua), poverty rush (Juncus tenuis), rattail fescue (Vulpia myuros), and Indian goosegrass (Eleusine indica), among others. A handful of desirable forage species are also tolerant of heavy grazing and high foot traffic, including white clover (Trifolium repens), dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum), and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). An overabundance of these species, along with poor plant vigor and areas of bare soil, may imply that excessive foot traffic and/or overgrazing is a concern, either in the present or in the recent past. Soil Fertility and pH Management: Like overgrazing and excessive foot traffic, inadequate soil fertility and pH management can lead to invasion from several common weeds of pastures and hayfields. Species indicative of poor soil fertility and/or suboptimal pH on this ecological site include broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), sweet vernalgrass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), Japanese clover (Kummerowia striata), common sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella), and Carolina horsenettle (Solanum carolinense), among others. Most of these weedy invaders do not compete well in dense, rapidly growing pastures and hayfields. By maintaining soil fertility and pH, managing grazing to favor desirable forage species, and clipping behind grazing rotations when needed, forage grasses and forbs can usually outcompete weedy invaders. Brush Encroachment: Brush encroachment can be problematic in some pastures, particularly near fence lines where there is often a ready seed source. Pastures subject to low stocking density and long-duration grazing rotations can also be susceptible to encroachment from woody plants. Shorter grazing rotations of higher stocking density can help alleviate pressure from shrubs and vines with low palatability or thorny stems. Clipping behind grazing rotations, annual brush hogging, and multispecies grazing systems (cattle with or followed by goats) can also be helpful. Common woody invaders of pasture on this ecological site include rose (Rosa spp.), blackberry (Rubus spp.), saw greenbrier (Smilax bona-nox), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), and black cherry (Prunus serotina).

Dominant plant species

tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), grass
dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum), grass
orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), grass
perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), grass
hairy crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), grass
Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), grass
purpletop tridens (Tridens flavus), grass
bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), grass
broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), grass
sweet vernalgrass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), grass
white clover (Trifolium repens), other herbaceous
red clover (Trifolium pratense), other herbaceous
vetch (Vicia), other herbaceous
narrowleaf plantain (Plantago lanceolata), other herbaceous
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), other herbaceous
field clover (Trifolium campestre), other herbaceous
black medick (Medicago lupulina), other herbaceous
common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), other herbaceous
wild garlic (Allium vineale), other herbaceous

State 6
Cropland State

This converted state produces food or fiber for human uses. It is dominated by domesticated crop species, along with typical weedy invaders of cropland.

Community 6.1
Conservation-management Cropland Phase

This cropland phase is characterized by the practice of no-tillage or strip-tillage, and other soil conservation practices. Though no-till systems offer many benefits, several weedy species tend to be more problematic under this type of management system. In contrast with conventional tillage systems, problematic species in no-till systems include biennial or perennial weeds, owing to the fact that tillage is no longer used in weed management.

Dominant plant species

corn (Zea mays), grass
common wheat (Triticum aestivum), grass
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), grass
soybean (Glycine max), other herbaceous
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), other herbaceous
cultivated tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), other herbaceous

Community 6.2
Conventional-management Cropland Phase

This cropland phase is characterized by the recurrent use of tillage as a management tool. Due to the frequent disturbance regime, weedy invaders tend to be annual herbaceous species that reproduce quickly and are prolific seed producers.

Resilience management. The potential for soil loss is high under this management system. Measures should be put in place to limit erosion.

Dominant plant species

corn (Zea mays), grass
common wheat (Triticum aestivum), grass
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), grass
soybean (Glycine max), other herbaceous
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), other herbaceous
cultivated tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), other herbaceous

Pathway 6.1A
Community 6.1 to 6.2

The conservation-management cropland phase can shift to the conventional-management cropland phase through cessation of conservation tillage practices and the reintroduction of conventional tillage practices.

Context dependence. Soil and vegetation changes associated with this community pathway typically occur several years after reintroduction of conventional tillage practices. These changes continue to manifest as conventional tillage is continued, before reaching a steady state.

Pathway 6.2A
Community 6.2 to 6.1

The conventional-management cropland phase can be brought into the conservation-management cropland phase through the implementation of one of several conservation tillage options, including no-tillage or strip-tillage, along with implementation of other soil conservation practices.

Context dependence. Soil and vegetation changes associated with this community pathway typically occur several years after implementation of conservation tillage. These changes continue to manifest as conservation tillage is continued, before reaching a steady state.

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

The reference state can transition to the secondary succession state through clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.

Transition T1B
State 1 to 3

The reference state can transition to the high-graded hardwood forest state through selective removal of the most valuable trees, leaving undesirable timber specimens behind. This may occur through multiple cutting cycles over the course of decades or longer, each cut progressively worsening the condition of the stand.

Transition T1C
State 1 to 5

The reference state can transition to the pasture/hayland state through 1) mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, 2) seedbed preparation, and 3) planting of perennial grasses and forbs.

Context dependence. Herbicide applications, fire, and/or root-raking can be helpful in transitioning treed land to pasture. This is done in part to limit coppicing, as many woody plants are capable of sprouting from residual plant structures left behind after clearing. Judicious use of root-raking is recommended, as this practice can have long-term repercussions with regard to soil structure. Applications of fertilizer and lime can also be helpful in establishing perennial forage species. Grazing should be deferred until grasses and forbs are well established.

Transition T1D
State 1 to 6

The reference state can transition to the cropland state through 1) mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, 2) seedbed preparation, 3) applications of fertilizer/lime, and 4) planting of crop or cover crop seed.

Context dependence. A broad spectrum herbicide, fire, and/or root-raking can be helpful in transitioning treed land to cropland. This is done in part to limit coppicing, as many woody plants are capable of sprouting from residual plant structures left behind after clearing. Judicious use of root-raking is recommended, as this practice can have long-term repercussions with regard to soil structure. Weedy grasses and forbs can also be problematic on these lands.

Transition T2A
State 2 to 1

The secondary succession state can transition to the reference state through long-term natural succession. This process can be accelerated to some degree by a combination of prescribed burns and selective harvesting of pines and opportunistic hardwoods.

Transition T2B
State 2 to 4

The secondary succession state can transition to the managed pine plantation state through site preparation and planting of timber trees. Thinning alone may be sufficient for portions of the forest if pines have already established, though it is rarely sufficient for an entire forest patch.

Transition T2C
State 2 to 5

The secondary succession state can transition to the pasture/hayland state through through 1) mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, 2) seedbed preparation, and 3) planting of perennial grasses and forbs.

Context dependence. A broad spectrum herbicide, fire, and/or root-raking can be helpful in transitioning wooded or semi-wooded land to pasture. This is done in part to limit coppicing, as many woody pioneers are capable of sprouting from residual plant structures left behind after clearing. Judicious use of root-raking is recommended, as this practice can have long-term repercussions with regard to soil structure. Applications of fertilizer and lime can also be helpful in establishing perennial forage species. Grazing should be deferred until grasses and forbs are well established.

Transition T2D
State 2 to 6

The secondary succession state can transition to the cropland state through 1) mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, 2) seedbed preparation, 3) applications of fertilizer/lime, 4) weed control, 5) planting of crop or cover crop seed.

Context dependence. A broad spectrum herbicide, fire, and/or root-raking may be needed to successfully transition land that has been fallow for some time back to cropland. This is done in part to limit coppicing, as many woody pioneers are capable of sprouting from residual plant structures left behind after clearing. Judicious use of root-raking is recommended, as this practice can have long-term repercussions with regard to soil structure. Weedy grasses and forbs can also be problematic on these lands.

Transition T3A
State 3 to 2

The high-graded hardwood forest state can transition to the secondary succession state through clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.

Transition T3C
State 3 to 5

The high-graded hardwood forest state can transition to the pasture/hayland state through 1) mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, 2) seedbed preparation, and 3) planting of perennial grasses and forbs.

Transition T3D
State 3 to 6

The high-graded hardwood forest state can transition to the cropland state through 1) mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, 2) seedbed preparation, 3) applications of fertilizer/lime, 4) herbicide application, 5) planting of crop or cover crop seed.

Context dependence. A broad spectrum herbicide, fire, and/or root-raking can be helpful in transitioning treed land to cropland. This is done in part to limit coppicing, as many woody pioneers are capable of sprouting from residual plant structures left behind after clearing. Judicious use of root-raking is recommended, as this practice can have long-term repercussions with regard to soil structure. Weedy grasses and forbs can also be problematic on these lands.

Transition T4A
State 4 to 2

The managed pine plantation state can transition to the secondary succession state through abandonment of forestry practices (with or without timber tree harvest).

Transition T4B
State 4 to 5

The managed pine plantation state can transition to the pasture/hayland state through 1) timber harvest, 2) mechanical stump and debris removal, 3) seedbed preparation, 4) planting of perennial grasses and forbs.

Context dependence. Applications of fertilizer and lime can be helpful in establishing perennial forage species. Grazing should be deferred until grasses and forbs are well established.

Transition T4C
State 4 to 6

The managed pine plantation state can transition to the cropland state through 1) timber harvest, 2) mechanical stump and debris removal, 3) seedbed preparation, 4) applications of fertilizer/lime, 5) herbicide application, 6) planting of crop or cover crop seed.

Transition T5A
State 5 to 2

The pasture/hayland state can transition to the secondary succession state through long-term cessation of grazing.

Transition T5B
State 5 to 4

The pasture/hayland state can transition to the managed pine plantation state through site preparation and tree planting.

Transition T5C
State 5 to 6

The pasture/hayland state can transition to the cropland state through 1) seedbed preparation, 2) applications of fertilizer/lime, 3) herbicide application, and 4) planting of crop or cover crop seed.

Transition T6A
State 6 to 2

The cropland state can transition to the secondary succession state through agricultural abandonment.

Transition T6B
State 6 to 4

The cropland state can transition to the managed pine plantation state through site preparation and tree planting.

Transition T6C
State 6 to 5

The cropland state can transition to the pasture/hayland state through 1) seedbed preparation, 2) weed control, and 3) planting of perennial forage grasses and forbs.

Context dependence. To convert cropland to pasture or hayland, weed control and good seed-soil contact are important. It is also critical to review the labels of herbicides used for weed control and on the previous crop. Many herbicides have plant-back restrictions, which if not followed could carryover and kill forage seedlings as they germinate. Grazing should be deferred until grasses and forbs are well established.

Additional community tables

Supporting information

Inventory data references

Data collection and analysis of field data will be performed during the Verification Stage of ESD development.

Other references

Barry, J.M. 1980. Part Three: Piedmont Province. p. 55 – 94. In J.M. Barry (ed.) Natural Vegetation of South Carolina. University of South Carolina Press. Columbia, SC.

Billings, W.D. 1938. The structure and development of old field shortleaf pine stands and certain associated physical properties of the soil. Ecological Monographs. 8(3):437-499.

Cleland, D.T., J.A. Freeouf, J.E. Keys, G.J. Nowacki, C.A. Carpenter, W.H. McNab. 2007. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections for the conterminous United States. General Technical Report WO-76D. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, D.C.

Cowell, C.M. 1998. Historical Change in Vegetation and Disturbance on the Georgia Piedmont. The American Midland Naturalist. 140(1):78-89.

Daniels, R.B., S.W. Boul, H.J. Kleiss, C.A. Ditzler. 1999. Soil Systems in North Carolina. Technical Bulletin 314. North Carolina State University, Soil Science Department. Raleigh, N.C.

Daniels, R.B. 1987. Soil Erosion and Degradation in the Southern Piedmont of the USA. In: M.G. Wolman, F.G.A. Fournier (eds.) Land Transformation in Agriculture. John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY.

Dearman, T.L., L.A. James. 2019. Patterns of legacy sediment deposits in a small South Carolina Piedmont catchment, USA. Geomorphology. 343(15):1-14.

Edwards, L., J., Ambrose, and L.K. Kirkman. 2013. Piedmont Ecoregion. In L. Edwards et al. (ed.) The natural communities of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA. 257-345.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013. Level III and IV ecoregions of the continental
United States. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory. Corvallis, Oregon. Map scale 1:3,000,000.

Felix III, A.C., T.L. Sharik, B.S. McGinnes, W.C. Johnson. 1983. Succession in loblolly pine plantations converted from second-growth forest in the Central Piedmont of Virginia.

Fenneman, N.M., Johnson D.W. 1946. Physiographic Divisions of the Conterminous U.S. U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC.

Fleming, G.P. 2012. The Nature of the Virginia Flora. P. 24-75. In A.S. Weakley, J.C. Ludwig, J.F. Townsend, B. Crowder (ed.) Flora of Virginia. Foundation of the Virginia Flora Project Inc., Richmond. Fort Worth: Botanical Research Institute of Texas Press.

Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2021. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.3. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]

Greenberg, C.H., B.S. Collins, S. Goodrick, M.C. Stambaugh, G.R. Wein. 2021. Introduction to Fire Ecology Across USA Forested Ecosystems: Past, Present, and Future. P. 1-30. In C.H. Greenberg and B. Collins (ed.) Fire ecology and management: past, present, and future of US forested ecosystems, Volume 39. Springer International Publishing. Cham, Switzerland.

Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson, J.B. Glover, V.B. Shelburne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. United States Geological Survey. Reston, Virginia.

Golden, M.S. 1979. Forest vegetation of the lower Alabama piedmont. Ecology. 60:770-782.

Guyette, R.P., M.C. Stambaugh, D.C. Dey, R.M. Muzika. 2012. Predicting fire frequency with chemistry and climate. Ecosystems. 15:322-335.

Keever, C. 1950. Causes of succession on old fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina. Ecological Monographs. 20(3):229-250.

Nelson, T.C. 1957. The original forests of the Georgia Piedmont. Ecology. 38(3):390-397.

Nelson, T.C., R.D. Ross, G. D. Walker. 1957. The extent of moist sites in the Georgia Piedmont and their forest associations. Res. Notes #102, S.E. Forest Experiment Station. United States Forest Service. Asheville, N.C.

Megalos, M. 2019. Thinning Pine Stands. Woodland Owners Notes. NC State Extension. https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/thinning-pine-stands (accessed 18 March 2023).

Miller, J.H., B.R. Zutter, S.M. Zedaker, M.B. Edwards, R.A. Newbold. 1995. Early plant succession in loblolly pine plantations as affected by vegetation management. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 19(3):109-126.

Miller, J.H., B.R. Zutter, R.A. Newbold, M.B. Edwards, S.M. Zedaker. 2003. Stand dynamics and plant associates of loblolly pine plantations to midrotation after early intensive vegetation management – a southeastern United States regional study. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 27(4):221-236.

Nicholson, S.A., C.D. Monk. 1974. Plant species diversity in old-field succession on the Georgia Piedmont. Ecology. 55(5):1075-1085.

Oosting, H.J. 1942. An ecological analysis of the plant communities of the Piedmont, North Carolina. The American Midland Naturalist. 28:1-126.

Peet, R. K., and N.L. Christensen. 1980. Hardwood forest vegetation of the North Carolina Piedmont. Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rubel 68:14-39.

Peet, R. K., and N.L. Christensen. 1987. Tree Death: Cause and Consequence. Bioscience. 37(8):586-595.

Schafale, M.P. 2012a. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation. Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC.

Schafale, M.P. 2012b. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina. 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation. Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC.

Schafale, M.P., A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC.

Schomberg, H., G. Hoyt, B. Brock, G. Naderman. A. Meijer. 2020. Southern Piedmont Case Studies. In: J. Bergtold, M. Sailus (eds.) Conservation Tillage Systems in the Southeast. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program.

Spira, T.P. 2011. Wildflowers & Plant Communities of the Southern Appalachian Mountains and Piedmont. A naturalist’s guide to the Carolinas, Virginia, Tennessee, and Georgia. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.

Spooner, J.K., R.K. Peet, M.P. Schafale, A.S. Weakley, T.R. Wentworth. 2021. The role of fire in the dynamics of Piedmont vegetation. p. 31-62. In C.H. Greenberg and B. Collins (ed.) Fire ecology and management: past, present, and future of US forested ecosystems, Volume 39. Springer International Publishing. Cham, Switzerland.

Trimble, S.W. 1974. Man-Induced Soil Erosion on the Southern Piedmont, 1700–1970. Soil Conservation Society of America. Ankeny, IA.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2022. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 296.

United States National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) Database Version 2.04. 2022. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee. Washington, DC. Available at https://usnvc.org.

Vander Yacht, A.L., Keyser, P.D., Barrioz, S.A. 2020. Litter to glitter: promoting herbaceous groundcover and diversity in mid-southern USA oak forests using canopy disturbance and fire. Fire Ecology. 16(17):1-19.

Van Lear, D.H, R.A. Harper, P.R. Kapeluck, and W.D. Carroll. 2004. History of Piedmont Forests: Implications for Current Pine Management. General Technical Report SRS–71. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, NC.

Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2023. Flora of the southeastern United States. University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, NC.

Wharton, C.H. 1978. Natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Atlanta, Georgia.

Contributors

Yogev Erez
Dee Pederson

Approval

Charles Stemmans, 5/02/2025

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	05/05/2025
Approved by	Charles Stemmans
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Secondary Succession State

3. High-graded Hardwood Forest State

4. Managed Pine Plantation State

5. Pasture/Hayland State

6. Cropland State

States 1, 5 and 6 (additional transitions)

1. Reference State

5. Pasture/Hayland State

6. Cropland State

States 2, 5 and 6 (additional transitions)

2. Secondary Succession State

5. Pasture/Hayland State

6. Cropland State

T1A	-	Clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.
T1B	-	Selective removals of the most valuable timber specimens, leaving inferior trees behind.
T1C	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T1D	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, and planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T2A	-	Long-term natural succession.
T2B	-	Site preparation and tree planting.
T2C	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T2D	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, weed control, planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T3A	-	Clearcut logging or other large-scale disturbances that cause canopy removal.
T3C	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T3D	-	Mechanical tree/brush/stump/debris removal, seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, weed control, planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T4A	-	Abandonment of forestry practices.
T4B	-	Timber harvest, mechanical stump and debris removal, seedbed preparation, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.
T4C	-	Timber harvest, mechanical stump and debris removal, seedbed preparation, fertilizer/lime, weed control, planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T5A	-	Long-term cessation of grazing.
T5B	-	Site preparation and tree planting.
T5C	-	Seedbed preparation, applications of fertilizer/lime, weed control, and planting of crop or cover crop seed.
T6A	-	Agricultural abandonment.
T6B	-	Site preparation and tree planting.
T6C	-	Seedbed preparation, weed control, and planting of perennial grasses and forbs.