

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02C063
Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/19/2025
Accessed: 10/19/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 012X, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in Idaho. MLRA 012X is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources, and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mt. Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869 meters). Annual precipitation has a significant range from six to 47 inches, the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly east of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from Salmon, Idaho to the north, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the south, the Beaverhead Mountain Range to the east, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the west. This LRU borders MLRA 043B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 010X - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet). The boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M170 Great Basin-Intermountain Dry Shrubland & Grassland Macrogroup
G308 Intermountain Low & Black Sagebrush Steppe & Shrubland Group
A3222 Black Sagebrush Steppe & Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001424 Black Sagebrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Shrubland Association
Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 Northwestern Forested Mountains
Level II: 10.1 Western Cordillera
Level III: 10.1.4 Middle Rockies
Ecological site concept
The Shallow to Loamy Calcareous 15 to 19 inch Precipitation Zone (SwLyC 15-19") is an upland ecological site with loamy surface textures, limited by soil chemistry in the four to 10 inch (10 to 25 centimeter) section of the soil profile. The site is moderately deep to very deep to restrictions, but shallow to highly calcareous soils. This site does not receive additional water.
These soils:
o Are not saline, saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are moderately deep, deep, or very deep
o Are highly calcareous having greater than 15 percent calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) within the top 10 to 25 centimeters (four to 10 inches) of the soil profile.
The primary limiting factors shaping plant communities for this ecological site involve soil chemistry and moderate relative effective annual precipitation in relation to the LRU. Having highly calcareous soils (greater than 15 percent CCE) within the top 10 to 25 centimeters of the soil profile creates conditions suitable to a specific group of species, specifically in the low sagebrush communities (little and black sagebrush - Artemisia arbuscula and Artemisia nova). Moderate relative effective
annual precipitation at this site may lessen the resource restrictions created by calcareous soils and allows for mountain big sagebrush to establish in communities at the higher end of the precipitation range.
Associated sites
BX012X02B020 |
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also usually found on limestone parent material but in a lower climatic subset (10-14) |
---|---|
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site is also found on limestone parent material. |
BX012X02C068 |
Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be adjacent on the landscape, however has a higher volume of coarse fragments in the soil profile. |
BX012X02C034 |
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found on rock outcroppings and ridges where soil is shallow to bedrock. |
BX012X02C072 |
Steep Skeletal 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found adjacent on slopes greater than 30 percent. |
Similar sites
BX012X02C022 |
Loamy 15 to 19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has similar textures and volume of course fragments within the top 50cm of the soil profile, however, lacks highly calcareous soils at any depth of the soil profile. |
---|---|
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has similar textures and volume of course fragments within the top 50cm, however, calcium carbonate equivalency does not exceed 15% until the 25-50cm section of the soil profile. |
BX012X02C034 |
Rocky Hills 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site often has highly calcareous soils, but it is characterized by outcrops of bedrock close to the surface and the presence of curl leaf mountain mahogany. |
BX012X02B020 |
Limy 10 to 14 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has highly calcareous soils in the 0-10cm portion of the soil profile and only occurs in the 10-14 |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia nova |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XC063ID
Physiographic features
This occurs on mountain slope, canyon wall, moraine, alluvial fan, or outwash terraces within the mountain landscape. The site is not aspect dependent, however, aspect may influence the elevation at which it occurs. Additionally, this site is not influenced by slope percentage but generally occurs on slopes ranging from 15 to 65 percent. Runoff is generally low to moderate and flooding and ponding do not occur.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Canyon wall -- The steep to near vertical slope between an canyon bottom and higher, adjacent hillslopes, mountain slopes, or summits. Canyon walls are generally dominated by rock outcrop and or bedrock within the soil profile.
Moraine -- A mound, ridge or other topographically distinct accumulation of unsorted, unstratified glacial drift, predominantly till, deposited primarily by the direct action of glacial ice in a variety of landforms.
Outwash terrace -- A flat-topped bank of outwash with an abrupt outer face (scarp or riser) extending along a valley downstream from an outwash plain or terminal moraine; a valley train deposit.
Alluvial fan -- A low, outspread mass of loose materials and/or rock material, commonly with gentle slopes, shaped like an open fan or a segment of a cone, deposited by a stream (best expressed in semiarid regions) at the place where it issues from a narrow mountain or upland valley.

Figure 1. Plot showing aspect (degrees) and elevation (meters) of each Shallow to Loamy Calcareous range site surveyed in the Lost River Mountain LRU
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Canyon wall (3) Mountains > Moraine (4) Mountains > Outwash terrace (5) Mountains > Alluvial fan |
---|---|
Runoff class | Negligible to medium |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 6,427 – 7,367 ft |
Slope | 21 – 56% |
Aspect | W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class | Not specified |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | Not specified |
Ponding frequency | Not specified |
Elevation | 5,849 – 8,177 ft |
Slope | 5 – 64% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this Shallow to Loamy Calcareous ecological site, the effective precipitation is 15 to 19 inches. Below 15 inches and above 19 inches, a notable shift will occur in dominant plant community composition, canopy cover, and production value. Because of loamy textures present at this ecological site, higher amounts of available moisture may be present when compared to adjacent ecological sites in the same climatic subset. Because effective precipitation is a modeled value that factors in elevation, aspect, and topography in association with mean annual precipitation, it is often a lower value than actual precipitation. Actual precipitation and temperature data were taken from Snotel stations located on the Lost River and Lemhi Range. Data was taken from Snotel sites that record actual precipitation and sit at a fixed location. Therefore, actual climatic conditions at a given ecological site can vary from data provided based on localized conditions.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 30-60 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 40-65 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 18-27 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 25-75 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 40-85 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 14-31 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 45 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 60 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 21 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this ecological site are moderately deep to very deep, ranging from 20 to greater than 60 inches (50 to 150centimeters) and consist of textures ranging from fine sandy loams to clay loams. Soils can be skeletal (greater than 35 percent coarse fragments) and are primarily formed from slope alluvium and colluvium derived from limestone. Soils are highly calcareous within 4 to 10 inches (15 to 25 centimeter) of the soil surface. This is represented by a calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) greater than 15 percent which is identified by having a pH of 7.8 or greater coupled with an effervescence of strong or higher. These soils are well drained.
Representative Taxonomy:
Loamy-skeletal, carbonatic Typic Calcicryolls
Loamy-skeletal, carbonatic, frigid Typic Calcixerepts
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Calcic Haplocryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Xeric Calcicryepts
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Calcixerepts
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Calcixerolls

Figure 8. pH Values by Horizon in 16 Shallow to Loamy Calcareous 15-19" Sites in the Lost River Mountain LRU

Figure 9. Soil Textures by Horizon in 16 Shallow to Loamy Calcareous 15-19" Sites in the Lost River Mountain LRU

Figure 10. Soil profile of Shallow to Loamy Calcareous Site 2020ID7031162
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
limestone
(2) Colluvium – limestone and dolomite (3) Colluvium – quartzite |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly loam (2) Gravelly silt loam (3) Extremely gravelly loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy-skeletal |
Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
Permeability class | Moderate |
Soil depth | 20 – 60 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 35% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 5% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
2.25 – 2.5 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (4-10in) |
15 – 30% |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
7.8 – 8.2 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
20 – 41% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
8% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Not specified |
---|---|
Permeability class | Moderately slow to moderately rapid |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 37% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 12% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
2.2 – 2.6 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (4-10in) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
7.6 – 8.5 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
7 – 47% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
19% |
Ecological dynamics
The Shallow to Loamy Calcareous ecological site in the 15 to 19 inch precipitation zone is dominated by a black and little sagebrush overstory with a bluebunch wheatgrass understory. The state and transition model consists of three states: Reference, Grazing Resistant, and Disturbed. Within those states are five different communities. The primary driver for state transitions is disturbance. The most common disturbances impacting this ecological site are frequent or severe fire and intensive grazing that results in chronic defoliation of vegetation.
A State-and-Transition Model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the State and Transition Model. This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference State. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the state-and-transition model, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between reference states and degraded states in this ecological site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference

Figure 11. Overstory of Artemisia nova with an understory of Psuedoroegenaria spicata.
The reference state consists of three dominant plant communities: The black sagebrush (Artemisia nova) dominated community, the the mixed early sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. Longiloba) and black sagebrush dominated community, and a community where overstory shrub canopy dominance is usurped by bunchgrasses. The greatest difference between the three plant communities is composition and foliar cover of sagebrush (Artemisia) species, and may include mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. Vasayana). Mountain big sagebrush foliar cover increases on sites that are closer to the high end of the effective precipitation range (15 to 19 inches) and the calcium carbonate equivalency in the soil is lower, closer to minimum 15 percent concentrations outlined in the site concept. Processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that result in state and community changes include fire, grazing, land use change, and occurrence of invasive species (Davies et al., 2011).
Characteristics and indicators. The shift between plant communities at this ecological site is generally driven by calcium carbonate concentration in soils, effective precipitation, and sagebrush killing disturbances or lack thereof. Historically, low to mixed severity fires occurred at relatively frequent fire return intervals of 10 to 25 years, limiting sagebrush canopy density and creating a mosaic of sagebrush stands and more open grasslands (Knick, Holmes, & Miller, 2005). Exclusion of fire (in conjunction with climate change) increases sagebrush canopy cover and can lead to more severe stand replacing fires, often times at more frequent intervals. These severe fires can drive shifts to grassland communities as well as create opportunities for invasive species establishment (Roadhouse, Irvine, & Bowerstock, 2020; Knick et al., 2005). Improper grazing practices can also lead to an increase in sagebrush canopy cover and increased risk of severe, stand replacing fire occurrence. Removal of understory grasses can lessen the opportunities for low severity fires which leads to increased canopy densities and increases potential for severe fire disturbance events (Knick et al., 2005).
Resilience management. This site has moderate to high resilience as a result of the cryic soil temperature regime and xeric soil moisture regime. Resistance and resilience of a specific site has been attributed with abiotic conditions favorable to plant growth and reproduction (Maestas et al. 2016). Soils that fall within the cryic (cold) temperature regime and xeric (wet) moisture regime tend to have higher diversity and production, and are therefore more resilient, specifically in terms of resisting or recovering from invasion post disturbance (Maestas et al., 2016). On the LRU scale, this site may also have increased resistance to invasion of annual grasses due to the calcium carbonate concentration found in the 10 to 25 centimeter range of the soil profile. Calcareous soils have shown to provide a deterrent to establishment of invasive grasses such as Bromus tectorum (Miller et al., 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Dominant resource concerns
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Inadequate livestock water quantity, quality, and distribution
Community 1.1
Black Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 12. Black sagebrush as the dominant overstory with nearly equal canopy cover of bluebunch wheatgrass.
This community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU, specifically when soils are shallow to a restrictive layer such as bedrock, clay, or calcareous soils. Although composition, foliar cover, and production at this ecological site can vary throughout the shrub overstory, black sagebrush tends to occur more often as a singular dominant overstory species. Black sagebrush thrives at dryer sites with soil conditions that create a root restrictive layer. The more pronounced these conditions become, the more likely the community shifts towards a black sagebrush dominated community (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012). At the landscape scale, mosaics between little and black sagebrush dominated sites can represent slight localized differences in soil conditions and effective precipitation (McArthur & Stevens, 2009). This community is drought tolerant and plant mortality is generally low during extended periods of below average precipitation. Black sagebrush communities can form in a mosaic distribution with other communities in this state (1.2 &1.3) across the range of effective precipitation. Black sagebrush dominated communities are more common at the lower end of the effective precipitation range (15 inches), and cover of alkali sagebrush tends to increase towards the upper end of 19 inches. Occasionally, at the upper end of the effective precipitation range, mountain big sagebrush can establish within the black and alkali sagebrush communities (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012). Surveys completed within this state and community had an average foliar cover of black sagebrush of 15 percent and bluebunch wheatgrass at 25 percent. Bluebunch wheatgrass is able establish on this site in openings not occupied by sagebrush. As a result of competition with sagebrush, bluebunch wheatgrass foliar cover decreases as sagebrush cover increases. Sagebrush cover tends to increase over time in the absence of disturbances such as fire, herbivory, or mechanical treatments (Davies, Bates, & O'Connor, 2021). Alternately, as sagebrush cover decreases, bluebunch cover increases resulting in bluebunch wheatgrass/dwarf sagebrush community (1.3).
Resilience management. This community is moderately resilient. Black sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass are both drought tolerant species, increasing their resistance to climate related disturbances such as prolonged periods with below average precipitation. However, with this community generally occurring on the drier end of the 15-19" effective precipitation range, recovery from other disturbances can be slow (Chambers et al., 2014). Slow returns to pre-disturbance conditions can open windows for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Additional resistance to invasion of annual grasses can be attributed to the calcareous soils. Calcareous soils, when high enough in the soil profile have shown to act as a deterrent towards establishment of invasive annual grasses (Miller et al., 2006).
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
Figure 13. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 407 | 422 | 500 |
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 210 | 288 |
Forb | 5 | 10 | 15 |
Total | 562 | 642 | 803 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 3-29% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 23-30% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 27-88% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0.0-1.1% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-31% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-7% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 13-63% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0.0-1.1% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-35% |
Figure 14. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0810, ARNO4/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Little Sagebrush, Black Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Figure 15. Even overstory composition of alkali and black sagebrush with a bluebunch wheatgrass understory.

Like community 1.1, this community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU. As depth and concentration of the calcareous soil layer decreases, the likelihood of a mixed little and black sagebrush overstory increases. Although composition, foliar cover, and production at this ecological site can vary throughout the shrub overstory, little sagebrush density tends to increase towards the higher end of the effective precipitation range (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012). It is not uncommon to find communities within this ecological site dominated by little sage with little to no black sagebrush presence. Where this site enters the transition zone (near the 19 inch effective precipitation zone and calcium carbonate concentrations decrease or are deeper in the soil profile), presence of mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana) becomes more likely. At the landscape scale, mosaics between alkali and black sagebrush dominated sites can represent slight localized differences in soil conditions and effective precipitation (McArthur & Stevens, 2009). This community is drought tolerant and plant mortality is generally low during extended periods of below average precipitation. Mixed little and black sagebrush communities can form in a mosaic distribution with other communities in this state (1.1 & 1.3) across the range of effective precipitation. Little or mixed little and black sagebrush dominated sites are generally more common at the upper end of the effective precipitation range (19 inch) and as depth or strength of restrictive layer becomes less pronounced (Tilley & St. John [2], 2012).
Resilience management. Resilience in community 1.2 is slightly higher than community 1.1. Like black sagebrush, little sagebrush is a drought tolerant species able to withstand periods of below average precipitation. The presence of little sagebrush is often an indicator of a slight localized increase in effective precipitation over the pure stand of black sagebrush that is exhibited in community 1.1. Higher amounts of effective precipitation have been shown to increase resilience in rangeland communities (Chambers et al., 2014). Additionally, increasing biodiversity in the overstory canopy reduces the risk that insect or disease would impact the entire canopy.
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
Figure 16. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 10. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 350 | 388 | 450 |
Shrub/Vine | 125 | 249 | 300 |
Forb | 15 | 26 | 34 |
Total | 490 | 663 | 784 |
Table 11. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 14-28% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 12-35% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-15% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 25-55% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-33% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 1-9% |
Table 12. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-4% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-7% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-5% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 10-45% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-7% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 47-72% |
Figure 17. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0810, ARNO4/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.3
Bluebunch Wheatgrass and Low Sagebrush


This community is characterized by a change in dominant foliar cover from sagebrush (black sagebursh, little sagebrush, or a combination of the two) to a dominant foliar cover of bunchgrasses including bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass. The shift in dominant foliar cover to bunchgrasses can be a result of local site characteristics that allow the bunchgrasses to establish and minimize additional growth of sagebrush, or by a sagebrush mortality event. These events can include fire, flooding, intense freezing periods, insect and disease, or anthropogenic disturbances. These sagebrush mortality events are low to moderate severity, leaving behind enough sagebrush plants to maintain a reduced population and seed source. Severe disturbance events that remove the majority or all of the sagebrush population in an area moves the ecological site into State Three, the Disturbance State. Production values for this community are wide ranging with the ability to outproduce communities 1.1 and 1.2 due to the increased opportunity for bunchgrass establishment. At the high end of the production range in this community (1200 pounds per acre), grasses can account for over half of total production (650 pounds per acre).
Resilience management. This community is moderate to highly resilient when bluebunch wheatgrass dominates the canopy cover and production. Bluebunch wheatgrass is well suited to the variable climate experienced in the Lost River Mountains and is resilient towards many natural disturbances including drought and frequent or severe fire. Bluebunch wheatgrass has shown to recover to pre-fire disturbance population levels in 1 to 7 years post disturbance. Under certain conditions, canopy cover and production can exceed pre-fire values (Zlatnik, 1999). Bluebunch wheatgrass is a decreaser, reducing in canopy cover and production in relation to grazing pressure. Under heavy grazing pressure the species will shift towards areas such as under the canopy of shrubs, opening the canopy for the establishment of rhizomatous grass species, invasive species, or bare ground. If grazing pressure is significant enough in intensity and duration resulting in chronic defoliation, this ecological site will shift to the Grazing Resistant State.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Figure 18. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 13. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 350 | 500 | 650 |
Shrub/Vine | 100 | 250 | 450 |
Forb | 0 | 50 | 100 |
Total | 450 | 800 | 1200 |
Table 14. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 15-21% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 18-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 6-14% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 15-45% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-25% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-9% |
Table 15. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-6% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 15-47% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-7% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 35-70% |
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2


Community transition from community 1.1 to community 1.2 is generally a result of localized abiotic conditions relating to effective precipitation, as well as depth and concentration of calcareous soils. Black sagebrush tends to dominate sites where calcareous soils are stronger and closer to the surface. As calcium carbonate concentrations decrease, deepen, and precipitation conditions become closer to the 15 inch boundary of relative effective annual precipitation, the likelihood of alkali sage emigrating or becoming dominant increases. As these conditions become really pronounced (nearing transitional areas) mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana) can be present in the overstory.
Context dependence. The abiotic conditions that result in community transitions from 1.1 to 1.2 are site specific and not directly influenced by anthropogenic or biotic interactions.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3


Community transition from community 1.1 to 1.3 is a result of a sagebrush removal disturbance. These disturbances can be either anthropogenic or naturally occurring. Natural disturbances include low to moderate severity fire, sagebrush die off events from freeze kill, drought, of prolonged saturation (flooding). Anthropogenic disturbances include mechanical or chemical brush thinning, land conversion, and herbivory.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3


Community transition from community 1.2 to 1.3 is a result of a sagebrush removal disturbance. These disturbances can be either anthropogenic or naturally occurring. Natural disturbances include low to moderate severity fire, sagebrush die off events from freeze kill, drought, of prolonged saturation (flooding). Anthropogenic disturbances include mechanical or chemical brush thinning, land conversion, and herbivory.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1


Transitions from community 1.3 to community 1.1 would be a result of time without a sagebrush removing disturbance (fire, flood, freeze, or prolonged drought). Time needed for sagebrush communities to re-establish is dependent on localized climate conditions and relative resilience of the site.
Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.2


Transitions from community 1.3 to community 1.2 would be a result of time without a sagebrush removing disturbance (fire, flood, freeze, or prolonged drought). Time needed for sagebrush communities to re-establish is dependent on localized climate conditions and relative resilience of the site.
State 2
Grazing Resistant

When a Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous ecological site enters the Grazing Resistant state, the primary shift occurs in the understory vegetation. Grazing pressure from livestock, native ungulates, or a combination of the two drives a shift from the cool-season bunch grasses present in the Reference State towards rhizomatous wheatgrasses, short-stature bunch grasses, and ground covering forbs. This state is generally a result of current or historic improper grazing practices that potentially included higher socking rates and repeated heavy grazing during the growing season.
Characteristics and indicators. In this state, total canopy cover and production values for mid to large sized bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass will decrease. These understory grasses will be relegated to the protected areas under the sagebrush canopies where they are sheltered from grazing. As they are removed from the canopy gaps, they will be replaced with grazing resistant short-stature bunch grasses like Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) and rhizomatous wheatgrasses such as thick spike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus), Western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), and at the higher end of the precipitation range, slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus). Openings in the canopy gaps vacated by bunchgrasses also present opportunities for an increase in disturbance tolerant forbs such as Hood's phlox (Phlox hoodii), cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), vetch species (Vetch sp.) and Indian paintbrush species (Castilleja sp.). Opportunities for invasive annual grasses also increase as competition from native grasses is removed from the canopy gaps. Depending on how well grazing resistant rhizomatous and bunchgrasses occupy the canopy gaps, an increase in bare ground cover usually occurs. This can lead to increased erosion and decreased infiltration, decreasing available moisture. Because of this, productivity and canopy cover will be lower than at the Reference State.
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is lower than in the Reference State, primarily due to the decrease in available moisture and the opportunity for invasive species recruitment. Ability to recover from disturbance in rangeland systems has shown to be related to local climatic conditions. As available moisture increases and temperature decreases, resilience to disturbance increases (Chambers, et al. 1014). At this ecological site, resilience of the black and little sagebrush dominated sites would tend to be lower than at the sites with mountain big sagebrush in the overstory canopy as this would indicate higher available moisture and lower average annual temperature. Resilience to erosion and invasive species establishment would be dependent on how well rhizomatous grasses and forbs occupy the bare ground spaces left by the removal of bunchgrasses. Rhizomatous grasses are mat forming and if able to establish relatively quickly can aid in reducing erosion. Additionally, if native rhizomatous grasses and forbs are able to quickly establish, this decreases the ability of invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass to occupy bare soil openings within the site.
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
Community 2.1
Sagebrush, Short Stature Bunchgrass, and Rhizomatous Wheatgrass
This plant community is identified by its sagebrush overstory and diminished short stature bunch grass and rhizomatous wheatgrass understory. The shrub overstory will consist of black sagebrush, little sagebrush, mountain big sagebrush, or a combination of any of the three, depending on available site moisture and elevation. Within this state and community, the bluebunch wheatgrass dominated understory present in the reference state is replaced by short stature bunch grasses such as Sandberg's bluegrass, and rhizomatous wheatgrasses. Remaining bluebunch wheatgrass is concentrated tightly under sagebrush canopies where it is protected from grazers. Sagebrush canopy cover will often be higher than that of the reference state as opportunities for sagebrush to migrate into the openings left by previous bluebunch wheatgrass plants are created. Sagebrush canopy cover in the reference communities ranges between 3-29% and 14-30% in the grazing resistant community. The diminished understory in this community also leads to lower annual production values. Production in the reference state ranges from 490-803 lbs/ac, whereas production in the grazing resistant community ranges from 320-500 lbs/ac. The greatest difference is caused by the decrease in bluebunch wheatgrass density. Bluebunch wheatgrass accounts for 90-450 lb/ac in the reference communities, and decreases to 0-50 lbs/ac in the grazing resistant community.
Resilience management. This community has moderate resilience, mostly in relation to the understory grass species that replace bluebunch wheatgrass in the reference communities. Sandberg bluegrass is a highly drought resistant species of bunchgrass that is also resistant to grazing stress. Even when tilled, Sandberg bluegrass is able to re-establish to pre disturbance levels within 7 years (Howard, 1997). Although not as resilient to grazing pressures as Sandberg bluegrass, the rhizomatous wheatgrasses that can occur on this site can tolerate moderate grazing. On upland sites, Western wheatgrass is considered to be a decreaser under heavy grazing pressure when annual precipitation is under 20", however, switches to an increaser when annual precipitation is over 20" ( Tirmenstein, 1999). Alternately, resilience in this community is lowered through the decrease in available soil moisture that occurs from the shift to rhizomatous grasses and the increase in bare soil cover. This is more prevalent on the sites that occur in the lower end of the effective precipitation range (15"). Sites closer to the 19" end of the precipitation range will be more resilient as a result of the additional moisture availability (Chambers, 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
-
cushion phlox (Phlox pulvinata), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
Figure 19. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 16. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 220 | 285 |
Grass/Grasslike | 50 | 125 | 200 |
Forb | 0 | 20 | 50 |
Total | 200 | 365 | 535 |
Table 17. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 20-31% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-15% |
Forb foliar cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-40% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 19-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-1% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 20-45% |
Table 18. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-2% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 0-2% |
Forb basal cover | 0-1% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-40% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 20-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-1% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 20-45% |
Figure 20. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0812, ARARL/PSSPS.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 3
Disturbed

Figure 21. Shallow to Loamy Calcareous 15-19" site that was burned in a fire in 1977, removing majority of early sagebrush overstory and increasing bunchgrass understory.
The Disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance events that result in widespread sagebrush mortality. The primary natural disturbance resulting in sagebrush mortality at this ecological site is frequent or severe wildfire. Flooding, intense freeze events, and insect and disease can also occur. Because this LRU exists primarily on publicly managed lands (US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and State), widespread anthropogenic disturbance events are infrequent. Examples of anthropogenic disturbance events include brush management through sagebrush mowing or removal treatments, chemical treatments, or improper grazing techniques that result in high intensity hoof disturbance. A combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbance is possible and can result in increased severity of disturbance, decreased resilience, and greater difficulty returning to the Reference State. For example, improper grazing practices that result in chronic defoliation following a fire disturbance event can increase bare ground cover, increase erosion potential, and slow the reestablishment of grass species that preclude the return of overstory sagebrush canopy (Zlatnik, 1999).
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the Disturbed State is near to complete loss of overstory sagebrush species (black sagebrush, little sagebrush, and mountain big sagebrush). A shift towards an increase in native and non-native disturbance tolerant grasses and forbs is likely with removal of resource competition associated with sagebrush overstory. Additionally, canopy cover of disturbance tolerant shrubs such as yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) and rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa) may increase. Severe disturbance events also increase the opportunity for invasion of annual grasses and weeds such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and thistle species. Percent canopy cover of invasive species is dependent on distance of a seed source post disturbance. Initial cover of invasive species stays below 5 percent (Zlatnik, 1999).
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is moderate. Many of the post-disturbance grasses and shrubs that are common in this state establish quickly and reach a representative canopy within 10 years post-disturbance, and continue to increase until overstory canopy of sagebrush begins to return. However, local resilience in this state is highly dependent on current soil moisture availability, seed sources, timing and severity of the disturbance. In the instance of fire disturbance, bluebunch wheatgrass mortality can be significantly lower if the fire occurs in the spring as opposed to fall, and recovery can be impacted by quantity of immediate post-fire precipitation (Zlatnik, 1999). More severe disturbances increase possibility of post-disturbance invasion. The greater the establishment of invasives, the lower the site resilience becomes.
Dominant plant species
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis), other herbaceous
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
Community 3.1
Mixed Grass and Forb
The Mixed Grass and Forb community is driven by the disturbance related removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in complete or near to complete removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment and canopy cover of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance tolerant shrubs. Fire is the primary disturbance responsible for removing sagebrush at this ecological site. The frequency and severity of fire disturbances are highly influenced by the overstory composition of the specific site in the Reference state. The composition and extent of the sagebrush species in the overstory impacts that respective fire regime. At sites dominated either solely by black sage, alkali sage, or varying combinations of the two, fire return intervals are less frequent. Additionally, fires are usually low to moderate in severity and cover small spatial extents (Steinberg, 2002 & Fryer, 2009). Black and alkali sagebrush dominated communities often lack fuels sufficient for frequent fire return intervals, severe fire events, or large fire events (Fryer, 2009). Shallow to loamy calcareous sites that are at the higher end of the 15 to 19 inch precipitation range with an overstory canopy at least partially comprised with mountain big sagebrush are more susceptible to frequent fire return intervals, more severe fires, and often at a greater extent. Sites dominated by mountain big sagebrush communities have historically burned more frequently than sites dominated by other sagebrush species because the soil moisture and temperature regimes required by mountain big sagebrush are also more apt to produce an increased amount of fine fuels from other plant species (Innes, 2017).
Resilience management. This plant community is moderately resilient because the grasses and forbs that dominate the composition are resistant to a variety of disturbances and able to re-establish quickly in the event of more severe disturbances. Both bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegenaria spicata) and Sandberg's bluegrass (Poa secunda) are rarely harmed by fire events except for in the most severe instances. Both species are able to reduce the amount of heat transfer to the root systems, allowing post-fire regrowth (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997). Studies have shown that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass dominated systems are able to return to pre-fire production levels eight years post disturbance (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg bluegrass has been shown to fully re-establish post-plowing disturbance events in as little as seven years after the plowing (Howard, 1997). Although many of the species in this state are at least somewhat resilient towards many of the disturbances encountered, available soil moisture, weather, and rest from grazing all play an important role in how quickly a site can recover post-disturbance. Both of the common shrub species found in this community at varying compositions are not only disturbance tolerant, but tend to increase with disturbance. Both yellow rabbitbrush and rubber rabbitbrush are often the first shrub species to re-establish on this ecological site following a disturbance, and can increase in relation to the severity or frequency of the disturbance. Although yellow rabbitbrush exists in relatively small numbers within the Reference State, it can only become the dominant shrub species in highly disturbed systems (Terminstein, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
Indian paintbrush (Castilleja), other herbaceous
-
stemless mock goldenweed (Stenotus acaulis), other herbaceous
Figure 22. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 19. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 150 | 350 | 500 |
Shrub/Vine | 0 | 75 | 150 |
Forb | 0 | 50 | 100 |
Total | 150 | 475 | 750 |
Table 20. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0-10% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 0-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-40% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-10% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-15% |
Table 21. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-7% |
Forb basal cover | 0-2% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-40% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-10% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 40-75% |
Figure 23. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0705, ARTRV–PSSPS-FEID. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2


Transition from the Reference state to the Grazing Resistant state is a product of current or historical improper grazing practices that resulted in chronic defoliation of vegetation. Continual overstocking and overgrazing during critical growing periods can result in a significant functional and compositional shift in the understory vegetation of the Shallow to Loamy Calcareous ecological site. In perennial bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass which is the dominant understory vegetation in the Reference State, repeated overgrazing weakens the underground structures through undernourishment caused by the continual removal of photosynthetic tissue (Daubenmire, 1940). This eventually results in death of these grasses, opening the canopy for grazing resistant grasses like Sandberg bluegrass, or bare soil. Because most of this LRU exists on publicly managed lands with regulated grazing policies, new transitions to this state are rare. Historical practices and regulations may have differed, leading to current existence of this state.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: o Continued improper grazing techniques o Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species o Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion o Establishment of invasive species
Context dependence. Restoration efforts can be greatly influenced by precipitation patterns. Successful regeneration of Reference State understory species is highly dependent on moisture received post restoration efforts. Rates of successful establishment of bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass increase when available moisture is high during critical regeneration periods (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997).
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3


Transition from the Reference to the Disturbed State is primarily a mechanism of severe disturbance, both natural and anthropogenic. In this this ecological site, the most likely disturbance to cause this transition is frequent or severe wildfire events. Other disturbances include but are not limited to flooding, freeze kill, insect and disease, and mechanical brush removal.
Constraints to recovery. Primary constraint to recovery is distance to seed source. When the disturbance is severe enough and the extent is great, seed source populations for sagebrush species may be removed from the vicinity. In this case, immigration and re-establishment of overstory sagebrush species can be slow. This time period can be greatly reduced through seeding and planting interventions.
Context dependence. The primary factor driving likelihood of restoration success is post disturbance weather patterns. Prolonged period of drought can slow restoration processes, whereas average to above average precipitation post disturbance can greatly increase speed and success in re-establishment of sagebrush species (Robin, 2017; Steinberg, 2002; and Fryer, 2009).
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1


The primary mechanism of restoration back to the Reference State is time without grazing. Seeding of desired Reference State species can speed up the restoration process.
Context dependence. Time frame for restoration is highly dependent on variations in localized weather patterns. Prolonged periods of drought can dramatically increase time required to return to the Reference State, whereas periods of above normal precipitation can decrease that time frame. Grazing practices that are infrequent and of light intensity, mimicking natural historic grazing patterns will not impact the restoration pathway. However, continuous early season grazing at moderate to high intensity resulting in significant defoliation will perpetuate the Grazing Resistant State.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3


Transition from the Grazing Resistant to the Disturbed State is a result of moderate to severe sagebrush removing disturbances. These can include both natural and anthropogenic disturbances; however, unlike the Reference State, possibility of moderate to severe fire events is reduced as a result of the diminished understory present in the Grazing Resistant State.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1


The most important mechanism driving restoration from the Disturbed to the Reference State is time without sagebrush removing disturbances and distance from overstory species (sagebrush) seed source. Seeding or planting of desired overstory species in the Reference State can accelerate restoration efforts.
Context dependence. Restoration is highly dependent on time without disturbance. New sagebrush seedlings that are able to establish on a site are moderately sensitive to disturbances such as flood, freeze, and insect and disease. They are highly sensitive to herbivory and even low severity fire occurrence (Fryer, 2009 & Steinberg 2002). Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process, however, regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during this restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above normal precipitation aid in sagebrush regeneration and establishment (Innes, 2017; Steinberg 2002 & Fryer, 2009).
Transition T3A
State 3 to 2


Transition from the Disturbed to the Grazing Resistant State results from improper grazing practices that result in chronic defoliation. Plant communities in the Disturbed State are particularly vulnerable to heavy grazing in the years immediately following the disturbance that initiated the transition. If bunchgrasses are unable to establish, plant composition could shift to more grazing resistant, rhizomatous grass species.
Context dependence. Years of drought or below average precipitation in combination with improper grazing that results in chronic defoliation can accelerate transition to the Grazing Resistant State.
Additional community tables
Table 22. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 55–300 | |||||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 50–300 | 3–20 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 48 | 5 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 48 | 4 | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 19 | 2 | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 10–15 | 1–2 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 10 | 1 | ||
prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 5 | 0 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0 | 1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 390–500 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 238–450 | 15–25 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 95–100 | 5–10 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 48 | 2 | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 10 | 1 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–20 | |||||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 10–15 | 1–2 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 5 | 1 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0 | 2 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0 | 0 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0 | 0 |
Table 23. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 55–466 | |||||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 45–300 | 1–20 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 45–190 | 1–10 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 15–95 | 1–3 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 10–45 | 1–3 | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 0–45 | 0–2 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 10–35 | 0–2 | ||
prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 240–475 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 90–450 | 3–25 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 75–285 | 5–15 | ||
Columbia needlegrass | ACNE9 | Achnatherum nelsonii | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–60 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 5–42 | 1–10 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–20 | 0–3 | ||
rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | 0–20 | 0–3 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 5–18 | 2 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 0–15 | 0–2 | ||
mariposa lily | CALOC | Calochortus | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
rockcress | ARABI2 | Arabis | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0 | 0 |
Table 24. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 100–450 | |||||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 50–225 | 3–10 | ||
black sagebrush | ARNO4 | Artemisia nova | 35–150 | 2–5 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–150 | 0–5 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–45 | 0–3 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–45 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 350–650 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 225–350 | 10–38 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 15–100 | 3–10 | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 0–65 | 0–6 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
cheatgrass | BRTE | Bromus tectorum | 0–50 | 0–4 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–100 | |||||
goldenrod | SOLID | Solidago | 15–80 | 2–9 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 5–75 | 1–6 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 15–50 | 2–7 | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 10–40 | 2–10 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 0–35 | 0–2 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–30 | 0–5 | ||
aster | ASTER | Aster | 5–15 | 1–2 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–10 | 0–3 | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 0–10 | 0–2 | ||
sandwort | ARENA | Arenaria | 0–5 | 0–1 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–5 | 0–1 | ||
rockcress | ARABI2 | Arabis | 0–5 | 0–1 | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 0–5 | 0–1 | ||
flax | LINUM | Linum | 0–5 | 0–1 | ||
white mariposa lily | CAEU | Calochortus eurycarpus | 0 | 0 |
Table 25. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–285 | |||||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 175–275 | 15–30 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–25 | 0–2 | ||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–20 | 0–1 | ||
villous lipfern | CHVI | Cheilanthes villosa | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 100–200 | |||||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 150 | 10 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 50 | 5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–50 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 15 | 3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0 | 0 |
Table 26. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 0–150 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 0–100 | 1 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–50 | 0–10 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–25 | 0–5 | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 150–500 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 50–200 | 5–20 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–160 | 0–20 | ||
needlegrass | ACHNA | Achnatherum | 0–90 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 0–100 | |||||
stemless mock goldenweed | STAC | Stenotus acaulis | 0–25 | 0–4 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–25 | 0–3 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–25 | 0–3 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Shallow to Loamy, Calcareous ecological site within the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset. Production ranges can be used to estimate stocking rates; however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at any specific location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre):
Reference State:
1.1 - 562-642-803
1.2 - 490-663-784
1.3 - 450-800-1200
Grazing Resistant State:
2.1 - 200-365-515
Disturbed State:
150-475-750
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush steppe in the Lost River Mountain LRU provide critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountains. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG) in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, northern end of the Pahsimeroi mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Black sagebrush (Artemisia nova):
Mule deer and pronghorn use black sagebrush habitats extensively. Use is especially heavy by mule deer in the early decades post fire disturbance (communities 1.3 and 3.1). This is most prevalent within the first three decades after the fire event (Fryer, 2009). Black sagebrush dominated sites have been shown as great winter range for pronghorn (Kindschy et al., 1982) and winter distribution has been strongly associated with black sagebrush communities (Clary & Beale, 1983). Sage grouse are obligate species of black and other sagebrush varieties. Generally, big sagebrush communities are preferred by sage grouse; however, some black sagebrush sites on the Snake River Plains and in Nevada have shown to be preferred winter grounds for feeding and cover (Dalke et al., 1963).
Other species of note that rely on black sagebrush communities include great basin pocket mice, Ord's kangaroo rats, sage thrashers, and a large variety of insect pollinator species (Fryer, 2009).
Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula longiloba):
In early spring and winter, little sagebrush is often a preferred forage species for mule deer (Blaisdell et al., 1982). In the Great Basin, little sagebrush dominated sites are heavily utilized by pronghorn during the summer (Kindschy et al., 1982). Little sagebrush, among other varieties is an important forage source for sage grouse throughout the year (Steinberg, 2002).
Mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata vaseyana):
Mountain big sagebrush is considered to be highly palatable by most wildlife browsers (Rosenstrater, 2005). Sage -grouse, ungulates, and rodents browse mountain big sagebrush primarily during the winter when it becomes one of the more palatable available forages. However, seasonal snow levels can exclude many browsing species. Several studies have shown that mountain big sagebrush is preferred forage by elk, mule deer, and sage-grouse when compared to the other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017).
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata):
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, use of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda):
Sandberg bluegrass is one of the earliest grasses to green up during the spring and become available forage for wildlife, however, becomes less utilized during the later summer months. Degree of use by elk and pronghorn is good to poor and good to fair for mule deer, small mammals, small nongame birds, and upland game birds. Usage is fair to poor by waterfowl (Howard, 1997).
Hydrological functions
Water in the form of annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid and soil permeability is moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals including pronghorn, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies.
The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site ID's and data collection intensity for each site used in development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include Line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involved a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
Reference State:
Community 1.1:
Tier III - 2020ID7031158
Tier I - 2020ID7031190, 2020ID7033121
Community 1.2:
Tier III - 2019ID7031002, 2020ID7031115, 2020ID7032174
Tier I - 2020ID7031182, 2020ID7031188
Community 1.3
Tier I - 2020ID7033190
Community 2.1:
Tier III - 2020ID7031112
Community 3.1
Tier I - 2020ID7033125
Type locality
Location 1: Butte County, ID | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T8 R26 S10 |
Other references
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Chambers, J.C., J.L. Beck, T.J. Christiansen, K.J. Clause, J.B. Dinkins, K.E. Doherty, K.A. Griffin, D.W. Havlina, K.F. Henke, L.L. Kurth, J.D. Maestas, M. Manning, K.E. Mayer, B.A. Mealor, C. McCarthy, M.A. Perea, and D.A. Pyke. 2016. Using resilience and resistance concepts to manage threats to sagebrush ecosystems, Gunnison sage-grouse, and Greater sage-grouse in their eastern range: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-356.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 1–143.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Esipinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A. Wuenschel. 2014. Using resistance and resilience concepts to reduce impacts of invasive annual grasses and altered fire regimes on the sagebrush ecosystem and greater sage-grouse: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-326.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station., Fort Collins, CO. 73.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Daubenmire, R. F. (1940). Plant Succession Due to Overgrazing in the Agropyron Bunchgrass Prairie of Southeastern Washington. Ecology, 21(1), 55–64.
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html
Forest Service Remote Automoted Weather Station (Bonanza & Copper Basin). Retrieved from: Western Regional Climate Center. October, 2022. https://wrcc.dri.edu/
Francis, John K. ed. 2004. Wildland shrubs of the United States and its Territories: thamnic descriptions: volume 1. Gen. Tech. Rep. IITF-GTR-26. San Juan, PR: USDA, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, and Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 830 p.
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
Kirk W. Davies, Jon D. Bates, Rory O'Connor. 2021. Long-term evaluation of restoring understories in Wyoming big sagebrush communities with mowing and seeding native bunchgrasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 75, Pages 81-90.
Knick, S.T.; Holmes, A.L.; Miller, Richard F. 2005. The role of fire in structuring sagebrush habitats and bird communities. Pages 63-75 In: Saab, Victoria A.; Powell, Hugh D. W. (eds.). Fire and Avian Ecology in North America. Studies in Avian Biology No. 30. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.
McArthur and Stevens. 2009. Composite Shrubs. In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw [compilers]. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-136-vol-2. p. 493-537.
Miller, M., Belnap, J., Beatty, S., Reynolds, R. (2006). Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in Relation to Soil Properties, Water Additions, and Chemical Amendments in Calcareous Soils of Southeastern Utah, USA. Canyonlands Research. 288. 10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Rodhouse TJ, Irvine KM and Bowersock L (2020) Post-Fire Vegetation Response in a Repeatedly Burned Low-Elevation Sagebrush Steppe Protected Area Provides Insights About Resilience and Invasion Resistance. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:584726.
Rosentreter, Roger. 2005. Sagebrush identification, ecology, and palatability relative to sage-grouse. In: Shaw, Nancy L.; Pellant, Mike; Monsen, Stephen B., eds. Sage-grouse habitat restoration symposium proceedings; 2001 June 4-7; Boise, ID. Proc. RMRS-P-38. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 3-16
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [1]. 2012. Plant Guide for black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [2]. 2012. Plant Guide for low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Pascopyrum smithii. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2022, October 25].
Contributors
Zachary Van Abbema
Carla Rebernak
Grant Petersen
Kirt Walstad
Marji Patz
Karen Clause
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/19/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Katelyn Palmer
Nicholas Kozlowski
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Zachary Van Abbema |
---|---|
Contact for lead author |
Zachary Van Abbema zachary.vanabbema@usda.gov |
Date | 10/11/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not present in the reference condition. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon in the reference condition. When present, they usually occur on steeper slopes (>15 percent) and are inconspicuous, disconnected, and very short in length. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes: Pedestals are not evident in the reference condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is between 10-35 percent, averaging 20 percent. This refers to exposed mineral soil not covered by litter, rock, basal cover, plant cover, standing dead, lichen and/or moss. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gullies are not present in the reference condition. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind scoured, or depositional areas are not evident in the reference condition. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Movement of fine herbaceous litter may occur within 1 foot from where it originated. Litter consists of fine, herbaceous material and slope can impact the distance it travels. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface is stable with stability ratings of 4-6 (both under canopy and bare). Abiotic crusts and or root mats may be present. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface structure is granular with the A horizon ranging from 0 - 30cm thick, averaging 16 cm thick. A horizon colors are primarily 10YR 3/3 and 10YR 3/2. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plants are evenly distributed across the ecological site and the shrubs and bunchgrasses present improved infiltration as well as protect against runoff. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Not present. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Blubuch wheatgrass > Black sagebrush > Mountain big sagebrushSub-dominant:
Remaining grass species > remaining shrub speciesOther:
Buckwheat > Hood's phlox > Tapertip hawksbeardAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Mortality in herbaceous species is not evident. Species with bunch growth forms may have some natural mortality in centers. Sagebrush species will become decadent in the absence of historical fire return intervals. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Total ground litter cover varies but can range from 13-63 percent averaging 35 percent. Depth is usually shallow at less than 1/8 inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production ranges from 400 - 900 lbs/acre, averaging 650 lbs/per acre. Production varies based on effective precipitation and natural variability of soil properties for this ecological site. Total production is slightly higher for perennial grass species, but tends to be split mostly equal between grasses and shrubs. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invasive species include cheatgrass, spotted knapweed, toadflax, and crested wheatgrass. Native species such a yellow rabbitbrush or significant populations of Sandberg bluegrass or rhizomatous wheatgrasses can indicate a departure from the reference state. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in most years. Bluebunch wheatgrass may not reproduce during extended periods of drought.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.