

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R058CY101ND
Steep-Sided Wooded Draw
Last updated: 4/21/2025
Accessed: 10/22/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 058C–Northern Rolling High Plains, Northeastern Part
MLRA 58C covers 2,320 square miles and encompasses approximately 1.8 million acres. MLRA 58C spans two states, with 96 percent located in North Dakota and the remaining 4 percent is in Montana. The MLRA 58C landscape is characterized by steeply sloping dissected badlands along the Little Missouri River and its tributaries. Primary land uses are of rangeland for grazing and wildlife habitat. Microclimates inherent in badlands landscapes influence both variety and abundance of vegetation in MLRA 58C. South- and west- facing exposures are dry, hot, and sparsely vegetated. More humid and cooler north- and east-facing exposures are favorable for abundant forage and woody vegetation.
MLRA 58C is known as the Little Missouri Badlands, which formed when the Little Missouri River was diverted along a shorter, steeper course by Pleistocene glaciers. Due to the resulting increased gradient after its eastward diversion by the glaciers, the Little Missouri River began rapidly downcutting into the soft, calcareous sedimentary shale, siltstone, and sandstone of the Fort Union and Hell Creek geological formations. This rapid downcutting eroded and carved the badlands of the MLRA. This cycle of erosion and deposition continues today.
Most of the soils in MLRA 58C developed from residuum weathered in place. As a result of constant erosion and deposition, the majority of soils in MLRA 58C are Entisols and Inceptisols. Mollisols formed on the high, stable drainageway divides and plateaus above the steeper, dissected hillslopes and fans that define the Little Missouri Badlands. Elevation ranges from 1,835 feet (560 meters) to 3,400 feet (1,036 meters). The Little Missouri River flows through the entire length of MLRA 58C and empties into Lake Sakakawea that was formed by the Garrison Dam on the Missouri River.
Classification relationships
Level IV Ecoregions of Conterminous United States: 43b-Little Missouri Badlands.
Ecological site concept
The Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site occurs on moderately steep to very steep sideslopes of ridges (draws), as well as on slumps (rotational slides) and hillslopes in badlands and associated sedimentary uplands. The site typically has north or east aspect. Soils data suggests this site shifted temporally and spatially (via fire and drought) between sparsely wooded with herbaceous understory to closed canopy deciduous forest. Deciduous trees and shrubs are established in these areas; however, periods of herbaceous plants increased on the site following fire. Soils on this site are well drained and deep or very deep. Typically, a thin O horizon (<3 inches thick) overlays the mineral soil. The A horizon has a loam, silt loam, or clay loam texture. Immediately below the A horizon is a non-calcareous subsoil layer (Bw or Bt horizon); this horizon forms a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long. A layer of carbonate accumulation (Bk or Btk horizon) is commonly within a depth of 24 inches. On the landscape, the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw site is below the Badland, Shallow Loamy, and Very Shallow ecological sites. Limy Residual and Loamy sites are on similar or lower landscape positions. Claypan, Loamy Overflow, and Flat Bottom Wooded Draw sites are below the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw sites. Slopes range from 9 to 70 percent.
Due to steepness of slope, precipitation events, fires, hydrology, drought bedrock/parent material (e.g., mudstone or siltstone), soil conditions/development, and other factors, this ecological site is subject to rotational slides, also known as slumping (see Figure 1 below). Significant precipitation events saturating the soil profile, especially after a stand replacing fire, is a major contributing factor in a semi-arid climate on these steep slopes.
As the slide occurs, the sliding mass may stay intact and result in relatively small changes in site conditions. However, it may also break up into portions of different sizes and settle out in different orientations. Often, much of the vegetation present before the slide continues growing after being relocated by the slide. The result is a mosaic of various sized segments that can markedly differ in soil characteristics, aspect, areal extent, existing vegetation, and other factors. Over time different ecological sites may develop. As such, care should be given to identify any rotational slides, as well as whether the slide has resulted in a change in states, community phases, or perhaps ecological site(s).
To see a full copy of the ecological site description with all tables and the full version 5 rangeland health worksheet, please use the following hyperlink:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/58C_Steep-Sided_Wooded_Draw_Narrative_FINAL.pdf
Associated sites
R058CY079ND |
Limy Residual This site occurs on similar or lower landscape positions as the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. The soils are calcareous within a depth of 8 inches. The surface A horizon is thin on Limy Residual sites; these soils generally do not have a mollic epipedon. This ecological site has prairie vegetation. |
---|---|
R058CY080ND |
Loamy The Loamy site occurs on similar or lower landscape positions as the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw site. The soils typically have a mollic epipedon and form a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long. They are deeper than 8 inches to carbonates. This ecological site has prairie vegetation. |
R058CY083ND |
Very Shallow This site is higher on the landscape than the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. It has procelanite or numerous stones and boulders within a depth of 20 inches. This ecological site has prairie vegetation. |
R058CY086ND |
Shallow Loamy This site is higher on the landscape than the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. The soils form a ribbon >1 inch long and have soft sedimentary bedrock at a depth of 10 to 20 inches. This ecological site has prairie vegetation. |
R058CY102ND |
Flat-Bottom Wooded Draw This site is lower on the landscape (in drainageways) than the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. The site has slope <6 percent. Flooding is frequent, very brief. The woodland canopy has influenced the understory plant community. |
R058CY103ND |
Badland This site is on the very steep, sparsely vegetated badland escarpments above the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. The Badland ecological site is characterized by exposed, soft, sedimentary siltstone and shale bedrock that is actively and constantly eroding. |
R058CY074ND |
Loamy Overflow This site occurs on the upper end of drainageways associated with Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological sites. The Loamy Overflow site commonly is a wooded phase; but is not as heavily forested as the associated Flat Bottom Wooded Draw site further down the drainageway. Steep-Sided Wooded Draw sites occur on side slopes above the drainageway. Slopes of Loamy Overflow sites are <6 percent. |
R058CY073ND |
Claypan This site is lower on the landscape than the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. It has a dense, sodic, root-restrictive claypan starting at a depth between 6 and 20 inches. |
Similar sites
R058CY102ND |
Flat-Bottom Wooded Draw This site is lower on the landscape (in drainageways) than the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site. The site has slope <6 percent. Flooding is frequent, very brief. |
---|

Figure 1. Rotational landslides are caused by the downward and outward movement of a mass on top of a concave upward failure surface (Abbott 2004).

Figure 2. Rotational landslide on east and north slopes with Rocky Mountain juniper, common juniper, and prostrate juniper surviving active slide.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs on sideslopes of ridges (draws), as well as on slumps and hillslopes in badlands and associated sedimentary uplands. Parent materials are colluvium from weathered, sedimentary bedrock (siltstone, mudstone, shale, sandstone, and/or porcelanite). The landscape position and aspect strongly influenced the development of this ecological site. Slope ranges from 9 to 70 percent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Draw
(2) Slump (3) Hillslope |
---|---|
Runoff class | Medium to high |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 1,835 – 3,400 ft |
Slope | 9 – 70% |
Water table depth | 80 in |
Aspect | N, NE, E |
Climatic features
MLRA 58C is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are common and characteristic of the MLRA. The continental climate is the result of the location of this MLRA in the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the northern Great Plains, so air masses move unobstructed across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature.
Annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 17 inches per year. The normal average annual temperature is about 41° F. January is the coldest month with an average temperature of about 17° F. July is the warmest month with an average temperature of about 70° F. The range of normal average monthly temperatures between the coldest and warmest months is 53° F. This large temperature range attests to the continental nature of the MLRA 58C climate. Wind speeds average about 11 miles per hour, ranging from about 13 miles per hour during the spring to about 10 miles per hour during the summer. Daytime wind speeds are generally stronger than nighttime wind speeds, and occasional strong storms may bring brief periods of high winds with gusts to more than 50 miles per hour.
Growth of native cool-season plants begins in late March and continues to early to mid-July. Native warm- season plants begin growth in mid-May and continue to the end of August. Greening up of cool-season plants can occur in September and October when adequate soil moisture is present.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 91-100 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 119-123 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 15-16 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 84-102 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 116-123 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 14-16 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 95 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 121 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 15 in |
Figure 3. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 4. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 6. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 7. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 8. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) AMIDON [USC00320209], Amidon, ND
-
(2) TROTTERS 3 SSE [USC00328812], Beach, ND
-
(3) WATFORD CITY 14S [USC00329246], Grassy Butte, ND
-
(4) MEDORA 7 E [USW00094080], Fairfield, ND
-
(5) CARLYLE 13 NW [USC00241518], Wibaux, MT
Influencing water features
This ecological is on a runoff landscape position; however, it does receive extra moisture by holding more snowfall than non-wooded sites. The seasonal ground water table is typically deeper than 6 feet throughout the growing season. Surface infiltration and permeability through the profile are moderate or moderately slow. Water loss is through evapotranspiration and percolation below the root zone. The primary north and east aspect and tree canopy provides benefit by keeping the soil surface shaded and cooler than non-wooded sites, thus reducing the rate of evaporation.
Soil features
Soils associated with the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ES are in the Mollisol and Inceptisol orders. The Mollisols are classified further as Alfic Argiustolls. The Inceptisols are classified further as Aridic Haplustepts and Typic Haplustepts. The Argiustoll soils were developed under long-term, densely woodland conditions. The Haplustept soils were developed under a mix of prairie and woodland conditions. The variability of classification of soils on this site is due to the varying influence of landscape/landform position, fire, and drought on the plant community (forest vs grassland) during soil development. Some soils have obvious indicators of forest influence (alfic properties); other soils have minimal or no clear indicators. They formed in colluvium from badlands and associated uplands. The soft sedimentary bedrock is primarily siltstone, mudstone, or shale, but sandstone and porcelanite (scoria) also occur. The soils on this site are very deep or deep and are well drained.
The soils commonly have a thin surface layer (<3 inches thick) of slightly decomposed organic material and leaf litter. Textures of the mineral A horizon are typically loam, silt loam, or clay loam. Below the A horizon, there is commonly an argillic horizon (Bt) with bleached sand grains. Some soils have a B/E horizon. In this
B/E horizon, bleached sand grains or gray coatings which are leached of organic matter and clay (E) cover subsoil peds where organic matter and clay (B) have accumulated. However, some soils do not have this evidence of leaching; they have either a Bw horizon with texture similar to the A horizon. Textures of these horizons are primarily loam, clay loam, silt loam, or clay loam textures (soil forms a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long). A few included soils may have fine sandy loam A and B horizons. Some soils have pieces of charcoal in the soil profile which indicates the influence of fire. Some soils have soft sedimentary bedrock as shallow as 3.5 feet.
Soil reaction in the mineral A and B/E, Bw, or Bt horizons typically is slightly acid to slightly alkaline (pH 6.1 to 7.8). Below these horizons, soil reaction is commonly slightly alkaline or moderately alkaline (pH 7.4 to 8.4). Soil salinity is none to slight (E.C. <4 dS/m); sodicity is typically none to low (SAR < 5); however, is some soils the SAR ranges to 20) in the lower substratum. Calcium carbonate content is none in A and upper B horizon. Typically, a layer of accumulated carbonates occurs within a depth of 24 inches (5 to 15 percent CaCO3).
Soils, on the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site, are typically not susceptible to erosion under reference conditions.
The major soil series which characterizes the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site is an aridic taxadjunct to Arikara (established in the ustic moisture regime). Also included are soils with more soil development (translocation of clays into Bt horizons); a new soil series has been considered for these soils but has not yet been established.
Access Web Soil Survey (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) for specific local soils information.

Figure 9. Steep-sided Wooded Draw ecological site typical soil profile showing B/E horizon with bleached sand grains.

Figure 10. Steep-sided Wooded Draw ecological site typical soil profile showing Bt horizon with bleached sand grains.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
siltstone
(2) Colluvium – mudstone (3) Colluvium – shale (4) Colluvium – sandstone (5) Colluvium – porcellanite |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Loam (2) Silt loam (3) Clay loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderately slow to moderate |
Depth to restrictive layer | 42 – 80 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover >3" | Not specified |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
6 – 10 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
15% |
Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
4 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
20 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
6.1 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-40in) |
10% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-40in) |
1% |
Ecological dynamics
This ecological site description is based on nonequilibrium ecology and resilience theory and utilizes a State- and-Transition Model (STM) diagram to organize and communicate information about ecosystem change as a basis for management. The ecological dynamics characterized by the STM diagram reflect how changes in ecological drivers, feedback mechanisms, and controlling variables can maintain or induce changes in plant community composition (phases and/or states). The application of various management actions, combined with weather variables, impact the ecological processes which influence the competitive interactions, thereby maintaining or altering plant community structure.
Prior to European influence, the historical disturbance regime for MLRA 58C included frequent fires, both anthropogenic and natural in origin. Most fires, however, were anthropogenic fires set by Native Americans. Native Americans set fires in all months except perhaps January. These fires occurred in two peak periods, one from March-May with the peak in April and another from July-November with the peak occurring in October. Most of these fires were scattered and of small extent and duration. The grazing history would have involved grazing and browsing by large herbivores (such as American bison, elk, pronghorn, mule deer, and whitetail deer). Herbivory by small mammals, insects, nematodes, and other invertebrates are also important factors influencing the production and composition of the communities. Grazing and fire interaction, particularly when coupled with drought events, influenced the dynamics discussed and displayed in the following state and transition diagram and descriptions.
Following European influence, this ecological site generally has had a history of grazing by domestic livestock, particularly cattle, which along with other related activities (e.g., fencing, water development, fire suppression) has changed the disturbance regime of the site. Changes will occur in the plant communities due to these and other factors.
Weather fluctuations coupled with managerial factors may lead to changes in the plant communities and may, under adverse impacts, result in a slow decline in vegetative vigor and composition. However, under favorable conditions the botanical composition may resemble that prior to European influence.
Four vegetative states have been identified for the site (Reference, Native/Invaded, Invaded, and Conifer Invaded). Within each state, one or more community phases have been identified. These community phases are named based on the more dominant and visually conspicuous species. They have been determined by study of historical documents, relict areas, scientific studies, and ecological aspects of plant species and plant communities. Transitional pathways and thresholds have been determined through similar methods.
State 1: Reference State represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site prior to European influence. Dynamics of the state were largely determined by variations in climate and weather (e.g., drought), as well as that of fire (e.g., timing, frequency) and grazing by native herbivores (e.g., frequency, intensity, selectivity). Due to those variations, the Reference State is thought to have shifted temporally and spatially between three plant community phases.
Currently the primary disturbances include widespread introduction of exotic plants, concentrated livestock grazing, lack of fire, and perhaps long-term non-use or very light grazing and no fire. Even though these changes have a direct impact on the plant community, field data indicates the Reference State still exists on the landscape but may be a rare occurrence. The presence of exotic plants on the site precludes it from being placed in the Reference State. It must then be placed in one of the other states, commonly State 2: Native/Invaded State (T1A).
State 2: Native/Invaded State. Colonization of the site by exotic cool-season grasses results in a transition from State 1: Reference State to State 2: Native/Invaded State (T1A). Invasion by Rocky Mountain Juniper also results in a transition to State 2.0. These transitions are inevitable, resulting from colonization by exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome) and/or conifers such as Rocky Mountain Juniper which have been particularly and consistently invasive under extended periods of no fire. Other exotic plants (e.g., hound’s tongue, Canada thistle, leafy spurge) are also known to invade the site. Excessive livestock use close to water sources can increase soil compaction.
Two community phases have been identified for this state; they are similar to the community phases in the Reference State but have now been invaded by exotic cool-season grasses. These exotic cool-season grasses can be expected to increase. As that increase occurs, plants more desirable to wildlife and livestock will decline. A decline in forb diversity can also be expected. Under non-use or minimal use management, mulch increases and may become a physical barrier to plant growth. This also changes the micro-climate near the soil surface and may alter infiltration, nutrient cycling, and biological activity near the soil surface. As a result, these factors combined with shading cause desirable native plants to have increasing difficulty remaining viable and recruitment declines.
To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic cool-season grasses, other exotic plants, or conifer species, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, and/or mechanical treatment of conifer) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. If management does not include measures to control or reduce these invasive plants, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected (T2A). This state may also transition to State 4: Conifer Invaded State during extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, and no fire (T2B). Managers need to understand when the plant community is at or near these parameters; all data available needs to be evaluated to determine needed management actions.
State 3: Invaded State. The threshold for this state is reached when both the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass) exceed 30% of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40% of the community. Managers need to understand when the plant community is at or near these parameters; all data available needs to be evaluated to determine needed management actions. One community phase has been identified for this state.
The exotic cool-season grasses can be quite invasive and often form monotypic stands. As they increase, both forage quantity and quality of the annual production becomes increasingly restricted to late spring and early summer, even though annual production may increase. Forb diversity often declines. Under non-use or minimal use management, mulch can increase and become a physical barrier to plant growth which alters nutrient cycling, infiltration, and soil biological activity. As such, desirable native plants become increasingly displaced.
Once the state is well established, managerial techniques have been largely ineffective in suppressing or eliminating the exotic cool-season grasses, even though some short-term reductions may appear successful. This state may transition to State 4: Conifer Invaded State during extended periods of non-use or very light grazing, and no fire (T3A).
State 4: Conifer Invaded State. This State results from extended periods of no fire, often in association with long-term non-use or very light grazing. It is characterized by the dominance of Rocky Mountain juniper which may have been present as scattered, mature trees prior to European influence. However, since that time a marked decrease in fire frequency and increased fire suppression have been particularly important in enabling Rocky Mountain juniper to increase and dominate the site.
A marked decrease in fire frequency and increased fire suppression since European influence has enabled this state to expand and become more widespread. This is particularly important to the fire-intolerant juniper species’ ability to expand, exploit, and dominate grasslands. Where a conifer seed source is available, woody encroachment processes begin to dominate as fire frequency decreases or fire is eliminated from the site. As depicted in the following diagram, conifer seeds disperse into an intact grassland State 1.0 or 2.0, beginning the process of woody encroachment. Decreased fire frequencies allow conifer to establish allowing for a transition to State 5: Conifer Invaded State.
This conifer invaded community phase often results from long-term non-use or very light grazing and no fire (T2B, T3A). Brush control (e.g., prescribed burning, and/or chemical/mechanical brush management) may lead to State 2: Native/Invaded State (R4A).
The following state and transition model diagram illustrates the common states, community phases, community pathways, and transition and restoration pathways that can occur on the site. These are the most common plant community phases and states based on current knowledge and experience; changes may be made as more data are collected. Pathway narratives describing the site’s ecological dynamics reference various management practices (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed fire, brush management, herbaceous weed treatment) which, if properly designed and implemented, will positively influence plant community competitive interactions. The design of these management practices will be site specific and should be developed by knowledgeable individuals; based upon management goals and a resource inventory; and supported by an ongoing monitoring protocol.
When the management goal is to maintain an existing plant community phase or restore to another phase within the same state, modification of existing management to ensure native species have the competitive advantage may be required. To restore a previous state, the application of two or more management practices in an ongoing manner will be required. Whether using prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, or a combination of both with or without additional practices (e.g., brush management), the timing and method of application needs to favor the native species over the exotic species. Adjustments to account for variations in annual growing conditions and implementing an ongoing monitoring protocol to track changes and adjust management inputs to ensure desired outcome will be necessary.
The plant community phase composition table(s) has been developed from the best available knowledge including research, historical records, clipping studies, and inventory records. As more data are collected, plant community species composition and production information may be revised.
State and transition model

Figure 11. Stages of Woody Encroachment - Adapted from: Reducing Woody Encroachment in Grasslands – A Guide for Understanding Risk and Vulnerability; Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service


More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
T1A | - | Introduction of exotic cool-season grasses and exotic forbs, altered fire frequency |
---|---|---|
T2A | - | Heavy continuous grazing/feeding, with or without drought, no fire |
T2B | - | Long-term non-use or very light grazing and no fire |
T3A | - | Long-term non-use or very light grazing and no fire |
R4A | - | Stand replacing fire; prescribed burning with/without mechanical treatment |
State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A | - | Multiyear drought or short-term drought with fire |
---|---|---|
1.1B | - | Multiyear above average precipitation producing fine fuel load followed by high intensity fire |
1.2A | - | Multiyear average or above average precipitation |
1.3A | - | Return to average precipitation, extended fire intervals |
State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A | - | Multiyear drought or short-term drought with stand replacing fire; heavy season-long grazing |
---|---|---|
2.2A | - | Return to average precipitation, no fire, long-term prescribed grazing |
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This state represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site prior to European influence. The primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included droughts of varying length and severity, soil slumping, ground fires, and wildlife trailing. The timing of fires coupled with weather patterns dictated the dynamics that occur within the natural range of variability. These factors likely caused the community to shift both spatially and temporally between three community phases. This state was dominated by an overstory of green ash with a shrub understory of chokecherry and American plum. The herbaceous understory was dominated by sedges (e.g., Sprengel’s sedge) with lesser amounts of shade-tolerant grasses, such as littleseed ricegrass. Common forbs included northern bedstraw, starry false lily of the valley, and meadow-rue. Bare ground was less than one percent due to a dense plant canopy and leaf litter. Rocky Mountain juniper may have been present as scattered, mature trees.
Characteristics and indicators. Because of changes in disturbances and other environmental factors (particularly the widespread occurrence of exotic species), the Reference State is considered to no longer exist.
Resilience management. If intact, the reference state should probably be managed with current disturbance regimes which has permitted the site to remain in reference condition as well as maintaining the quality and integrity of associated ecological sites. Maintenance of the reference condition is contingent upon a monitoring protocol to guide management.
Community 1.1
Green Ash/ Chokecherry (Fraxinus pennsylvanica/ Prunus virginiana): Multi-Age Class
This community phase was historically the most dominant both temporally and spatially. It was multi-layered with multi-aged green ash occurring in the tree (≥4 inches diameter breast height [=dbh]), sapling (>6 feet in height and <4 inches dbh), shrub (<4 inches dbh and ≤ 6 feet in height), and herbaceous (≤4 inches in height). Chokecherry was abundant (10 to 20 percent cover with an average density of 1 to 2 per square yard), often co-occurring with American plum and lesser amounts of Saskatoon serviceberry. Chokecherry and American plum help to reduce browsing by ungulates of green ash in the herbaceous layer (seedlings) and in the shrub layer on lesser slopes where limited browsing may occur. Poison ivy was also present. Sprengel’s sedge, Torrey’s sedge, Assiniboia sedge, littleseed ricegrass, Virginia wildrye, starry false lily of the valley, woodland strawberry, wild strawberry, and northern bedstraw were among the more common herbaceous understory species. This phase occurred when and where disturbances (grazing, drought, fire, etc.) permitted establishment and growth of green ash seedlings in the herbaceous layer. Areas of this site where the canopy was more open may have included Canada wildrye, wild bergamot, slender wheatgrass, and Pennsylvania sedge.
Community 1.2
Green Ash/ Chokecherry/ Herbaceous Understory (Fraxinus pennsylvanica/ Prunus virginiana/ Herbaceous Understory)
This phase could be characterized by two age classes of green ash trees (≥4 inches dbh) and saplings (≥6 feet in height and <4 inches dbh). Green ash was reduced; it was still present in the sapling layer but absent in the shrub and herbaceous layers (<6 feet in height). Associated shrubs, especially chokecherry, and the herbaceous vegetation were moderately to severely reduced by drought. However, fires likely caused sprouting in chokecherry, American plum, and green ash. The herbaceous understory was dominated by Sprengel’s sedge with lesser amounts of shade-tolerant grasses such as littleseed ricegrass. Common forbs included northern bedstraw, starry false lily of the valley, and meadow-rue. Due to the opening of the canopy, the herbaceous and shrub plant communities were most likely increasing.
Community 1.3
Chokecherry/ Herbaceous Understory (Prunus virginiana/ Herbaceous Understory)
This community may be characterized by the dominance of chokecherry and perhaps American plum in the sapling, shrub, and herbaceous layers with a noticeable absence (or at least very low densities) of green ash in these layers. Green ash would have been the dominant overstory species, several of which were likely multi- stemmed where fire (potentially a stand-replacing fire) was the primary driver of the change from Community Phase 1.1 to Community Phase 1.3. Herbaceous understory species likely included Canada wildrye, northern bedstraw, starry false lily of the valley, and littleseed ricegrass.
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Community Phase Pathway 1.1 to 1.2 occurred during multiyear drought or short-term drought with fire which reduced or eliminated recruitment of green ash in the herbaceous and shrub layers for several years. The probability and severity of fire would have decreased as the drought progressed, due to the lack of fine fuels.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3
Community Phase Pathway 1.1 to 1.3 occurred over multiyear periods of above average precipitation which produced fire fuel loads followed by mixed- to high-intensity fires. These fires would have largely eliminated green ash in the understory layers (sapling, shrub, and herbaceous) and reduced green ash in the tree layer (>10 cm dbh), resulting in a shift to Plant Community Phase 1.3. Green ash sprouts following fire, leading to an increase in multi-stemmed trees.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Community Phase Pathway 1.2 to 1.1 occurred during multiyear periods of average or above average precipitation. This would have generated conditions favorable for germination and establishment of green ash seedlings, which would ultimately reestablish the multi-aged/multi-layered structure of green ash and returning the site to the Reference Plant Community Phase 1.1. The survival and growth of green ash in the herbaceous and shrub layers were enhanced by the high cover of chokecherry, which reduced the potential damage to green ash <2 m in height by browsing ungulates on lesser slopes.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1
Community Phase Pathway 1.3 to 1.1 occurred with the return to average precipitation along with low disturbance (absence of fire) which provided opportunities for green ash seedlings to establish and grow, returning the site to the multi-aged/multi-layered Reference Plant Community Phase 1.1. The successional process would be greatly enhanced by high density/cover of chokecherry and American plum that would have reduced the potential for browsing of young green ash <6 feet in height on lesser slopes.
State 2
Native/Invaded State
This state is similar to State 1: Reference State but has now been colonized by the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome) which are now present in small amounts. Although the state is still dominated by native trees and shrubs, exotic cool-season grasses have increased in the understory. These exotic cool-season grasses can be quite invasive and are particularly well adapted to heavy grazing, shading, as well as long-term non-use. These exotic cool-season grasses have been particularly and consistently invasive under extended periods of no fire. To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, and/or mechanical treatment (juniper removal)) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. If management does not include measures to control or reduce these exotic cool-season grasses, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected. The invasion of Rocky Mountain Juniper within State 2 occurs when a juniper seed source is present. Lack of active juniper management will lead to State 4.0 Conifer Invaded State. Active management includes prescribed burning and mechanical juniper removal. Limiting juniper seed sources is important to avoid re- invasion of juniper on the site. Active monitoring and management are needed to remove new juniper seedlings as they establish from seedbanks or dispersal. Other exotic plants invading the site include Canada thistle, leafy spurge, hounds tongue, and common burdock. Rocky Mountain juniper, creeping juniper, and perhaps eastern red cedar may also invade the site. Annual production of this state can be quite variable, in large part due to variations in shading and the amount of exotic cool-season grasses.
Characteristics and indicators. The presence of trace amounts of exotic cool-season grass species indicates a transition from State 1 to State 2. The presence of exotic biennial or perennial leguminous forbs (i.e., sweet clover, black medic) may not, on their own, indicate a transition from State 1 to State 2 but may facilitate that transition.
Resilience management. To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic cool-season grasses, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. Due to site conditions (e.g., steep slopes, limited forage production, etc.) grazing on this site is limited. Slopes range from 9 to 70% generally limits grazing on these steeper slopes. Livestock trailing can occur especially when close to a water source. Therefore, grazing management efforts should be concentrated on adjacent sites and should be applied that enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species. This may include: (1) grazing when exotic cool-season grasses are actively growing, and native cool-season grasses are dormant; (2) applying proper deferment periods allowing native grasses to recover and maintain or improve vigor; (3) incorporating early heavy spring utilization which focuses grazing pressure on exotic cool-season grasses and reduces plant litter provided that livestock are moved when grazing selection shifts from exotic cool-season grasses to native grasses.
Community 2.1
Green Ash/ Chokecherry (Fraxinus pennsylvanica/ Prunus virginiana): Multi-Age Class

Figure 12. Community Phase 2.1: Green Ash/Chokecherry, with Kentucky bluegrass invasion.
This community phase is characterized by green ash trees and the dominance of chokecherry (and perhaps American plum) in the sapling, shrub, and herbaceous layers, with a noticeable absence (or at least very low densities) of green ash in these layers. This state has been invaded by exotic cool-season grasses and forbs including Kentucky bluegrass (<10 percent), smooth brome, Canada thistle, leafy spurge, etc. Of these introduced species, Kentucky bluegrass has the greatest effect on the ecological processes (such as green ash seedling recruitment) and restoration potential due to its ability to form a dense sod and thatch layer that inhibits seed/soil contact.
Community 2.2
Chokecherry/ Exotic Herbaceous Understory (Prunus virginiana/ Exotic Herbaceous Understory)
Multiyear drought, short-term drought with fire, or heavy continuous grazing leads to the mortality of green ash resulting in the site becoming dominated by chokecherry with an understory largely composed of herbaceous exotic plants such as exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass) and/or exotic forbs (e.g., leafy spurge, Canada thistle).
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2
Community Phase Pathway 2.1 to 2.2 occurs with multiyear drought or short-term drought with stand replacing fire, or heavy grazing.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1
Community Phase Pathway 2.2 to 2.1 occurs with return to average precipitation, no fire, and long-term prescribed grazing, leading to recruitment of green ash and the development of a green ash overstory.
State 3
Invaded State
This state often develops in association with heavy continuous grazing on adjacent sites, or where livestock activity significantly impacts the woody vegetation. It can be characterized by scattered mature and decadent green ash, in association with chokecherry and an understory predominantly consisting of exotic herbaceous species. Exotic cool-season grasses often include Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass. Exotic forbs (such as leafy spurge, Canada thistle, and hound’s tongue) may also be present.
Characteristics and indicators. This site is characterized by exotic herbaceous species constituting greater than 30 percent of the annual production and native herbaceous species constituting less than 40 percent of the annual production.
Resilience management. Applying grazing management to adjacent sites which incorporates adequate deferment periods between grazing events and proper stocking rate levels will help maintain this State. The application of herbaceous weed treatment may be needed to manage noxious weeds.
Community 3.1
Decadent Green Ash/ Chokecherry/ Exotic Herbaceous Understory (Decadent Fraxinus pennsylvanica/ Prunus virginiana/ Exotic Herbaceous Understory)
This community phase can be described as consisting of decadent and/or dead green ash trees in association with a shrub component dominated by chokecherry. The herbaceous understory is largely composed of exotic cool-season grasses (such as Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass). Exotic forbs (such as leafy spurge, Canada thistle, and hound’s tongue) may also be present.
State 4
Conifer Invaded State

Figure 13. Stand replacing fire via Restoration Pathway R4A.

Figure 14. Example of Mechanical treatment with masticator via Restoration Pathway R4A

Figure 15. Example of mechanical treatment with masticator via Restoration Pathway R4A.
This state results from extended periods of no fire, often in association with long-term non-use or very light grazing. It is characterized by the dominance of conifers, such as Rocky Mountain juniper or ponderosa pine, which may have been present as scattered, mature trees prior to European influence. However, since that time a marked decrease in fire frequency and increased fire suppression has been particularly important in enabling conifers to increase and dominate the site. Associated plants can be quite variable in composition and production depending upon juniper age, size, density, and other factors.
Characteristics and indicators. The dominance of conifers in association with an herbaceous understory composed largely of exotic cool-season grasses distinguishes this state from other states.
Resilience management. This state is resistant to change in the long-term absence of fire. Restoration efforts would require the use of prescribed fire, mechanical treatment, and prescribed grazing. Considerable time and effort will be required to restore to other States.
Community 4.1
Juniper-Pine (Juniperus spp.-Pinus ponderosa)

Figure 16. Steep-Sided Wooded Draw 4.0 Conifer Invaded State – 4.1 Juniper-Pine. Dominated by Rocky Mountain juniper with Badland Fan ecological site in foreground and Badland ecological site in background.

Figure 17. 4.1 Juniper-Pine; dominated by Rocky Mountain juniper – Sparse understory of sedges and forbs found on a Conifer Invaded State.
This community phase is commonly dominated by Rocky Mountain juniper. In some cases, it may be dominated by other juniper species and/or ponderosa pine. The community results from extended periods of no fire, often in association with long-term non-use or very light grazing. Associated plants can be quite variable in composition and production depending upon juniper age, size, density, and other factors but may include other woody species such as common juniper, creeping juniper, eastern red cedar, chokecherry, silver sagebrush, prairie rose, western snowberry, and silver buffaloberry. The herbaceous component is also quite variable, perhaps including exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass) as well as white sagebrush, white heath aster, common yarrow, and bluebell bellflower.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
This is the transition from the State 1: Reference State to the State 2: Native/Invaded State due to the introduction and establishment of exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass) or exotic forbs (e.g., leafy spurge). This transition was inevitable and corresponded to a decline in native warm-season and cool-season grasses; it may have been exacerbated by chronic season- long or heavy late season grazing. Other factors could also have hastened the transition. The threshold between states was crossed when Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, or other exotic plants became established on the site.
Constraints to recovery. Current knowledge and technology will not facilitate a successful restoration to Reference State.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
This transition from the State 2: Native/Invaded State to State 3: Invaded State results from heavy continuous grazing on adjacent sites and/or livestock activity (e.g., trailing, feeding, adjacent water facility, etc.), with or without drought and no fire, which leads to decadent green ash and an understory dominated by exotic herbaceous species.
Constraints to recovery. Variations in growing conditions will influence effects of various management activities on the exotic herbaceous understory.
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4
This is the transition from the State 2: Native/Invaded State to State 4: Conifer Invaded State due to invasion by Rocky Mountain juniper. It often occurs with long-term non-use or very light grazing, and no fire, where there is a local population of Rocky Mountain juniper.
Constraints to recovery. The extended fire interval may make recovery doubtful due to the abundance of exotic cool-season grasses and lack of native grasses. Fire intensity along with consumption of available fuels may cause incomplete or patchy burns. Ladder fuel and/or fuel loading are required for successfully controlling ponderosa pine (crown vs. ground fire). Continued recruitment of seeds (juniper and pine) from adjacent sites will hamper site restoration. Constraints to recovery include reticence to undertake tree removal and the perception that trees may be a desirable vegetation component for wildlife habitat, carbon sequestration, aesthetics, etc. Managing the site for mule deer, big horn sheep, livestock, or grassland nesting birds will need to consider the intensive management required to restore and maintain the site in State 2. The disturbance regime necessary to restore this site to State 2: Native/Invaded State is very labor intensive and costly; therefore, addressing woody removal earlier in the encroachment phase is the most cost-effective treatment for woody control.
Transition T3A
State 3 to 4
This is the transition from the State 3: Invaded State to State 4: Conifer Invaded State due to invasion by Rocky Mountain juniper. It often occurs with long-term non-use or very light grazing, and no fire, where there is a local population of Rocky Mountain juniper.
Constraints to recovery. The extended fire interval may make recovery doubtful due to the abundance of exotic cool-season grasses and lack of native grasses. Fire intensity along with consumption of available fuels may cause incomplete or patchy burns. Ladder fuel and/or fuel loading are required for successfully controlling ponderosa pine (crown vs. ground fire). Continued recruitment of seeds (juniper and pine) from adjacent sites will hamper site restoration. Constraints to recovery include reticence to undertake tree removal and the perception that trees may be a desirable vegetation component for wildlife habitat, carbon sequestration, aesthetics, etc. Managing the site for mule deer, big horn sheep, livestock, or grassland nesting birds will need to consider the intensive management required to restore and maintain the site in State 2. The disturbance regime necessary to restore this site to State 2: Native/Invaded State is very labor intensive and costly; therefore, addressing woody removal earlier in the encroachment phase is the most cost-effective treatment for woody control.
Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 2
This restoration pathway from State 4: Conifer Invaded State to State 2: Native/Invaded State may occur with a stand replacing fire or prescribed burning with/without mechanical treatment.
Context dependence. Fire intensity along with consumption of available fuels may cause incomplete or patchy burns. Ladder fuel and/or fuel loading are required for successfully controlling ponderosa pine (crown vs. ground fire). Continued recruitment of juniper seeds from adjacent sites will hamper site restoration. Intensive management is required to restore and maintain the site in State 2: Native/Invaded State.
Additional community tables
Interpretations
Animal community
Wildlife Interpretations
Landscape:
The MLRA 58C landscape is characterized by moderately dissected rolling plains with areas of local Badlands, buttes, and isolated hills. MLRA 58C is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are common and characteristic of the MLRA. This area supports natural mixed-grass prairie vegetation with prairie rose, leadplant, and patches of western snowberry interspersed throughout the area. Green ash, chokecherry, and buffaloberry occur in draws and narrow valleys, creating woody riparian corridors. Complex/intermingled ecological sites create diverse grass- and shrubland habitats interspersed with varying densities linear, slope, depressional, and in-stream wetlands associated with headwater streams and tributaries to the Missouri River. These habitats provide critical life-cycle components for many wildlife species.
Historic Communities/Conditions within MLRA 58C:
The northern mixed-grass prairie was a disturbance-driven ecosystem with fire, herbivory, and climate functioning as the primary ecological drivers (either singly or often in combination). Many species of grassland birds, small mammals, insects, reptiles, amphibians, and large herds of Audubon bighorn sheep, roaming bison, elk, and pronghorn were historically among the inhabitants adapted to this semi-arid region. Bighorn sheep have been re-introduced. Roaming herbivores, as well as several small mammal and insect species, were the primary consumers linking the grassland resources to large predators (such as the wolf, mountain lion, and grizzly bear) and smaller carnivores (such as the coyote, bobcat, red fox, and raptors). The black-tailed prairie dog was once abundant and provided ecological services by manipulating the plant and soil community providing habitat for the black-footed ferret, burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, mountain plover, swift fox, small mammals, and amphibians and reptiles. Extirpated species include free-ranging American bison, Canada lynx, common raven, grizzly bear, gray wolf, black-footed ferret, mountain plover, and peregrine falcon (breeding). Extinct from the region is the Rocky Mountain locust.
Present Communities/Conditions within MLRA 58C:
Following European influence, domestic livestock grazing, elimination of fire, energy development, and other anthropogenic factors influenced plant community composition and abundance. Transportation corridors, energy development, and Rocky Mountain juniper and ponderosa pine encroachment are the main factors contributing to habitat fragmentation, reducing habitat quality for area-sensitive species. These influences fragmented the landscape, reduced or eliminated ecological drivers (fire), and introduced exotic plant species including smooth brome, crested wheatgrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and leafy spurge further impacting plant and animal communities. The loss of the bison, reduction of black-tailed prairie dogs, and fire, as primary ecological drivers, greatly influenced the character of the remaining native plant communities and the associated wildlife moving towards a less diverse and more homogeneous landscape, lacking diverse species composition and stature.
Extensive fragmentation by annual cropping has not occurred within the MLRA. Limited fragmentation from annual cropping or tame hay production has occurred within the Little Missouri River flood plain and the higher, flat plateaus. Fragmentation east and west of MLRA 58C has funneled many species into this area in search of expansive grasslands.
Some wildlife species in this area are: mule deer, white-tailed deer, elk, bighorn sheep, pronghorn, mountain lion, coyote, red fox, bobcat, prairie rattlesnake, American badger, raccoon, North American porcupine, beaver, striped skunk, American mink, white-tailed jackrabbit, black-tailed prairie dog, Eastern and Merriam’s wild turkey, golden eagle, ferruginous hawks, sharp-tailed grouse, greater sage-grouse, black-billed magpie, and numerous species of grassland-nesting birds and pollinating insects. The highest diversity of bats in North Dakota also occurs in this MLRA, where eleven species have been documented.
Presence of wildlife species is often determined by ecological site characteristics including grass and forb species, hydrology, aspect, and other associated ecological sites. Home ranges for most species are larger than one ecological site or are dependent on more than one ecological site for annual life requisites. Ecological sites offer different habitat elements as the annual life requisites change. Habitat improvement and creation must be conducted within the mobility limits of a known population for the species.
Insects play an important role providing ecological services for plant community development. Insects that are scavengers or aid in decomposition provide the food chain baseline sustaining the carnivorous insects feeding upon them. Many insects provide the ecological services necessary for pollination, keeping plant communities healthy and productive. Insects provide a protein food source for numerous species including grassland nesting birds and their young.
Species unique to the MLRA:
Mountain Lions: Mountain lions were relatively common in the Badlands but disappeared from the state by the early 20th Century. Sightings resumed in the 1950’s and have subsequently increased since that time. The species has recently taken up permanent residency within the region. Mountain lions occur in of the Little Missouri Badlands and woody habitat in MLRA 58C. Rugged terrain and forest provide excellent stalking cover to hunt large mammals and other prey. Mountain lions make use of caves for escape and loafing cover.
Bighorn sheep: Bighorn sheep make use of the rugged terrain, rocky outcrops, and high plateaus of MLRA 58C along the Little Missouri River. North Dakota bighorn sheep populations are almost exclusively within MLRA 58C. Bighorn sheep were once extirpated from North Dakota but were successfully reintroduced in the mid-twentieth century. They now occur in several distinct populations within MLRA 58C. Rocky Mountain juniper encroachment degrades the limited habitat for bighorn sheep. Managers should consider bighorn sheep association with domestic sheep, since transfer of pneumonia and other diseases is known to occur.
Golden eagle: The badlands within MLRA 58C are key areas for Golden eagle nesting. Adjacent grasslands, shrublands, and black-tailed prairie dog towns are used for hunting.
Bats: MLRA 58C provides life requisites for several bat species, in part due to presence of riparian forest, wooded draws, caves, and rocky outcrops. Hibernacula of six bat species have been found in MRLA 58C; however, additional work is needed to further understand utilization of hibernacula by bats during the winter months in North Dakota.
Short-horned lizard and sagebrush lizard: This MLRA provides preferred habitat for these two species. The short-horned lizard prefers semi-arid, shortgrass prairie in rough terrain, and is uncommon to locally abundant in MLRA 58C. The rare sagebrush lizard prefers sagebrush and rocky areas provided by this MLRA and adjacent MLRA 58D.
Greater sage-grouse and Brewer’s sparrow: The extreme southwest extension of MLRA 58C have ecological sites capable of producing sufficient big sage canopy cover to provide greater sage-grouse life requisites. MLRA 58C and 58D are the only MLRAs in North Dakota that support Wyoming big sage brush (big sage) production. Research data indicates greater sage-grouse prefer big sagebrush canopy cover for nesting at ≥8% with an average height of around 16 inches. The species prefers winter cover canopy that averages 15% with an average height of around 8 inches. Soil site potential, management, climate, and other factors all play a role in the amount, if any, of big sagebrush on an ecological site. Changes in big sage canopy cover occur slowly (30-50 years) unless the site is impacted by fire or cultivation. Big sage recovery after a burn can take 30 to 100 years. Greater sage- grouse and Brewer’s sparrow habitat and populations are reduced or eliminated when big sagebrush canopy is reduced to less than 8% for greater sage-grouse and 10% cover for Brewer’s sparrow. As conifer encroachment increases, greater sage-grouse lekking activity decreases. Once conifer encroachment exceeds 4% canopy cover, no leks remain.
Species of Concern within the MLRA:
Following is a list of species considered “species of conservation priority” in the North Dakota State Wildlife Action Plan (2015); “species of greatest conservation need” in the Montana State Wildlife Action Plan (2015); and species listed as “threatened, endangered, or petitioned” under the Endangered Species Act within MLRA 58C at the time this section was developed:
Invertebrates: Dakota skipper, monarch butterfly, regal fritillary, yellow-banded bumble bee, and western bumble bee.
Birds: American kestrel, Baird’s sparrow, bald eagle, black-billed cuckoo, bobolink, Brewer’s sparrow, burrowing owl, chestnut-collared longspur, common poorwill, eastern screech-owl ferruginous hawk, golden eagle, grasshopper sparrow, greater sage-grouse, lark bunting, loggerhead shrike, long-billed curlew, marbled godwit, McCown’s longspur, mountain plover, northern harrier, northern pintail, peregrine falcon (migration), prairie falcon, red knot (migration), red-headed woodpecker, sharp-tailed grouse, short-eared owl, Sprague’s pipit, Swainson’s hawk, upland sandpiper, western meadowlark, Wilson’s phalarope, whooping crane (migration), and willet.
Mammals: Big brown bat, black-footed ferret, black-tailed prairie dog, dwarf shrew, gray wolf, hispid pocket mouse, little brown bat, long-eared bat, long-legged bat, meadow jumping mouse, Merriam’s shrew, northern long-eared bat, porcupine, sagebrush vole, swift fox, Townsend’s big- eared bat, and western small-footed bat.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Common snapping turtle, Great Plains toad, greater short-horned lizard, milk snake, northern leopard frog, plains hognose snake, plains spadefoot, sagebrush lizard, smooth softshell, smooth green snake, and spiny softshell.
Fish and Mussels: Blue sucker, burbot, Flathead chub, northern redbelly dace, sickle-fin chub, pearl dace, shortnose gar, sturgeon chub, and sauger.
Steep-Sided Wooded Draw Wildlife Interpretation:
Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological sites, commonly known as woody, hardwood, wooded, or green ash draws support a diverse structure of trees and shrubs with a minor understory of grasses. The Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site provides a connection between Flat Bottom Wooded Draw, Riparian Complex, and Loamy Overflow ecological sites. These forested associations form a dendritic pattern extending into herbaceous uplands.
Forest associations - created where Steep-Sided Wooded Draws are found adjacent to Flat Bottomed Wooded Draws and Loamy Overflow - provide excellent loafing, escape, and winter cover for small and large herbivores and excellent year-round habitat for elk and deer (white-tailed and mule). These sites provide nesting habitat for many migratory passerines and excellent winter cover for sharp-tailed grouse, eastern screech owl, great horned owl, wild turkey, and non-migrating passerine birds (such as black-capped chickadee and white-breasted nuthatch).
Steep-Sided Wooded Draws are usually associated with Flat Bottom Wooded Draws - typically expressed as woody travel corridors. Wild turkey, deer, elk, small mammals, passerine birds, etc., use this ecological site to move across the landscape for food, cover, and water. Steep-Sided Wooded Draws also occur as detached woody blocks on steep slopes (9 to 50 percent) in concave or convex landscape positions providing excellent loafing, escape, and winter cover for small and large herbivores. Steep-Sided Wooded Draws associated with Flat Bottom Wooded Draws augment expansive year-round habitat for elk and deer.
Steep-Sided Wooded Draws do not support big sagebrush; therefore, it is not appropriate to manage these sites for big sagebrush. Greater sage-grouse do not utilize these sites for foraging, loafing, or winter habitat. Ecological sites associated with the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw sites in MLRA 58C include Claypan, Limy Residual, Loamy, Loamy Overflow, Very Shallow, Shallow Loamy, Flat Bottom Wooded Draw, and Badland. In combination, these sites provide a landscape generally dominated by grassland with intermingled woody draws. Historically these sites provided woodland edge vegetation adjacent to grassland.
This ecological site exists in four plant community states (1.0 Reference, 2.0 Native/Invaded, 3.0 Invaded, and 4.0 Conifer Invaded) within a local landscape. Multiple plant community phases occur in State 1.0 and 2.0. Today, these states occur primarily in response to grazing, above or below average precipitation, and Rocky Mountain juniper invasion. Secondary influences include anthropogenic disturbances such as energy development and fire.
It is important to intensively manage, using tools in the Community Phase Pathways of State 1.0, to prevent further plant community degradation. When degradation occurs along Transitional Pathways T2B, or T3A, the plant community crosses the threshold to Conifer Invaded State 4.0. Success along Restoration Pathway R4A State 2.0 is very difficult; it is dependent upon a stand replacing fire or mechanical treatment and prescribed fire. Mechanical treatment may only be possible on lower gradient slopes.
Management goals along community phase, transition, or restoration pathways should focus on attainable changes. Short- and long-term monetary costs must be evaluated against short- and long- term ecological services in creating and maintaining vegetative communities of sufficient quality to support sustainable wildlife populations.
1.0 Reference State
Community Phase 1.1 Green Ash/Chokecherry (Multi-Age Class):
This plant community offers quality vegetative cover for wildlife; every effort should be made to maintain the Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological site within this community phase. Multi-aged and multi-layered deciduous trees (such as green ash, American elm, and boxelder) and shrubs (such as chokecherry, American plum, western snowberry, and Saskatoon serviceberry) dominate this site. This phase only occurs where infrequent disturbances (grazing, drought, fire, etc.) permit establishment and growth of green ash seedlings in the herbaceous layer. Prescribed grazing, with adequate recovery periods, as well as prescribed burning will sustain high functionality.
These wooded draws are an important habitat type used by many large herbivorous mammals. Multi- level canopy, high edge-to-area ratio, and prevalence of preferred forage species provides high quality wildlife vegetative associations. Wooded draws within MLRA 58C, such as those in Community Phase 1.1, receive various levels of seasonal use by American bison (Theodore Roosevelt National Park), Rocky Mountain elk, and deer. In general, wooded draws provide important travel corridors, security cover, foraging, loafing, and parturition (birthing) areas.
Invertebrates: Dominated by early season flowering shrubs, pollinating insects will need adjacent herbaceous- and forb-dominated ecological sites for mid- to late-season pollen sources. Lower trophic-level consumers (such as invertebrate decomposers, scavengers, shredders, predators, herbivores, dung beetles, and fungal-feeders) will use woody plant material, leaves, and limited amounts of grasses in contact and mineral soil. The woody component of this site is not conducive to use by the Dakota skipper, regal fritillary, or monarch butterfly. Woody plant material is available for wood-nesting bees. These wind-protected, moist plant communities provide favorable habitat for flying insects (flies, mosquitoes, moths, etc.). Favorable climatic conditions can lead to large hatches of insects providing forage.
Birds: This site does not provide habitat requisites for grassland-nesting bird species due the dominance of woody vegetation. Bird species that use and benefit from woodland edge (such as wild turkey, black-billed cuckoo, red-headed woodpecker, black-capped chickadee, gray catbird, and loggerhead shrike) can be found in this community phase. These sites provide quality winter thermal cover for sharp-tailed grouse. Wildlife use increases as the depth of snow increases during the winter, thereby becoming critical to the sustainment of winter resident bird populations. The presence of woody plant species may increase mammalian and avian predation and may increase brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds on adjacent grassland ecological sites.
Mammals: Nearly all bat species use Community Phase 1.1 for roost sites and forage. Small herbivores that can use or tolerate woodland edge (such as least chipmunks, American porcupine, and cotton-tail rabbit) will benefit from this plant community phase.
Shrubs and trees provide security and thermal cover used by elk and deer and for foraging, loafing, and rearing young-of-the-year. Multi-layer shrub/tree communities provide concealment protection from predators during parturition. Plant species provide highly nutritious forage during peak lactation, one of the most energy-demanding time periods of the year for female ungulates.
Elk utilizes Community Phase 1.1 as a source of cover during daylight hours - only emerging early/late in the day to forage in adjacent grasslands - then returning to the relative security provided by this plant community to ruminate and loaf during daylight hours. At times of drought, elk forage heavily on western snowberry found within Community Phase 1.1.
Deer utilize Community Phase 1.1 as primary foraging areas during all seasons of the year. Research at Theodore Roosevelt National Park found utilization of chokecherry and western snowberry by mule deer peaks during the fall accounting for 20 to 25 percent of their total dietary intake. In addition, mule deer also utilize rose, gooseberry, and Saskatoon serviceberry during the growing season. Winter white-tailed deer diets are dominated by chokecherry, western snowberry, Saskatoon serviceberry, rose, and various species of gooseberry. However, utilization of green ash as a forage by elk and deer was minimal, accounting for <3 percent total dietary intake during all seasons.
Amphibians and Reptiles: This ecological site and associated plant communities provides limited habitat for smooth green snakes. This ecological site can provide habitat for the northern leopard frog and Great Plains toad if freshwater habitats (such as stock water ponds) are located in or adjacent to the site. Dominated by woody species, this site provides limited habitat for sagebrush lizard, short-horned lizard, plains hog-nosed snake, and plains spadefoot.
Fish and Mussels: Detached Steep-Sided Wooded Draws have little effect on streams, rivers, or water bodies. However, this ecological site is usually associated with Flat Bottom Wooded Draws, which are directly associated with streams, rivers, or water bodies. When associated with Flat Bottom Wooded Draws, this site receives run-on water from adjacent ecological sites. Management on Steep-Sided Wooded Draw sites, in conjunction with neighboring run-on sites, has a direct effect on aquatic species in streams and/or tributaries or water bodies. Optimum hydrologic function and nutrient cycling limit potential for sediment yield and nutrient loading to the adjacent aquatic ecosystems.
Community Phase 1.2 Green Ash/Chokecherry/Herbaceous Understory:
Multiyear or short-term drought, coupled with low-intensity fires, reduces or eliminates green ash recruitment. As drought continues, the severity of a fire is reduced due to a lack of fine fuels. This community still offers quality woodland edge vegetation; every effort should be made to maintain this ecological site within the 1.0 Reference State. A predominance of woody species favors browsing ungulates and migratory and resident birds which depend upon some degree of woody vegetation to fulfill life requisites.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 1.3 Chokecherry/Herbaceous Understory:
Several years of above-average precipitation leads to high amounts of fine fuels setting up conditions for moderate- to high-intensity fire. Fire largely eliminates green ash in the understory layer and reduces the density in the tree layer. Green ash that survives fire would likely occur as multi-stemmed trees.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, a reduction in the tree and shrub canopy will increase sunlight to the shrub and herbaceous layer, increasing nectar opportunities for pollinating insects. Increased sunlight may reduce soil moisture which is preferred by some ground- dwelling invertebrates.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, a reduction or complete loss of green ash and other trees will impact canopy-nesting species. Cavity-nesting bird species may benefit from remaining decadent trees. The presence of snags or live trees with patches of decay or cavities from limb breakage will determine cavity-nesting bird use. Cavity-nesting bird species use existing natural or excavated cavities, or they build their own.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, elk habitat may be impacted with a reduction of the tree canopy as a source of cover during daylight hours. Forage for elk and deer may increase as western snowberry increases.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, increased sunlight may promote use by some reptiles.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
2.0 Native/Invaded State
Community Phase 2.1 Green Ash/Chokecherry (Multi-Age Class):
Similar in appearance to Community Phase 1.1, this plant community phase is characterized by a presence of cool-season exotic grasses, such as Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 2.2 Chokecherry/Exotic Herbaceous Understory:
Similar in appearance to Community Phase 1.3, this plant community phase is characterized by a decreasing presence of green ash in the herbaceous, shrub, and eventually the sapling layers. In this phase, chokecherry dominates the sapling, shrub, and herbaceous layers. This state has been invaded by exotic cool-season grasses and forbs including Kentucky bluegrass (<10 percent), smooth brome, Canada thistle, leafy spurge, etc. Kentucky bluegrass sod and thatch inhibits seed/soil contact, impacting green ash seedling recruitment, and restoration potential.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3.
3.0 Invaded State
Community Phase 3.1 Decadent Green Ash/Chokecherry/Exotic Herbaceous Understory: This state often develops in association with heavy continuous grazing on adjacent sites, or when livestock activity on this site significantly impacts the woody vegetation. Green ash recruitment is reduced or eliminated and chokecherry, along with other shrubs, may be trampled. Scattered, decadent green ash exists in the tree layer, but no longer as saplings. Exotic herbaceous species begin to dominate.
Invertebrates: Increased livestock use reduces availability of pollinator species for nectar and pollen. Increased livestock compaction may reduce site availability for ground-nesting bees.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.3; however, increased livestock use reduces use of this plant community bird species.
Mammals: Thermal, loafing, and escape cover has been significantly reduced or eliminated for most mammal species.
Amphibians and Reptiles: This plant community phase provides limited life requisites for most amphibians and reptiles.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
4.0 Conifer Invaded State
Community Phase 4.1 Juniper-Pine:
This phase results from Transitional Pathways T2B and T3A with the continued lack of fire and the presence of a conifer seed source (e.g., Rocky Mountain juniper, ponderosa pine) from a nearby site; conifers will invade this site and eventually dominate the site. This phase is dependent upon seed dispersal by birds and mammals from nearby sites. A dense stand of conifers leads to changes in soil chemistry and a change in the associated herbaceous plant community. A detritus layer of juniper needles, shade, a shallow root system, and interception of precipitation with a possible soil chemistry change (decrease in pH), can reduce or eliminate an herbaceous or forb understory. A stand- replacing fire is required to move this plant community to State 2.0 (via Restoration Pathway R4A).
Invertebrates: Flowering shrubs, such as chokecherry and silver buffaloberry, are outcompeted by conifers (mainly Rocky Mountain juniper). Depending upon the degree of dominance by Rocky Mountain juniper, pollinating insects will only be supported if flowering shrubs or forbs remain within or on the edge of the plant community.
Birds: Dominated by Rocky Mountain juniper, some canopy-dwelling/nesting birds will benefit. Lack of shrub and sapling layer will limit use by forest-edge bird species that depend upon forest understory.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, the reduction of the shrub understory reduces browse availability for deer and thermal cover for other large and small mammals.
Amphibians/Reptiles: This plant community phase provides limited life requisites for most amphibians and reptiles.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Grazing Interpretations
Due to site conditions (e.g., steep slopes, limited forage production, etc.), grazing on this site is limited. Therefore, grazing management efforts should be concentrated on adjacent sites and should be applied that enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species. This may include: (1) grazing when exotic cool-season grasses are actively growing and native cool-season grasses are dormant; (2) applying proper deferment periods allowing native grasses to recover and maintain or improve vigor; (3) adjusting overall grazing intensity to reduce excessive plant litter (above that needed for rangeland health indicator #14 – see Rangeland Health Reference Worksheet); (4) incorporating early heavy spring utilization which focuses grazing pressure on exotic cool-season grasses and reduces plant litter provided that livestock are moved when grazing selection shifts from exotic cool-season grasses to native grasses.
Grazing levels are noted within the plant community narratives and pathways in reference to grazing management on adjacent sites. “Degree of utilization” is defined as the proportion of the current years forage production that is consumed and/or destroyed by grazing animals (may refer to a single plant species or a portion or all the vegetation). “Grazing utilization” is classified as slight, moderate, full, close, and severe (see the following table for description of each grazing use category). The following utilization levels are also described in the Ranchers Guide to Grassland Management IV. Utilization levels are determined by using the landscape appearance method as outlined in the Interagency Technical Reference “Utilization Studies and Residual Measurements” 1734-3.
Utilization Level:
Slight (Light) 0-20% Appears practically undisturbed when viewed obliquely. Only choice areas and forage utilized.
Moderate 20-40% Almost all of accessible range shows grazing. Little or no use of poor forage. Little evidence of trailing to grazing.
Full 40-60% All fully accessible areas are grazed. The major sites have key forage species properly utilized (about half taken, half left). Points of concentration with overuse limited to 5 to 10 percent of accessible area.
Close (Heavy) 60-80% All accessible range plainly shows use and major sections closely cropped. Livestock forced to use less desirable forage, considering seasonal preference.
Severe > 80% Key forage species completely used. Low-value forages are dominant.
Hydrological functions
Water is the principal factor limiting herbage production on this site. The site is dominated by soils in hydrologic group B. Infiltration is moderate or moderately slow; runoff potential is medium or high or depending on slope percent and ground cover. In many cases, areas with greater than 75% ground cover have the greatest potential for high infiltration and lower runoff. An exception would be where short grasses form a dense sod and dominate the site. Areas where ground cover is less than 50% have the greatest potential to have reduced infiltration and higher runoff (refer to Section 4, NRCS National Engineering Handbook for runoff quantities and hydrologic curves).
Recreational uses
The largest acreage of public land available for recreation in the MLRA is owned and managed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) within the Little Missouri National Grasslands in North Dakota (525,211 acres). These areas are available for hunting, fishing, hiking, camping, horse and bike riding, nature viewing, etc. In addition, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages 30,895 acres in North Dakota and Montana with the same recreational opportunities as the USFS lands. North Dakota and Montana Department of Trust Lands (80,220 acres) provide hunting, bird watching, hiking, and other outdoor recreation opportunities. North Dakota Wildlife Management Areas (3,447 acres) of land managed by the states for wildlife habitat in MLRA 58C.
MLRA 58C is home to the North and South Units of Theodore Roosevelt National Park. The Park encompasses approximately 70,000 acres and welcomes approximately 900,000 visitors annually. 29,920 acres of the park is designated Wilderness Area. The south unit of the park has a 48-mile scenic drive while the north unit has a 28-mile scenic drive. The Badland and associated ecological sites provide the main scenery attraction.
Bird watching: Public and private grasslands within MLRA 58C provide essential habitat for prairie-dependent bird species (such as Sprague's pipits, western meadowlark, and Baird's sparrow) along with some of the larger, showy members of the upland prairie including marbled godwits, upland sandpipers, and willets. The abundance of publicly owned lands (such as Theodore Roosevelt National Park, USFS, North Dakota Department of Trust Lands, BLM, etc.) provide excellent birding opportunities. MLRA 58C is in the Central Flyway.
Hunting/Fishing: MLRA 58C is a fall destination for upland game bird hunters, especially sharp-tailed grouse. This MLRA also provides excellent white-tailed deer, mule deer, pronghorn, elk, coyote, and mountain lion hunting opportunities along with the only bighorn sheep hunting units in the North Dakota. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department manages three man-made fishing lakes within the MLRA. Available species include rainbow and brown trout, bluegill, and largemouth and smallmouth bass.
Camping: Many camping opportunities exist in the MLRA. Modern and primitive camping is available at the Theodore Roosevelt National Park, Sully’s Creek State Park, Little Missouri State Park, Buffalo Gap Campground, BLM land, and the Dakota Prairie National Grasslands. The Sully’s Creek and Little Missouri State Parks are designated horse parks.
Hiking/Biking: Over 150 miles of the May-Daah-Hey Trail provide some of the best single-track trails in the world for biking, hiking, or horseback riding. The International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) has designated the hiking, biking, and horseback riding trail as EPIC - meaning it’s one of the top mountain biking trails in the United States. The trail has nine fenced campgrounds, each accessible by gravel surfaced roads; they include camping spurs, potable water, hitching rails, picnic tables, fire rings, and accessible toilets. They are spaced about every 20 miles along the trail. The North and South Units of the Theodore Roosevelt National Park provide 38.9 and 49.6 miles, respectively, of hiking trails for walkers, bikers, or horseback riders. The Little Missouri State Park has 45 miles of trails that run through the North Dakota Badlands.
Canoeing: Traversing 274 miles through MLRA 58C, the Little Missouri River provides early spring canoeing and kayaking. The Little Missouri River is the only designated State Scenic River in the MLRA. The river passes through Sully Creek State Park, the Little Missouri National Grassland, and Theodore Roosevelt National Park.
Wood products
Rocky Mountain juniper may be used for fence posts, wood mulch, rails and similar wood products.
Other products
Seed harvest of native plant species can provide additional income on this site.
Other information
Site Development and Testing Plan
Steep-Sided Wooded Draw needs additional production and cover data to more accurately depict the plant communities listed above in collaboration with the USFS.
Established Arikara series is planned to be reclassified according to the collected soil data for Steep- Sided Wooded Draw.
This ESD is the best available knowledge. The site concept and species composition table have been used in the field and tested for more than five years. It is expected that as additional information becomes available revisions may be required.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented here has been derived from NRCS and other federal/state agency clipping and inventory data. Also, field knowledge of range-trained personnel was used. All descriptions were peer reviewed and/or field-tested by various private, state, and federal agency specialists.
Other references
Abbott, P.L., 2004, Natural disasters, New York, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 460 p.
Bakker, K.K. 2003. The effect of woody vegetation on grassland nesting birds: an annotated bibliography. The Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 82:119-141.
Barker, W.T. and W. C. Whitman. 1988. Vegetation of the Northern Great Plains. Rangelands 10: 266-272h
Barnhart, Paul. 2017. Documentation of overwintering bat species presence and hibernacula use in the badlands of North Dakota, Northwestern Naturalist 98(1), 48-56, (1 March 2017). https://doi.org/10.1898/NWN15-34.1.
Bjustad, A. J. 1965. Vegetation measurements in relation to range condition classification on the principal range sites of southwestern North Dakota. Ph.D. Thesis. North Dakota State University.
Bluemle. J.P. 2016. North Dakota’s geologic legacy. North Dakota State University Press. 382 pages.
Brand, M. D. and H. Goetz. 1986. Vegetation of exclosures in southwestern North Dakota. Journal of Range Management 39:434-437.
Briske, D.D. (editor). 2017. Rangeland systems – processes, management, and challenges. Springer Series on Environmental Management. 661 pages.
DeKeyser, S., G. Clambey, K. Krabbenhoft and J. Ostendorf. 2009. Are changes in species composition on central North Dakota rangelands due to non-use management? Rangelands 31:16-19.
Dodd, J.L. 1970. Distribution and community site relations of bluebunch wheatgrass in North Dakota. Ph.D. Thesis. North Dakota State University.
Dyke, S. R., S. K. Johnson, and P.T. Isakson. 2015. North Dakota state wildlife action plan – North Dakota Game and Fish Department.
Ehrenfeld, J.G. 2002. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503- 523.
Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; designation of critical habitat for the Dakota skipper and Poweshiek skipperling; Vol. 79 No. Final Rule October 1, 2015, 50 CFR Part 17.
Ereth, C., J. Hendrickson, D. Kirby, E. DeKeyser, K. Sedevic, and M. West. Controlling Kentucky bluegrass with herbicide and burning is influenced by invasion level. Invasive Plant Science and Management 10:80-89.
Flesland, J.R. 1964. Composition and structure of the salt-desert shrub type in the badlands of western North Dakota. M.S. Thesis. North Dakota State University.
Gilgert, W.; and S. Zack. 2010. Integrating multiple ecosystem services introduction ecological site descriptions. Rangelands 32:49-54.
Gillam, Erin. Distribution and habitat use of the bats of North Dakota, Final Report, T2-5-R Bat Survey Final Report 2012_0.pdf (nd.gov).
Grant, T.A. and R.K. Murphy. 2005. Changes on woodland cover on prairie refuges in North Dakota, USA. Natural Areas Journal 25:359-368.
Hanson, H.C and W. Whitman. 1938. Characteristics of major grassland types in western North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 8:57-114.
Heitschmidt, R. K., K. D. Klement, and M. R. Haferkamp. 2005. Interactive effects of drought and grazing on Northern Great Plains rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:11-19.
Hendrickson, J.R., P. S. Johnson, M. A. Liebig, K. K. Sedivec, and G. A. Halvorson. 2016. Use of ecological sites in managing wildlife and livestock: an example with prairie dogs. Rangelands 38:23-28.
Higgins, K.F. 1984. Lightning fires in North Dakota grasslands and in pine-savanna lands of South Dakota and Montana. Journal of Range Management 37:100-103.
Higgins, K.F. 1986. Interpretation and compendium of historical fire accounts in the northern great plains. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Resource Publication 161. 39 pages.
Higgins, K. F., A. D. Kruse, and J. L. Piehl. 1987. Effects of fire in the northern Great Plains. South Dakota State University Extension Circular Paper 429.
High Plains Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska. http://hprcc.unl.edu, Accessed on May 1, 2017.
Hirsch, K.L. 1985. Habitat type classification of grasslands and shrublands of southwestern North Dakota. Ph.D. Thesis. North Dakota State University.
Johnson, S. 2015. Reptiles and amphibians of North Dakota. North Dakota Game and Fish Department. 64 pages.
Jordan, N. R., D.L. Larson, and S.C. Huerd. 2008. Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biological Invasions 10:177-190.
Mader, E., M. Shepherd, M. Vaughan, and S.H. Black. 2011. Attracting native pollinators: protecting North America's bees and butterflies. Accessed at https://xerces.org, May 1, 2017.
Montana’s State Wildlife Action Plan. 2015. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Viewed at https://xerces.org/ on May 1, 2017.
North Dakota Division of Tourism, Accessed on February 25, 2019. Available at https://www.ndtourism.com/sports-recreation
North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, Accessed on February 25, 2019. Available at http://www.parkrec.nd.gov/recreationareas/recreationareas.html
Palit, R., G. and E.S. DeKeyser. 2022. Impacts and drivers of smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyes.) invasion in native ecosystems. Plants: 10,3390. http://http://http://http://https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/10/1340
Palit, R., G. Gramig, and E.S. DeKeyser. 2021. Kentucky bluegrass invasion in the Northern Great Plains and prospective management approaches to mitigate its spread. Plants: 10,817. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040817
Printz, J.L. and J.R. Hendrickson. 2015. Impacts of Kentucky bluegrass invasion (Poa pratensis) on ecological processes in the Northern Great Plains. Rangelands 37:226-232.
Redmann, R.E. 1975. Production ecology of grassland plant communities in western North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 45:83-106.
Reeves, J.L., J.D. Derner, M.A. Sanderson, J.R. Hendrickson, S.L. Kronberg, M.K. Petersen, and L.T. Vermeire. 2014. Seasonal weather influences on yearling beef steer production in C3-dominated Northern Great Plains rangeland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 183:110-117.
Robinson, A.C. 2014. Management plan and conservation strategies for greater sage grouse in North Dakota. North Dakota Game and Fish Department.
Royer, R. A., 2003. Butterflies of North Dakota: an atlas and guide. Minot State University.
Sanford, R.C. 1970. Skunk bush in the North Dakota badlands: ecology, phytosociology, browse production, and utilization. Ph.D. Thesis. North Dakota State University.
Seabloom, R. 2020. Mammals of North Dakota. North Dakota State University Press.
Sedivec, K.K., and J.L. Printz. 2014. Ranchers guide to grassland management IV. North Dakota State University Extension Service publication R1707.
South Dakota Dept. of Game, Fish and Parks. 2014. South Dakota wildlife action plan. Wildlife Division Report 2014-03.
Spaeth, K.E., Hayek, M.A., Toledo, D., and Hendrickson, J. 2019. Cool season grass impacts on native mixed grass prairie species in the Northern Great Plains. America’s Grassland Conference: Working Across Boundaries. The Fifth Biennial Conference on the Conservation of America’s Grasslands. Bismarck, ND. 20- 22 August.
Steffens, Tim, G. Grisson, M. Barnes, F. Provenza, and R. Roath. Adaptive grazing management for recovery. Know why you’re moving from paddock to paddock. Rangelands 35(5):28–34
Tidwell, D., D.T. Fogarty, and J.R. Weir. 2021. Woody encroachment in grasslands, a guide for understanding risk and vulnerability. Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Publication E- 1054. 32 pages.
Toledo, D., M. Sanderson, K. Spaeth, J. Hendrickson, and J. Printz. 2014. Extent of Kentucky bluegrass and its effect on native plant species diversity and ecosystem services in the Northern Great Plains of the United State. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7:543-552.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
USDA, NRCS. National Water and Climate Center. (http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)
USDA, NRCS. National range and pasture handbook, September 1997.
USDA, NRCS. National Soil Information System, Information Technology Center. Accessed on May 1, 2017 at http://nasis.nrcs.usda.gov.
USDA, NRCS. 2001. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed May 2, 2017.
USDA, NRCS. 2021. Species diversification of crested wheatgrass dominated grasslands: a review of methods. Plant Materials Technical Note No. MT-126 November 2021.
USDA, NRCS, Various published soil surveys.
USDI BLM. Utilization studies and residual measurements. Interagency Technical Reference 1734-3. 1999.
Vinton, M.A. and E.M. Goergen. 2006. Plant-soil feedbacks contribute to the persistence of Bromus inermis in tallgrass prairie. Ecosystems 9:967-976.
Whitman, W., H. Hanson, and R. Peterson. 1943. Relation of drought and grazing to North Dakota rangelands. North Dakota Agricultural Experimentation Bulletin 320.
Zaczkowski, N. K. 1972. Vascular flora of Billings, Bowman, Golden Valley, and Slope counties, North Dakota. Ph.D. Thesis, North Dakota State University.
Zimmerman, G. M. 1981. Effects of fire upon selected plant communities in the little Missouri badlands. M.S. Thesis, North Dakota State University.
Contributors
ND NRCS: David Dewald, Johnthan Fettig, Alan Gulsvig, Mark Hayek, Jeanne Heilig, John Kempenich, Chuck Lura, Jeff Printz, Steve Sieler, and Hal Weiser.
Approval
Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 4/21/2025
Acknowledgments
NRCS would like to acknowledge the United State Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS) for access to USFS and NPS properties and technical assistance in ESD development. USFS: Jack Dahl, Nickole Dahl, Chad Prosser, Jack Butler; NPS: Chad Sexton.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 04/21/2025 |
Approved by | Suzanne Mayne-Kinney |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.
T1A | - | Introduction of exotic cool-season grasses and exotic forbs, altered fire frequency |
---|---|---|
T2A | - | Heavy continuous grazing/feeding, with or without drought, no fire |
T2B | - | Long-term non-use or very light grazing and no fire |
T3A | - | Long-term non-use or very light grazing and no fire |
R4A | - | Stand replacing fire; prescribed burning with/without mechanical treatment |
State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A | - | Multiyear drought or short-term drought with fire |
---|---|---|
1.1B | - | Multiyear above average precipitation producing fine fuel load followed by high intensity fire |
1.2A | - | Multiyear average or above average precipitation |
1.3A | - | Return to average precipitation, extended fire intervals |
State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A | - | Multiyear drought or short-term drought with stand replacing fire; heavy season-long grazing |
---|---|---|
2.2A | - | Return to average precipitation, no fire, long-term prescribed grazing |